Feasibility Study of Accelerated Preoperative Radiotherapy for Early Breast Cancer
NCT ID: NCT02858934
Last Updated: 2022-07-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-03-08
2022-03-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This clinical study involves delivering radiotherapy in 1 week and before the surgery in stead of following surgery. In the postoperative setting, it is often debatable which volume should be included in the boost. Often boost-volumes remain large because of uncertainties in delineation. Preoperative radiotherapy has the advantage that the tumor is visible on imaging. This can result in smaller boost volumes. The surgery will follow shortly after termination of the radiotherapy, resulting in a very short treatment period.
This study is an open study investigating the effect on quality of life of a very short preoperative radiotherapy for early breast cancer.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pre- Versus Postoperative Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation
NCT02913729
Pre- or Postoperative Accelerated Radiotherapy
NCT03783364
Three Fraction Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation as the Sole Method of Radiation Therapy for Low-risk Stage 0 and I Breast Carcinoma
NCT03612648
Partial Breast Versus no Irradiation for Women With Early Breast Cancer
NCT03646955
Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation for Early Breast Cancer
NCT00418210
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In the postoperative setting, it is often debatable which volume should be included in the boost. Surgical clips can help to decrease inter-observer variability, but often boost-volumes remain large because of uncertainties in delineation. Preoperative radiotherapy has the advantage that the gross tumor volume (GTV) is visible on imaging. This can result in smaller boost volumes.
The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of a short preoperative tomotherapy. The potential benefits are
* a decrease in overall treatment time
* a positive effect on quality of life
* a more precise target delineation
* profitable health economics.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
preoperative tomotherapy
This study is an open study investigating the effect on quality of life of a very short preoperative radiotherapy for early breast cancer, including approximately 24 women. Radiotherapy will be performed in 1 week and before the surgery in stead of following surgery.Preoperative radiotherapy has the advantage that the tumor is visible on imaging. This can result in smaller boost volumes. The surgery will follow shortly after termination of the radiotherapy, resulting in a very short treatment period.
Tomotherapy
Dose prescription:
Whole breast irradiation: 25 Gy in 5 daily fractions of 5 Gy Boost: 30 Gy in 5 daily fractions of 6 Gy The boost will be delivered as a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB).
Target volumes:
Clinical target volume (CTV) breast: defined by the soft tissue of the breast down to the pectoralis fascia, but excluding the skin and the underlying muscle, ribs, lung and heart.
Gross tumor volume (GTV) boost: includes all gross tumor volume, as visible on computer tomography, mammography and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRI imaging is preferentially performed in treatment position.
CTV boost: includes the primary tumor, with a margin of 1.0 cm in all directions to encompass potential microscopic disease extension. The CTV boost excludes the skin, pectoralis muscle, ribs, lung and heart.
Planning target volume (PTV): CTV plus a margin of 5 mm in all directions, but limited at 5 mm below the skin surface.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Tomotherapy
Dose prescription:
Whole breast irradiation: 25 Gy in 5 daily fractions of 5 Gy Boost: 30 Gy in 5 daily fractions of 6 Gy The boost will be delivered as a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB).
Target volumes:
Clinical target volume (CTV) breast: defined by the soft tissue of the breast down to the pectoralis fascia, but excluding the skin and the underlying muscle, ribs, lung and heart.
Gross tumor volume (GTV) boost: includes all gross tumor volume, as visible on computer tomography, mammography and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRI imaging is preferentially performed in treatment position.
CTV boost: includes the primary tumor, with a margin of 1.0 cm in all directions to encompass potential microscopic disease extension. The CTV boost excludes the skin, pectoralis muscle, ribs, lung and heart.
Planning target volume (PTV): CTV plus a margin of 5 mm in all directions, but limited at 5 mm below the skin surface.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Histological diagnosis of unifocal invasive breast carcinoma, no special type (ductal carcinoma)
* Tumor Staging: cT1-2N0M0
* Luminal A or B
* Candidate for breast conserving surgery
* N0-status confirmed by lymph node cytology
Exclusion Criteria
* Prior thoracic radiotherapy
* Pregnancy
* SBR3 grading
* Triple negative status which benefit neoadjuvant chemotherapy
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Andre Nazac
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Andre Nazac
Head of clinic
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mark De Ridder, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CHU Brugmann/UZ Brussel
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU Brugmann
Brussels, , Belgium
UZ Brussel
Brussels, , Belgium
AZ Sint Blasius
Dendermonde, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Senkus E, Kyriakides S, Ohno S, Penault-Llorca F, Poortmans P, Rutgers E, Zackrisson S, Cardoso F; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26 Suppl 5:v8-30. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv298. No abstract available.
Bartelink H, Horiot JC, Poortmans PM, Struikmans H, Van den Bogaert W, Fourquet A, Jager JJ, Hoogenraad WJ, Oei SB, Warlam-Rodenhuis CC, Pierart M, Collette L. Impact of a higher radiation dose on local control and survival in breast-conserving therapy of early breast cancer: 10-year results of the randomized boost versus no boost EORTC 22881-10882 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug 1;25(22):3259-65. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.4991. Epub 2007 Jun 18.
Whelan TJ, Pignol JP, Levine MN, Julian JA, MacKenzie R, Parpia S, Shelley W, Grimard L, Bowen J, Lukka H, Perera F, Fyles A, Schneider K, Gulavita S, Freeman C. Long-term results of hypofractionated radiation therapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 Feb 11;362(6):513-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0906260.
Haviland JS, Owen JR, Dewar JA, Agrawal RK, Barrett J, Barrett-Lee PJ, Dobbs HJ, Hopwood P, Lawton PA, Magee BJ, Mills J, Simmons S, Sydenham MA, Venables K, Bliss JM, Yarnold JR; START Trialists' Group. The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) trials of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: 10-year follow-up results of two randomised controlled trials. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Oct;14(11):1086-1094. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70386-3. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
Van Parijs H, Miedema G, Vinh-Hung V, Verbanck S, Adriaenssens N, Kerkhove D, Reynders T, Schuermans D, Leysen K, Hanon S, Van Camp G, Vincken W, Storme G, Verellen D, De Ridder M. Short course radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost for stage I-II breast cancer, early toxicities of a randomized clinical trial. Radiat Oncol. 2012 Jun 1;7:80. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-80.
Versmessen H, Vinh-Hung V, Van Parijs H, Miedema G, Voordeckers M, Adriaenssens N, Storme G, De Ridder M. Health-related quality of life in survivors of stage I-II breast cancer: randomized trial of post-operative conventional radiotherapy and hypofractionated tomotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2012 Oct 25;12:495. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-495.
van Mourik AM, Elkhuizen PH, Minkema D, Duppen JC; Dutch Young Boost Study Group; van Vliet-Vroegindeweij C. Multiinstitutional study on target volume delineation variation in breast radiotherapy in the presence of guidelines. Radiother Oncol. 2010 Mar;94(3):286-91. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.01.009. Epub 2010 Mar 2.
Kirby AN, Jena R, Harris EJ, Evans PM, Crowley C, Gregory DL, Coles CE. Tumour bed delineation for partial breast/breast boost radiotherapy: what is the optimal number of implanted markers? Radiother Oncol. 2013 Feb;106(2):231-5. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
Nichols EM, Dhople AA, Mohiuddin MM, Flannery TW, Yu CX, Regine WF. Comparative analysis of the post-lumpectomy target volume versus the use of pre-lumpectomy tumor volume for early-stage breast cancer: implications for the future. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 May 1;77(1):197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.063.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CHUB-Preop-Breast
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.