Efficacy of Education Programs in Patients With Chronic Airway Diseases

NCT ID: NCT02827929

Last Updated: 2016-07-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

285 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-06-30

Study Completion Date

2016-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this study is to determine whether the systematic education on air way disease and inhalers in outpatient settings contributes to improve the quality of life.

Education has been known to be effective for management of chronic airway disease. However, the real benefits remain unclear. An organized education on the chronic airway disease is directed by primary care physicians, and the investigators evaluate the effectiveness of the education.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The present study is a prospective and interventional study comparing the outcomes of education program for one month.

A one month education program is composed of three visits (every two weeks follow-up ) during which subjects were taught about their diseases, action plans in acute exacerbation, and inhaler technique.

To evaluate the effectiveness of systematic education, questionnaires evaluating quality of life and satisfaction of education will be examined after each visit.

Asthma control test (ACT) in asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment test (CAT) in COPD subjects were compared before and after education as an index of quality of life.

Educational effects were also measured, associated with improvement of their knowledge for chronic airway disease itself, proper use of inhaler technique, and satisfaction of subjects after education.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

COPD Asthma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

educated group

Subjects who is diagnosed as COPD or asthma by their physicians were recruited from 43 primary clinic and had been visiting each primary clinic over one year or more will be provided education of 3 times for one months about disease, inhaler use technics and action plans about exacerbation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Education

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

3 times systemic education program will be provided to patients were diagnosed as asthma or COPD by their physicians.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Education

3 times systemic education program will be provided to patients were diagnosed as asthma or COPD by their physicians.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients diagnosed as asthma or COPD
2. Patients of over 20 years old
3. Patients who agree with voluntary informed consent
4. Patients who were prescribed inhaler medication as treatment option

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients who have comorbid disorders which can influence on the study result (e.g. severe cardiac or kidney disease, cancer, transplantation, bronchiectasis, tuberculous destroyed lung)
2. Pregnant women
3. Patients who refused to participate in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Konkuk University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kwang-Ha Yoo

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kwang-Ha NA Yoo, M.D

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Konkuk University Hospial

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Konkuk University Hospital

Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Valero C, Monteagudo M, Llagostera M, Bayona X, Granollers S, Acedo M, Ferro JJ, Rodriguez-Latre L, Almeda J, Munoz L; COPD Group of SAP Baix LLobregat Centre. Evaluation of a combined strategy directed towards health-care professionals and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): information and health education feedback for improving clinical monitoring and quality-of-life. BMC Public Health. 2009 Dec 1;9:442. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-442.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20128887 (View on PubMed)

Wacker ME, Jorres RA, Karch A, Wilke S, Heinrich J, Karrasch S, Koch A, Schulz H, Watz H, Leidl R, Vogelmeier C, Holle R; COSYCONET-Consortium. Assessing health-related quality of life in COPD: comparing generic and disease-specific instruments with focus on comorbidities. BMC Pulm Med. 2016 May 10;16(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12890-016-0238-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27160582 (View on PubMed)

Koblizek V, Novotna B, Zbozinkova Z, Hejduk K. Diagnosing COPD: advances in training and practice - a systematic review. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2016 Apr 4;7:219-31. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S76976. eCollection 2016.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27099544 (View on PubMed)

Leiva-Fernandez J, Vazquez-Alarcon RL, Aguiar-Leiva V, Lobnig-Becerra M, Leiva-Fernandez F, Barnestein-Fonseca P. Efficacy of an educational intervention in primary health care in inhalation techniques: study protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Mar 17;17(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1269-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26988095 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ESR-14-10193

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Evaluation of COPD Co-Pilot
NCT02944591 UNKNOWN