Trial Outcomes & Findings for Fluid Responsiveness Evaluation in Sepsis-associated Hypotension (NCT NCT02837731)
NCT ID: NCT02837731
Last Updated: 2020-12-03
Results Overview
Fluid balance is defined as all intravenous fluids administered over a 72 hour period (or ICU discharge, whichever occurred first), minus all fluid output. Urine output was measured in the ICU in 12 hour increments.
COMPLETED
NA
150 participants
72 hours
2020-12-03
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Treatment Starling SV Monitor
During Allocation phase, randomization was a 2:1 allocation of SV-guided to usual care. Subjects that didn't complete Follow-up phase are those that (1) show data that indicates unacceptable bias in the measurements, (2) data collection is interrupted prior to 72 hour data collection period of ICU stay, or (3) severe agitation and/or cardiopulmonary resuscitations resulted in poor quality data. Subjects completed follow-up were included in the Analysis.
|
Usual Care
During Allocation phase, randomization was a 2:1 allocation of SV-guided to usual care. Subjects that didn't complete Follow-up phase are those that (1) show data that indicates unacceptable bias in the measurements, (2) data collection is interrupted prior to 72 hour data collection period of ICU stay, or (3) severe agitation and/or cardiopulmonary resuscitations resulted in poor quality data. Subjects completed follow-up were included in the Analysis.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Allocation
STARTED
|
102
|
48
|
|
Allocation
COMPLETED
|
83
|
41
|
|
Allocation
NOT COMPLETED
|
19
|
7
|
|
Follow-up
STARTED
|
83
|
41
|
|
Follow-up
COMPLETED
|
83
|
41
|
|
Follow-up
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Analysis
STARTED
|
83
|
41
|
|
Analysis
COMPLETED
|
83
|
41
|
|
Analysis
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Treatment Starling SV Monitor
During Allocation phase, randomization was a 2:1 allocation of SV-guided to usual care. Subjects that didn't complete Follow-up phase are those that (1) show data that indicates unacceptable bias in the measurements, (2) data collection is interrupted prior to 72 hour data collection period of ICU stay, or (3) severe agitation and/or cardiopulmonary resuscitations resulted in poor quality data. Subjects completed follow-up were included in the Analysis.
|
Usual Care
During Allocation phase, randomization was a 2:1 allocation of SV-guided to usual care. Subjects that didn't complete Follow-up phase are those that (1) show data that indicates unacceptable bias in the measurements, (2) data collection is interrupted prior to 72 hour data collection period of ICU stay, or (3) severe agitation and/or cardiopulmonary resuscitations resulted in poor quality data. Subjects completed follow-up were included in the Analysis.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Allocation
Admitted to General Floor
|
3
|
4
|
|
Allocation
Immediate surgery/withdrew
|
2
|
0
|
|
Allocation
Diabetic Ketoacidosis/withdrew
|
1
|
0
|
|
Allocation
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
0
|
|
Allocation
Device not available
|
1
|
0
|
|
Allocation
Protocol not implemented
|
7
|
0
|
|
Allocation
Moribund/Do not resuscitate
|
2
|
0
|
|
Allocation
Did not meet sepsis criteria
|
1
|
2
|
|
Allocation
Known aortic abnormalities
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Fluid Responsiveness Evaluation in Sepsis-associated Hypotension
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Treatment Starling SV Monitor
n=83 Participants
A dynamic assessment of fluid responsiveness using the Starling SV monitor will be performed at every clinical decision point for the first 72 hours of study enrollment. Examples of a clinical decision point include a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of \< 65, the decision to give additional fluid volume, and the decision to either escalate or wean vasopressors. Fluid responsiveness will be assessed using a passive leg raise (PLR) and Starling SV hemodynamic monitor to guide corresponding treatment.
|
Usual Care
n=41 Participants
No required therapeutic protocol will be used for patient treatment, and is determined per the discretion of the physician and hospital standards.
|
Total
n=124 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
61.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.9 • n=5 Participants
|
62.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15 • n=7 Participants
|
62.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.24 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
51 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
64 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
61 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
92 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 72 hoursPopulation: mITT population was predefined as including all patients who signed consent, met study eligibility criteria, were randomized and received monitoring for 72 hours or ICU discharge if earlier. mITT (n=83,41).
Fluid balance is defined as all intravenous fluids administered over a 72 hour period (or ICU discharge, whichever occurred first), minus all fluid output. Urine output was measured in the ICU in 12 hour increments.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment Starling SV Monitor
n=83 Participants
A dynamic assessment of fluid responsiveness using the Starling SV monitor will be performed at every clinical decision point for the first 72 hours of study enrollment. Examples of a clinical decision point include a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of \< 65, the decision to give additional fluid volume, and the decision to either escalate or wean vasopressors. Fluid responsiveness will be assessed using a passive leg raise (PLR) and Starling SV hemodynamic monitor to guide corresponding treatment.
|
Usual Care
n=41 Participants
No required therapeutic protocol will be used for patient treatment, and is determined per the discretion of the physician and hospital standards.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Fluid Balance
|
0.65 Liters
Standard Deviation 2.85
|
2.02 Liters
Standard Deviation 3.44
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 to Day 30Population: mITT
Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is therapy that replaces the normal blood-filtering function of the kidneys. It is used when the kidneys are not working well, which is called kidney failure and includes acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease. Patient receives new treatment with dialysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment Starling SV Monitor
n=79 Participants
A dynamic assessment of fluid responsiveness using the Starling SV monitor will be performed at every clinical decision point for the first 72 hours of study enrollment. Examples of a clinical decision point include a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of \< 65, the decision to give additional fluid volume, and the decision to either escalate or wean vasopressors. Fluid responsiveness will be assessed using a passive leg raise (PLR) and Starling SV hemodynamic monitor to guide corresponding treatment.
|
Usual Care
n=40 Participants
No required therapeutic protocol will be used for patient treatment, and is determined per the discretion of the physician and hospital standards.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Requiring Renal Replacement Therapy
|
5.1 percentage of participants
|
17.5 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 to Day 30Population: mITT
Patients did not enter the study on ventilation, but required ventilator use during the study are included in the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment Starling SV Monitor
n=79 Participants
A dynamic assessment of fluid responsiveness using the Starling SV monitor will be performed at every clinical decision point for the first 72 hours of study enrollment. Examples of a clinical decision point include a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of \< 65, the decision to give additional fluid volume, and the decision to either escalate or wean vasopressors. Fluid responsiveness will be assessed using a passive leg raise (PLR) and Starling SV hemodynamic monitor to guide corresponding treatment.
|
Usual Care
n=41 Participants
No required therapeutic protocol will be used for patient treatment, and is determined per the discretion of the physician and hospital standards.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Requiring Ventilator Use
|
17.7 percentage of participants
|
34.1 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 to Day 30Population: mITT
Intensive Car Unit (ICU) length of stay will be calculated using the earliest of date that the subject is medically ready for discharge when captured, the date of discharge, or the study exit date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment Starling SV Monitor
n=74 Participants
A dynamic assessment of fluid responsiveness using the Starling SV monitor will be performed at every clinical decision point for the first 72 hours of study enrollment. Examples of a clinical decision point include a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of \< 65, the decision to give additional fluid volume, and the decision to either escalate or wean vasopressors. Fluid responsiveness will be assessed using a passive leg raise (PLR) and Starling SV hemodynamic monitor to guide corresponding treatment.
|
Usual Care
n=35 Participants
No required therapeutic protocol will be used for patient treatment, and is determined per the discretion of the physician and hospital standards.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Length of ICU Stay
|
3.31 days
Standard Deviation 3.51
|
6.22 days
Standard Deviation 10.72
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 to Day 30Population: mITT
Patients that did not enter the study on ventilation, but required ventilator use during the study are included in the analysis.Ventilator use might have improved (less use of ventilator support), had no change, or worsened (more use of ventilator support).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment Starling SV Monitor
n=14 Participants
A dynamic assessment of fluid responsiveness using the Starling SV monitor will be performed at every clinical decision point for the first 72 hours of study enrollment. Examples of a clinical decision point include a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of \< 65, the decision to give additional fluid volume, and the decision to either escalate or wean vasopressors. Fluid responsiveness will be assessed using a passive leg raise (PLR) and Starling SV hemodynamic monitor to guide corresponding treatment.
|
Usual Care
n=14 Participants
No required therapeutic protocol will be used for patient treatment, and is determined per the discretion of the physician and hospital standards.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Hours of Ventilator Use
|
46.99 hours
Standard Deviation 52.33
|
119.42 hours
Standard Deviation 134.90
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 to Day 30Population: mITT
Vasopressor drugs are provided to restore and maintain blood pressure in patients with septic shock. Patients that have vasopressors initiated throughout the trial are included in this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment Starling SV Monitor
n=55 Participants
A dynamic assessment of fluid responsiveness using the Starling SV monitor will be performed at every clinical decision point for the first 72 hours of study enrollment. Examples of a clinical decision point include a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of \< 65, the decision to give additional fluid volume, and the decision to either escalate or wean vasopressors. Fluid responsiveness will be assessed using a passive leg raise (PLR) and Starling SV hemodynamic monitor to guide corresponding treatment.
|
Usual Care
n=26 Participants
No required therapeutic protocol will be used for patient treatment, and is determined per the discretion of the physician and hospital standards.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Hours of Vasopressor Use
|
40.74 hours
Standard Deviation 51.23
|
55.64 hours
Standard Deviation 87.42
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 72 hoursPopulation: mITT
The diagnosis of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) is traditionally based on a rise in serum creatinine
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment Starling SV Monitor
n=79 Participants
A dynamic assessment of fluid responsiveness using the Starling SV monitor will be performed at every clinical decision point for the first 72 hours of study enrollment. Examples of a clinical decision point include a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of \< 65, the decision to give additional fluid volume, and the decision to either escalate or wean vasopressors. Fluid responsiveness will be assessed using a passive leg raise (PLR) and Starling SV hemodynamic monitor to guide corresponding treatment.
|
Usual Care
n=34 Participants
No required therapeutic protocol will be used for patient treatment, and is determined per the discretion of the physician and hospital standards.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Serum Creatinine Levels at 72 Hours
|
0.13 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
0.04 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 72 hoursPopulation: mITT
Traditional methods of assessing fluid responsiveness (FR) such as vital signs, physical examination, and static measurements of circulatory pressure have shown not to reliably correlate with fluid responsiveness. In contrast, dynamic measurement of stroke volume (SV) following an intravenous (IV) fluid bolus or passive leg raise (PLR) is a safe and feasible method of rapidly assessing the effectiveness of fluid-induced augmentation of SV and cardiac output (CO). Mean volume of treatment fluid Administered (ml) at 72 hours or ICU discharge, whichever occurs first, between the two treatment groups
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment Starling SV Monitor
n=83 Participants
A dynamic assessment of fluid responsiveness using the Starling SV monitor will be performed at every clinical decision point for the first 72 hours of study enrollment. Examples of a clinical decision point include a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of \< 65, the decision to give additional fluid volume, and the decision to either escalate or wean vasopressors. Fluid responsiveness will be assessed using a passive leg raise (PLR) and Starling SV hemodynamic monitor to guide corresponding treatment.
|
Usual Care
n=41 Participants
No required therapeutic protocol will be used for patient treatment, and is determined per the discretion of the physician and hospital standards.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Volume of Fluid
|
5759.2 ml
Standard Deviation 2246.8
|
6865.5 ml
Standard Deviation 3348.5
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 to Day 30Population: mITT
Incidence of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment Starling SV Monitor
n=83 Participants
A dynamic assessment of fluid responsiveness using the Starling SV monitor will be performed at every clinical decision point for the first 72 hours of study enrollment. Examples of a clinical decision point include a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of \< 65, the decision to give additional fluid volume, and the decision to either escalate or wean vasopressors. Fluid responsiveness will be assessed using a passive leg raise (PLR) and Starling SV hemodynamic monitor to guide corresponding treatment.
|
Usual Care
n=41 Participants
No required therapeutic protocol will be used for patient treatment, and is determined per the discretion of the physician and hospital standards.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)
|
6 percentage of participants
|
12.2 percentage of participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 to Day 30Population: ITT-all randomized.
Adverse events associated with the treatment procedure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment Starling SV Monitor
n=102 Participants
A dynamic assessment of fluid responsiveness using the Starling SV monitor will be performed at every clinical decision point for the first 72 hours of study enrollment. Examples of a clinical decision point include a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of \< 65, the decision to give additional fluid volume, and the decision to either escalate or wean vasopressors. Fluid responsiveness will be assessed using a passive leg raise (PLR) and Starling SV hemodynamic monitor to guide corresponding treatment.
|
Usual Care
n=48 Participants
No required therapeutic protocol will be used for patient treatment, and is determined per the discretion of the physician and hospital standards.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE) Related to Study Device
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 to Day 30Population: mITT
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment Starling SV Monitor
n=83 Participants
A dynamic assessment of fluid responsiveness using the Starling SV monitor will be performed at every clinical decision point for the first 72 hours of study enrollment. Examples of a clinical decision point include a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of \< 65, the decision to give additional fluid volume, and the decision to either escalate or wean vasopressors. Fluid responsiveness will be assessed using a passive leg raise (PLR) and Starling SV hemodynamic monitor to guide corresponding treatment.
|
Usual Care
n=41 Participants
No required therapeutic protocol will be used for patient treatment, and is determined per the discretion of the physician and hospital standards.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Hospital Discharge Without ICU Readmission
|
94.9 percentage of participants
|
97.8 percentage of participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 to Day 30Population: mITT
Incidence of death.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment Starling SV Monitor
n=83 Participants
A dynamic assessment of fluid responsiveness using the Starling SV monitor will be performed at every clinical decision point for the first 72 hours of study enrollment. Examples of a clinical decision point include a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of \< 65, the decision to give additional fluid volume, and the decision to either escalate or wean vasopressors. Fluid responsiveness will be assessed using a passive leg raise (PLR) and Starling SV hemodynamic monitor to guide corresponding treatment.
|
Usual Care
n=41 Participants
No required therapeutic protocol will be used for patient treatment, and is determined per the discretion of the physician and hospital standards.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Within Overall 30 Day Mortality Rate
|
15.7 percentage of participants
|
22 percentage of participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 to Day 30Population: mITT
Patient location (either "home" or "other") following hospital discharge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment Starling SV Monitor
n=83 Participants
A dynamic assessment of fluid responsiveness using the Starling SV monitor will be performed at every clinical decision point for the first 72 hours of study enrollment. Examples of a clinical decision point include a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of \< 65, the decision to give additional fluid volume, and the decision to either escalate or wean vasopressors. Fluid responsiveness will be assessed using a passive leg raise (PLR) and Starling SV hemodynamic monitor to guide corresponding treatment.
|
Usual Care
n=41 Participants
No required therapeutic protocol will be used for patient treatment, and is determined per the discretion of the physician and hospital standards.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants by Hospital Discharge Location
Home
|
53 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Hospital Discharge Location
Other
|
30 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Treatment Starling SV Monitor
Usual Care
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Treatment Starling SV Monitor
n=102 participants at risk
A dynamic assessment of fluid responsiveness using the Starling SV monitor will be performed at every clinical decision point for the first 72 hours of study enrollment. Examples of a clinical decision point include a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of \< 65, the decision to give additional fluid volume, and the decision to either escalate or wean vasopressors. Fluid responsiveness will be assessed using a passive leg raise (PLR) and Starling SV hemodynamic monitor to guide corresponding treatment.
|
Usual Care
n=48 participants at risk
No required therapeutic protocol will be used for patient treatment, and is determined per the discretion of the physician and hospital standards.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac Arrest
|
2.9%
3/102 • Number of events 3 • Day 1 to Day 30
It was not pre-specified in the Study Protocol to collect Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events. For Mortality and SAE, safety analyses were performed on randomized (ITT) population.
|
6.2%
3/48 • Number of events 3 • Day 1 to Day 30
It was not pre-specified in the Study Protocol to collect Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events. For Mortality and SAE, safety analyses were performed on randomized (ITT) population.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Intubation/respiratory distress
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 30
It was not pre-specified in the Study Protocol to collect Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events. For Mortality and SAE, safety analyses were performed on randomized (ITT) population.
|
0.00%
0/48 • Day 1 to Day 30
It was not pre-specified in the Study Protocol to collect Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events. For Mortality and SAE, safety analyses were performed on randomized (ITT) population.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Severe septic shock and transition to comfort care
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 30
It was not pre-specified in the Study Protocol to collect Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events. For Mortality and SAE, safety analyses were performed on randomized (ITT) population.
|
0.00%
0/48 • Day 1 to Day 30
It was not pre-specified in the Study Protocol to collect Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events. For Mortality and SAE, safety analyses were performed on randomized (ITT) population.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Intubation and ards
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 30
It was not pre-specified in the Study Protocol to collect Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events. For Mortality and SAE, safety analyses were performed on randomized (ITT) population.
|
0.00%
0/48 • Day 1 to Day 30
It was not pre-specified in the Study Protocol to collect Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events. For Mortality and SAE, safety analyses were performed on randomized (ITT) population.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary edema
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 30
It was not pre-specified in the Study Protocol to collect Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events. For Mortality and SAE, safety analyses were performed on randomized (ITT) population.
|
0.00%
0/48 • Day 1 to Day 30
It was not pre-specified in the Study Protocol to collect Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events. For Mortality and SAE, safety analyses were performed on randomized (ITT) population.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 30
It was not pre-specified in the Study Protocol to collect Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events. For Mortality and SAE, safety analyses were performed on randomized (ITT) population.
|
2.1%
1/48 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 30
It was not pre-specified in the Study Protocol to collect Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events. For Mortality and SAE, safety analyses were performed on randomized (ITT) population.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Intubation and surgery
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 30
It was not pre-specified in the Study Protocol to collect Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events. For Mortality and SAE, safety analyses were performed on randomized (ITT) population.
|
0.00%
0/48 • Day 1 to Day 30
It was not pre-specified in the Study Protocol to collect Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events. For Mortality and SAE, safety analyses were performed on randomized (ITT) population.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypoxic Respiratory Failure
|
0.00%
0/102 • Day 1 to Day 30
It was not pre-specified in the Study Protocol to collect Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events. For Mortality and SAE, safety analyses were performed on randomized (ITT) population.
|
2.1%
1/48 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 30
It was not pre-specified in the Study Protocol to collect Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events. For Mortality and SAE, safety analyses were performed on randomized (ITT) population.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory distress requiring intubation and transfer to ICU
|
0.00%
0/102 • Day 1 to Day 30
It was not pre-specified in the Study Protocol to collect Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events. For Mortality and SAE, safety analyses were performed on randomized (ITT) population.
|
2.1%
1/48 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 30
It was not pre-specified in the Study Protocol to collect Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events. For Mortality and SAE, safety analyses were performed on randomized (ITT) population.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Multiorgan Failure
|
0.00%
0/102 • Day 1 to Day 30
It was not pre-specified in the Study Protocol to collect Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events. For Mortality and SAE, safety analyses were performed on randomized (ITT) population.
|
2.1%
1/48 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 30
It was not pre-specified in the Study Protocol to collect Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events. For Mortality and SAE, safety analyses were performed on randomized (ITT) population.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin tear and possible infection related to the monitor leads
|
0.98%
1/102 • Number of events 1 • Day 1 to Day 30
It was not pre-specified in the Study Protocol to collect Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events. For Mortality and SAE, safety analyses were performed on randomized (ITT) population.
|
0.00%
0/48 • Day 1 to Day 30
It was not pre-specified in the Study Protocol to collect Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events. For Mortality and SAE, safety analyses were performed on randomized (ITT) population.
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Baxter Clinical Trials Disclosure Call Center
Baxter Healthcare
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Specifics of the publication policy will be outlined to the Investigator in the Clinical Trial Research Agreement.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER