Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
200 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-05-31
2020-12-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Optimal imaging to guide tissue sampling is pivotal. PET-CT has higher sensitivity than conventional CT for detecting malignant lesions \>10mm. However, no randomised trial has investigated differences in diagnostic accuracy, time-to-diagnosis, or economics. Falsely PET-positive lesions in e.g. colon however, lead to more derived tests than do CT alone.
Gold standard for pleural tissue sampling is the surgical (VATS) thoracoscopy, allowing direct visual guiding of tissue sampling from all pleural surfaces. Yet, globally the medical (pleuroscopy) thoracoscopy is more widely used: cheaper, outpatient procedure, but allows only sampling from the parietal pleura. To date, no randomised studies have compared medical and surgical thoracoscopy concerning diagnostic hit rates, adverse events, or economics.
The investigators will perform two randomized studies to investigate whether
1. PET/CT is comparable to CT alone
2. VATS is comparable to pleuroscopy concerning hit rate, total investigations performed, time-to-diagnosis.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Rational Approach to a Unilateral Pleural Effusion
NCT03272087
The Added Value of CT Scanning in Patients With an Unilateral Pleural Effusion
NCT03270215
A Randomised Study Evaluating Diagnostics of Pleural Effusion Among Patients Suspect of Cancer.
NCT04233359
Ultrasound-guided Biopsy of the Pleura as a Supplement to Extraction of Fluid in Patients With One-sided Fluid in the Pleura
NCT04236037
Using Pleural Effusions to Diagnose Cancer
NCT03319472
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CE-CT scanning
Contrast-enhanced CT scan of the thorax and abdomen.
Contrast-enhanced CT
50% of patients with unilateral pleural effusion will have performed a CE-CT
PET-CT scanning
Positron-emission-CT scanning (low dose without contrast) of the thorax and abdomen.
PET-CT
50% of patients with unilateral pleural effusion will have performed a PET-CT
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Contrast-enhanced CT
50% of patients with unilateral pleural effusion will have performed a CE-CT
PET-CT
50% of patients with unilateral pleural effusion will have performed a PET-CT
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Indication for thoracoscopy according to BTS guidelines.
3. Patients accept further investigation according to Danish and BTS guidelines.
4. Have received oral and written consent and agreed.
5. At the time of inclusion, above 18 years of age.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Lack of language comprehension.
3. Legally incompetent patients.
4. Life expectancy less than 3 month.
5. Contraindications to pleural tissue sampling.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Simon Reuter
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Simon Reuter
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Naestved Sygehus
Næstved, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Resp-REPEAT-SIRE
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.