Immune Lot Consistency, Immunogenicity, and Safety of an Investigational Quadrivalent Meningococcal Conjugate Vaccine

NCT ID: NCT02842853

Last Updated: 2022-04-05

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

3344 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-07-15

Study Completion Date

2017-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate immune lot consistency of Meningococcal Polysaccharide (Serogroups A, C, Y and W) Tetanus Toxoid (MenACYW) Conjugate vaccine and the immune non-inferiority compared to the licensed vaccine Menactra®, and describe the safety and additional immunogenicity of these study vaccines in adolescents and adults 10 to 55 years of age in the United States (US).

Primary Objectives:

* To demonstrate the immune lot consistency of the antibody responses to meningococcal serogroups A, C, Y, and W following the administration of a single dose of MenACYW Conjugate vaccine with respect to serum bactericidal assay using human complement (hSBA) geometric mean titers (GMTs).
* To demonstrate the non-inferiority of the antibody responses to meningococcal serogroups A, C, Y, and W following the administration of a single dose of MenACYW Conjugate vaccine (pooled Lots 1 to 3) compared to those observed following the administration of a single dose of Menactra®.

Secondary Objective:

* To demonstrate the non-inferiority of the antibody responses to meningococcal serogroups A, C, Y, and W following the administration of a single dose of MenACYW Conjugate vaccine (pooled Lots 1 to 3) compared to those observed following the administration of a single dose of Menactra® in the adult population (18 to 55 years old).
* To demonstrate the non-inferiority of the antibody responses to meningococcal serogroups A, C, Y, and W following the administration of a single dose of MenACYW Conjugate vaccine (pooled Lots 1 to 3) compared to those observed following the administration of a single dose of Menactra® in the adolescent population (10 to 17 years old).
* To compare the hSBA vaccine seroresponses of meningococcal serogroups A, C, Y, and W for each of 3 lots of MenACYW Conjugate vaccine 30 days (+14 days) after vaccination.
* To compare the hSBA antibody GMTs of meningococcal serogroups A, C, Y, and W following the administration of MenACYW Conjugate vaccine to those observed following the administration of Menactra®.

Observational Objectives:

* To describe the safety profile of MenACYW Conjugate vaccine and that of the licensed Menactra®.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Healthy meningococcal-vaccine naïve adolescents and adults were randomized and received a single dose of either MenACYW Conjugate vaccine from 1 of the 3 lots (Lot 1, Lot 2, or Lot 3) or Menactra®. They were assessed for immunogenicity at baseline (pre-vaccination) and at 30 to 44 days post-vaccination. Safety information were collected post-vaccination and throughout the entire study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Meningitis Meningococcal Meningitis Meningococcal Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine Lot 1

Healthy, meningococcal-vaccine naive adolescents aged 10 to 17 years (Group 1a) and adults aged 18 to 55 years (Group 1b) received a single dose of MenACYW conjugate vaccine from lot 1 on Day 0.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Meningococcal Polysaccharide (Serogroups A, C, Y, and W) Tetanus Toxoid Conjugate Vaccine

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

0.5 mL, Intramuscular

MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine Lot 2

Healthy, meningococcal-vaccine naive adolescents aged 10 to 17 years (Group 2a) and adults aged 18 to 55 years (Group 2b) received a single dose of MenACYW conjugate vaccine from lot 2 on Day 0.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Meningococcal Polysaccharide (Serogroups A, C, Y, and W) Tetanus Toxoid Conjugate Vaccine

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

0.5 mL, Intramuscular

MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine Lot 3

Healthy, meningococcal-vaccine naive adolescents aged 10 to 17 years (Group 3a) and adults aged 18 to 55 years (Group 3b) received a single dose of MenACYW conjugate vaccine from lot 3 on Day 0.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Meningococcal Polysaccharide (Serogroups A, C, Y, and W) Tetanus Toxoid Conjugate Vaccine

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

0.5 mL, Intramuscular

Menactra®

Healthy, meningococcal-vaccine naive adolescents aged 10 to 17 years (Group 4a) and adults aged 18 to 55 years (Group 4b) received a single dose of Menactra® on Day 0.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Meningococcal (Groups A, C, Y and W-135) Polysaccharide Diphtheria Toxoid Conjugate Vaccine

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

0.5 mL, Intramuscular

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Meningococcal Polysaccharide (Serogroups A, C, Y, and W) Tetanus Toxoid Conjugate Vaccine

0.5 mL, Intramuscular

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Meningococcal (Groups A, C, Y and W-135) Polysaccharide Diphtheria Toxoid Conjugate Vaccine

0.5 mL, Intramuscular

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

MenACYW conjugate vaccine Menactra®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aged 10 to 55 years on the day of inclusion.
* Informed consent form was signed and dated by the participant (aged 18 to 55 years) or assent form was signed and dated by the participant and informed consent form was signed and dated by the parent(s) or guardian (for participants aged 10 to \< 18 years).
* Participant (\>= 18 years) or participant (10 to \< 18 years) and parent / guardian were able to attend all scheduled visits and comply with all trial procedures.

Exclusion Criteria

* Participant was pregnant, or lactating, or of childbearing potential (to be considered of non-childbearing potential, a female must have been pre-menarche or post-menopausal for at least 1 year, surgically sterile, or using an effective method of contraception or abstinence from at least 4 weeks prior to vaccination until at least 4 weeks after vaccination).
* Participation in the 4 weeks preceding the trial vaccination or planned participation during the present trial period in another clinical trial investigating a vaccine, drug, medical device, or medical procedure.
* Receipt of any vaccine in the 4 weeks (28 days) preceding the trial vaccination or planned receipt of any vaccine prior to Visit 2 except for influenza vaccination, which may be received at least 2 weeks before or after the study investigational vaccines. This exception includes monovalent pandemic influenza vaccines and multivalent influenza vaccines.
* Previous vaccination against meningococcal disease with either the trial vaccine or another vaccine (i.e., mono- or polyvalent, polysaccharide, or conjugate meningococcal vaccine containing serogroups A, C, Y, or W; or meningococcal B vaccine).
* Receipt of immune globulins, blood or blood-derived products in the past 3 months.
* Known or suspected congenital or acquired immunodeficiency; or receipt of immunosuppressive therapy, such as anti-cancer chemotherapy or radiation therapy, within the preceding 6 months; or long-term systemic corticosteroid therapy (prednisone or equivalent for more than 2 consecutive weeks within the past 3 months).
* History of meningococcal infection, confirmed either clinically, serologically, or microbiologically.
* At high risk for meningococcal infection during the trial (specifically, but not limited to, participants with persistent complement deficiency, with anatomic or functional asplenia, or participants traveling to countries with high endemic or epidemic disease).
* Known systemic hypersensitivity to any of the vaccine components, or history of a life-threatening reaction to the vaccines used in the trial or to a vaccine containing any of the same substances.
* Verbal report of thrombocytopenia, as reported by the participant or the participant's parent / guardian, contraindicating intramuscular vaccination in the Investigator's opinion.
* Bleeding disorder, or receipt of anticoagulants in the 3 weeks preceding inclusion, contraindicating intramuscular vaccination in the Investigator's opinion.
* Personal history of Guillain-Barre syndrome.
* Personal history of an Arthus-like reaction after vaccination with a tetanus toxoid-containing vaccine within 10 years of the proposed study vaccination.
* Deprived of freedom by an administrative or court order, or in an emergency setting, or hospitalized involuntarily.
* Current alcohol abuse or drug addiction.
* Chronic illness that, in the opinion of the Investigator, was at a stage where it might interfere with trial conduct or completion.
* Moderate or severe acute illness/infection (according to Investigator judgment) on the day of vaccination or febrile illness (temperature \>= 100.4 degree Fahrenheit \[°F\]). A prospective participant was not be included in the study until the condition was resolved or the febrile event had subsided.
* Receipt of oral or injectable antibiotic therapy within 72 hours prior to the first blood draw.
* Identified as an Investigator or employee of the Investigator or study center with direct involvement in the proposed study, or identified as an immediate family member (i.e., parent, spouse, natural or adopted child) of the Investigator or employee with direct involvement in the proposed study.
Minimum Eligible Age

10 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sanofi Pasteur, a Sanofi Company

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Medical Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Sanofi Pasteur Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Dothan, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Glendale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Harrisburg, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Downey, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Paramount, California, United States

Site Status

Redding, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Rosa, California, United States

Site Status

Upland, California, United States

Site Status

West Covina, California, United States

Site Status

Littleton, Colorado, United States

Site Status

DeLand, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

South Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Savannah, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Meridian, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Council Bluffs, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Lenexa, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Newton, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Park City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Bardstown, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Metairie, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Bridgeton, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Salisbury, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Corvallis, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Grants Pass, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Erie, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Hermitage, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

McMurray, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Upper Saint Clair, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Warwick, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Tullahoma, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Corpus Christi, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Waxahachie, Texas, United States

Site Status

Draper, Utah, United States

Site Status

Layton, Utah, United States

Site Status

Murray, Utah, United States

Site Status

Orem, Utah, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

South Jordan, Utah, United States

Site Status

West Jordan, Utah, United States

Site Status

West Jordan, Utah, United States

Site Status

Burke, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Midlothian, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U1111-1161-3060

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

MET43

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.