Randomized, Open-label Economic and Medical Study on the Lymph Node Management of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx Tumor Stage 1 or 2, Nodes 0 (T1-T2 N0) Operable
NCT ID: NCT02855723
Last Updated: 2016-08-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
307 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-04-30
2015-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This open-label randomized multicenter clinical trial aims to compare the oncologic and functional outcome of two strategies : the current management versus the management based on the sentinel lymph node.
The hypothesis is based on a nodal control difference at 2 years in both arms not exceeding 10%. The medico-economic analysis will be conducted in two stages : a classic stage on 2 years with estimated incremental cost-effectiveness and incremental cost-utility, then a step with log term modeling.
A reduction in morbidity and treatment costs in the sentinel node arm are expected in this study.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Neck Surgery in Treating Patients With Early-Stage Oral Cancer
NCT00571883
Multicenter Phase II Study of Sentinel Node Detection in Squamous Cell Carcinoma T1-T2N0 of the Oropharynx Treated With Radiotherapy and Larynx Treated by Surgery, Laser or Robot
NCT03010553
Comparing Sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) Biopsy With Standard Neck Dissection for Patients With Early-Stage Oral Cavity Cancer
NCT04333537
Radioguided Selective Neck Dissection for Staging and Treatment of Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
NCT03727594
Chemotherapy, Radiation Therapy, and Cetuximab in Treating Patients With the Head and Neck Cancer
NCT00875849
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
At the screening, after verification of the eligibility criteria and signature of the informed consent form, the subject will be randomized in one of 2 arms. At the inclusion the following exams have to be done : clinical exam, panendoscopy, cytologic and histologic analysis and CT-Scan (or MRI). For each visit, the investigator will perform a clinical exam and the subjects should complete some questionnaires themselves from V0 to V3, V6 (12 months) and V9. At the last visit (24 months) the patients will have a CTC-Scan ou MRI.
At the end of the follow-up period (24 months), the data of subjects survival will be recorded during three years.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
GS strategy
sentinel node biopsy
Surgery: GS strategy
sentinel node biopsy
Classic strategy
systematic lymphadenectomy
Surgery: Classic strategy
systematic lymphadenectomy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Surgery: GS strategy
sentinel node biopsy
Surgery: Classic strategy
systematic lymphadenectomy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Social Insured
3. Patient Information and Informed Consent signed by the patient
4. Patient not participating in another trial since the legal time
5. Absence of any previous treatment for cancer of the Upper AeroDigestive Tract (VADS)
6. Patient with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx documented by biopsy with histopathologic analysis not older than 1 month
7. curable or operable tumor with radiation under the Tumor, Nodes, Metastasis (TNM) stage, location and the patient's general condition
8. Stage T1 and T2
9. Tumor listed N0 satisfying the following conditions (21 days validity period): A) absence of lymphadenopathy palpable on clinical examination of the ENT investigator. B) CT scan or MRI with injection of contrast product: lack of suspicious adenomegaly for metastasis = node size less than one centimeter and 1.5 cm for the group IIa, ovoid, homogeneous, not taking contrast and showing no signs of lymph perinodal invasion ( hyperdensity fat, vascular adhesion), absence of lymph node group (\> 3)
10. Systematic ENT endoscopy eliminating a second synchronous tumor and precisely establishing the T (21 days validity period)
11. Absence of metastasis: M0
2. Other cancer being treated
3. Non-invasive tumor: high-grade dysplasia, carcinoma in situ
4. Inadequate tumor excision: margins invaded without further recovery in safe zone
5. Contraindications to surgery such sentinel node or lymph node dissection
6. Contraindications to radiotherapy
7. Contraindications to performing a scan:
* Known allergy or intolerance to the injected product and particularly with Technetium-99
* Pregnancy
8. Refusal to accept the full treatment regardless of the strategy
9. Follow-up not possible
10. Refusal to accept the described follow-up and / or provide the necessary information for the study
11. Patient already treated for the tumor outside an excision biopsy
12. Patient who previously had chemotherapy or immunotherapy for another cancer outside VADS within less than 6 months
13. Patient undergoing cervical or VADS radiotherapy whatever the cause or time
14. Patient who have had cervical spine surgery regardless of the cause or time
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Montpellier
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Montpellier University Hospital
Montpellier, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Garrel R, Poissonnet G, Moya Plana A, Fakhry N, Dolivet G, Lallemant B, Sarini J, Vergez S, Guelfucci B, Choussy O, Bastit V, Richard F, Costes V, Landais P, Perriard F, Daures JP, de Verbizier D, Favier V, de Boutray M. Equivalence Randomized Trial to Compare Treatment on the Basis of Sentinel Node Biopsy Versus Neck Node Dissection in Operable T1-T2N0 Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Dec 1;38(34):4010-4018. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01661. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2007- AO1191-52
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
UF 5023
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.