Durvalumab and Tremelimumab and Best Supportive Care vs Best Supportive Care in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer

NCT ID: NCT02870920

Last Updated: 2023-12-08

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

180 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-10-12

Study Completion Date

2022-06-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The standard or usual treatment for this disease is treatment with drugs and other treatments that may help to make a patient better or may improve their quality of life. This treatment is known as "best supportive care" (BSC). Although patients with best supportive care can feel better for some months, the cancer usually continues to grow.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Durvalumab is a new type of drug for many types of cancer. Laboratory tests show that it works by allowing the immune system to detect cancer and reactivate the immune response. This may help to slow down the growth of cancer or may cause cancer cells to die. Durvalumab has been shown to shrink tumours in animals and has been studied in a few people and seems promising but it is not clear if it can offer better results than standard treatment alone.

Tremelimumab is a new type of drug for various types of cancers. It works in a similar way to durvalumab and may improve the effect of durvalumab. This may also help slow the growth of the cancer cells or may cause cancer cells to die. Tremelimumab has been shown to shrink tumours in animals and has been studied in a few people and seems promising but it is not clear if it can offer better results than standard treatment alone when used with durvalumab.

Combinations of durvalumab and tremelimumab have also been studied and when combined have been shown to increase tumour shrinkage in animals compared to either drug alone and while the combination has been studied in a few people, it is not clear if it can offer better results than standard treatment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Best Supportive Care

Best supportive care available

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Best Supportive Care

Intervention Type OTHER

Durvalumab plus Tremelimumab and Best Supportive Care

Tremelimumab 75mg IV 60 minutes Day 1, cycles 1-4 Durvalumab 1500mg IV 60 minutes Day 1 every 28 days. Plus best supportive care

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tremelimumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Durvalumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Best Supportive Care

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tremelimumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Durvalumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Best Supportive Care

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Imfinzi

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Must have histologically or pathologically confirmed advanced (metastatic or locally advanced) colorectal cancer that is unresectable.
* Received a prior thymidylate synthase inhibitor (e.g. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), capecitabine, raltitrexed, UFT) for metastatic disease or as adjuvant therapy. A thymidylate synthase inhibitor may have been given in combination with oxaliplatin or irinotecan.
* Received and failed an irinotecan -containing regimen (i.e. single-agent or in combination) for treatment of metastatic disease, OR relapsed within 6 months of completion of an irinotecan-containing adjuvant therapy, OR have documented unsuitability for an irinotecan-containing regimen.
* Received and failed an oxaliplatin-containing regimen (i.e. single-agent or in combination) for treatment of metastatic disease, OR relapsed within 6 months of completion of an oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant therapy OR have documented unsuitability for an oxaliplatin-containing regimen.
* For patients with colorectal cancer that is RAS-wild type:

Received and failed a cetuximab or panitumumab-containing regimen (i.e. single-agent or in combination) for treatment of metastatic disease OR have documented unsuitability for a cetuximab or panitumumab-containing regimen

* Patient prior treatment with VEGF targeting therapy, such as bevacizumab, aflibercept, ramucirumab, or regorafenib, is permitted but not mandatory. Reasons not used are to be documented.
* Patient prior treatment with TAS-102 (an agent composed of a combination of trifluorothymidine (FTD) and tipiracil hydrochloride (TPI)), is permitted but not mandatory.
* The only remaining standard available therapy as recommended by the Investigator, in consultation with the patient, is best supportive care.
* Must have presence of measurable or evaluable disease as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST 1.1).
* Imaging investigations including CT/MRI of chest/abdomen/pelvis or other scans as necessary to document all sites of disease done within 28 days prior to randomization.
* Must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.
* Life expectancy of ≥ 12 weeks at the time of study entry.
* Must be ≥ 18 years of age.
* Women/men of childbearing potential must have agreed to use a highly effective contraceptive method.
* Patient must consent to provision of, and investigator(s) must confirm adequacy of tissue, and confirm access to and agree to submit within 4 weeks of randomization to the CCTG Central Tumour Bank, a representative formalin fixed paraffin block of tumour tissue in order that the specific correlative marker assays may be conducted.
* Patient must consent to provision of samples of blood in order that the specific correlative marker assays
* Patient is able (i.e. sufficiently fluent) and willing to complete the quality of life questionnaires in either English or French.

Patients must be accessible for treatment and follow-up. Investigators must assure themselves the patients randomized on this trial will be available for complete documentation of the treatment, adverse events, and follow-up.

* In accordance with CCTG policy, protocol treatment is to begin within 2 working days of patient randomization.
* The patient is not receiving therapy in a concurrent clinical study and the patient agrees not to participate in other clinical studies during their participation in this trial while on study treatment.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Canadian Cancer Trials Group

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Eric Chen

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Univ. Health Network-Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto ON Canada

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tom Baker Cancer Centre

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

BCCA - Vancouver Cancer Centre

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

The Moncton Hospital

Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status

Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

QEII Health Sciences Centre

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre

Barrie, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario at Kingston

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

London Regional Cancer Program

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Algoma District Cancer Program

Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Odette Cancer Centre

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

University Health Network

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Windsor Regional Cancer Centre

Windsor, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Hopital Charles LeMoyne

Greenfield Park, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Hopital de la Cite-de-la-Sante

Laval, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

L'Hotel-Dieu de Levis

Lévis, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

CHUM - Hopital Notre-Dame

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

The Jewish General Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Centre Integre Universitaire De Sante Et De Services

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

CHUQ-Pavillon Hotel-Dieu de Quebec

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke

Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Centre hospitalier regional de Trois-Rivieres

Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Allan Blair Cancer Centre

Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Saskatoon Cancer Centre

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chen EX, Jonker DJ, Loree JM, Kennecke HF, Berry SR, Couture F, Ahmad CE, Goffin JR, Kavan P, Harb M, Colwell B, Samimi S, Samson B, Abbas T, Aucoin N, Aubin F, Koski SL, Wei AC, Magoski NM, Tu D, O'Callaghan CJ. Effect of Combined Immune Checkpoint Inhibition vs Best Supportive Care Alone in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer: The Canadian Cancer Trials Group CO.26 Study. JAMA Oncol. 2020 Jun 1;6(6):831-838. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0910.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32379280 (View on PubMed)

Eric X. Chen, MD, PhD; Jonathan M. Loree, MD; Emma Titmuss, MSc; Derek J. Jonker, MD; Hagen F. Kennecke, MD; Scott Berry, MD; Felix Couture, MD; Chaudharry E. Ahmad, MD; John R. Goffin, MD; Petr Kavan, MD; Mohammed Harb, MD; Bruce Colwell, MD; Setareh Samimi, MD; Benoit Samson, MD; Tahir Abbas,MD; Nathalie Aucoin, MD; Francine Aubin, MD; Sheryl Koski, MD; Alice C.Wei, MD; Dongsheng Tu, PhD; Chris J. O'Callaghan, PhD

Reference Type RESULT

Ma LX, Titmuss E, Loree JM, Jonker DJ, Kennecke HF, Berry S, Couture F, Ahmad CE, Goffin JR, Kavan P, Harb M, Colwell B, Samimi S, Samson B, Abbas T, Aucoin N, Aubin F, Koski S, Tu D, O'Callaghan C, Chen EX. Plasma arginine as a predictive biomarker for outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic colorectal cancer: a correlative analysis of the CCTG CO.26 trial. J Immunother Cancer. 2024 Dec 4;12(12):e010094. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2024-010094.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39631846 (View on PubMed)

Topham JT, O'Callaghan CJ, Feilotter H, Kennecke HF, Lee YS, Li W, Banks KC, Quinn K, Renouf DJ, Jonker DJ, Tu D, Chen EX, Loree JM. Circulating Tumor DNA Identifies Diverse Landscape of Acquired Resistance to Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan 20;41(3):485-496. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00364. Epub 2022 Aug 25.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36007218 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CO26

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id