Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study of Quizartinib in Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) (NCT NCT02834390)
NCT ID: NCT02834390
Last Updated: 2025-03-05
Results Overview
Best response was defined as the best measured complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete hematological recovery (CRi), CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp), Partial remission (PR), or No response (NR) in the overall response assessments at all time points after the first dose. CR is defined as absence of leukemia cells morphologically; bone marrow blasts \<5 %; neutrophil count ≥ 1000 /mm 3; platelet count ≥ 100 ,000 /mm 3, independence of RBC transfusions for 4 weeks; independence of platelet transfusions for 1 week; absence of extramedullary leukemia.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
7 participants
Day 0 to Day 21 of last completed cycle (each cycle 28 days), up to approximately 1 year
2025-03-05
Participant Flow
A total of 7 participants who met all inclusion and no exclusion criteria were enrolled and received treatment in the study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Quizartinib 20 mg/Day
Participants who received 20 mg quizartinib once daily in the morning under fasting conditions.
For the Induction phase, cytarabine (100 mg/m\^2/day IV) and either idarubicin (12 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion) or daunorubicin (60 mg/m\^2/day IV) were co-administered with quizartinib.
For the Consolidation phase, cytarabine (3.0 g/m\^2/12 hours IV) was co-administered with quizartinib.
|
Quizartinib 40 mg/Day
Participants who received 40 mg/day quizartinib once daily in the morning under fasting conditions.
For the Induction phase, cytarabine (100 mg/m\^2/day IV) and either idarubicin (12 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion) or daunorubicin (60 mg/m\^2/day IV) were co-administered with quizartinib.
For the Consolidation phase, cytarabine (3.0 g/m\^2/12 hours IV) was co-administered with quizartinib.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Induction Phase
STARTED
|
4
|
3
|
|
Induction Phase
COMPLETED
|
2
|
1
|
|
Induction Phase
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
2
|
|
Consolidation Phase
STARTED
|
2
|
1
|
|
Consolidation Phase
COMPLETED
|
1
|
0
|
|
Consolidation Phase
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Quizartinib 20 mg/Day
Participants who received 20 mg quizartinib once daily in the morning under fasting conditions.
For the Induction phase, cytarabine (100 mg/m\^2/day IV) and either idarubicin (12 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion) or daunorubicin (60 mg/m\^2/day IV) were co-administered with quizartinib.
For the Consolidation phase, cytarabine (3.0 g/m\^2/12 hours IV) was co-administered with quizartinib.
|
Quizartinib 40 mg/Day
Participants who received 40 mg/day quizartinib once daily in the morning under fasting conditions.
For the Induction phase, cytarabine (100 mg/m\^2/day IV) and either idarubicin (12 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion) or daunorubicin (60 mg/m\^2/day IV) were co-administered with quizartinib.
For the Consolidation phase, cytarabine (3.0 g/m\^2/12 hours IV) was co-administered with quizartinib.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Induction Phase
Progressive disease
|
0
|
1
|
|
Induction Phase
CR, CRp, or CRi not achieved (Induction Cycle 2)
|
2
|
0
|
|
Induction Phase
Relapse after CR, CRp, or CRi
|
0
|
1
|
|
Consolidation Phase
Physician Decision
|
1
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study of Quizartinib in Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Quizartinib 20 mg/Day
n=4 Participants
Participants who received 20 mg quizartinib once daily in the morning under fasting conditions.
For the Induction phase, cytarabine (100 mg/m\^2/day IV) and either idarubicin (12 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion) or daunorubicin (60 mg/m\^2/day IV) were co-administered with quizartinib.
For the Consolidation phase, cytarabine (3.0 g/m\^2/12 hours IV) was co-administered with quizartinib.
|
Quizartinib 40 mg/Day
n=3 Participants
Participants who received 40 mg/day quizartinib once daily in the morning under fasting conditions.
For the Induction phase, cytarabine (100 mg/m\^2/day IV) and either idarubicin (12 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion) or daunorubicin (60 mg/m\^2/day IV) were co-administered with quizartinib.
For the Consolidation phase, cytarabine (3.0 g/m\^2/12 hours IV) was co-administered with quizartinib.
|
Total
n=7 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
57.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5 • n=5 Participants
|
53.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.1 • n=7 Participants
|
55.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Japan
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 0 to Day 21 of last completed cycle (each cycle 28 days), up to approximately 1 yearPopulation: Best response was assessed in the Efficacy Analysis Set.
Best response was defined as the best measured complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete hematological recovery (CRi), CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp), Partial remission (PR), or No response (NR) in the overall response assessments at all time points after the first dose. CR is defined as absence of leukemia cells morphologically; bone marrow blasts \<5 %; neutrophil count ≥ 1000 /mm 3; platelet count ≥ 100 ,000 /mm 3, independence of RBC transfusions for 4 weeks; independence of platelet transfusions for 1 week; absence of extramedullary leukemia.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Quizartinib 20 mg/Day
n=4 Participants
Participants who received 20 mg quizartinib once daily in the morning under fasting conditions.
For the Induction phase, cytarabine (100 mg/m\^2/day IV) and either idarubicin (12 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion) or daunorubicin (60 mg/m\^2/day IV) were co-administered with quizartinib.
For the Consolidation phase, cytarabine (3.0 g/m\^2/12 hours IV) was co-administered with quizartinib.
|
Quizartinib 40 mg/Day
n=3 Participants
Participants who received 40 mg/day quizartinib once daily in the morning under fasting conditions.
For the Induction phase, cytarabine (100 mg/m\^2/day IV) and either idarubicin (12 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion) or daunorubicin (60 mg/m\^2/day IV) were co-administered with quizartinib.
For the Consolidation phase, cytarabine (3.0 g/m\^2/12 hours IV) was co-administered with quizartinib.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Summary of Best Responses After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Participants With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Complete remission (CR)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Summary of Best Responses After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Participants With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Summary of Best Responses After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Participants With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
CR with incomplete hematological recovery (CRi)
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Summary of Best Responses After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Participants With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Partial remission (PR)
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Summary of Best Responses After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Participants With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
No response (NR)
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 0 to Day 21 of last completed cycle (each cycle 28 days), up to approximately 1 yearPopulation: Best response was assessed in the Efficacy Analysis Set.
Best response was defined as the best measured complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete hematological recovery (CRi), CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp), Partial remission (PR), or No response (NR) in the overall response assessments at all time points after the first dose.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Quizartinib 20 mg/Day
n=4 Participants
Participants who received 20 mg quizartinib once daily in the morning under fasting conditions.
For the Induction phase, cytarabine (100 mg/m\^2/day IV) and either idarubicin (12 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion) or daunorubicin (60 mg/m\^2/day IV) were co-administered with quizartinib.
For the Consolidation phase, cytarabine (3.0 g/m\^2/12 hours IV) was co-administered with quizartinib.
|
Quizartinib 40 mg/Day
n=3 Participants
Participants who received 40 mg/day quizartinib once daily in the morning under fasting conditions.
For the Induction phase, cytarabine (100 mg/m\^2/day IV) and either idarubicin (12 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion) or daunorubicin (60 mg/m\^2/day IV) were co-administered with quizartinib.
For the Consolidation phase, cytarabine (3.0 g/m\^2/12 hours IV) was co-administered with quizartinib.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Summary of Best Response Rates After the First Oral Dose of Quizartinib in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Composite CR rate (CRc rate: CR+CRp+CRi)
|
75.0 percentage of participants
Interval 30.1 to 95.4
|
66.7 percentage of participants
Interval 20.8 to 93.9
|
|
Summary of Best Response Rates After the First Oral Dose of Quizartinib in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Response rate (CRc+PR)
|
100 percentage of participants
Interval 51.0 to 100.0
|
66.7 percentage of participants
Interval 20.8 to 93.9
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 8 to Cycle 1, Day 21 (each cycle 28 days)Population: Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed in the Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set.
The maximum serum plasma concentration (Cmax) is reported at Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 9 and the maximum serum plasma concentration at steady state (Cmax,ss) is reported at Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 21 for quizartinib, active metabolite AC886, and quizartinib and AC886.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Quizartinib 20 mg/Day
n=4 Participants
Participants who received 20 mg quizartinib once daily in the morning under fasting conditions.
For the Induction phase, cytarabine (100 mg/m\^2/day IV) and either idarubicin (12 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion) or daunorubicin (60 mg/m\^2/day IV) were co-administered with quizartinib.
For the Consolidation phase, cytarabine (3.0 g/m\^2/12 hours IV) was co-administered with quizartinib.
|
Quizartinib 40 mg/Day
n=3 Participants
Participants who received 40 mg/day quizartinib once daily in the morning under fasting conditions.
For the Induction phase, cytarabine (100 mg/m\^2/day IV) and either idarubicin (12 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion) or daunorubicin (60 mg/m\^2/day IV) were co-administered with quizartinib.
For the Consolidation phase, cytarabine (3.0 g/m\^2/12 hours IV) was co-administered with quizartinib.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Geometric Means of Quizartinib and Active Metabolite (AC886) After Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg Combined With Chemotherapy to Japanese Participants With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Cycle 1, Day 8: Quizartinib, Cmax
|
42.4 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 25.7
|
91.3 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 28.5
|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Geometric Means of Quizartinib and Active Metabolite (AC886) After Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg Combined With Chemotherapy to Japanese Participants With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Cycle 1, Day 8: AC886, Cmax
|
36.5 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 25.4
|
103 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 37.0
|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Geometric Means of Quizartinib and Active Metabolite (AC886) After Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg Combined With Chemotherapy to Japanese Participants With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Cycle 1, Day 8: Quizartinib + AC886, Cmax
|
77.4 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 10.3
|
180 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16.0
|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Geometric Means of Quizartinib and Active Metabolite (AC886) After Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg Combined With Chemotherapy to Japanese Participants With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Cycle 1, Day 21: Quizartinib, Cmax, ss
|
64.2 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 64.0
|
212 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 47.4
|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Geometric Means of Quizartinib and Active Metabolite (AC886) After Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg Combined With Chemotherapy to Japanese Participants With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Cycle 1, Day 21: AC886, Cmax, ss
|
96.7 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 23.7
|
256 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 45.0
|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Geometric Means of Quizartinib and Active Metabolite (AC886) After Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg Combined With Chemotherapy to Japanese Participants With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Cycle 1, Day 21: Quizartinib + AC886, Cmax
|
162 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 35.3
|
480 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 2.4
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 8 to Cycle 1, Day 21 (each cycle 28 days)Population: Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed in the Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set.
The area under the plasma concentration-time curve during dosing interval (AUCtau) of geometric means is reported at Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 9 and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve during dosing interval at steady state (AUCtauss) of geometric means are reported at Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 21 for quizartinib, active metabolite AC886, and quizartinib and AC886.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Quizartinib 20 mg/Day
n=4 Participants
Participants who received 20 mg quizartinib once daily in the morning under fasting conditions.
For the Induction phase, cytarabine (100 mg/m\^2/day IV) and either idarubicin (12 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion) or daunorubicin (60 mg/m\^2/day IV) were co-administered with quizartinib.
For the Consolidation phase, cytarabine (3.0 g/m\^2/12 hours IV) was co-administered with quizartinib.
|
Quizartinib 40 mg/Day
n=3 Participants
Participants who received 40 mg/day quizartinib once daily in the morning under fasting conditions.
For the Induction phase, cytarabine (100 mg/m\^2/day IV) and either idarubicin (12 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion) or daunorubicin (60 mg/m\^2/day IV) were co-administered with quizartinib.
For the Consolidation phase, cytarabine (3.0 g/m\^2/12 hours IV) was co-administered with quizartinib.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve During Dosing Interval of Quizartinib and Metabolite (AC886) After Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg With Chemotherapy to Japanese Participants With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Cycle 1, Day 21: AC886, AUCtau, ss
|
1940 ng*h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 25.4
|
5310 ng*h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 40.6
|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve During Dosing Interval of Quizartinib and Metabolite (AC886) After Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg With Chemotherapy to Japanese Participants With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Cycle 1, Day 21: Quizartinib + AC886, AUCtau
|
3020 ng*h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 42.3
|
8850 ng*h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.3
|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve During Dosing Interval of Quizartinib and Metabolite (AC886) After Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg With Chemotherapy to Japanese Participants With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Cycle 1, Day 8: Quizartinib, AUCtau
|
418 ng*h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 50.4
|
921 ng*h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 31.3
|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve During Dosing Interval of Quizartinib and Metabolite (AC886) After Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg With Chemotherapy to Japanese Participants With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Cycle 1, Day 8: AC886, AUCtau
|
555 ng*h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 28.8
|
1640 ng*h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 24.4
|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve During Dosing Interval of Quizartinib and Metabolite (AC886) After Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg With Chemotherapy to Japanese Participants With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Cycle 1, Day 8: Quizartinib + AC886, AUCtau
|
1010 ng*h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 26.9
|
2640 ng*h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 8.0
|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve During Dosing Interval of Quizartinib and Metabolite (AC886) After Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg With Chemotherapy to Japanese Participants With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Cycle 1, Day 21: Quizartinib, AUCtau,ss
|
991 ng*h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 87.7
|
2940 ng*h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 76.6
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 8 to Cycle 1, Day 21 (each cycle 28 days)Population: Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed in the Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set.
The time of maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) of geometric means is reported at Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 9 and the time of maximum plasma concentration at steady state (Tmax,ss) of geometric means is reported at Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 21 for quizartinib, active metabolite AC886, and quizartinib and AC886.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Quizartinib 20 mg/Day
n=4 Participants
Participants who received 20 mg quizartinib once daily in the morning under fasting conditions.
For the Induction phase, cytarabine (100 mg/m\^2/day IV) and either idarubicin (12 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion) or daunorubicin (60 mg/m\^2/day IV) were co-administered with quizartinib.
For the Consolidation phase, cytarabine (3.0 g/m\^2/12 hours IV) was co-administered with quizartinib.
|
Quizartinib 40 mg/Day
n=3 Participants
Participants who received 40 mg/day quizartinib once daily in the morning under fasting conditions.
For the Induction phase, cytarabine (100 mg/m\^2/day IV) and either idarubicin (12 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion) or daunorubicin (60 mg/m\^2/day IV) were co-administered with quizartinib.
For the Consolidation phase, cytarabine (3.0 g/m\^2/12 hours IV) was co-administered with quizartinib.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Quizartinib and the Active Metabolite (AC886) After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg Combined With Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Cycle 1, Day 8: AC886, Tmax
|
5.01 hour
Interval 2.05 to 6.03
|
6.08 hour
Interval 4.03 to 6.17
|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Quizartinib and the Active Metabolite (AC886) After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg Combined With Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Cycle 1, Day 8: Quizartinib, Tmax
|
3.03 hour
Interval 1.05 to 6.03
|
2.17 hour
Interval 2.07 to 4.17
|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Quizartinib and the Active Metabolite (AC886) After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg Combined With Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Cycle 1, Day 8: Quizartinib + AC886, Tmax
|
4.01 hour
Interval 2.05 to 6.03
|
4.17 hour
Interval 4.03 to 6.17
|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Quizartinib and the Active Metabolite (AC886) After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg Combined With Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Cycle 1, Day 21: Quizartinib, Tmax,ss
|
4.03 hour
Interval 2.03 to 4.13
|
4.08 hour
Interval 4.05 to 4.12
|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Quizartinib and the Active Metabolite (AC886) After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg Combined With Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Cycle 1, Day 21: AC886, Tmax,ss
|
5.02 hour
Interval 2.08 to 5.98
|
6.09 hour
Interval 6.05 to 6.13
|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Quizartinib and the Active Metabolite (AC886) After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg Combined With Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Cycle 1, Day 21: Quizartinib + AC886, Tmax
|
4.03 hour
Interval 2.08 to 5.93
|
4.08 hour
Interval 4.05 to 4.12
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 8 (each cycle 28 days)Population: Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed in the Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set.
The metabolite to parent ratio of geometric means for Cmax and AUCtau is reported at Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 9 for active metabolite AC886 is reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Quizartinib 20 mg/Day
n=4 Participants
Participants who received 20 mg quizartinib once daily in the morning under fasting conditions.
For the Induction phase, cytarabine (100 mg/m\^2/day IV) and either idarubicin (12 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion) or daunorubicin (60 mg/m\^2/day IV) were co-administered with quizartinib.
For the Consolidation phase, cytarabine (3.0 g/m\^2/12 hours IV) was co-administered with quizartinib.
|
Quizartinib 40 mg/Day
n=3 Participants
Participants who received 40 mg/day quizartinib once daily in the morning under fasting conditions.
For the Induction phase, cytarabine (100 mg/m\^2/day IV) and either idarubicin (12 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion) or daunorubicin (60 mg/m\^2/day IV) were co-administered with quizartinib.
For the Consolidation phase, cytarabine (3.0 g/m\^2/12 hours IV) was co-administered with quizartinib.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Metabolite to Parent Ratio (MR) of Active Metabolite (AC886) After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg Combined With Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Cycle 1, Day 8: MR (Cmax)
|
0.861 metabolite to parent ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 43.8
|
1.13 metabolite to parent ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 45.6
|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Metabolite to Parent Ratio (MR) of Active Metabolite (AC886) After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg Combined With Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Cycle 1, Day 8: MR (AUCtau)
|
1.33 metabolite to parent ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 64.1
|
1.78 metabolite to parent ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 56.4
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 21 (each cycle 28 days)Population: Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed in the Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set.
The trough plasma concentration (Ctrough) of geometric means is reported at Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 21 for serum quizartinib, active metabolite AC886, and quizartinib and AC886.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Quizartinib 20 mg/Day
n=4 Participants
Participants who received 20 mg quizartinib once daily in the morning under fasting conditions.
For the Induction phase, cytarabine (100 mg/m\^2/day IV) and either idarubicin (12 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion) or daunorubicin (60 mg/m\^2/day IV) were co-administered with quizartinib.
For the Consolidation phase, cytarabine (3.0 g/m\^2/12 hours IV) was co-administered with quizartinib.
|
Quizartinib 40 mg/Day
n=2 Participants
Participants who received 40 mg/day quizartinib once daily in the morning under fasting conditions.
For the Induction phase, cytarabine (100 mg/m\^2/day IV) and either idarubicin (12 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion) or daunorubicin (60 mg/m\^2/day IV) were co-administered with quizartinib.
For the Consolidation phase, cytarabine (3.0 g/m\^2/12 hours IV) was co-administered with quizartinib.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of Quizartinib and Active Metabolite (AC886) After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg Combined With Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Cycle 1, Day 21: Quizartinib
|
22.7 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 173.4
|
77.1 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 117.6
|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of Quizartinib and Active Metabolite (AC886) After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg Combined With Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Cycle 1, Day 21: AC886
|
68.6 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 49.3
|
195 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 46.1
|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of Quizartinib and Active Metabolite (AC886) After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg Combined With Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Cycle 1, Day 21: Quizartinib + AC886
|
94.6 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 68.5
|
299 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 3.3
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 21 (each cycle 28 days)Population: Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed in the Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set.
The accumulation ratio of geometric means for Cmax and AUCtau is reported at Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 21 for serum quizartinib, active metabolite AC886, and quizartinib and AC886.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Quizartinib 20 mg/Day
n=4 Participants
Participants who received 20 mg quizartinib once daily in the morning under fasting conditions.
For the Induction phase, cytarabine (100 mg/m\^2/day IV) and either idarubicin (12 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion) or daunorubicin (60 mg/m\^2/day IV) were co-administered with quizartinib.
For the Consolidation phase, cytarabine (3.0 g/m\^2/12 hours IV) was co-administered with quizartinib.
|
Quizartinib 40 mg/Day
n=2 Participants
Participants who received 40 mg/day quizartinib once daily in the morning under fasting conditions.
For the Induction phase, cytarabine (100 mg/m\^2/day IV) and either idarubicin (12 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion) or daunorubicin (60 mg/m\^2/day IV) were co-administered with quizartinib.
For the Consolidation phase, cytarabine (3.0 g/m\^2/12 hours IV) was co-administered with quizartinib.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Accumulation Ratio (AR) of Quizartinib and Active Metabolite (AC886) After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg Combined With Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Cycle 1, Day 21: AC886 AR (Cmax)
|
2.65 accumulation ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 46.9
|
2.55 accumulation ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 7.2
|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Accumulation Ratio (AR) of Quizartinib and Active Metabolite (AC886) After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg Combined With Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Cycle 1, Day 21: Quizartinib + AC886 AR (Cmax)
|
2.09 accumulation ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 41.6
|
2.53 accumulation ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16.2
|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Accumulation Ratio (AR) of Quizartinib and Active Metabolite (AC886) After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg Combined With Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Cycle 1, Day 21: Quizartinib AR (AUCtau)
|
2.37 accumulation ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 88.5
|
2.84 accumulation ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 36.2
|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Accumulation Ratio (AR) of Quizartinib and Active Metabolite (AC886) After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg Combined With Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Cycle 1, Day 21: Quizartinib AR (Cmax)
|
1.52 accumulation ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 72.1
|
1.98 accumulation ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 58.5
|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Accumulation Ratio (AR) of Quizartinib and Active Metabolite (AC886) After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg Combined With Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Cycle 1, Day 21: AC886 AR (AUCtau)
|
3.50 accumulation ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 56.2
|
3.31 accumulation ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 5.4
|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Accumulation Ratio (AR) of Quizartinib and Active Metabolite (AC886) After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg Combined With Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Cycle 1, Day 21: Quizartinib + AC886 AR (AUCtau)
|
2.99 accumulation ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 59.5
|
3.24 accumulation ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 6.8
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last dose in Cycle 2 (each cycle 28 days), up to approximately 1 yearPopulation: Adverse events were assessed in the Safety Analysis Set.
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an adverse event (AE) that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and coadministered drugs, or the start date of new AML post-treatment, whichever was earlier.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Quizartinib 20 mg/Day
n=4 Participants
Participants who received 20 mg quizartinib once daily in the morning under fasting conditions.
For the Induction phase, cytarabine (100 mg/m\^2/day IV) and either idarubicin (12 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion) or daunorubicin (60 mg/m\^2/day IV) were co-administered with quizartinib.
For the Consolidation phase, cytarabine (3.0 g/m\^2/12 hours IV) was co-administered with quizartinib.
|
Quizartinib 40 mg/Day
n=3 Participants
Participants who received 40 mg/day quizartinib once daily in the morning under fasting conditions.
For the Induction phase, cytarabine (100 mg/m\^2/day IV) and either idarubicin (12 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion) or daunorubicin (60 mg/m\^2/day IV) were co-administered with quizartinib.
For the Consolidation phase, cytarabine (3.0 g/m\^2/12 hours IV) was co-administered with quizartinib.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Pneumonia
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Skin infection
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Febrile neutropenia
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Anaemia
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Thrombocytopenia
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Immune Disorders
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Hypersensitivity
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Decreased appetite
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Hypoalbuminaemia
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Hypokalaemia
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Hypomagnesaemia
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Hyponatraemia
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Hypouricaemia
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Tumour lysis syndrome
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Nervous System Disorders
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Dysgeusia
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Dizziness
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Eye Disorders
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Hypotension
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Respiratory, Thoracic, and Mediastinal Disorders
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Oropharyngeal pain
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Respiratory disorder
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Nausea
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Constipation
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Diarrhoea
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Cheilitis
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Vomiting
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Pain in extremity
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Renal and Urinary Disorders
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Reproductive System and Breast Disorders
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Menorrhagia
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
General Disorders & Administration Site Conditions
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Oedema peripheral
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Pyrexia
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Investigations
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Platelet count decreased
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Weight decreased
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
White blood cell count decreased
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Aspartate aminotransferase
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Blood bilirubin increased
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Blood pressure decreased
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Participants with TEAEs
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Infections and Infestations
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Staphylococcal bacteraemia
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Blood and Lymphatic System Disorders
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Leukopenia
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Hypophosphataemia
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Hepatic function abnormal
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Alopecia
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Rash
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Rash maculo-papular
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Dermatitis bullous
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Dry skin
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue Disorders
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Arthralgia
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Musculoskeletal pain
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Myalgia
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Haematuria
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Proteinuria
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Urinary tract pain
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Electrocardiogram QT prolonged
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Lipase increased
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Neutropenia
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Photophobia
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Cardiac Disorders
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Palpitations
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Vascular Disorders
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Epistaxis
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Gastrointestinal Disorders
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Abdominal pain upper
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Stomatitis
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Melaena
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Induction Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Hepatobiliary Disorders
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Consolidation phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last dose (each cycle 28 days), up to approximately 1 yearPopulation: Adverse events were assessed in the Safety Analysis Set.
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an adverse event (AE) that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and coadministered drugs, or the start date of new AML post-treatment, whichever was earlier.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Quizartinib 20 mg/Day
n=2 Participants
Participants who received 20 mg quizartinib once daily in the morning under fasting conditions.
For the Induction phase, cytarabine (100 mg/m\^2/day IV) and either idarubicin (12 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion) or daunorubicin (60 mg/m\^2/day IV) were co-administered with quizartinib.
For the Consolidation phase, cytarabine (3.0 g/m\^2/12 hours IV) was co-administered with quizartinib.
|
Quizartinib 40 mg/Day
n=1 Participants
Participants who received 40 mg/day quizartinib once daily in the morning under fasting conditions.
For the Induction phase, cytarabine (100 mg/m\^2/day IV) and either idarubicin (12 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion) or daunorubicin (60 mg/m\^2/day IV) were co-administered with quizartinib.
For the Consolidation phase, cytarabine (3.0 g/m\^2/12 hours IV) was co-administered with quizartinib.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Consolidation Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Participants with TEAEs
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Consolidation Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Skin infection
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Consolidation Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Blood and Lymphatic System Disorders
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Consolidation Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Nervous System Disorders
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Consolidation Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Dysgeusia
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Consolidation Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Gastrointestinal Disorders
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Consolidation Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Diarrhoea
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Consolidation Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Nausea
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Consolidation Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Stomatitis
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Consolidation Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Consolidation Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Rash
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Consolidation Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Rash maculo-papular
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Consolidation Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
General Disorders & Administration Site Conditions
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Consolidation Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Oedema peripheral
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Consolidation Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Investigations
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Consolidation Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
White blood cell count decreased
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Consolidation Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Consolidation Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Electrocardiogram QT prolonged
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Consolidation Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Contusion
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Consolidation Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Infections and Infestations
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Consolidation Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Lung infection
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Consolidation Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Consolidation Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Febrile neutropenia
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Consolidation Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Platelet count decreased
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Consolidation Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Injury, Poisoning, and Procedural Complications
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported During Consolidation Phase After a Daily Dose of 20 mg or 40 mg in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy to Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Fall
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Quizartinib 20 mg/Day
Quizartinib 40 mg/Day
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Quizartinib 20 mg/Day
n=4 participants at risk
Participants who received 20 mg quizartinib once daily in the morning under fasting conditions.
For the Induction phase, cytarabine (100 mg/m\^2/day IV) and either idarubicin (12 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion) or daunorubicin (60 mg/m\^2/day IV) were co-administered with quizartinib.
For the Consolidation phase, cytarabine (3.0 g/m\^2/12 hours IV) was co-administered with quizartinib.
|
Quizartinib 40 mg/Day
n=3 participants at risk
Participants who received 40 mg/day quizartinib once daily in the morning under fasting conditions.
For the Induction phase, cytarabine (100 mg/m\^2/day IV) and either idarubicin (12 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion) or daunorubicin (60 mg/m\^2/day IV) were co-administered with quizartinib.
For the Consolidation phase, cytarabine (3.0 g/m\^2/12 hours IV) was co-administered with quizartinib.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal bacteraemia
|
0.00%
0/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Quizartinib 20 mg/Day
n=4 participants at risk
Participants who received 20 mg quizartinib once daily in the morning under fasting conditions.
For the Induction phase, cytarabine (100 mg/m\^2/day IV) and either idarubicin (12 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion) or daunorubicin (60 mg/m\^2/day IV) were co-administered with quizartinib.
For the Consolidation phase, cytarabine (3.0 g/m\^2/12 hours IV) was co-administered with quizartinib.
|
Quizartinib 40 mg/Day
n=3 participants at risk
Participants who received 40 mg/day quizartinib once daily in the morning under fasting conditions.
For the Induction phase, cytarabine (100 mg/m\^2/day IV) and either idarubicin (12 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion) or daunorubicin (60 mg/m\^2/day IV) were co-administered with quizartinib.
For the Consolidation phase, cytarabine (3.0 g/m\^2/12 hours IV) was co-administered with quizartinib.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
25.0%
1/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Skin infection
|
25.0%
1/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lung infection
|
0.00%
0/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
25.0%
1/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile neutropenia
|
100.0%
4/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
100.0%
3/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
50.0%
2/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
25.0%
1/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
25.0%
1/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
25.0%
1/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
|
0.00%
0/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
75.0%
3/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoalbuminaemia
|
25.0%
1/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
50.0%
2/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypomagnesaemia
|
25.0%
1/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
|
25.0%
1/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypophosphataemia
|
25.0%
1/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypouricaemia
|
0.00%
0/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Tumour lysis syndrome
|
25.0%
1/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
|
75.0%
3/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
25.0%
1/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Eye disorders
Photophobia
|
25.0%
1/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Palpitations
|
0.00%
0/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.00%
0/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
0.00%
0/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
0.00%
0/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory disorder
|
0.00%
0/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
75.0%
3/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
66.7%
2/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
75.0%
3/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
66.7%
2/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
75.0%
3/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
75.0%
3/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
25.0%
1/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
66.7%
2/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Cheilitis
|
25.0%
1/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
25.0%
1/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Melaena
|
0.00%
0/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic function abnormal
|
0.00%
0/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
75.0%
3/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
66.7%
2/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
25.0%
1/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
66.7%
2/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash maculo-papular
|
25.0%
1/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis bullous
|
0.00%
0/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
|
0.00%
0/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
66.7%
2/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
0.00%
0/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
25.0%
1/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.00%
0/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
|
25.0%
1/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Proteinuria
|
25.0%
1/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary tract pain
|
25.0%
1/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Menorrhagia
|
0.00%
0/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
25.0%
1/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
|
75.0%
3/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
50.0%
2/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram QT prolonged
|
0.00%
0/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
100.0%
3/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Investigations
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased
|
25.0%
1/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
|
25.0%
1/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Investigations
Weight decreased
|
25.0%
1/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell count decreased
|
25.0%
1/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase
|
25.0%
1/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Investigations
Blood bilirubin increased
|
25.0%
1/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Investigations
Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased
|
0.00%
0/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure decreased
|
0.00%
0/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Investigations
Lipase increased
|
0.00%
0/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
0.00%
0/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.00%
0/4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected from Induction phase Cycle 1, Day 1 up to 35 days after last completed cycle in Consolidation phase, up to approximately 1 year.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE that emerges (or worsens) from the first dose of study drug and coadministered drugs to the follow-up visit, 35 days after the last dose of study drug and co-administered drugs, or the start date of new acute myeloid leukemia post-treatment, whichever was earlier. The serious AEs (SAEs) reported occurred only in the Induction phase. No SAEs occurred during the consolidation phase. TEAEs at ≥5% are reported for both induction and consolidation phases.
|
Additional Information
Contact for Clinical Trial Information
Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place