Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Retrospective Observational Study to Assess the Impact of Co-morbidities on Treatment Response in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (NCT NCT02861118)

NCT ID: NCT02861118

Last Updated: 2019-08-14

Results Overview

Correlation between co-morbidities profile and lack of response, adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical profile of participants, logistic regression models were conducted. Lack of response was reduction of 2 points from baseline in Harvey-Bradshaw Indices (HBI) score for CD or Partial Mayo score (PMS) for UC after 10 weeks treatment with anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF). HBI included general well-being (0=very well to 4=terrible), abdominal pain (0=none to 3=severe), number of liquid stools/day, abdominal mass (0=none to 3=tender), and complications (8 items; 1 score/item). The total score was sum of sub scores, where score \<5=remission, 5-7=mild disease, 8-16=moderate disease and \>16-severe disease. PMS included 3 sub-scores: stool frequency (0=normal to 3=\>4 stools/day more than normal), rectal bleeding (0=none to 3=passing blood alone), and physician's global assessment (0=Normal to 3=severe). The total score was sum of sub scale scores from 0=normal to 9=severe disease.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Target enrollment

310 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Up to 10 weeks after start of treatment with biologics

Results posted on

2019-08-14

Participant Flow

Participants took part in the study at the 25 investigative sites in Spain from 26 October 2016 to 04 April 2018.

Participants with a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD) who started treatment with biologics between June 2011 and June 2013, participated in the study. Total 357 participants were registered, out of which only 310 participants were analyzed.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Cohort 1: Crohn's Disease
Participants with Crohn's disease who received biological treatment between June 2011 and June 2013.
Cohort 2: Ulcerative Colitis
Participants with ulcerative colitis who received biological treatment between June 2011 and June 2013.
Overall Study
STARTED
194
116
Overall Study
COMPLETED
194
116
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data at this baseline measure.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Cohort 1: Crohn's Disease
n=194 Participants
Participants with Crohn's disease who received biological treatment between June 2011 and June 2013.
Cohort 2: Ulcerative Colitis
n=116 Participants
Participants with ulcerative colitis who received biological treatment between June 2011 and June 2013.
Total
n=310 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
43.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8 • n=5 Participants
46.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3 • n=7 Participants
44.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.00 • n=5 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
103 Participants
n=5 Participants
63 Participants
n=7 Participants
166 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
90 Participants
n=5 Participants
47 Participants
n=7 Participants
137 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Not Available
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
189 Participants
n=5 Participants
108 Participants
n=7 Participants
297 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Latin
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Gipsy
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Arab
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Available
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
194 Participants
n=5 Participants
116 Participants
n=7 Participants
310 Participants
n=5 Participants
Working Status
Employed by Other
115 Participants
n=5 Participants
51 Participants
n=7 Participants
166 Participants
n=5 Participants
Working Status
Self Employed
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
Working Status
Retired
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
Working Status
Housework
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
Working Status
Unemployed
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
Working Status
Student
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
Working Status
Permanently Unable to Work
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
Working Status
Temporarily Unable to Work
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Working Status
Other
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Working Status
Not Available
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Level of Education
Secondary Education
101 Participants
n=5 Participants
46 Participants
n=7 Participants
147 Participants
n=5 Participants
Level of Education
Primary Education
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
75 Participants
n=5 Participants
Level of Education
University Education
42 Participants
n=5 Participants
32 Participants
n=7 Participants
74 Participants
n=5 Participants
Level of Education
Uneducated
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
Level of Education
Not Available
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Smoking Habits
Non-smoker
86 Participants
n=5 Participants
70 Participants
n=7 Participants
156 Participants
n=5 Participants
Smoking Habits
Ex-smoker
52 Participants
n=5 Participants
37 Participants
n=7 Participants
89 Participants
n=5 Participants
Smoking Habits
Smoker
55 Participants
n=5 Participants
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
62 Participants
n=5 Participants
Smoking Habits
Not Available
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Alcohol Abuse
Yes
4 Participants
n=5 Participants • Number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data at this baseline measure.
0 Participants
n=7 Participants • Number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data at this baseline measure.
4 Participants
n=5 Participants • Number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data at this baseline measure.
Alcohol Abuse
No
189 Participants
n=5 Participants • Number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data at this baseline measure.
114 Participants
n=7 Participants • Number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data at this baseline measure.
303 Participants
n=5 Participants • Number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data at this baseline measure.
Alcohol Abuse
Not Available
1 Participants
n=5 Participants • Number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data at this baseline measure.
2 Participants
n=7 Participants • Number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data at this baseline measure.
3 Participants
n=5 Participants • Number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data at this baseline measure.

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 10 weeks after start of treatment with biologics

Population: Analyzed participants included all participants who didn't had screen failure, met all the inclusion criteria and had enough information about response to the biological treatment.

Correlation between co-morbidities profile and lack of response, adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical profile of participants, logistic regression models were conducted. Lack of response was reduction of 2 points from baseline in Harvey-Bradshaw Indices (HBI) score for CD or Partial Mayo score (PMS) for UC after 10 weeks treatment with anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF). HBI included general well-being (0=very well to 4=terrible), abdominal pain (0=none to 3=severe), number of liquid stools/day, abdominal mass (0=none to 3=tender), and complications (8 items; 1 score/item). The total score was sum of sub scores, where score \<5=remission, 5-7=mild disease, 8-16=moderate disease and \>16-severe disease. PMS included 3 sub-scores: stool frequency (0=normal to 3=\>4 stools/day more than normal), rectal bleeding (0=none to 3=passing blood alone), and physician's global assessment (0=Normal to 3=severe). The total score was sum of sub scale scores from 0=normal to 9=severe disease.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Participants With Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)
n=310 Participants
Participants with IBD (Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis) who received biological treatment between June 2011 and June 2013.
Cohort 2: Ulcerative Colitis
Participants with ulcerative colitis who received biological treatment between June 2011 and June 2013.
Impact of the Comorbidities Profile in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Participants on Lack of Treatment Response to Biological Therapy
IBD
0.59 odds ratio
Interval 0.37 to 0.93
Impact of the Comorbidities Profile in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Participants on Lack of Treatment Response to Biological Therapy
Corticosteroids
2.16 odds ratio
Interval 1.25 to 3.73
Impact of the Comorbidities Profile in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Participants on Lack of Treatment Response to Biological Therapy
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
2.67 odds ratio
Interval 1.33 to 5.35

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 6 months after start of treatment with biologics

Population: Analyzed participants included all participants who didn't had screen failure, met all the inclusion criteria and had enough information about response to the biological treatment.

Correlation between co-morbidities profile and loss of response, adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical profile of participants, logistic regression models were conducted. Loss of response was defined as loss of drug effect along follow up with initial response i.e. reduction of 2 points from baseline in HBI score for CD or PMS for UC after 6 months of treatment with anti-TNF. HBI included general well-being (0=very well to 4=terrible), abdominal pain (0=none to 3=severe), number of liquid stools/day, abdominal mass (0=none to 3=tender), and complications (8 items; 1 score/item). The total score was sum of sub scores, \<5=remission, 5-7=mild disease, 8-16=moderate disease and \>16=severe disease. PMS score included 3 sub-scores: stool frequency (0=normal to 3=\>4 stools/day more than normal), rectal bleeding (0=none to 3=passing blood alone), and physician's global assessment (0=Normal to 3=severe). The total score was sum of sub scale scores ranging from 0=normal to 9=severe disease.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Participants With Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)
n=310 Participants
Participants with IBD (Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis) who received biological treatment between June 2011 and June 2013.
Cohort 2: Ulcerative Colitis
Participants with ulcerative colitis who received biological treatment between June 2011 and June 2013.
Impact of the Comorbidities Profile in IBD Participants on Loss of Treatment Response to Biological Therapy
IBD
0.58 odds ratio
Interval 0.34 to 0.99
Impact of the Comorbidities Profile in IBD Participants on Loss of Treatment Response to Biological Therapy
Corticosteroids
2.45 odds ratio
Interval 1.35 to 4.44
Impact of the Comorbidities Profile in IBD Participants on Loss of Treatment Response to Biological Therapy
Myocardial Infarction
3.30 odds ratio
Interval 1.48 to 7.35

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 10 weeks after start of treatment with biologics

Population: Analyzed participants included all participants who didn't had screen failure, met all the inclusion criteria and had enough information about response to the biological treatment.

Correlation between extraintestinal manifestations profile and lack of response, adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical profile of participants, logistic regression models were conducted. Lack of response was reduction of at least 2 points from baseline in HBI score for CD or PMS for UC after 10 weeks treatment with TNF. HBI included general well-being (0=very well to 4=terrible), abdominal pain (0=none to 3=severe), number of liquid stools/day, abdominal mass (0=none to 3=tender), and complications (8 items; 1 score/item). The total score was sum of sub scores, where score \<5=remission, 5-7=mild disease, 8-16=moderate disease and \>16-severe disease. PMS included 3 sub-scores: stool frequency (0=normal to 3=\>4 stools/day more than normal), rectal bleeding (0=none to 3=passing blood alone), and physician's global assessment (0=Normal to 3=severe). The total score was sum of sub scale scores from 0=normal to 9=severe disease.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Participants With Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)
n=310 Participants
Participants with IBD (Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis) who received biological treatment between June 2011 and June 2013.
Cohort 2: Ulcerative Colitis
Participants with ulcerative colitis who received biological treatment between June 2011 and June 2013.
Impact of the Extraintestinal Manifestations Profile in IBD Participants on Lack of Treatment Response to Biological Therapy
2.08 odds ratio
Interval 1.22 to 3.54

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 6 months after start of treatment with biologics

Population: Analyzed participants included all participants who didn't had screen failure, met all the inclusion criteria and had enough information about response to the biological treatment.

Correlation between extraintestinal manifestations profile and loss of response, adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical profile, logistic regression models were conducted. Loss of response was defined as loss of drug effect along follow up with initial response i.e. reduction of 2 points from baseline in HBI score for CD or PMS for UC after 6 months of treatment with anti-TNF. HBI included general well-being (0=very well to 4=terrible), abdominal pain (0=none to 3=severe), number of liquid stools/day, abdominal mass (0=none to 3=tender), and complications (8 items; 1 score/item). The total score was sum of sub scores, \<5=remission, 5-7=mild disease, 8-16=moderate disease and \>16=severe disease. PMS score included 3 sub-scores: stool frequency (0=normal to 3=\>4 stools/day more than normal), rectal bleeding (0=none to 3=passing blood alone), and physician's global assessment (0=Normal to 3=severe). The total score was sum of sub scale scores ranging from 0=normal to 9=severe disease.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Participants With Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)
n=310 Participants
Participants with IBD (Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis) who received biological treatment between June 2011 and June 2013.
Cohort 2: Ulcerative Colitis
Participants with ulcerative colitis who received biological treatment between June 2011 and June 2013.
Impact of the Extraintestinal Manifestations Profile in IBD Participants on Loss of Treatment Response to Biological Therapy
Corticosteroids
2.57 odds ratio
Interval 1.43 to 4.61
Impact of the Extraintestinal Manifestations Profile in IBD Participants on Loss of Treatment Response to Biological Therapy
Skin Disease
2.73 odds ratio
Interval 1.42 to 5.25

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1

Population: Analyzed participants included all participants who didn't had screen failure, met all the inclusion criteria and had enough information about response to the biological treatment. Number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data at the given time-point.

Participants with CD and UC along with comorbidities were reported. Comorbidity referred to the presence of co-existing or additional diseases with reference to an initial diagnosis or with reference to the index condition.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Participants With Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)
n=194 Participants
Participants with IBD (Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis) who received biological treatment between June 2011 and June 2013.
Cohort 2: Ulcerative Colitis
n=116 Participants
Participants with ulcerative colitis who received biological treatment between June 2011 and June 2013.
Percentage of IBD Participants With Comorbidities
Myocardial Infarction
2.2 percentage of participants
0.9 percentage of participants
Percentage of IBD Participants With Comorbidities
Congestive Heart Failure
1.6 percentage of participants
0.9 percentage of participants
Percentage of IBD Participants With Comorbidities
Peripheral Vascular Disease
1.6 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of IBD Participants With Comorbidities
Cardiovascular Disease
0.5 percentage of participants
2.6 percentage of participants
Percentage of IBD Participants With Comorbidities
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
3.2 percentage of participants
4.4 percentage of participants
Percentage of IBD Participants With Comorbidities
Connective Tissue Disease
2.7 percentage of participants
3.5 percentage of participants
Percentage of IBD Participants With Comorbidities
Peptic Ulcer Disease
0.5 percentage of participants
0.9 percentage of participants
Percentage of IBD Participants With Comorbidities
Mild Chronic Hepatopathy
1.1 percentage of participants
3.5 percentage of participants
Percentage of IBD Participants With Comorbidities
Diabetes Mellitus
0.5 percentage of participants
5.3 percentage of participants
Percentage of IBD Participants With Comorbidities
Diabetes with Lesions in Target Organs
0.0 percentage of participants
0.9 percentage of participants
Percentage of IBD Participants With Comorbidities
Solid Tumor
2.2 percentage of participants
0.9 percentage of participants
Percentage of IBD Participants With Comorbidities
Leukemia
0.0 percentage of participants
0.9 percentage of participants
Percentage of IBD Participants With Comorbidities
Lymphoma
0.5 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of IBD Participants With Comorbidities
Moderate-Severe Chronic Hepatopathy
0.5 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1

Population: Analyzed participants included all participants who didn't had screen failure, met all the inclusion criteria and had enough information about response to the biological treatment. Number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data at the given time-point.

Participants with CD were classified into IBD severe or non-severe at baseline based on the HBI scores according the following criteria:- HBI includes general well-being (0=very well to 4=terrible), abdominal pain (0=none to 3=severe), number of liquid stools per day, abdominal mass (0=none to 3=tender), and complications (8 items; 1 score/item). The total score is sum of sub scores, score \<5=remission, 5-7=mild disease, 8-16=moderate disease and \>16=severe disease.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Participants With Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)
n=194 Participants
Participants with IBD (Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis) who received biological treatment between June 2011 and June 2013.
Cohort 2: Ulcerative Colitis
Participants with ulcerative colitis who received biological treatment between June 2011 and June 2013.
Percentage of CD Participants With Comorbidities According to the Level of IBD Severity
Non-Severe Disease
62.4 percentage of participants
Percentage of CD Participants With Comorbidities According to the Level of IBD Severity
Severe Disease
8.3 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1

Population: Analyzed participants included all participants who didn't had screen failure, met all the inclusion criteria and had enough information about response to the biological treatment. Number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data at the given time-point.

Participants with UC were classified into IBD severe or non-severe at baseline based on the PMS scores according the following criteria:- PMS score includes 3 sub-scores: stool frequency (0=normal to 3=\>4 stools/day more than normal), rectal bleeding (0=none to 3=passing blood alone), and physician's global assessment (0=Normal to 3=severe). The total score is sum of sub scale scores ranging from 0=normal to 9=severe disease.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Participants With Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)
n=116 Participants
Participants with IBD (Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis) who received biological treatment between June 2011 and June 2013.
Cohort 2: Ulcerative Colitis
Participants with ulcerative colitis who received biological treatment between June 2011 and June 2013.
Percentage of UC Participants With Comorbidities According to the Level of IBD Severity
Severe Disease
91.7 percentage of participants
Percentage of UC Participants With Comorbidities According to the Level of IBD Severity
Non-Severe Disease
37.6 percentage of participants

Adverse Events

Cohort 1: Crohn's Disease

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Cohort 2: Ulcerative Colitis

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Cohort 1: Crohn's Disease
n=194 participants at risk
Participants with Crohn's disease who received biological treatment between June 2011 and June 2013.
Cohort 2: Ulcerative Colitis
n=116 participants at risk
Participants with ulcerative colitis who received biological treatment between June 2011 and June 2013.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Infusion related reaction
0.00%
0/194 • Time since participants started biological treatment until study visit (Day 1)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
0.86%
1/116 • Time since participants started biological treatment until study visit (Day 1)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Medical Director

Takeda

Phone: +1-877-825-3327

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The first study related publication will be a multi-center publication submitted within 24 months after conclusion or termination of a study at all sites. After such multi site publication, all proposed site publications and presentations will be submitted to sponsor for review 60 days in advance of publication. Site will remove Sponsor confidential information unrelated to study results. Sponsor can delay a proposed publication for another 60 days to preserve intellectual property.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER