Trial Outcomes & Findings for Family Activation and Communication About Errors and Safety (FACES) (NCT NCT02877017)
NCT ID: NCT02877017
Last Updated: 2025-04-01
Results Overview
Our primary outcome was family-reported safety concerns, defined as reporting safety concern(s) via pre-discharge survey (baseline and intervention) or mobile tool (intervention). Safety concerns were counted once if reported both via survey and mobile tool.
COMPLETED
NA
985 participants
During both baseline and intervention periods, the time frame for each participant being assessed was from admission to discharge, on average approximately 5-14 days.
2025-04-01
Participant Flow
The protocol enrollment reflects participants who are families of hospitalized children and providers among the hospital units. The Participant Flow reflects only families of hospitalized children that participated in the mobile tool aspect of the intervention, which the "Providers" group did not participate in and therefore are not included here.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Pre-intervention Arm
This arm is the pre-intervention arm of participants before the family safety reporting bundle has been implemented.
|
Post-intervention Arm
This arm is the post-intervention arm of participants after the family safety reporting bundle has been implemented on the study units.
Family safety reporting intervention: family safety reporting intervention for families and providers
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
232
|
208
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
207
|
157
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
25
|
51
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Pre-intervention Arm
n=207 Participants
This arm is the pre-intervention arm of participants before the family safety reporting bundle has been implemented.
|
Post-intervention Arm
n=157 Participants
This arm is the post-intervention arm of participants after the family safety reporting bundle has been implemented on the study units.
Family safety reporting intervention: family safety reporting intervention for families and providers
|
Total
n=364 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
48 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 • n=207 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 • n=157 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
46 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 • n=364 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
168 Participants
n=205 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
134 Participants
n=155 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
302 Participants
n=360 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
37 Participants
n=205 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
21 Participants
n=155 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
58 Participants
n=360 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaskan Native, Non- Hispanic
|
1 Participants
n=205 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
0 Participants
n=155 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
1 Participants
n=360 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian/Pacific Islander, non-Hispanic
|
5 Participants
n=205 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
4 Participants
n=155 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
9 Participants
n=360 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black/African-American, non-Hispanic
|
9 Participants
n=205 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
9 Participants
n=155 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
18 Participants
n=360 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
|
30 Participants
n=205 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
34 Participants
n=155 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
64 Participants
n=360 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multi-racial, non-Hispanic
|
4 Participants
n=205 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
1 Participants
n=155 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
5 Participants
n=360 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other, non-Hispanic
|
4 Participants
n=205 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
2 Participants
n=155 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
6 Participants
n=360 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White, non-Hispanic
|
152 Participants
n=205 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
105 Participants
n=155 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
257 Participants
n=360 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
207 Participants
n=207 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
157 Participants
n=157 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
364 Participants
n=364 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
|
English Proficiency
Proficient
|
174 Participants
n=205 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
132 Participants
n=154 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
306 Participants
n=359 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
|
English Proficiency
Limited English Proficient
|
31 Participants
n=205 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
22 Participants
n=154 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
53 Participants
n=359 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
|
Education Attainment
Less than college
|
105 Participants
n=206 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
85 Participants
n=155 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
190 Participants
n=361 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
|
Education Attainment
Completed college or higher
|
101 Participants
n=206 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
70 Participants
n=155 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
171 Participants
n=361 Participants • We enrolled 440 participants overall (pre-intervention=232, post-intervention=208). Of these, 364 (82.7%) completed surveys (pre-intervention=207, post-intervention=157).
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: During both baseline and intervention periods, the time frame for each participant being assessed was from admission to discharge, on average approximately 5-14 days.Population: We included English/Spanish-speaking parents of patients of all ages hospitalized on the complex care service.
Our primary outcome was family-reported safety concerns, defined as reporting safety concern(s) via pre-discharge survey (baseline and intervention) or mobile tool (intervention). Safety concerns were counted once if reported both via survey and mobile tool.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pre-intervention Arm
n=207 Participants
This arm is the pre-intervention arm of parents and providers before the family safety reporting bundle has been implemented.
|
Post-intervention Arm
n=157 Participants
This arm is the post-intervention arm of parents and providers after the family safety reporting bundle has been implemented on the study units.
Family safety reporting intervention: family safety reporting intervention for families and providers
|
|---|---|---|
|
Family Safety Reporting Rates
|
61 Participants
|
60 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During both baseline and intervention periods, the time frame for each participant being assessed was from admission to discharge, on average approximately 5-14 days.Population: We included English/Spanish-speaking parents of patients of all ages hospitalized on the complex care service.
For Family Reported Hospital Safety Climate Scores, Child HCAHPS safety experience was used to ask whether hospital staff told participants how to report concerns about mistakes. We examined top-box (top-most, e.g., 5 of 5, Likert scale) safety climate scores baseline vs intervention and proportion of parents reporting "yes definitely" or "yes somewhat" vs "no" to the Child HCAHPS "tell you how to report" question.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pre-intervention Arm
n=182 Participants
This arm is the pre-intervention arm of parents and providers before the family safety reporting bundle has been implemented.
|
Post-intervention Arm
n=151 Participants
This arm is the post-intervention arm of parents and providers after the family safety reporting bundle has been implemented on the study units.
Family safety reporting intervention: family safety reporting intervention for families and providers
|
|---|---|---|
|
Family Reported Hospital Safety Climate Scores
|
66 Participants
|
69 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Pre-intervention Arm
Post-intervention Arm
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Pre-intervention Arm
n=232 participants at risk
This arm is the pre-intervention arm of participants (families of children with medical complexity) whose children had monitored/assessed adverse events before the family safety reporting bundle had been implemented on the study units.
|
Post-intervention Arm
n=208 participants at risk
This arm is the post-intervention arm of participants (families of children with medical complexity) whose children had recorded adverse events after the family safety reporting bundle had been implemented on the study units.
|
|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Serious Adverse Events
|
0.00%
0/232 • Time on study unit, from admission to discharge, on average approximately 9 days.
Documented system-wide adverse event reports were reviewed and evaluated on a weekly basis. Of note, we collected adverse events as part of this study's primary outcome and all the events reported below are unrelated to the study intervention. We collected events through family safety reporting and hospital collected events which were then chart reviewed.
|
0.00%
0/208 • Time on study unit, from admission to discharge, on average approximately 9 days.
Documented system-wide adverse event reports were reviewed and evaluated on a weekly basis. Of note, we collected adverse events as part of this study's primary outcome and all the events reported below are unrelated to the study intervention. We collected events through family safety reporting and hospital collected events which were then chart reviewed.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Pre-intervention Arm
n=232 participants at risk
This arm is the pre-intervention arm of participants (families of children with medical complexity) whose children had monitored/assessed adverse events before the family safety reporting bundle had been implemented on the study units.
|
Post-intervention Arm
n=208 participants at risk
This arm is the post-intervention arm of participants (families of children with medical complexity) whose children had recorded adverse events after the family safety reporting bundle had been implemented on the study units.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Other Adverse Events
|
0.43%
1/232 • Time on study unit, from admission to discharge, on average approximately 9 days.
Documented system-wide adverse event reports were reviewed and evaluated on a weekly basis. Of note, we collected adverse events as part of this study's primary outcome and all the events reported below are unrelated to the study intervention. We collected events through family safety reporting and hospital collected events which were then chart reviewed.
|
0.00%
0/208 • Time on study unit, from admission to discharge, on average approximately 9 days.
Documented system-wide adverse event reports were reviewed and evaluated on a weekly basis. Of note, we collected adverse events as part of this study's primary outcome and all the events reported below are unrelated to the study intervention. We collected events through family safety reporting and hospital collected events which were then chart reviewed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Other Adverse Events
|
0.86%
2/232 • Time on study unit, from admission to discharge, on average approximately 9 days.
Documented system-wide adverse event reports were reviewed and evaluated on a weekly basis. Of note, we collected adverse events as part of this study's primary outcome and all the events reported below are unrelated to the study intervention. We collected events through family safety reporting and hospital collected events which were then chart reviewed.
|
0.96%
2/208 • Time on study unit, from admission to discharge, on average approximately 9 days.
Documented system-wide adverse event reports were reviewed and evaluated on a weekly basis. Of note, we collected adverse events as part of this study's primary outcome and all the events reported below are unrelated to the study intervention. We collected events through family safety reporting and hospital collected events which were then chart reviewed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Other Adverse Events
|
0.86%
2/232 • Time on study unit, from admission to discharge, on average approximately 9 days.
Documented system-wide adverse event reports were reviewed and evaluated on a weekly basis. Of note, we collected adverse events as part of this study's primary outcome and all the events reported below are unrelated to the study intervention. We collected events through family safety reporting and hospital collected events which were then chart reviewed.
|
0.96%
2/208 • Time on study unit, from admission to discharge, on average approximately 9 days.
Documented system-wide adverse event reports were reviewed and evaluated on a weekly basis. Of note, we collected adverse events as part of this study's primary outcome and all the events reported below are unrelated to the study intervention. We collected events through family safety reporting and hospital collected events which were then chart reviewed.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Other Adverse Events
|
0.86%
2/232 • Time on study unit, from admission to discharge, on average approximately 9 days.
Documented system-wide adverse event reports were reviewed and evaluated on a weekly basis. Of note, we collected adverse events as part of this study's primary outcome and all the events reported below are unrelated to the study intervention. We collected events through family safety reporting and hospital collected events which were then chart reviewed.
|
2.4%
5/208 • Time on study unit, from admission to discharge, on average approximately 9 days.
Documented system-wide adverse event reports were reviewed and evaluated on a weekly basis. Of note, we collected adverse events as part of this study's primary outcome and all the events reported below are unrelated to the study intervention. We collected events through family safety reporting and hospital collected events which were then chart reviewed.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Other Adverse Events
|
0.00%
0/232 • Time on study unit, from admission to discharge, on average approximately 9 days.
Documented system-wide adverse event reports were reviewed and evaluated on a weekly basis. Of note, we collected adverse events as part of this study's primary outcome and all the events reported below are unrelated to the study intervention. We collected events through family safety reporting and hospital collected events which were then chart reviewed.
|
0.48%
1/208 • Time on study unit, from admission to discharge, on average approximately 9 days.
Documented system-wide adverse event reports were reviewed and evaluated on a weekly basis. Of note, we collected adverse events as part of this study's primary outcome and all the events reported below are unrelated to the study intervention. We collected events through family safety reporting and hospital collected events which were then chart reviewed.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Other Adverse Events
|
1.3%
3/232 • Time on study unit, from admission to discharge, on average approximately 9 days.
Documented system-wide adverse event reports were reviewed and evaluated on a weekly basis. Of note, we collected adverse events as part of this study's primary outcome and all the events reported below are unrelated to the study intervention. We collected events through family safety reporting and hospital collected events which were then chart reviewed.
|
4.8%
10/208 • Time on study unit, from admission to discharge, on average approximately 9 days.
Documented system-wide adverse event reports were reviewed and evaluated on a weekly basis. Of note, we collected adverse events as part of this study's primary outcome and all the events reported below are unrelated to the study intervention. We collected events through family safety reporting and hospital collected events which were then chart reviewed.
|
|
Product Issues
Other Adverse Events
|
0.00%
0/232 • Time on study unit, from admission to discharge, on average approximately 9 days.
Documented system-wide adverse event reports were reviewed and evaluated on a weekly basis. Of note, we collected adverse events as part of this study's primary outcome and all the events reported below are unrelated to the study intervention. We collected events through family safety reporting and hospital collected events which were then chart reviewed.
|
0.48%
1/208 • Time on study unit, from admission to discharge, on average approximately 9 days.
Documented system-wide adverse event reports were reviewed and evaluated on a weekly basis. Of note, we collected adverse events as part of this study's primary outcome and all the events reported below are unrelated to the study intervention. We collected events through family safety reporting and hospital collected events which were then chart reviewed.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Other Adverse Events
|
0.43%
1/232 • Time on study unit, from admission to discharge, on average approximately 9 days.
Documented system-wide adverse event reports were reviewed and evaluated on a weekly basis. Of note, we collected adverse events as part of this study's primary outcome and all the events reported below are unrelated to the study intervention. We collected events through family safety reporting and hospital collected events which were then chart reviewed.
|
0.00%
0/208 • Time on study unit, from admission to discharge, on average approximately 9 days.
Documented system-wide adverse event reports were reviewed and evaluated on a weekly basis. Of note, we collected adverse events as part of this study's primary outcome and all the events reported below are unrelated to the study intervention. We collected events through family safety reporting and hospital collected events which were then chart reviewed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Other Adverse Events
|
0.86%
2/232 • Time on study unit, from admission to discharge, on average approximately 9 days.
Documented system-wide adverse event reports were reviewed and evaluated on a weekly basis. Of note, we collected adverse events as part of this study's primary outcome and all the events reported below are unrelated to the study intervention. We collected events through family safety reporting and hospital collected events which were then chart reviewed.
|
0.00%
0/208 • Time on study unit, from admission to discharge, on average approximately 9 days.
Documented system-wide adverse event reports were reviewed and evaluated on a weekly basis. Of note, we collected adverse events as part of this study's primary outcome and all the events reported below are unrelated to the study intervention. We collected events through family safety reporting and hospital collected events which were then chart reviewed.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Other Adverse Events
|
0.43%
1/232 • Time on study unit, from admission to discharge, on average approximately 9 days.
Documented system-wide adverse event reports were reviewed and evaluated on a weekly basis. Of note, we collected adverse events as part of this study's primary outcome and all the events reported below are unrelated to the study intervention. We collected events through family safety reporting and hospital collected events which were then chart reviewed.
|
0.96%
2/208 • Time on study unit, from admission to discharge, on average approximately 9 days.
Documented system-wide adverse event reports were reviewed and evaluated on a weekly basis. Of note, we collected adverse events as part of this study's primary outcome and all the events reported below are unrelated to the study intervention. We collected events through family safety reporting and hospital collected events which were then chart reviewed.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place