Trial Outcomes & Findings for Immune Profile in Subjects With New Onset Type 1 Diabetes (NCT NCT02801942)

NCT ID: NCT02801942

Last Updated: 2019-02-27

Results Overview

Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. The analysis was based upon Safety Population which comprised of all participants who complete any study assessment. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles). NA indicates that data was not available.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

22 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Pre Biopsy session on Day 1

Results posted on

2019-02-27

Participant Flow

This was a multi-center, non-drug treatment study to compare differences in immune cells derived from the inguinal lymph nodes (iLN) and peripheral blood of New Onset Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (NOT1D) participants and healthy volunteers. Participants were enrolled at a single center in United Kingdom.

Participants underwent iLN biopsies by two methods; fine-needle aspirate (FNA) and core needle biopsy. Participants underwent screening followed by study visits and follow-up. A total of 43 participants were screened, of which, 21 were considered as screen failures and 22 were enrolled into the study.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Healthy Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Overall Study
STARTED
12
10
Overall Study
COMPLETED
12
10
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Immune Profile in Subjects With New Onset Type 1 Diabetes

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Total
n=22 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
28.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.53 • n=5 Participants
27.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.35 • n=7 Participants
27.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.38 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - White/Caucasian/European Heritage
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
22 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. The analysis was based upon Safety Population which comprised of all participants who complete any study assessment. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles). NA indicates that data was not available.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in Blood
Circulating B Lymphocytes; n=12, 10
16.54 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 2.229
14.23 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 2.442
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in Blood
Classical B Lymphocytes; n=12, 10
19.37 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 1.616
15.83 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 1.771
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in Blood
Double Negative B Lymphocytes; n=12, 10
3.25 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 1.250
6.26 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 1.370
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in Blood
Naive B Lymphocytes; n=12, 10
59.81 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 3.021
62.32 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 3.310
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in Blood
Plasmablast ; n=11, 10
NA Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
NA Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in Blood
Transitional B Lymphocytes; n=12, 10
NA Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
NA Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles). NA indicates that data was not available.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN
Transitional B Lymphocytes; ; n=3, 2
NA Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
NA Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN
Circulating B Lymphocytes; n=9, 10
15.51 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 1.860
12.14 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 1.898
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN
Classical B Lymphocytes; n=9, 10
38.78 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 4.119
30.19 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 4.130
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN
Double Negative B Lymphocytes; n=9, 10
8.68 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 1.668
10.26 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 1.651
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN
Naive B Lymphocytes; n=9, 10
35.83 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 3.761
44.13 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 3.621
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN
Plasmablast; n=4, 8
NA Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
NA Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. NA indicates that data was not available.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, Clusters of Differentiation 56 Positive (CD56+) CD16+ , CD56bright Natural Killer (NK) Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16 Negative (CD56lo CD16-), Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in Blood
CD56lo CD16+
7.96 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 1.011
8.24 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 1.108
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, Clusters of Differentiation 56 Positive (CD56+) CD16+ , CD56bright Natural Killer (NK) Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16 Negative (CD56lo CD16-), Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in Blood
B-cells
8.50 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.589
7.58 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.645
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, Clusters of Differentiation 56 Positive (CD56+) CD16+ , CD56bright Natural Killer (NK) Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16 Negative (CD56lo CD16-), Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in Blood
CD56+CD16+
NA Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
NA Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, Clusters of Differentiation 56 Positive (CD56+) CD16+ , CD56bright Natural Killer (NK) Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16 Negative (CD56lo CD16-), Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in Blood
CD56bright NK cells
0.36 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.042
0.30 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.046
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, Clusters of Differentiation 56 Positive (CD56+) CD16+ , CD56bright Natural Killer (NK) Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16 Negative (CD56lo CD16-), Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in Blood
CD56lo CD16-
0.24 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.036
0.23 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.040
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, Clusters of Differentiation 56 Positive (CD56+) CD16+ , CD56bright Natural Killer (NK) Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16 Negative (CD56lo CD16-), Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in Blood
Dendritic cells
0.93 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.080
0.87 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.088
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, Clusters of Differentiation 56 Positive (CD56+) CD16+ , CD56bright Natural Killer (NK) Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16 Negative (CD56lo CD16-), Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in Blood
NK cells
8.71 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.999
8.84 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 1.095

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles). NA indicates that data was not available.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16-, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN
B-cells; n=9, 10
8.88 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 1.641
7.34 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 1.512
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16-, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN
CD56+CD16+; n=8, 8
NA Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
NA Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16-, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN
CD56bright NK cells; n=9, 10
0.54 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.098
0.50 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.101
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16-, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN
CD56lo CD16+; n=9, 10
0.68 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.173
0.69 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.184
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16-, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN
CD56lo CD16-; n=8, 9
0.19 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.043
0.21 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.040
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16-, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN
Dendritic cells; n=9, 10
0.45 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.100
0.39 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.081
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16-, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN
NK cells; n=9, 10
1.43 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.324
1.50 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.364

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. NA indicates that data was not available.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in Blood
CD56bright NK cells
5.02 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 0.894
3.99 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 0.980
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in Blood
CD56lo CD16+
89.71 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 1.567
92.40 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 1.717
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in Blood
CD56+CD16+
NA Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
NA Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in Blood
CD56lo CD16-
3.11 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 0.497
2.70 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 0.545

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles). NA indicates that data was not available.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in iLN
CD56+CD16+; n=8, 8
NA Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
NA Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in iLN
CD56bright NK cells; n=9, 10
41.85 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 3.999
35.01 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 3.868
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in iLN
CD56lo CD16+; n=9, 10
37.12 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 6.220
45.01 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 4.900
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in iLN
CD56lo CD16-; n=8, 9
12.80 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 1.855
14.26 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 1.490

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Myeloid Dendritic Cells and Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells in Blood
Myeloid Dendritic cells
51.78 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 3.073
50.45 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 3.366
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Myeloid Dendritic Cells and Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells in Blood
Plasmacytoid Dendritic cells
45.51 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 3.140
47.36 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 3.440

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA.Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Myeloid Dendritic Cells and Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells in iLN
Myeloid Dendritic cells; n=8, 10
42.96 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 3.870
30.72 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 4.128
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Myeloid Dendritic Cells and Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells in iLN
Plasmacytoid Dendritic cells; n=9, 9
57.43 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 4.426
68.30 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 5.372

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. NA indicates that data was not available.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD14+ CD16+ Monocytes, CD14+ Monocytes, and CD16+ Monocytes in Blood
CD14+ monocytes
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD14+ CD16+ Monocytes, CD14+ Monocytes, and CD16+ Monocytes in Blood
CD16+ monocytes
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD14+ CD16+ Monocytes, CD14+ Monocytes, and CD16+ Monocytes in Blood
CD14+ CD16+ monocytes
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles). NA indicates that data was not available.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD14+ CD16+ Monocytes, CD14+ Monocytes and CD16+ Monocytes in iLN
CD14+ CD16+ monocytes; n=0, 1
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD14+ CD16+ Monocytes, CD14+ Monocytes and CD16+ Monocytes in iLN
CD14+ monocytes; n=7, 4
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD14+ CD16+ Monocytes, CD14+ Monocytes and CD16+ Monocytes in iLN
CD16+ monocytes; n=0, 2
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 Cells in Blood
CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8
29.89 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 4.267
28.10 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 4.674
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 Cells in Blood
Central Memory CD8
7.13 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 1.537
6.98 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 1.684
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 Cells in Blood
Effector Memory CD8
19.22 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 2.223
14.84 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 2.435
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 Cells in Blood
Stem Cell Memory-like CD8
1.34 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.206
1.37 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.225
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 Cells in Blood
Naive CD8
34.38 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 3.863
40.44 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 4.231

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 Cells in iLN
Effector Memory CD8
13.74 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 1.867
15.59 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 2.074
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 Cells in iLN
Naive CD8
55.12 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 4.259
54.45 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 4.700
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 Cells in iLN
Stem Cell Memory-like CD8
1.69 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.316
2.36 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.377
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 Cells in iLN
CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8
14.54 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 2.094
13.34 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 2.330
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 Cells in iLN
Central Memory CD8
5.55 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.978
6.21 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 1.093

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population. Data were not collected due to lack of model convergence or model reliability.

Peripheral blood samples were planned to be collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Results could not be presented as data were not collected for this analysis due to lack of model convergence or model reliability

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at specified time point were analyzed.

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. NA indicates that data was not available.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=5 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=7 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cell-like Reg T Cells in iLN
NA Percentage of TFH cell-like Reg T cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
NA Percentage of TFH cell-like Reg T cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at specified time point were analyzed.

Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=6 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=7 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells in Blood
0.53 Percentage of TFH cells
Standard Error 0.173
0.87 Percentage of TFH cells
Standard Error 0.160

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at specified time point were analyzed.

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=10 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells in iLN
2.75 Percentage of TFH cells
Standard Error 3.192
8.96 Percentage of TFH cells
Standard Error 2.973

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conventional (Conv) T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in Blood
Central Memory Conv T cells
32.21 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.125
33.75 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.328
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conventional (Conv) T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in Blood
Effector Memory Conv T cells
11.74 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.409
11.97 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.543
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conventional (Conv) T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in Blood
Naive Conv T cells
43.40 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.586
42.48 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.833
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conventional (Conv) T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in Blood
Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T cells
0.91 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.098
1.01 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.107
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conventional (Conv) T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in Blood
CD45RA+ Effector Memory Conv T cells
2.47 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.856
1.44 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.937

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conv T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in iLN
Effector Memory Conv T cells
20.43 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.422
18.28 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.692
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conv T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in iLN
Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T cells
1.35 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.176
1.57 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.201
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conv T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in iLN
CD45RA+ Effector Memory Conv T cells
1.14 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.152
0.88 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.180
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conv T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in iLN
Central Memory Conv T cells
23.07 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.646
25.03 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.923
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conv T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in iLN
Naive Conv T cells
46.13 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 3.081
46.93 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 3.454

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in Blood
TFH cells; n=12, 10
16.77 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.723
21.86 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.888
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in Blood
PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH cells; n=6, 7
0.13 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.036
0.18 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.035
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in Blood
TH1 TH17 cells; n=12, 10
16.25 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.606
16.22 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.759
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in Blood
TH1 TH17 TH2 T cells; n=12, 10
7.16 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.750
7.16 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.821
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in Blood
TH22 cells; n=12, 10
3.00 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.340
3.01 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.372
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in Blood
TH17 cells; n=12, 10
7.79 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.963
7.89 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.055
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in Blood
TH1 cells; n=12, 10
19.69 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.895
17.60 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 3.172
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in Blood
TH1 TH2 cells; n=12, 10
9.30 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.692
9.90 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.758
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in Blood
TH2 cells; n=12, 10
8.46 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.994
6.89 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.089

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN
TFH cells; n=12,10
23.02 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.385
21.48 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.706
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN
TH1 TH17 cells; n=11,10
3.03 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.483
2.78 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.558
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN
PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH cells; n=10,10
1.30 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.662
1.93 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.542
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN
TH17 cells; n=12,10
6.56 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.932
6.15 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.033
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN
TH1 cells; n=12,10
15.08 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.878
18.58 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.110
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN
TH1 TH17 TH2 T cells; n=11,10
1.94 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.360
1.54 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.409
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN
TH1 TH2 cells; n=12,10
7.73 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.816
7.25 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.942
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN
TH2 cells; n=12,10
20.03 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.754
16.98 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.975
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN
TH22 cells; n=12,10
1.50 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.277
1.48 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.352

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. NA indicates that data was not availble. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in Blood
TH1 cells-like Reg T cells; n=12, 10
5.35 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.643
6.18 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.704
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in Blood
TH22 cells-like Reg T cells; n=12, 10
11.46 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.953
12.63 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.044
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in Blood
TFH cells-like Reg T cells; n=12, 10
11.63 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.901
16.46 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 2.083
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in Blood
TH1 TH17-like Reg T cells; n=7, 7
NA Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
NA Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in Blood
TH1 TH17 TH2 cells-like Reg T cells; n=12, 10
10.48 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.036
13.36 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.135
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in Blood
TH1 TH2 cells-like Reg T cells; n=12, 10
12.04 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.649
10.24 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.711
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in Blood
TH17 cells-like Reg T cells; n=12, 10
17.37 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.869
17.67 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.952
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in Blood
TH2 cells-like Reg T cells; n=12, 10
12.47 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.285
9.09 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.408

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles). NA indicates that data was not available.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN
TFH cells-like Reg T cells; n=12, 10
13.48 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.913
12.97 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 2.203
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN
PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH cells-like Reg T cells; n=5,7
NA Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
NA Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN
TH1 cells-like Reg T cells; n=12, 10
7.31 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.202
11.41 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.395
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN
TH1 TH17-like Reg T cells; n=1, 2
NA Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
NA Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN
TH1 TH17 TH2 cells-like Reg T cells; n=7, 6
2.56 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.839
4.11 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.871
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN
TH1 TH2 cells-like Reg T cells; n=12, 10
10.12 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.085
10.99 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.342
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN
TH17 cells-like Reg T cells; n=12, 10
7.20 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.418
7.67 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.673
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN
TH2 cells-like Reg T cells; n=12, 10
27.83 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 2.262
27.24 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 2.546
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN
TH22 cells-like Reg T cells; n=8, 7
2.29 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.513
2.70 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.628

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T Reg cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Reg T Cells in Blood
6.95 Percentage of CD4 T cells
Standard Error 0.405
6.56 Percentage of CD4 T cells
Standard Error 0.444

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at specified time point were analyzed.

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T Reg cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=11 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=9 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Reg T Cells in iLN
12.04 Percentage of CD4 T cells
Standard Error 0.631
12.28 Percentage of CD4 T cells
Standard Error 0.682

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T Reg cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD69+ CD8 and Antigen Ki67 (Ki67)+ CD8 in Blood
CD69+ CD8 cells
3.23 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.299
2.28 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.327
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD69+ CD8 and Antigen Ki67 (Ki67)+ CD8 in Blood
Ki67+ CD8 cells
1.06 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.391
1.89 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.429

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T Reg cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD69+ CD8 and Antigen Ki67 (Ki67)+ CD8 in iLN
CD69+ CD8 cells; n=11, 9
17.77 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 2.950
20.54 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 3.127
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD69+ CD8 and Antigen Ki67 (Ki67)+ CD8 in iLN
Ki67+ CD8 cells; n= 11, 6
5.86 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.646
3.66 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.828

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T Reg cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in Blood
CD69+ Reg T cells; n= 11, 10
3.19 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 0.213
2.27 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 0.223
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in Blood
Helios+ Reg T cells; n= 12, 10
75.19 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 2.034
70.98 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 2.228
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in Blood
Ki67+ T Reg cells; n= 12, 10
5.34 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 0.664
6.32 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 0.727
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in Blood
Memory Reg T cells; n= 12, 10
40.93 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 2.563
45.79 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 2.808
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in Blood
Resting Reg T cells n= 12, 10
45.34 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 3.191
36.74 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 3.496
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in Blood
CD15s+ Reg T cells; n= 12, 10
7.84 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 1.492
9.13 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 1.635

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T Reg cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN
CD15s+ Reg T cells; n=11, 8
16.54 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 3.248
10.01 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 3.675
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN
CD69+ Reg T cells; n= 11, 9
48.02 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 3.034
56.55 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 3.451
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN
Helios+ Reg T cells; n=11,9
81.28 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 1.723
79.17 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 1.837
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN
Ki67+ T Reg cell; n= 10, 8
8.39 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 1.347
5.09 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 1.505
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN
Memory Reg T cells; n= 11, 9
50.12 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 2.660
49.90 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 3.022
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN
Resting Reg T cells; n=11,9
35.32 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 3.031
27.00 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 3.453

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T Reg cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in Blood
CD69+ Conv T cells
2.05 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.206
1.41 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.226
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in Blood
CD15s+ Conv T cells
2.59 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.405
2.28 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.444
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in Blood
Helios+ Conv T cells
2.07 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.233
1.68 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.255
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in Blood
Ki67+ Conv T cells
1.02 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.202
1.18 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.221

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T Reg cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in iLN
CD15s+ Conv T cells; n=11, 8
4.43 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.653
2.65 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.743
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in iLN
Ki67+ Conv T cells; n= 11,8
4.39 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.560
1.65 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.669
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in iLN
CD69+ Conv T cells; n=11, 9
27.74 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 3.060
30.29 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 3.589
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in iLN
Helios+ Conv T cells;n=11,9
5.50 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.631
5.35 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.720

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T Reg cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in Blood
Helios+ Memory Conv T cells
3.46 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.401
2.64 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.439
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in Blood
CD15s+ Memory Conv T cells
5.39 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.906
4.82 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.993
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in Blood
CD69+ Memory Conv T cells
2.53 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.237
1.69 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.259
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in Blood
Ki67+ Memory Conv T cells
2.03 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.397
2.34 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.435

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T Reg cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in iLN
CD15s+ Memory Conv T cells; n=11, 8
7.60 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.131
4.59 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.307
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in iLN
CD69+ Memory Conv T cells; n=11, 9
44.32 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.739
46.38 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 3.433
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in iLN
Helios+ Memory Conv T cells; n= 11, 9
8.25 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.450
6.97 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.438
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in iLN
Ki67+ Memory Conv T cells; n=11,8
4.47 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.545
2.33 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.643

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles). NA indicates that data was not available.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Naive B Lymphocytes;FNA; n=9,4
36.05 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 3.545
44.36 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 4.939
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Naive B Lymphocytes; Core; n= 4, 8
35.60 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 4.671
43.91 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 3.796
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Transitional B Lymphocytes;Core; n=1, 2
NA Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
NA Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Circulating B Lymphocytes; FNA; n=9,4
14.36 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 2.104
12.07 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 2.272
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Circulating B Lymphocytes; Core; n=4, 8
16.66 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 1.668
12.20 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 1.633
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Classical B Lymphocytes; FNA; n=9,4
39.89 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 4.438
28.35 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 6.283
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Classical B Lymphocytes; Core; n= 4, 8
37.66 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 4.711
32.02 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 3.716
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Double Negative B Lymphocytes; FNA; n=9,4
8.48 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 2.285
9.85 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 2.430
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Double Negative B Lymphocytes; Core; n= 4, 8
8.89 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 1.302
10.68 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 1.177
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Plasmablast; FNA; n=4, 3
NA Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
NA Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Plasmablast; Core; n=0, 5
NA Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Transitional B Lymphocytes; FNA; n=2, 1
NA Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
NA Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles). NA indicates that data was not available.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
B-cells; FNA; n=9, 4
10.48 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 1.417
5.51 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 2.106
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
B-cells; Core; n=4, 8
7.29 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 2.411
9.17 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 1.769
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56+CD16+; FNA; n=8, 2
NA Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
NA Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56+CD16+; Core; n=2, 7
NA Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
NA Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56bright NK cells; FNA; n=9, 4
0.61 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.110
0.47 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.154
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56bright NK cells; Core; n=4, 8
0.47 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.118
0.53 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.089
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56lo CD16+; FNA; n=9, 4
0.55 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.215
0.94 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.340
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56lo CD16+; Core; n=3, 8
0.82 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.272
0.45 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.152
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56lo CD16-; FNA; n=8, 4
0.19 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.042
0.21 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.053
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56lo CD16-; Core; n=3,7
0.18 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.054
0.21 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.041
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Dendritic cells; FNA; n=9, 4
0.47 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.061
0.24 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.097
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Dendritic cells; Core; n=4, 8
0.44 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.183
0.54 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.125
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
NK cells; FNA; n=9, 4
1.60 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.425
1.66 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.637
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
NK cells; Core; n=4, 8
1.27 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.333
1.35 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.251

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles). NA indicates that data was not available.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56br NK Cells CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56+CD16+; FNA; n=8, 2
NA Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
NA Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56br NK Cells CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56+CD16+; Core; n=2, 7
NA Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
NA Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56br NK Cells CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56bright NK cells; FNA; n=9, 4
40.37 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 3.934
26.65 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 6.356
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56br NK Cells CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56bright NK cells; Core; n=4, 8
43.32 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 6.340
43.36 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 4.129
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56br NK Cells CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56lo CD16+; FNA; n=9, 4
34.66 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 4.476
54.69 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 7.327
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56br NK Cells CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56lo CD16+; Core; n=3, 8
39.58 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 11.072
35.32 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 6.300
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56br NK Cells CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56lo CD16-; FNA; n=8, 4
13.17 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 1.321
13.31 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 2.039
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56br NK Cells CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56lo CD16-; Core; n=3, 7
12.42 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 3.479
15.21 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 2.258

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Myeloid Dendritic Cells and Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Myeloid Dendritic cells; FNA; n=8, 4
46.76 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 4.383
38.50 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 6.298
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Myeloid Dendritic Cells and Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Myeloid Dendritic cells; Core; n=4 ,8
39.16 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 4.626
22.95 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 4.111
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Myeloid Dendritic Cells and Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Plasmacytoid Dendritic cells; FNA; n=9, 3
54.59 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 5.834
62.48 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 8.742
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Myeloid Dendritic Cells and Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Plasmacytoid Dendritic cells; Core; n=4, 8
60.27 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 4.185
74.12 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 3.988

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles). NA indicates data was not available.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD14+ CD16+ Monocytes, CD14+ Monocytes and CD16+ Monocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD14+ CD16+ monocytes; ;FNA; n=0, 1
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD14+ CD16+ Monocytes, CD14+ Monocytes and CD16+ Monocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD14+ monocytes; ;FNA; n=5, 2
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD14+ CD16+ Monocytes, CD14+ Monocytes and CD16+ Monocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD14+ monocytes;Core; n=3, 3
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD14+ CD16+ Monocytes, CD14+ Monocytes and CD16+ Monocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD16+ monocytes; ;FNA; n=0, 2
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8; FNA; n=12, 8
11.96 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 2.298
13.58 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 2.721
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8; Core; n=11, 10
17.12 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 2.342
13.11 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 2.489
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Central Memory CD8; FNA; n=12, 7
4.84 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.895
5.00 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 1.113
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Central Memory CD8; Core; n=11, 10
6.25 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 1.264
7.41 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 1.352
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Effector Memory CD8; FNA; n=12, 8
11.32 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 2.026
13.43 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 2.389
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Effector Memory CD8; Core; n= 11, 10
16.16 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 2.105
17.76 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 2.236
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Naive CD8; FNA; n=12, 8
61.17 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 4.306
57.65 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 4.994
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Naive CD8; Core; n=11, 10
49.07 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 4.888
51.25 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 5.224
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Stem Cell Memory-like CD8;FNA; n= 12, 6
1.73 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.428
2.65 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.563
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Stem Cell Memory-like CD8; Core; 9,10
1.64 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.257
2.06 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.269

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles). NA indicates that data was not available.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cell-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH cell-like Reg T cells; FNA;n=2, 3
NA Percentage of TFH cell-like Reg T Cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
NA Percentage of TFH cell-like Reg T Cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cell-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH cell-like Reg T cells; Core; n=4,5
NA Percentage of TFH cell-like Reg T Cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
NA Percentage of TFH cell-like Reg T Cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH cells; Core; n=6, 10
1.55 Percentage of TFH cells
Standard Error 5.416
8.58 Percentage of TFH cells
Standard Error 4.613
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH cells; FNA; n=8, 4
3.95 Percentage of TFH cells
Standard Error 1.601
9.34 Percentage of TFH cells
Standard Error 1.977

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conv T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Naive Conv T cells; FNA; n=12,8
50.43 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 3.672
52.52 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 4.395
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conv T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD45RA+ Effector Memory Conv T cells; FNA; n=12, 7
1.16 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 0.221
0.77 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 0.282
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conv T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD45RA+ Effector Memory Conv T cells;Core;n=11, 10
1.13 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 0.126
0.99 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 0.133
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conv T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Central Memory Conv T cells; FNA; n= 12, 8
21.15 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 2.765
21.34 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 3.188
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conv T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Central Memory Conv T cells; Core; n= 11, 10
24.99 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 2.881
28.71 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 3.087
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conv T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Effector Memory Conv T cells; FNA; n=12, 8
17.71 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 2.605
15.46 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 3.080
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conv T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Effector Memory Conv T cells; Core; n=11, 10
23.16 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 2.736
21.10 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 2.909
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conv T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Naive Conv T cells; Core; n=11, 10
41.82 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 3.421
41.34 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 3.614
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conv T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T cells; FNA; n=12, 7
1.39 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 0.191
1.40 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 0.249
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conv T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T cells; Core; n=11, 10
1.31 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 0.224
1.73 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 0.236

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TFH cells; ; FNA; n=12, 8
24.09 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.913
17.09 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 3.651
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TFH cells; Core; n=11,10
21.94 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 3.335
25.86 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 3.491
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH cells; FNA; n=8,4
0.89 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.356
2.15 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.545
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH cells; Core; n=6,10
1.72 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.239
1.71 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.859
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH17 cells;FNA; n=12,8
7.73 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.122
6.96 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.289
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH17 cells; Core; n=11,10
5.38 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.915
5.33 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.977
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 cells; FNA; n=12,8
14.08 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.340
15.05 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.777
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 cells; Core; n=11,10
16.09 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.858
22.12 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.970
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 TH17 cells; FNA; n=10,4
2.97 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.510
3.07 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.728
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 TH17 cells; Core; n=10,10
3.08 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.553
2.49 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.559
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 TH17 TH2 T cells; FNA; n=10,4
1.87 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.371
1.44 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.488
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 TH17 TH2 T cells; Core; n=10,10
2.01 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.390
1.63 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.409
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 TH2 cells; FNA; n=12,6
6.20 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.910
5.68 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.250
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 TH2 cells; Core; n=10, 10
9.25 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.130
8.83 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.147
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH2 cells; FNA; n=12,8
20.82 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.168
18.67 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.562
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH2 cells; Core; n=11,10
19.24 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.685
15.29 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.821
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH22 cells; FNA; n=12,4
1.51 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.336
1.46 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.530
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH22 cells; Core; n=10, 10
1.49 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.308
1.50 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.311

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles). NA indicates that data was not available.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TFH cells-like Reg T cells; FNA; n=11, 5
13.52 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 2.224
13.22 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 2.869
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TFH cells-like Reg T cells; Core; n=9, 10
13.44 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.884
12.71 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.926
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH cells-like Reg T cells;FNA;n=2,3
NA Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
NA Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH cells-like Reg T cells;Core;n=4,5
NA Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
NA Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 cells-like Reg T cells;FNA; n=11,5
7.19 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.428
12.09 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.900
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 cells-like Reg T cells;Core;n=8, 10
7.43 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.211
10.72 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.167
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 TH17-like Reg T cells;FNA; n=1, 1
NA Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
NA Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 TH17-like Reg T cells;Core; n=0,2
NA Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 TH17 TH2 cells-like Reg T cells;FNA; n=7, 4
2.88 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.599
3.17 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.845
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 TH17 TH2 cells-like Reg T cells;Core;n=5,5
2.25 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.381
5.05 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.348
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 TH2 cells-like Reg T cells;FNA; n=11, 4
9.08 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.092
10.52 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.813
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 TH2 cells-like Reg T cells;Core; n=10,10
11.15 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.434
11.45 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.460
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH17 cells-like Reg T cells;FNA; n=11, 4
8.18 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.547
9.64 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 2.146
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH17 cells-like Reg T cells;Core; n=10, 10
6.23 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.507
5.70 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.582
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH2 cells-like Reg T cells;FNA; n=12, 8
27.38 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 2.749
29.63 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 3.305
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH2 cells-like Reg T cells;Core; n=11, 10
28.28 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 2.386
24.86 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 2.522
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH22 cells-like Reg T cells;FNA; n=6,3
2.30 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.653
2.95 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.950
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH22 cells-like Reg T cells;Core; n=7,7
2.28 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.619
2.45 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.610

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T Reg cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Reg T cells; FNA; n=10, 4
11.98 Percentage of CD4 T cells
Standard Error 0.750
11.52 Percentage of CD4 T cells
Standard Error 1.067
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Reg T cells; Core; n=5, 9
12.11 Percentage of CD4 T cells
Standard Error 0.871
13.05 Percentage of CD4 T cells
Standard Error 0.597

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T Reg cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD69+ CD8 and Antigen Ki67 (Ki67)+ CD8 in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD69+ CD8 cells; FNA; n=10, 4
16.80 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 2.837
17.97 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 4.201
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD69+ CD8 and Antigen Ki67 (Ki67)+ CD8 in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD69+ CD8 cells; Core; n=5, 9
18.74 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 4.287
23.12 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 3.117
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD69+ CD8 and Antigen Ki67 (Ki67)+ CD8 in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Ki67+ CD8 cells; FNA; n=9, 3
4.82 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.689
3.33 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 1.189
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD69+ CD8 and Antigen Ki67 (Ki67)+ CD8 in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Ki67+ CD8 cells; Core; n=4, 6
6.90 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 1.025
3.99 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.785

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T Reg cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD15s+ Reg T cells; FNA; n=9, 4
12.99 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 2.022
8.13 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 2.327
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD15s+ Reg T cells; Core; n=4, 8
20.10 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 4.531
11.89 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 5.044
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD69+ Reg T cells; FNA; n=10, 4
48.55 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 3.666
59.74 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 4.510
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD69+ Reg T cells; Core; n=5, 9
47.48 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 2.744
53.37 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 2.708
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Helios+ Reg T cells; FNA; n=10, 4
80.88 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 1.559
79.23 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 1.929
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Helios+ Reg T cells; Core; n=5, 9
81.68 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 2.180
79.10 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 1.968
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Ki67+ T Reg cells; FNA; n=8, 4
8.02 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 1.855
4.80 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 2.072
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Ki67+ T Reg cells; Core; n=4, 7
8.76 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 0.893
5.38 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 0.996
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Memory Reg T cells; FNA; n=10, 4
47.10 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 2.842
48.55 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 3.788
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Memory Reg T cells; Core; n=5, 9
53.13 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 3.036
51.25 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 2.818
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Resting Reg T cells; FNA; n=9, 4
38.09 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 3.392
27.64 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 4.692
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Resting Reg T cells; Core; n=5, 9
32.54 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 3.828
26.37 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 3.080

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T Reg cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD15s+ Conv T cells;FNA;n=9, 4
3.02 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.448
1.64 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.533
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD15s+ Conv T cells; Core; n=5, 8
5.85 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.892
3.66 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.978
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD69+ Conv T cells;FNA;n=10, 4
27.95 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 3.498
28.86 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 5.346
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD69+ Conv T cells; Core; n=5, 9
27.54 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 3.870
31.73 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.943
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Helios+ Conv T cells ; FNA;n=10, 4
5.14 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.750
5.27 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.980
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Helios+ Conv T cells ; Core; n=5, 9
5.85 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.644
5.44 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.570
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Ki67+ Conv T cells; FNA;n=9, 4
4.07 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.760
0.86 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.935
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Ki67+ Conv T cells ; Core; n=5, 8
4.72 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.502
2.45 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.505

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1

Population: Safety Population

Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T Reg cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD15s+ Memory Conv T cells; FNA; n=9, 4
6.39 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 0.889
3.12 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 1.042
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD15s+ Memory Conv T cells; Core; n=5, 8
8.80 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 1.390
6.06 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 1.585
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD69+ Memory Conv T cells; FNA; n=10, 4
45.74 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 3.604
45.74 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 5.662
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD69+ Memory Conv T cells; Core; n=5, 9
42.91 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 3.198
47.03 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 2.314
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Helios+ Memory Conv T cells; FNA; n=9, 4
7.68 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 1.312
6.35 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 2.661
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Helios+ Memory Conv T cells; Core; n=5, 9
8.82 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 2.144
7.59 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 0.794
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Ki67+ Memory Conv T cells; FNA; n=9, 4
4.32 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 0.659
1.62 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 0.777
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Ki67+ Memory Conv T cells; Core; n=4, 8
4.63 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 0.482
3.04 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 0.558

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to Day 14

Population: Safety Population

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/ incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/ birth defect or other situations.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-SAEs
Any SAE
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-SAEs
Any non-SAE
9 Participants
5 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to Day 4

Population: Safety Population

Participants were asked to complete Pre-Biopsy Lymph Node Questionnaire about their expectations/experiences of undergoing the procedure of FNA biopsy followed by core needle biopsy. The number of participants who underwent procedure under local anesthetics have been presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Number of Participants Undergoing Procedure Under Local Anesthetics
6 Participants
7 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to Day 4

Population: Safety Population

Participants were asked to complete Pre-Biopsy Lymph Node Questionnaire about their expectations/experiences of undergoing the procedure of FNA biopsy followed by core needle biopsy. The number of participants who underwent iLN biopsy under local anesthetics have been presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Number of Participants Undergoing iLN Biopsy Under Local Anesthetics
0 Participants
0 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to Day 4

Population: Safety Population

Participants were asked to complete Pre-Biopsy Lymph Node Questionnaire about their expectations/experiences of undergoing the procedure of FNA biopsy followed by core needle biopsy. The different reasons have been listed as follows; have friend with diabetes mellitus (DM)/ to progress knowledge, to improve medicines development, participating in the study because of the honorarium, any other reason not listed above was categorized as "other" and participants having all three reasons as listed above to participate in the study were included in "All reasons" category

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Number of Participants With Different Reasons for Participating in the Study
Have friend with DM/ to progress knowledge
2 Participants
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Different Reasons for Participating in the Study
To improve medicines development
10 Participants
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Different Reasons for Participating in the Study
Honorarium
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Different Reasons for Participating in the Study
Other
0 Participants
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Different Reasons for Participating in the Study
All reasons
0 Participants
1 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to Day 4

Population: Safety Population

Participants were asked to complete Pre-Biopsy Lymph Node Questionnaire about their expectations/experiences of undergoing the procedure of FNA biopsy followed by core needle biopsy. The number of participants with extreme anxiety towards the procedure have been presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Number of Participants With Extreme Anxiety Towards the Lymph Node Biopsy
0 Participants
0 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to Day 4

Population: Safety Population

Participants were asked to complete Pre-Biopsy Lymph Node Questionnaire about their expectations/experiences of undergoing the procedure of FNA biopsy followed by core needle biopsy. The number of participants looking forward to undergo the procedure have been presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Number of Participants Looking Forward to Undergo the Procedure
1 Participants
0 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to Day 4

Population: Safety Population

Participants were asked to complete Post-Biopsy Lymph Node Questionnaire about their expectations/experiences of undergoing the procedure of FNA biopsy followed by core needle biopsy. The aspects better explained were as follows; itself, anesthetic procedure, after-care, none and any other procedure not listed above was categorized as "other".

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Number of Participants With Aspects Better Explained About the Lymph Node Biopsy Procedure
Procedure itself
1 Participants
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Aspects Better Explained About the Lymph Node Biopsy Procedure
Anesthetic procedure
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Aspects Better Explained About the Lymph Node Biopsy Procedure
After-care
1 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Aspects Better Explained About the Lymph Node Biopsy Procedure
None
9 Participants
9 Participants
Number of Participants With Aspects Better Explained About the Lymph Node Biopsy Procedure
Other
1 Participants
0 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to Day 4

Population: Safety Population

Participants were asked to complete Post-Biopsy Lymph Node Questionnaire about their expectations/experiences of undergoing the procedure of FNA biopsy followed by core needle biopsy. The number of participants who considered to undergo procedure another time have been presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Number of Participants Who Considered to Undergo Lymph Node Biopsy Procedure Another Time
10 Participants
9 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to Day 4

Population: Safety Population

Participants were asked to complete Post-Biopsy Lymph Node Questionnaire about their expectations/experiences of undergoing the procedure of FNA biopsy followed by core needle biopsy. Participants who were encouraged in study for iLN biopsy have been presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Number of Participants Who Were Encouraged to be Included in Study for iLN Biopsy
11 Participants
8 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to Day 4

Population: Safety Population

Participants were asked to complete Post-Biopsy Lymph Node Questionnaire about their expectations/experiences of undergoing the procedure of FNA biopsy followed by core needle biopsy. Participants who appreciated receiving study feedback have been presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Number of Participants Who Appreciated Receiving Study Feedback
12 Participants
10 Participants

Adverse Events

Healthy Participants

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 9 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Participants With NOT1D

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 5 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=12 participants at risk
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 participants at risk
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (non-SAEs) were collected up to Day 14.
SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Safety Population which comprised of all participants who completed any study assessment.
0.00%
0/10 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (non-SAEs) were collected up to Day 14.
SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Safety Population which comprised of all participants who completed any study assessment.
General disorders
Fatigue
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (non-SAEs) were collected up to Day 14.
SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Safety Population which comprised of all participants who completed any study assessment.
0.00%
0/10 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (non-SAEs) were collected up to Day 14.
SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Safety Population which comprised of all participants who completed any study assessment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural contusion
33.3%
4/12 • Number of events 4 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (non-SAEs) were collected up to Day 14.
SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Safety Population which comprised of all participants who completed any study assessment.
40.0%
4/10 • Number of events 4 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (non-SAEs) were collected up to Day 14.
SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Safety Population which comprised of all participants who completed any study assessment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pain
50.0%
6/12 • Number of events 6 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (non-SAEs) were collected up to Day 14.
SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Safety Population which comprised of all participants who completed any study assessment.
40.0%
4/10 • Number of events 4 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (non-SAEs) were collected up to Day 14.
SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Safety Population which comprised of all participants who completed any study assessment.

Additional Information

GSK Response Center

GlaxoSmithKline

Phone: 866-435-7343

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER