Trial Outcomes & Findings for Feasibility Study of Retinal Screening Using the RetinaVue 100 Camera in Outpatient Dialysis Centers (NCT NCT02823600)

NCT ID: NCT02823600

Last Updated: 2018-07-20

Results Overview

Usability of RetinaVue camera assessed by determining the number and percentage of inadequate images and the number and percentage of adequate images.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

68 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

baseline visit

Results posted on

2018-07-20

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
RetinaVue 100 Camera
Participants will have a retinal exam completed by study staff using the FDA-approved RetinaVue 100 hand-held camera RetinaVue 100 camera: Images of the subject's retina will be obtained using the RetinaVue 100 camera and uploaded to a secure network. The study doctor, a board-certified ophthalmologist, will interpret the patient images and return a diagnosis and management plan to the dialysis unit.
Overall Study
STARTED
68
Overall Study
COMPLETED
68
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Feasibility Study of Retinal Screening Using the RetinaVue 100 Camera in Outpatient Dialysis Centers

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
RetinaVue 100 Camera
n=68 Participants
All participants will have a retinal eye exam completed by study staff using the FDA-approved RetinaVue 100 hand-held camera
Age, Customized
No retinopathy
54.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.1 • n=5 Participants
Age, Customized
Retinopathy without referral
60.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6 • n=5 Participants
Age, Customized
Retinopathy with referral
57.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6 • n=5 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female : No retinopathy
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female : Retinopathy without referral
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female : Retinopathy with referral
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male : No retinopathy
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male : Retinopathy without referral
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male : Retinopathy with referral
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American: No retinopathy
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American: Retinopathy without referral
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American: Retinopathy with referral
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian: No retinopathy
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian: Retinopathy without referral
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian: Retinopathy with referral
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic: No retinopathy
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic: Retinopathy without referral
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic: Retinopathy with referral
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Data Missing
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
End-Stage Renal Disease Etiology
Diabetes: No retinopathy
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
End-Stage Renal Disease Etiology
Diabetes: Retinopathy without referral
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
End-Stage Renal Disease Etiology
Diabetes: Retinopathy with referral
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
End-Stage Renal Disease Etiology
Hypertension: No retinopathy
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
End-Stage Renal Disease Etiology
Hypertension: Retinopathy without referral
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
End-Stage Renal Disease Etiology
Hypertension: Retinopathy with referral
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
End-Stage Renal Disease Etiology
Other: No retinopathy
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
End-Stage Renal Disease Etiology
Other: Retinopathy without referral
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
End-Stage Renal Disease Etiology
Other: Retinopathy with referral
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
End-Stage Renal Disease Etiology
Data Missing
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Diabetic dialysis population
Diabetes: Yes
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
Diabetic dialysis population
Diabetes: No
31 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline visit

Usability of RetinaVue camera assessed by determining the number and percentage of inadequate images and the number and percentage of adequate images.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Images
n=136 Retinal Images
This group is the total number of images, 136, captured from the study population.
Usability of the RetinaVue Hand-Held 100 Camera
Inadequate Images
20 Retinal Images
Usability of the RetinaVue Hand-Held 100 Camera
Adequate Images
116 Retinal Images

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Post retinal eye exam

Number of participants found to have retinopathy in a dialysis population

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Images
n=68 Participants
This group is the total number of images, 136, captured from the study population.
Overall Retinopathy in a Dialysis Population
No retinopathy
33 Participants
Overall Retinopathy in a Dialysis Population
Retinopathy
35 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Post retinal eye exam

Population: This analysis is based on responses from the 39 that completed the survey.

Participant satisfaction survey data to be collected following the completion of retinal eye exam. Participants will be assessed on participant satisfaction measures such as comfort of experience, recovery time, and time invested in undergoing procedure vs. traditional retinal exam methods. The survey utilized a five-point Likert scale with the following responses: (1) strongly agree, (2) agree, (3) neutral, (4) disagree, (5) strongly disagree. The outcome measure is reported percentages for each of the six survey components.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Images
n=39 Participants
This group is the total number of images, 136, captured from the study population.
Participant Satisfaction
Satisfied time complete eye exam:Strongly agree
61.5 Percentage of participants
Participant Satisfaction
Satisfied time complete eye exam : Agree
28.2 Percentage of participants
Participant Satisfaction
Satisfied time complete eye exam : Neutral
10.3 Percentage of participants
Participant Satisfaction
Satisfied time complete eye exam:Disagree
0 Percentage of participants
Participant Satisfaction
Satisfied time complete eye exam:Strongly Disagree
0 Percentage of participants
Participant Satisfaction
Comfort during eye exam : Strongly agree
75.4 Percentage of participants
Participant Satisfaction
Comfort during eye exam : Agree
24.6 Percentage of participants
Participant Satisfaction
Comfort during eye exam : Neutral
0 Percentage of participants
Participant Satisfaction
Comfort during eye exam : Disagree
0 Percentage of participants
Participant Satisfaction
Comfort during eye exam : Strongly Disagree
0 Percentage of participants
Participant Satisfaction
Comfort after eye exam : Strongly agree
82.0 Percentage of participants
Participant Satisfaction
Comfort after eye exam : Agree
18.0 Percentage of participants
Participant Satisfaction
Comfort after eye exam : Neutral
0 Percentage of participants
Participant Satisfaction
Comfort after eye exam : Disagree
0 Percentage of participants
Participant Satisfaction
Comfort after eye exam : Strongly Disagree
0 Percentage of participants
Participant Satisfaction
1st eye quick recovery:Strongly agree
53.9 Percentage of participants
Participant Satisfaction
1st eye quick recovery:Agree
41.0 Percentage of participants
Participant Satisfaction
1st eye quick recovery:Neutral
5.1 Percentage of participants
Participant Satisfaction
1st eye quick recovery:Disagree
0 Percentage of participants
Participant Satisfaction
1st eye quick recovery:Strongly Disagree
0 Percentage of participants
Participant Satisfaction
2nd eye quick recovery:Strongly agree
59.0 Percentage of participants
Participant Satisfaction
2nd eye quick recovery:Agree
35.9 Percentage of participants
Participant Satisfaction
2nd eye quick recovery:Neutral
5.1 Percentage of participants
Participant Satisfaction
2nd eye quick recovery :Disagree
0 Percentage of participants
Participant Satisfaction
2nd eye quick recovery:Strongly Disagree
0 Percentage of participants
Participant Satisfaction
Satisfied w overall experience:Strongly agree
79.5 Percentage of participants
Participant Satisfaction
Satisfied w overall experience:Agree
20.5 Percentage of participants
Participant Satisfaction
Satisfied w overall experience:Neutral
0 Percentage of participants
Participant Satisfaction
Satisfied w overall experience:Disagree
0 Percentage of participants
Participant Satisfaction
Satisfied w overall experience:Strongly Disagree
0 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and post retinal eye exam

Population: Baseline retinal examination data were not present within the EMR; therefore, this analysis could not be performed.

Changes in eye exam rates of the diabetic subset of total population from baseline (i.e. study entry) and post-enrollment in study. Baseline data were to be obtained from the UNC electronic medical record (EMR) as the number of participants with eye exams within the past year and post data would consist of the number of participants completing a study exam.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

POST_HOC outcome

Timeframe: Up to as much as one year after study enrollment

Population: Diabetic dialysis participants

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Images
n=37 Participants
This group is the total number of images, 136, captured from the study population.
Number of Diabetic Dialysis Subjects Undergoing Retinal Exam During Study Using the RetinaVue 100 Camera
No retinopathy
11 Participants
Number of Diabetic Dialysis Subjects Undergoing Retinal Exam During Study Using the RetinaVue 100 Camera
Retinopathy without referral
9 Participants
Number of Diabetic Dialysis Subjects Undergoing Retinal Exam During Study Using the RetinaVue 100 Camera
Retinopathy with referral
17 Participants

Adverse Events

ESRD

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Seema Garg, MD, PhD

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Phone: 919-966-5296

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place