A Study to Assess Renal Function Response to Treatment in Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma and Creatinine Clearance
NCT ID: NCT02849444
Last Updated: 2021-08-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
326 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2012-09-23
2020-12-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Post-authorisation Study of Biological Relapse in Patients With Multiple Myeloma
NCT02394210
Use of Elranatamab in Patients With High-risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
NCT06183489
A Study of the First-line Treatment of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Transplant-ineligible Multiple Myeloma in Spain
NCT03602755
A Study of Real-Life Current Standards of Care in Participants With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
NCT05160584
Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of CC-92328 in Participants With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
NCT04975399
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
300 patients are expected to be recruited (225 for Group 1 and 75 for Group 2) from 40 sites (approximately 7-8 patients for each site). Patients will be included consecutively in the study.
The inclusion will be stratified to ensure the presence of all stages of renal impairment (RI) in two groups:
Documentation of 300 patients is planned (a maximum of 225 in group 1 and a minimum of 75 in group 2) at 40 sites (approximately 7-8 patients per each site). The patients will be included in the study in a consecutive manner.
In order to ensure the correct stratification of the sample group a real time central registry will be kept for the patients included in each group. Once the required number of patients for one of the groups is completed, inclusion in that group will be closed at all sites, keeping inclusion for other groups open, and so on until the entire sample size is complete.
Primary objective: To assess the response of renal function in clinical practice to anti-multiple myeloma therapy in patients with relapsed MM and creatinine clearance \<50 mL/min/1.73 m2 (CrCl \<50 mL/min/1.73m2).
The prospective follow-up period will cover two phases:
1. Treatment phase: covers the entire time the patient is receiving the first anti-myeloma treatment for relapse\* for which he/she is included in this study.
2. Follow-up phase: A 36-month extension period after the end of the first anti-myeloma treatment for relapse for which he/she was included in the study.
* Any change in therapeutic regimens, for example, discontinuation or addition of a drug (except for changes in dose for some of the initial drugs) will mark the end of the treatment phase and the passing of the patient to the follow-up phase. In case of temporary interruptions in treatment under 30 days (or of any duration if the reason for interruption is toxicity) the patient will continue in the treatment phase, provided that the initial treatment regimen for the relapse it resumed.
Secondary objectives:
* To describe the clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with relapsed multiple myeloma and CrCl \<50 mL/min/1.73 m2.
* To assess the response rate of renal function in clinical practice to anti-multiple myeloma therapy in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma and CrCl \<50 mL/min/1.73 m2.
* To assess the response of renal function based on the therapeutic regimens administered.
* To explore the concordance of the kidney function response and that of the myeloma in the clinical practice to the anti-myeloma treatment between consecutive relapses in the same patient.
* To assess time-dependent response parameters.
* To analyse the safety of treatments administered in clinical practice.
* To describe the use of resources associated with anti-myeloma therapy in clinical practice that can be measured financially, and to explore the possible differences between the various therapeutic regimens administered.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Moderate kidney failure
30 ≤ CrCl \< 50 mL/min/1.73 m2
Anti-myeloma treatment at physician discretion
non Interventional Study
Severe kidney failure
CrCl \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m2
Anti-myeloma treatment at physician discretion
non Interventional Study
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Anti-myeloma treatment at physician discretion
non Interventional Study
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients with documented relapsed multiple myeloma according to International Myeloma Working Group ( IMWG) criteria.
3. Patients with documented renal damage defined as creatinine clearance \<50 ml / min / 1.73 m2 (CrCl \<50ml / min / 1.73m2).
4. Patients to whom the researcher decides to initiate anti-myeloma treatment for relapse with one or more agents according to clinical practice \*.
5. Patients who consent in writing after it has been clearly explained to them the nature and purpose of the study (written informed consent).
6. Subject with any of the following characteristics (at least one of the 2 following options must be Yes):
* Subjects who have not previously participated in the study
* The decision to prescribe treatment will be clearly dissociated from the decision to include the patient in the study
* Clarification is provided as to the aim of the study, which is to encompass all relapse subcategories included in the International Myeloma Working Group consensus document published in 2006. Therefore, all patients with clinically relapsed multiple myeloma, who are in relapse following a complete response or in progression (including refractory cases) as defined in point 8.1 and in table 4 of the protocol, are considered eligible candidates for participation in the EPA-MIR 50 study, as long as they meet all the other criteria
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with CrCl \<50 ml / min / 1.73m2 due to a cause other than multiple myeloma properly documented at the discretion of the investigator \*.
* The inclusion of patients who are participating in another observational study is permitted.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Celgene
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mireya Navarro, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Celgene Spain
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Torrecárdenas
Almería, Andalusia, Spain
Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar
Cadiz, Andalusia, Spain
Hospital Virgen de la Nieves
Granada, Andalusia, Spain
Hospital Universitario Ciudad de Jaen
Jaén, Andalusia, Spain
Hospital general de jeréz
Jerez de la Frontera, Andalusia, Spain
Hospital Virgen de la macarena
Seville, Andalusia, Spain
Hospital Miguel Servet
Zaragoza, Aragon, Spain
Hospital Son Espases
Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain
Hospital de Insular de Gran Canaria
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain
Hospital de Basurto
Bilbao, Castille and León, Spain
Hospital de Burgos
Burgos, Castille and León, Spain
Hospital de León
León, Castille and León, Spain
Rio Hortega de Valladolid
Valladolid, Castille and León, Spain
Hospital General de Ciudad Real
Ciudad Real, Castille-La Mancha, Spain
Hospital La Ribera
Alzira, Catalonia, Spain
Hospital del Mar
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Hospital Vall d´Hebron
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Hospital Clinic I Provincial de Barcelona
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Hospital Duran reynls
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Hospital Universitario Josep Trueta de Girona
Girona, Catalonia, Spain
Hospital Arnau de Vilanova de Lleida
Lleida, Catalonia, Spain
Hospital Sant Joan de manresa
Manresa, Catalonia, Spain
Hospital de Sabadell ( Parc Taulí)
Sabadell, Catalonia, Spain
Hospital Mutua terrassa
Terrassa, Catalonia, Spain
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Santiago
Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo
Vigo, Galicia, Spain
Hospital san pedro
Logroño, La Rioja, Spain
Hospital Fundación de Alcorcón
Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
Hospital Puerta de Hierro
Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
Hospital Santa Lucía
Cartagena, Murcia, Spain
Hospital Virgen de Arrixaca
El Palmar, Murcia, Murcia, Spain
Hospital de Cabueñes
Gijón, Principality of Asturias, Spain
Hospital General de Alicante
Alicante, Valencia, Spain
Hospital Clínico Universitario Valencia
Valencia, Valencia, Spain
Hospital La fe
Valencia, Valencia, Spain
Hospital Gregorio marañon
Madrid, , Spain
Hospital Ramon y Cajal
Madrid, , Spain
Complejo Universitario de San Carlos
Madrid, , Spain
Hospital Universitario La paz
Madrid, , Spain
Hospital Dr peset
Valencia, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CEL-MIE-2012-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.