Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety and Efficacy of KPI-121 in Subjects With Dry Eye Disease (NCT NCT02813265)
NCT ID: NCT02813265
Last Updated: 2021-02-03
Results Overview
Comparison of mean bulbar conjunctival hyperemia between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-4 grading scale. The grading scale was based on the Cornea and Contact Lens Research Unit Grading Scale where 0 = none, 1 = very slight, 2 = slight, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
918 participants
Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) and to Visit 4 (Day 15)
2021-02-03
Participant Flow
918 subjects were randomized, 3 of which were not included in any analysis population as they had participated in more than one study. The data for the second-participation for these 3 individuals were not included in any analysis population as agreed upon with the FDA.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
Participants randomized to KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
Participants randomized to Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
459
|
456
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
455
|
453
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
3
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Safety and Efficacy of KPI-121 in Subjects With Dry Eye Disease
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
n=459 Participants
Participants randomized to KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
n=456 Participants
Participants randomized to Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
Total
n=915 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
58.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.41 • n=5 Participants
|
58.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.66 • n=7 Participants
|
58.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.03 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
367 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
359 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
726 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
92 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
97 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
189 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
69 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
71 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
140 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
362 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
361 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
723 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
459 participants
n=5 Participants
|
456 participants
n=7 Participants
|
915 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) and to Visit 4 (Day 15)Population: Intent to Treat population minus subjects in each treatment group that discontinued the study by this time point or otherwise did not have this assessment completed
Comparison of mean bulbar conjunctival hyperemia between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-4 grading scale. The grading scale was based on the Cornea and Contact Lens Research Unit Grading Scale where 0 = none, 1 = very slight, 2 = slight, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
n=452 Participants
Participants randomized to KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
n=451 Participants
Participants randomized to Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in Bulbar Conjunctival Hyperemia at Visit 4 (Day 15)
|
-0.4049 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.65062
|
-0.1574 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.60704
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) and to Visit 4 (Day 15)Population: Intent to Treat population minus subjects in each treatment group that discontinued the study by this time point or otherwise did not have this assessment completed
Comparison of mean ocular discomfort severity between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-100 visual analog grading scale where 0 was better and 100 was worse.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
n=455 Participants
Participants randomized to KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
n=452 Participants
Participants randomized to Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in Ocular Discomfort Severity at Visit 4 (Day 15)
|
-14.53 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.636
|
-9.16 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.924
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) and to Visit 4 (Day 15)Population: Intent to Treat population minus subjects in each treatment group that discontinued the study by this time point or otherwise did not have this assessment completed
Comparison of mean corneal fluorescein staining between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using methods developed by the National Eye Institute (NEI) Dry Eye Workshop in evaluating 5 regions of the cornea (superior, inferior, nasal, temporal and central) using a 0-3 grading scale, where 0 = no visible staining, 1 = Mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
n=455 Participants
Participants randomized to KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
n=452 Participants
Participants randomized to Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score at Visit 4 (Day 15)
|
-0.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
-0.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.79
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) and to Visit 4 (Day 15)Population: Sub-group of Intent to Treat population with more severe ocular discomfort minus subjects in each treatment group that discontinued the study by this time point or otherwise did not have this assessment completed.
Comparison of mean ocular discomfort severity between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-100 visual analog grading scale where 0 was better and 100 was worse, in a sub-group of participants with more severe ocular discomfort at baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
n=233 Participants
Participants randomized to KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
n=238 Participants
Participants randomized to Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) Ocular Discomfort Severity at Visit 4 (Day 15) in the Subgroup of Participants With More Severe Ocular Discomfort
|
-16.67 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.937
|
-10.76 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.037
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) and to Visit 4 (Day 15)Population: Sub-group of Intent to Treat population with more severe ocular discomfort minus subjects in each treatment group that discontinued the study by this time point or otherwise did not have this assessment completed.
Comparison of mean bulbar conjunctival hyperemia between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-4 grading scale. The grading scale was based on the Cornea and Contact Lens Research Unit Grading Scale where 0 = none, 1 = very slight, 2 = slight, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
n=256 Participants
Participants randomized to KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
n=264 Participants
Participants randomized to Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Conjunctival Hyperemia Scores at Visit 4 (Day 15) in the Subgroup of Participants With More Severe Ocular Discomfort at Baseline (Day 1)
|
-0.4648 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.66770
|
-0.2045 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.62567
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) and to Visit 4 (Day 15)Population: Intent to Treat population minus subjects in each treatment group that discontinued the study by this time point or otherwise did not have this assessment completed.
Proportion of subjects with ≥1 improvement from baseline in conjunctival hyperemia scores. The grading scale was based on the Cornea and Contact Lens Research Unit Grading Scale where 0 = none, 1 = very slight, 2 = slight, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
n=452 Participants
Participants randomized to KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
n=451 Participants
Participants randomized to Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Subjects With ≥1 Improvement in Conjunctival Hyperemia at Visit 4 (Day 15)
|
189 Participants
|
98 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) and to Visit 4 (Day 15)Population: Intent to Treat population minus subjects in each treatment group that discontinued the study by this time point or otherwise did not have this assessment completed.
Comparison of mean bulbar conjunctival hyperemia between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-4 grading scale. The grading scale was based on the Cornea and Contact Lens Research Unit Grading Scale where 0 = none, 1 = very slight, 2 = slight, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
n=453 Participants
Participants randomized to KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
n=450 Participants
Participants randomized to Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) Conjunctival Hyperemia Scores at Visit 4 (Day 15) for the Mean of All Regions (Nasal, Temporal, Frontal)
|
-0.2980 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.59018
|
-0.0421 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.51921
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) and to Visit 3 (Day 8)Population: Intent to Treat population minus subjects in each treatment group that discontinued the study by this time point or otherwise did not have this assessment completed.
Comparison of mean ocular discomfort severity between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-100 visual analog grading scale where 0 was better and 100 was worse.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
n=457 Participants
Participants randomized to KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
n=455 Participants
Participants randomized to Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Ocular Discomfort Severity Scores Prior to Visit 3 (Day 8) Minus the Mean of the Scores to Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1)
|
-8.12 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.880
|
-4.81 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.851
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) and to Visit 3 (Day 8)Population: Sub-group of Intent to Treat population with more severe ocular discomfort minus subjects in each treatment group that discontinued the study by this time point or otherwise did not have this assessment completed.
Comparison of mean ocular discomfort severity between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-100 visual analog grading scale where 0 was better and 100 was worse.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
n=258 Participants
Participants randomized to KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
n=263 Participants
Participants randomized to Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Ocular Discomfort Severity Scores Prior to Visit 3 (Day 8) Minus Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in the Subgroup of Participants With More Severe Ocular Discomfort.
|
-9.90 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.835
|
-6.38 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.289
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) and to Visit 3 (Day 8)Population: Intent to Treat population minus subjects in each treatment group that discontinued the study by this time point or otherwise did not have this assessment completed.
Comparison of mean ocular discomfort severity between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-100 visual analog grading scale where 0 was better and 100 was worse.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
n=455 Participants
Participants randomized to KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
n=452 Participants
Participants randomized to Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Ocular Discomfort Severity Scores on Day 4 (Diary) Minus Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1)
|
-6.60 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.710
|
-3.20 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.125
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) and to Visit 3 (Day 8)Population: Sub-group of Intent to Treat population with more severe ocular discomfort minus subjects in each treatment group that discontinued the study by this time point or otherwise did not have this assessment completed.
Comparison of mean ocular discomfort severity between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-100 visual analog grading scale where 0 was better and 100 was worse, in a sub-group of participants with more severe ocular discomfort at baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
n=256 Participants
Participants randomized to KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
n=261 Participants
Participants randomized to Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Ocular Discomfort Severity Scores on Day 4 Day 4 (Diary) Minus Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in the Subgroup of Participants With More Severe Ocular Discomfort
|
-8.48 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.412
|
-5.20 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.903
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) and to Visit 4 (Day 15)Population: Sub-group of Intent to Treat population with more severe ocular discomfort minus subjects in each treatment group that discontinued the study by this time point or otherwise did not have this assessment completed.
Comparison of mean bulbar conjunctival hyperemia between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-4 grading scale in a sub-group of participants with more severe ocular discomfort at baseline.. The grading scale was based on the Cornea and Contact Lens Research Unit Grading Scale where 0 = none, 1 = very slight, 2 = slight, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
n=379 Participants
Participants randomized to KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
n=379 Participants
Participants randomized to Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline/Visit 2 (Day 1) in Conjunctival Hyperemia Scores With a Day 1 Conjunctival Hyperemia Score of ≥ 2 in the Subgroup of Participants With More Severe Ocular Discomfort
|
-0.47 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.631
|
-0.22 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.577
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Visit 4 (Day 15)Population: Intent to Treat population minus subjects in each treatment group that discontinued the study by this time point or otherwise did not have this assessment completed.
Comparison of mean bulbar conjunctival hyperemia between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-4 grading scale. The grading scale was based on the Cornea and Contact Lens Research Unit Grading Scale where 0 = none, 1 = very slight, 2 = slight, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe
Outcome measures
| Measure |
KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
n=453 Participants
Participants randomized to KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
n=451 Participants
Participants randomized to Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subjects With a Grade of 0 in Conjunctival Hyperemia Score at Visit 4 (Day 15)
|
27 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
Adverse Events
KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
n=459 participants at risk
Participants randomized to KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
n=456 participants at risk
Participants randomized to Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
|
|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Instillation site foreign body sensation
|
0.44%
2/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.00%
0/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
General disorders
Instillation site lacrimation
|
0.22%
1/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.00%
0/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
General disorders
Instillation site pruritus
|
0.22%
1/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.66%
3/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
General disorders
Installation site discomfort
|
0.00%
0/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
General disorders
Installation site reaction
|
0.00%
0/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
|
0.22%
1/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.00%
0/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.22%
1/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.00%
0/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
0.22%
1/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.00%
0/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.22%
1/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.44%
2/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Conjunctivitis
|
0.00%
0/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
0.00%
0/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.66%
3/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arthropod bite
|
0.22%
1/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.00%
0/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament Sprain
|
0.22%
1/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.00%
0/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Investigations
Intraocular pressure increased
|
0.65%
3/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal Column Stenosis
|
0.22%
1/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.00%
0/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.44%
2/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
|
0.22%
1/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.00%
0/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Nerve Compression
|
0.22%
1/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.00%
0/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sinus Headache
|
0.22%
1/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
0.00%
0/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
|
0.22%
1/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.00%
0/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dysphonia
|
0.00%
0/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary congestion
|
0.00%
0/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sneezing
|
0.00%
0/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis Contact
|
0.22%
1/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.00%
0/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Eccymosis
|
0.22%
1/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.22%
1/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Eye disorders
Ocular hyperaemia
|
0.00%
0/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Eye disorders
Photophobia
|
0.00%
0/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Eye disorders
Punctate keratitis
|
0.00%
0/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctival vascular disorder
|
0.22%
1/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.00%
0/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye discharge
|
0.22%
1/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.00%
0/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye Pruritus
|
0.22%
1/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.88%
4/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Eye disorders
Eyelid margin crusting
|
0.22%
1/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.44%
2/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Eye disorders
Eyelid ptosis
|
0.22%
1/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.00%
0/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Eye disorders
Trichiasis
|
0.22%
1/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.00%
0/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Eye disorders
Vision Blurred
|
0.22%
1/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.44%
2/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Eye disorders
Vitreous detachment
|
0.22%
1/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.00%
0/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Eye disorders
Blepharospasm
|
0.00%
0/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
hypoaesthesia oral
|
0.22%
1/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.00%
0/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
|
0.22%
1/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.00%
0/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gingival bleeding
|
0.00%
0/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
General disorders
Installation site pain
|
6.1%
28/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
6.1%
28/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Eye disorders
Keratitis
|
0.00%
0/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye Irritation
|
1.1%
5/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
1.5%
7/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Eye disorders
Blepharitis
|
0.65%
3/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.00%
0/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Eye disorders
Lacrimination increased
|
0.65%
3/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.44%
2/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctival hyperemia
|
0.44%
2/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.88%
4/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye Pain
|
0.44%
2/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.22%
1/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
|
Eye disorders
Foreign Body Sensation
|
0.44%
2/459 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
0.88%
4/456 • Adverse events were collected at Visit 2 (Day 1) until they exited the study at Visit 4 (Day 15).
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The agreement between the Principal Investigator and the Sponsor restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results until after the first to occur of the following: (a) publication of such multi-center clinical trial results; (b) notification by sponsor that such a multi-center clinical trial submission is no longer planned; or ( c) the eighteen ( 18) month anniversary of the completion, abandonment or termination of such multi-center clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER