Ultrasonography Detection of Local Twitch Response During Dry Needling
NCT ID: NCT02824991
Last Updated: 2023-12-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
7 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-01-31
2016-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of this report was to evaluate the reliability of semi-automatic LTR intensities tracking during dry needling by assessing ultrasound signals with an image processing method, in addition to evaluating the relationship between LTR intensities and muscle elasticity.
Method: Young males without signs or symptoms of musculoskeletal pain were included. Primary outcome measure was the LTR intensities determined by percentage change of muscle thickness. The secondary outcome measures were the muscle elasticity of medial gastrocnemius and hamstring, previous and posterior DN in both lower limbs for each subject. Three LTRs, detected by a physical therapist and ultrasound assessment, were induced by inserting a filament needle into muscle latent trigger points in medial gastrocnemius. The intensities of LTRs were measured by assessing ultrasound images using an optical flow method and through comparisons with manual detection.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Experimental protocol and measurements For each subject, the ROM of the medial gastrocnemius (MG) and hamstring (HA) was determined in both lower limbs using weight bearing and the active knee extension test, respectively, using a universal goniometer. For the knee extension test, 180° were subtracted from the obtained range, and the values were presented as negative. Both tests present excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability.
All participants were placed in a prone position with the ankle locked at 90º. Latent MTrPs were identified in both MG using according the presence of a palpable taut band and hypersensitive spot in the palpable taut band as diagnostic criteria. The ultrasound transducer was positioned over the MG muscle using a fixing device that was composed of a thermoplastic polymer, with enough space for the dry needling (DN) technique to be performed.
The deep DN was administered by a physical therapist with three years of experience in the technique. The ultrasound video (SonoSite Titan; Sonosite, Bothell, WA, USA) was recorded at 60 frames per second captured through an external capture device from Epiphan Systems Inc. (Ottawa, Ontario, Canada). According to the perception of the physical therapist and the ultrasound assessment, the filament needle was inserted into the MTrP to achieve three LTRs. Posterior to DN application, the ROMs of the MG and HA were measured.
The recorded ultrasound video was examined by the Camtasia software (Tech-Smith Corp, Okemos, MI, USA) to select three LTRs for latter analysis. Each LTR was tracked by the Lucas-Kanade optical flow (LKOF) algorithm with affine optic flow extension \[12\]. All analyses were performed using the Matlab® 2014 software (Mathworks Inc., Natick, MA, USA). For tracking muscle thickness, two ROIs (size 250 x 70 pixels) positioned on the superficial and deep aponeurosis were manually selected.
Muscle thickness was normalized as a percentage of recruitment using the following equation: (thickness contracted-thickness rest/thickness rest)\*100. For manual tracking of LTRs, the recorded ultrasound video was analyzed in the Matlab® 2014 software. Peak muscle thickness was determined by selecting muscle borders using hyperechoic aponeurosis lines.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Deep Dry Needling
Deep Dry Needling (DN) with the purpose of obtaining local twitch responses (LTRs). Description: Latent MTrPs were identified in both MG using according the presence of a palpable taut band and hypersensitive spot in the palpable taut band as diagnostic criteria.
The deep DN was administered by a physical therapist with three years of experience in the technique. The ultrasound video (SonoSite Titan; Sonosite, Bothell, WA, USA) was recorded at 60 frames per second captured through an external capture device from Epiphan Systems Inc. (Ottawa, Ontario, Canada). According to the perception of the physical therapist and the ultrasound assessment, the filament needle was inserted into the MTrP to achieve three LTRs. Posterior to DN application, the ROMs of the MG and HA were measured
detection of local twitch response intensities during dry needling
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
detection of local twitch response intensities during dry needling
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
35 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Chile
OTHER
University of Malaga
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas
Principal Research PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Antonio Cuesta-Vargas, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Malaga
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CH-Sp-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id