Assessment of a Tool for Decision Making in Case of Worsening Condition of Cancer Patients

NCT ID: NCT02852629

Last Updated: 2017-09-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

483 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-02-28

Study Completion Date

2016-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Observational two year study to evaluate the utility of a decision-support sheet on how to proceed in case of aggravation of a patient's condition with advanced disease.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Prospective and multicenter study conducted in the Rhône-Alpes-Auvergne area. All patients suffering from lung cancer admitted to a pulmonology unit in 2014 will be included. This document will be used if a decision to withhold life-sustaining treatment is decided. Investigators will assess the relationship between the planned intensity of care and those established when the patient develops an organ failure. Patient characteristics and factors associated with proposed levels and types of care will be analyzed. Patient and family opinions will be obtained after 3 months. The number of subjects is 468.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lung Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

observational study

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Any patient with lung cancer, hospitalized in pulmonology unit in one of the participating centers.
* Patient who requires a decision to withhold life-sustaining treatment
* One patient can be included at each hospitalization.

Exclusion Criteria

* Minor patient
* Refusal of participation of the patient in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Grenoble

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital Grenoble

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Toffart AC, Sakhri L, Girard N, Couraud S, Merle P, Fournel P, Perol M, Souquet PJ, Timsit JF, Moro-Sibilot D. [Assessment of a tool for decision making in case of worsening condition of cancer patients]. Rev Mal Respir. 2015 Jan;32(1):66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.rmr.2014.02.006. Epub 2014 Mar 20. French.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25618207 (View on PubMed)

Toffart AC, Pizarro CA, Schwebel C, Sakhri L, Minet C, Duruisseaux M, Azoulay E, Moro-Sibilot D, Timsit JF. Selection criteria for intensive care unit referral of lung cancer patients: a pilot study. Eur Respir J. 2015 Feb;45(2):491-500. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00118114. Epub 2014 Oct 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25323247 (View on PubMed)

Detering KM, Hancock AD, Reade MC, Silvester W. The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c1345. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1345.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20332506 (View on PubMed)

Garrouste-Orgeas M, Tabah A, Vesin A, Philippart F, Kpodji A, Bruel C, Gregoire C, Max A, Timsit JF, Misset B. The ETHICA study (part II): simulation study of determinants and variability of ICU physician decisions in patients aged 80 or over. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Sep;39(9):1574-83. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-2977-x. Epub 2013 Jun 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23765237 (View on PubMed)

Denis N, Timsit JF, Giaj Levra M, Sakhri L, Duruisseaux M, Schwebel C, Merle P, Pinsolle J, Ferrer L, Moro-Sibilot D, Toffart AC. Impact of systematic advanced care planning in lung cancer patients: A prospective study. Respir Med Res. 2020 Mar;77:11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.resmer.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Oct 28.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31927479 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CBP-AGGRAV_CIC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id