Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Use for Dobutamine Infusion in Heart Failure Patients
NCT ID: NCT02854254
Last Updated: 2016-08-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
PIcc Cost EffectiveneSS and Safety of Infusional Therapy
NCT03392831
Study on the Incidence of Early Deep Vein Thrombosis After Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Insertion
NCT02752984
Observational Study of Complications Related to Use of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters
NCT01578993
Radial Artery Stenosis Following PiCCO Catheter Implementation
NCT02695407
Subclavian Versus Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Indices.
NCT03337386
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Population Patients who were admitted with congestive heart failure of decompensated in use of intravenous inotropic agents were screened for eligibility to participate in this study. Inclusion criteria were: advanced congestive heart failure, use of vasoactive drugs, patients with platelet ≥50.000 mm3, left ventricular ejection fraction \<0.45, upper limb venous system able for catheter insertion and central catheter peripherally inserted. Exclusion criteria were age \<18, cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator, active systemic infection without treatment or without control, platelets \<50.000 mm3, injury skin in cubital region and presence of central catheter.
Sample size calculation Based on pilot study data, we estimated the occurrence of phlebitis 20% in PICC group and 80% in control group. Considering statistical power of 80% and α-error in 5%, the sample size was estimated by 39 patients in each group. For more conservative estimation we defined 40 patients in each group (80 patients in total).Considering these values the sample size was 39 patients in each group in a more conservative estimate set the size in 40 patients for each group and 60% in the control group and 20% in the PICC group. In total 172 patients were evaluated, of these 86 patients did not meet the inclusion criteria and six did not agree to participate.
Ethics considerations Eligible patients were invited to participate and receive written information about the study objectives and procedures. After detailed explanations about the study if the patient agreed to participate they signed the informed consent. The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee, and the study is in accordance with the principles set out in the Declaration of Helsinki. (1989) Intervention and endpoints Patients were divided into two groups: PICC Group and Control Group - peripheral venous access. In patients PICC group the catheter was inserted by the researcher and used to puncture technique guided by ultrasound (2). In the control group, patients were maintained with venous access by peripheral vein with flexible peripheral intravenous device and evaluation similar to the PICC group. The researcher evaluated daily the insertion site and asked the patient whether feel pain or not. The degree of phlebitis considered according to phlebitis scale Infusion Nurses Society (Table 1). Daily photo of all catheters and insertion site were performed. The patients were followed up to present the outcome, phlebitis; in his absence they were followed for ten consecutive days.
The dobutamine infusion was prescribed by responsible cardiologists well as the remaining drug therapy.
Statistical Analysis Categorical variables were expressed as number and percentage and compared between groups using the chi-square test (א 2) or Fisher's exact test. Continuous variables were expressed as mean, standard deviation and variance and compared between groups by Student's t test. Kaplan-Meir free-event curve (4) was built according the groups. Logistic regression analysis examined the predictive value of PICC Group and other variables for the occurrence of phlebitis, determining the odds ratio and its 95% confidence interval. Was considered statistically significant P \<0.05. The primary analysis respected the principle of intention to treat, including only randomized patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PICC
peripherally inserted central catheter
peripherally inserted central catheter
peripherally inserted central catheter
Control
peripherally venous access
peripherally venous access
standard over-the-needle intravenous catheter
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
peripherally inserted central catheter
peripherally inserted central catheter
peripherally venous access
standard over-the-needle intravenous catheter
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* In use of intravenous inotropic
* Platelets \> 50.000 mm3
* Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 0.45
Exclusion Criteria
* Active uncontrolled systemic infection
* Skin disease, central venous catheter
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
InCor Heart Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marcelo Eidi Ochiai
Dr.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Antonio CP Barretto, Ph.D.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
INCOR /2012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.