Monocentric Study and Prognostic of Treatments Endodontics of Teeth With Periapical Pathology Realized CSERD (Nantes University Hospital)
NCT ID: NCT02819258
Last Updated: 2016-06-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-03-31
2016-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The analysis of the literature on intracanal therapeutic shows great variability of the results obtained, the reported success rate is 53 to 95%.
This is explained by the difficulty of the surgical procedure, but also by the multiplicity of possible factors of failure, related practitioner, canal anatomy, the operating procedures, the preparation techniques and root canal filling. This success rate is variable depending on the presence or absence of periapical pathology before treatment: more than 85% for teeth treated without initial periapical pathology against only 62% for teeth with pathology before treatment. Furthermore, the literature review revealed two contradictory assumptions about the dominant factor failure in endodontics: the failure of the sealing canal system (bad level shutter) against the failure of the endovascular disinfection.
Main hypothesis of the research objectives:
The probability of success in a year endodontic treatments carried out according to the recommendations and the operating standards on teeth with periapical pathology is approximately 60%.
The primary prognostic factors would be the existence of intracanal obstacles (stop calcification ...) responsible for a sub-obturation of the canal, factors inherent to the tooth (situation ductal anatomy and complexity), the operating techniques used, the practitioner ( skill level), the quality of the restoration.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Endodontic treatment for a tooth with a periapical pathology
Endodontic treatment
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Endodontic treatment
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient receiving endodontic treatment for a tooth with a periapical pathology (Category IV of Baume)
* Patients affiliated to a social security scheme or of such a regime,
* Patients admitted to the CSERD,
* Patients in good general health,
* Patient compliant (see medical records: number of appointments not honored)
* Patients with a fixed address and available by telephone, pledging to return a year after treatment at a follow-up consultation for clinical and radiographic examination, and prevent CSERD of any changes of address and telephone number.
* Patients including French
* Patients free of guardianship or trusteeship
Exclusion Criteria
* Tooth with a pulp pathology type Category III of Baume
* Unspecified sheet in diagnosis
* Patients with general contraindication against the endodontic treatment of teeth with periapical pathology (risk oslérien, immuno-depressed subjects, patients with prosthetic hip, knee).
* No possibility of rubber dam during endodontic treatment.
* Patient with latex allergy (contraindicating the installation of a dam and possibly endodontic obturation with gutta-percha)
* Patients whose postoperative follow is deemed random by the investigator (cf. medical record: number of appointments not honored)
* Patient not engaging to return for clinical and radiographic examination in a year
* Patients with temporary housing or no fixed address: Living in a furnished accommodation or a hotel room, in a nursing home, in a home-type squat, Homeless
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Nantes University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Benedicte ENKEL, Doctor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Nantes University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nantes University Hospital
Nantes, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BRD 07/6-N
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id