Teaching Skin Self -Examination to Melanoma Patients and Their Skin Check Partners

NCT ID: NCT02854657

Last Updated: 2021-03-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

682 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-05-31

Study Completion Date

2021-03-09

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The proposed study is a continuation of a research program (STU00017005: Interventions to teach melanoma patients skin self-examination) designed to increase early detection of melanomas before they metastasize. In 2015, approximately 73,870 individuals in the U.S. will be diagnosed with invasive melanoma and about 9,940 will die from the disease. During 2002-2011, melanoma incidence increased at an average annual rate of 1.6% for men and 1.5% for women. People with a history of melanoma have a 10 times greater risk of developing a second primary melanoma relative to the general population. Early detection with surgical excision at an earlier stage when treatment is usually more effective is the only proven curative strategy.

Relationship factors to help sustain skin self-examination will also be evaluated.

The study has been amended to include an administrative supplement, which builds upon the pilot research completed during the summer of 2017 that measured the efficacy of two wearable UV sensors (Shade and Wearifi) and a survey assessing sun protection along with the quality of life. See Detailed Description for a description of amendment addition.

This research was expanded to distance (remote) learning provided by mailing the same workbook used in the in-office training.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The completed R01 demonstrated preliminary evidence for a melanoma survivor and partner skin self-examination (SSE) training program resulting in regular and accurate SSEs relative to patients and partners receiving treatment as usual care. However, one caveat is that the patients and partners in the well-controlled study are potentially being cued to conduct the SSEs following training and reinforced for their actions. Whereas in "real-world" conditions the participants would see their dermatologist less frequently with significantly less cueing to conduct SSEs.

This research addresses this limitation by examining the long-term influence of SSE training on SSE knowledge, self-efficacy, performance, and accuracy under real-world conditions for melanoma patients in the treatment group from the ongoing R01 study relative to controls (Aim 1). In addition, the continuation study will also examine for whom the intervention works best under real-world conditions (Aim 2). Findings from clinical RCTs of behavioral interventions involving patients are rarely if ever, examined to determine generalizability to real-world settings. The current proposal will contribute critical information to the scientific literature on the impact of early detection of melanomas using SSEs and will be the first to test the sustainability and long-term impact of an efficacious SSE intervention for early detection targeting melanoma survivors in real-world settings. Relationship factors to help sustain skin self-examination will also be evaluated.

The amended part of the study is an administrative supplement, which builds upon the pilot research completed during the summer of 2017 that measured the efficacy of two wearable UV sensors (Shade and Wearifi) and a survey assessing sun protection along with the quality of life. The Shade sensor provided a more reliable time-stamped assessment. With the use of the Daily Minutes of Unprotected Sun Exposure Inventory (MUSE) and the Shade sensors, the investigators assessed the sun protection behaviors of melanoma survivors and found that 13% of the melanoma survivors were surprised by their amount of UV exposure.

The investigators now wish to determine the feasibility of simultaneously obtaining wearable sensor data for physical activity (ActiGraph) and the Shade sensor and completion of self-reported surveys for the same time period. The feasibility and methodological information derived from this project are highly relevant to capture and quantify UV exposure among physically active individuals.

A total of 40 participants will be recruited for this phase (324 from initial study + 40 from amended section = 364 anticipated total).Ten participants (5 melanoma survivors and 5 young adult relatives), testing the feasibility of wearing two sensors and completing daily online surveys. After feasibility testing, the study will enroll melanoma survivors, age 18-70 years, with Stages 0-1A (n=15) and their young adult relatives (n=15) who are 18-39 years old. The sex of enrolled participants will be monitored to assure equivalent numbers of male and female participants.

Two arms were added: a) Feasibility of wearing 2 sensors, and b) Feasibility of completing online daily survey. The research team will strive to integrate event level data in real-time. At the conclusion of the study, participants receive a report of their UV exposure and physical activity over the 7 days of the study. Eligibility Criteria has also been updated for the amended portion of the study.

Distance (remote) learning will be compared with in-person learning with online surveys assessing SSE knowledge, confidence, anxiety and performance. Electronic health record review will identify biopsies of concerning moles and the number and stage of melanomas identified.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Melanoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

skin self-examination

Participants from the treatment arms of the original RCT. It is anticipated that 228 participant dyads that are 18-70 years old from the original study will be invited to continue in the ongoing study. These subjects received Skin Self- examination structured training.

The subject are being followed for an additional period of time after receiving an educational intervention.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Skin Self- examination structured training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

A PowerPoint presentation will be provided as a PDF file. The file will be available in English and Spanish. This is the same skin self-examination structured training intervention used in the original RCT (MoleScore)

Skin Self- examination:Distance (remote) learning

Participants receive the Skin Self- examination structured training with partner assistance educational intervention via mailed workbook while under the customary care of their own dermatologists. It is anticipated that 50 new participant dyads will be recruited and randomized to this group.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Skin Self- examination structured training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

A PowerPoint presentation will be provided as a PDF file. The file will be available in English and Spanish. This is the same skin self-examination structured training intervention used in the original RCT (MoleScore)

Active control

Participants from the control arm of the original RCT. It is anticipated that 100 participant dyads that are 18-70 years old from the original study will be invited to continue in the ongoing study.

These subjects are controls and do not receive the structured training in skin self-examination with partner assistance at the beginning of the study. After completing the 18 month online survey, the subjects may request the Skin Self- examination structured training with partner assistance.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Skin Self- examination structured training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

A PowerPoint presentation will be provided as a PDF file. The file will be available in English and Spanish. This is the same skin self-examination structured training intervention used in the original RCT (MoleScore)

Assessment-only control

Participants who receive customary care from their own dermatologists. It is anticipated that 150 new participant dyads will be recruited and randomized to this group.

These subjects are controls and do not receive the structured training in skin self-examination with partner assistance at the beginning of the study. After completing the 18 month online survey, the subjects may request the structured training in skin self-examination with partner assistance.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Skin Self- examination structured training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

A PowerPoint presentation will be provided as a PDF file. The file will be available in English and Spanish. This is the same skin self-examination structured training intervention used in the original RCT (MoleScore)

Observational study 1

Feasibility of wearing 2 sensors No intervention. At the conclusion of the study, participants receive a report of their UV exposure and physical activity over the 7 days of the study.

N= 10

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Observational study 2

Feasibility of completing online daily survey. The research team will strive to integrate event level data in real -time No intervention. At the conclusion of the study, participants receive an event level reports of their daily UV exposure and physical activity over the 7 days of the study.

N= 30

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Relationship Factors Study Observational Study

Identification of how shared responsibility for SSE (i.e., "being in this together) contributed to SSE frequency and provide dermatologists with practical information they can efficiently communicate to patients with a history of melanoma to increase SSE.

No intervention- Control group. n=144 Results pending\*

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Relationship Factors Study- Skin Self Examination

Identification of how shared responsibility for SSE (i.e., "being in this together) contributed to SSE frequency and provide dermatologists with practical information they can efficiently communicate to patients with a history of melanoma to increase SSE.

Intervention= Skin self-examination training n=197 Results Pending\*

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Skin Self- examination structured training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

A PowerPoint presentation will be provided as a PDF file. The file will be available in English and Spanish. This is the same skin self-examination structured training intervention used in the original RCT (MoleScore)

Comparison of distance (remote) learning vs in-person learning

Controls re-enrolled from the original study (n=38) and newly enrolled in the distance (remote) learning (n=106) are compared with participants receiving the workbook in-person in the original study and re-enrolled (n=134) and participants newly enrolled in distance (remote) learning, who had the workbook mailed to them (n=63). Online surveys assessed SSE knowledge, confidence, anxiety and performance. Electronic health record review identified biopsies of concerning moles and the number of melanomas identified.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Skin Self- examination structured training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

A PowerPoint presentation will be provided as a PDF file. The file will be available in English and Spanish. This is the same skin self-examination structured training intervention used in the original RCT (MoleScore)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Skin Self- examination structured training

A PowerPoint presentation will be provided as a PDF file. The file will be available in English and Spanish. This is the same skin self-examination structured training intervention used in the original RCT (MoleScore)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

MoleScore

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Personal history of Stage 0 (in situ) to IIB melanoma
* At least 6 weeks post-surgical treatment of Stage 0 (in situ) to IIB melanoma
* Age 18-70 years old
* Have sufficient vision to read a newspaper in order to visually detect changes of the skin
* Able to read English or Spanish at a sixth grade language level
* Have a skin check partner (i.e. spouse, family member, or friend) who is willing to participate in the research with the patient


* Ages 18-70, who are participating in the research supported by the R01
* Able to read English at a sixth-grade language level
* Willing to participate in daily online assessments
* Willingness to wear two sensors for 7 consecutive days
* Own a smartphone and able to use a mobile application
* Reliable access to the Internet
* Reliable mailing address for safe delivery and return of sensors
* Capable of walking a quarter of a mile (about 3 city blocks) with little to no difficulty

Young adult relatives of melanoma survivors

* Ages 18-39 years old
* Able to read English at a sixth-grade language level
* Willing to participate in daily online assessments
* Willing to wear two sensors for 7 consecutive days
* Own a smartphone and able to use a mobile application
* Reliable access to the Internet
* Reliable mailing address for safe delivery and return of sensors
* Capable of walking a quarter of a mile (about 3 city blocks) with little to no difficulty

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects overburdened with other co-morbid diseases (e.g. chronic immunosuppression from organ transplantation) or medical treatments (e.g. chemotherapy)
* Subjects unable to participate in a conversation at a sixth grade language level due to cognitive impairment (e.g. by a stroke)
* For newly enrolled subjects only: Prior participation in skin self-examination research

Eligibility Criteria for amended portion of the study:


* Excluded subjects are those overburdened with other co-morbid diseases (e.g. chronic immunosuppression from organ transplantation) or medical treatments (e.g. chemotherapy).
* Subjects unable to participate in a conversation at a sixth-grade language level due to cognitive impairment (e.g. by a stroke) and have an ECOG performance status \>1 will also be excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Northwestern University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

June Robinson

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

June K Robinson, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Northwestern University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

June K Robinson

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Robinson JK, Reavy R, Mallett KA, Turrisi R. Remote partner assisted skin self-examination skills training of melanoma survivors and their partners. Australas J Dermatol. 2019 Feb;60(1):e80-e82. doi: 10.1111/ajd.12877. Epub 2018 Jul 10. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30773613 (View on PubMed)

Robinson JK, Hultgren B, Mallett K, Turrisi R. Self-confidence and Embarrassment About Partner-Assisted Skin Self-examination for Melanoma. JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Mar 1;153(3):342-344. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.4776. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27973675 (View on PubMed)

Robinson JK, Wayne JD, Martini MC, Hultgren BA, Mallett KA, Turrisi R. Early Detection of New Melanomas by Patients With Melanoma and Their Partners Using a Structured Skin Self-examination Skills Training Intervention: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2016 Sep 1;152(9):979-85. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.1985.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27367303 (View on PubMed)

Hultgren BA, Turrisi R, Mallett KA, Ackerman S, Robinson JK. Influence of Quality of Relationship Between Patient With Melanoma and Partner on Partner-Assisted Skin Examination Education: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2016 Feb;152(2):184-90. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.2819.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26422745 (View on PubMed)

Stapleton JL, Turrisi R, Mallett KA, Robinson JK. Correspondence between pigmented lesions identified by melanoma patients trained to perform partner-assisted skin self-examination and dermatological examination. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Aug;24(8):1247-53. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0218. Epub 2015 Jun 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26063475 (View on PubMed)

Robinson JK, Gaber R, Hultgren B, Eilers S, Blatt H, Stapleton J, Mallett K, Turrisi R, Duffecy J, Begale M, Martini M, Bilimoria K, Wayne J. Skin self-examination education for early detection of melanoma: a randomized controlled trial of Internet, workbook, and in-person interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jan 13;16(1):e7. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2883.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24418949 (View on PubMed)

Robinson JK, Reavy R, Mallett KA, Turrisi R. Remote skin self-examination training of melanoma survivors and their skin check partners: A randomized trial and comparison with in-person training. Cancer Med. 2020 Oct;9(19):7301-7309. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3299. Epub 2020 Aug 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32761987 (View on PubMed)

Robinson JK. Skin check partner assistance for melanoma skin self-examination by at-risk patients: it takes two to identify melanomas. Future Oncol. 2020 Jun;16(16):1065-1068. doi: 10.2217/fon-2020-0265. Epub 2020 Apr 15. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32292057 (View on PubMed)

Robinson JK, Abou-El-Seoud D, Reavy R, Turrisi R, Mallett KA. Persistence of partner-assisted skin self-examination supported by 'being in this together': a randomized trial. Br J Dermatol. 2020 Sep;183(3):571-573. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19048. Epub 2020 Apr 23. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32222067 (View on PubMed)

Robinson JK. Frequency of 'regular' skin checks by dermatologists for melanoma survivors. Br J Dermatol. 2020 May;182(5):1081. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18626. Epub 2019 Nov 27. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31774148 (View on PubMed)

Robinson JK, Stapleton J, Turrisi R. Relationship and partner moderator variables increase self-efficacy of performing skin self-examination. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008 May;58(5):755-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.12.027. Epub 2008 Feb 6.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18258332 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STU00201983

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.