A Study to Assess Renal Function Response to Treatment in Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma and Creatinine Clearance

NCT ID: NCT02849444

Last Updated: 2021-08-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

326 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-09-23

Study Completion Date

2020-12-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A prospective, multicentre, post-authorisation observational study. The objective of this study is assess the response of renal function in clinical practice to anti-multiple myeloma therapy in patients with relapsed MM and CrCl \<50 mL/min/1.73 m2.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Prospective, multicentre, post-authorisation observational study. Study population: Patients with relapsed multiple myeloma and with CrCl \<50 mL/min/1.73 m2, for whom the investigator decides to start a new line of anti-myeloma treatment as per normal clinical practice. The decision to prescribe treatment will be clearly disassociated from the decision to include the patient in the study.

300 patients are expected to be recruited (225 for Group 1 and 75 for Group 2) from 40 sites (approximately 7-8 patients for each site). Patients will be included consecutively in the study.

The inclusion will be stratified to ensure the presence of all stages of renal impairment (RI) in two groups:

Documentation of 300 patients is planned (a maximum of 225 in group 1 and a minimum of 75 in group 2) at 40 sites (approximately 7-8 patients per each site). The patients will be included in the study in a consecutive manner.

In order to ensure the correct stratification of the sample group a real time central registry will be kept for the patients included in each group. Once the required number of patients for one of the groups is completed, inclusion in that group will be closed at all sites, keeping inclusion for other groups open, and so on until the entire sample size is complete.

Primary objective: To assess the response of renal function in clinical practice to anti-multiple myeloma therapy in patients with relapsed MM and creatinine clearance \<50 mL/min/1.73 m2 (CrCl \<50 mL/min/1.73m2).

The prospective follow-up period will cover two phases:

1. Treatment phase: covers the entire time the patient is receiving the first anti-myeloma treatment for relapse\* for which he/she is included in this study.
2. Follow-up phase: A 36-month extension period after the end of the first anti-myeloma treatment for relapse for which he/she was included in the study.

* Any change in therapeutic regimens, for example, discontinuation or addition of a drug (except for changes in dose for some of the initial drugs) will mark the end of the treatment phase and the passing of the patient to the follow-up phase. In case of temporary interruptions in treatment under 30 days (or of any duration if the reason for interruption is toxicity) the patient will continue in the treatment phase, provided that the initial treatment regimen for the relapse it resumed.

Secondary objectives:

* To describe the clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with relapsed multiple myeloma and CrCl \<50 mL/min/1.73 m2.
* To assess the response rate of renal function in clinical practice to anti-multiple myeloma therapy in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma and CrCl \<50 mL/min/1.73 m2.
* To assess the response of renal function based on the therapeutic regimens administered.
* To explore the concordance of the kidney function response and that of the myeloma in the clinical practice to the anti-myeloma treatment between consecutive relapses in the same patient.
* To assess time-dependent response parameters.
* To analyse the safety of treatments administered in clinical practice.
* To describe the use of resources associated with anti-myeloma therapy in clinical practice that can be measured financially, and to explore the possible differences between the various therapeutic regimens administered.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Multiple Myeloma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Moderate kidney failure

30 ≤ CrCl \< 50 mL/min/1.73 m2

Anti-myeloma treatment at physician discretion

Intervention Type OTHER

non Interventional Study

Severe kidney failure

CrCl \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m2

Anti-myeloma treatment at physician discretion

Intervention Type OTHER

non Interventional Study

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Anti-myeloma treatment at physician discretion

non Interventional Study

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients of both genders, aged equal or more than 18 years.
2. Patients with documented relapsed multiple myeloma according to International Myeloma Working Group ( IMWG) criteria.
3. Patients with documented renal damage defined as creatinine clearance \<50 ml / min / 1.73 m2 (CrCl \<50ml / min / 1.73m2).
4. Patients to whom the researcher decides to initiate anti-myeloma treatment for relapse with one or more agents according to clinical practice \*.
5. Patients who consent in writing after it has been clearly explained to them the nature and purpose of the study (written informed consent).
6. Subject with any of the following characteristics (at least one of the 2 following options must be Yes):

* Subjects who have not previously participated in the study

* The decision to prescribe treatment will be clearly dissociated from the decision to include the patient in the study

* Clarification is provided as to the aim of the study, which is to encompass all relapse subcategories included in the International Myeloma Working Group consensus document published in 2006. Therefore, all patients with clinically relapsed multiple myeloma, who are in relapse following a complete response or in progression (including refractory cases) as defined in point 8.1 and in table 4 of the protocol, are considered eligible candidates for participation in the EPA-MIR 50 study, as long as they meet all the other criteria

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients who are participating in an interventional clinical trial \* or who refuse to participate in the study.
2. Patients with CrCl \<50 ml / min / 1.73m2 due to a cause other than multiple myeloma properly documented at the discretion of the investigator \*.

* The inclusion of patients who are participating in another observational study is permitted.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Celgene

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mireya Navarro, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Celgene Spain

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Torrecárdenas

Almería, Andalusia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar

Cadiz, Andalusia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Virgen de la Nieves

Granada, Andalusia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Ciudad de Jaen

Jaén, Andalusia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital general de jeréz

Jerez de la Frontera, Andalusia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Virgen de la macarena

Seville, Andalusia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Miguel Servet

Zaragoza, Aragon, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Son Espases

Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain

Site Status

Hospital de Insular de Gran Canaria

Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain

Site Status

Hospital de Basurto

Bilbao, Castille and León, Spain

Site Status

Hospital de Burgos

Burgos, Castille and León, Spain

Site Status

Hospital de León

León, Castille and León, Spain

Site Status

Rio Hortega de Valladolid

Valladolid, Castille and León, Spain

Site Status

Hospital General de Ciudad Real

Ciudad Real, Castille-La Mancha, Spain

Site Status

Hospital La Ribera

Alzira, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital del Mar

Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Vall d´Hebron

Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clinic I Provincial de Barcelona

Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Duran reynls

Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Josep Trueta de Girona

Girona, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Arnau de Vilanova de Lleida

Lleida, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Sant Joan de manresa

Manresa, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital de Sabadell ( Parc Taulí)

Sabadell, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Mutua terrassa

Terrassa, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Santiago

Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain

Site Status

Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo

Vigo, Galicia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital san pedro

Logroño, La Rioja, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Fundación de Alcorcón

Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Puerta de Hierro

Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Santa Lucía

Cartagena, Murcia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Virgen de Arrixaca

El Palmar, Murcia, Murcia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital de Cabueñes

Gijón, Principality of Asturias, Spain

Site Status

Hospital General de Alicante

Alicante, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clínico Universitario Valencia

Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital La fe

Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Gregorio marañon

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Ramon y Cajal

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Complejo Universitario de San Carlos

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario La paz

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Dr peset

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CEL-MIE-2012-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.