Trial Outcomes & Findings for Immune Profile in Subjects With New Onset Type 1 Diabetes (NCT NCT02801942)
NCT ID: NCT02801942
Last Updated: 2019-02-27
Results Overview
Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. The analysis was based upon Safety Population which comprised of all participants who complete any study assessment. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles). NA indicates that data was not available.
COMPLETED
NA
22 participants
Pre Biopsy session on Day 1
2019-02-27
Participant Flow
This was a multi-center, non-drug treatment study to compare differences in immune cells derived from the inguinal lymph nodes (iLN) and peripheral blood of New Onset Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (NOT1D) participants and healthy volunteers. Participants were enrolled at a single center in United Kingdom.
Participants underwent iLN biopsies by two methods; fine-needle aspirate (FNA) and core needle biopsy. Participants underwent screening followed by study visits and follow-up. A total of 43 participants were screened, of which, 21 were considered as screen failures and 22 were enrolled into the study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
12
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
12
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Immune Profile in Subjects With New Onset Type 1 Diabetes
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
Total
n=22 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
28.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.53 • n=5 Participants
|
27.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.35 • n=7 Participants
|
27.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.38 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - White/Caucasian/European Heritage
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. The analysis was based upon Safety Population which comprised of all participants who complete any study assessment. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles). NA indicates that data was not available.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in Blood
Circulating B Lymphocytes; n=12, 10
|
16.54 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 2.229
|
14.23 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 2.442
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in Blood
Classical B Lymphocytes; n=12, 10
|
19.37 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 1.616
|
15.83 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 1.771
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in Blood
Double Negative B Lymphocytes; n=12, 10
|
3.25 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 1.250
|
6.26 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 1.370
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in Blood
Naive B Lymphocytes; n=12, 10
|
59.81 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 3.021
|
62.32 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 3.310
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in Blood
Plasmablast ; n=11, 10
|
NA Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
NA Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in Blood
Transitional B Lymphocytes; n=12, 10
|
NA Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
NA Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles). NA indicates that data was not available.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN
Transitional B Lymphocytes; ; n=3, 2
|
NA Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
NA Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN
Circulating B Lymphocytes; n=9, 10
|
15.51 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 1.860
|
12.14 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 1.898
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN
Classical B Lymphocytes; n=9, 10
|
38.78 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 4.119
|
30.19 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 4.130
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN
Double Negative B Lymphocytes; n=9, 10
|
8.68 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 1.668
|
10.26 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 1.651
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN
Naive B Lymphocytes; n=9, 10
|
35.83 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 3.761
|
44.13 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 3.621
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN
Plasmablast; n=4, 8
|
NA Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
NA Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. NA indicates that data was not available.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, Clusters of Differentiation 56 Positive (CD56+) CD16+ , CD56bright Natural Killer (NK) Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16 Negative (CD56lo CD16-), Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in Blood
CD56lo CD16+
|
7.96 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 1.011
|
8.24 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 1.108
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, Clusters of Differentiation 56 Positive (CD56+) CD16+ , CD56bright Natural Killer (NK) Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16 Negative (CD56lo CD16-), Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in Blood
B-cells
|
8.50 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.589
|
7.58 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.645
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, Clusters of Differentiation 56 Positive (CD56+) CD16+ , CD56bright Natural Killer (NK) Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16 Negative (CD56lo CD16-), Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in Blood
CD56+CD16+
|
NA Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
NA Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, Clusters of Differentiation 56 Positive (CD56+) CD16+ , CD56bright Natural Killer (NK) Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16 Negative (CD56lo CD16-), Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in Blood
CD56bright NK cells
|
0.36 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.042
|
0.30 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.046
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, Clusters of Differentiation 56 Positive (CD56+) CD16+ , CD56bright Natural Killer (NK) Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16 Negative (CD56lo CD16-), Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in Blood
CD56lo CD16-
|
0.24 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.036
|
0.23 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.040
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, Clusters of Differentiation 56 Positive (CD56+) CD16+ , CD56bright Natural Killer (NK) Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16 Negative (CD56lo CD16-), Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in Blood
Dendritic cells
|
0.93 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.080
|
0.87 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.088
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, Clusters of Differentiation 56 Positive (CD56+) CD16+ , CD56bright Natural Killer (NK) Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16 Negative (CD56lo CD16-), Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in Blood
NK cells
|
8.71 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.999
|
8.84 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 1.095
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles). NA indicates that data was not available.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16-, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN
B-cells; n=9, 10
|
8.88 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 1.641
|
7.34 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 1.512
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16-, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN
CD56+CD16+; n=8, 8
|
NA Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
NA Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16-, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN
CD56bright NK cells; n=9, 10
|
0.54 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.098
|
0.50 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.101
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16-, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN
CD56lo CD16+; n=9, 10
|
0.68 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.173
|
0.69 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.184
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16-, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN
CD56lo CD16-; n=8, 9
|
0.19 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.043
|
0.21 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.040
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16-, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN
Dendritic cells; n=9, 10
|
0.45 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.100
|
0.39 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.081
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16-, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN
NK cells; n=9, 10
|
1.43 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.324
|
1.50 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.364
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. NA indicates that data was not available.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in Blood
CD56bright NK cells
|
5.02 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 0.894
|
3.99 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 0.980
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in Blood
CD56lo CD16+
|
89.71 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 1.567
|
92.40 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 1.717
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in Blood
CD56+CD16+
|
NA Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
NA Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in Blood
CD56lo CD16-
|
3.11 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 0.497
|
2.70 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 0.545
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles). NA indicates that data was not available.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in iLN
CD56+CD16+; n=8, 8
|
NA Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
NA Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in iLN
CD56bright NK cells; n=9, 10
|
41.85 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 3.999
|
35.01 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 3.868
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in iLN
CD56lo CD16+; n=9, 10
|
37.12 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 6.220
|
45.01 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 4.900
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in iLN
CD56lo CD16-; n=8, 9
|
12.80 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 1.855
|
14.26 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 1.490
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Myeloid Dendritic Cells and Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells in Blood
Myeloid Dendritic cells
|
51.78 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 3.073
|
50.45 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 3.366
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Myeloid Dendritic Cells and Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells in Blood
Plasmacytoid Dendritic cells
|
45.51 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 3.140
|
47.36 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 3.440
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA.Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Myeloid Dendritic Cells and Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells in iLN
Myeloid Dendritic cells; n=8, 10
|
42.96 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 3.870
|
30.72 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 4.128
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Myeloid Dendritic Cells and Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells in iLN
Plasmacytoid Dendritic cells; n=9, 9
|
57.43 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 4.426
|
68.30 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 5.372
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. NA indicates that data was not available.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD14+ CD16+ Monocytes, CD14+ Monocytes, and CD16+ Monocytes in Blood
CD14+ monocytes
|
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis
|
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD14+ CD16+ Monocytes, CD14+ Monocytes, and CD16+ Monocytes in Blood
CD16+ monocytes
|
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis
|
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD14+ CD16+ Monocytes, CD14+ Monocytes, and CD16+ Monocytes in Blood
CD14+ CD16+ monocytes
|
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis
|
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles). NA indicates that data was not available.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD14+ CD16+ Monocytes, CD14+ Monocytes and CD16+ Monocytes in iLN
CD14+ CD16+ monocytes; n=0, 1
|
—
|
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD14+ CD16+ Monocytes, CD14+ Monocytes and CD16+ Monocytes in iLN
CD14+ monocytes; n=7, 4
|
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD14+ CD16+ Monocytes, CD14+ Monocytes and CD16+ Monocytes in iLN
CD16+ monocytes; n=0, 2
|
—
|
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 Cells in Blood
CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8
|
29.89 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 4.267
|
28.10 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 4.674
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 Cells in Blood
Central Memory CD8
|
7.13 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 1.537
|
6.98 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 1.684
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 Cells in Blood
Effector Memory CD8
|
19.22 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 2.223
|
14.84 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 2.435
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 Cells in Blood
Stem Cell Memory-like CD8
|
1.34 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.206
|
1.37 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.225
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 Cells in Blood
Naive CD8
|
34.38 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 3.863
|
40.44 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 4.231
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 Cells in iLN
Effector Memory CD8
|
13.74 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 1.867
|
15.59 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 2.074
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 Cells in iLN
Naive CD8
|
55.12 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 4.259
|
54.45 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 4.700
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 Cells in iLN
Stem Cell Memory-like CD8
|
1.69 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.316
|
2.36 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.377
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 Cells in iLN
CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8
|
14.54 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 2.094
|
13.34 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 2.330
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 Cells in iLN
Central Memory CD8
|
5.55 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.978
|
6.21 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 1.093
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population. Data were not collected due to lack of model convergence or model reliability.
Peripheral blood samples were planned to be collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Results could not be presented as data were not collected for this analysis due to lack of model convergence or model reliability
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at specified time point were analyzed.
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. NA indicates that data was not available.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=5 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=7 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cell-like Reg T Cells in iLN
|
NA Percentage of TFH cell-like Reg T cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
NA Percentage of TFH cell-like Reg T cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at specified time point were analyzed.
Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=6 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=7 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells in Blood
|
0.53 Percentage of TFH cells
Standard Error 0.173
|
0.87 Percentage of TFH cells
Standard Error 0.160
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at specified time point were analyzed.
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=10 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells in iLN
|
2.75 Percentage of TFH cells
Standard Error 3.192
|
8.96 Percentage of TFH cells
Standard Error 2.973
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conventional (Conv) T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in Blood
Central Memory Conv T cells
|
32.21 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.125
|
33.75 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.328
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conventional (Conv) T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in Blood
Effector Memory Conv T cells
|
11.74 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.409
|
11.97 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.543
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conventional (Conv) T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in Blood
Naive Conv T cells
|
43.40 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.586
|
42.48 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.833
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conventional (Conv) T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in Blood
Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T cells
|
0.91 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.098
|
1.01 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.107
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conventional (Conv) T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in Blood
CD45RA+ Effector Memory Conv T cells
|
2.47 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.856
|
1.44 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.937
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conv T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in iLN
Effector Memory Conv T cells
|
20.43 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.422
|
18.28 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.692
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conv T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in iLN
Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T cells
|
1.35 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.176
|
1.57 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.201
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conv T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in iLN
CD45RA+ Effector Memory Conv T cells
|
1.14 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.152
|
0.88 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.180
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conv T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in iLN
Central Memory Conv T cells
|
23.07 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.646
|
25.03 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.923
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conv T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in iLN
Naive Conv T cells
|
46.13 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 3.081
|
46.93 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 3.454
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in Blood
TFH cells; n=12, 10
|
16.77 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.723
|
21.86 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.888
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in Blood
PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH cells; n=6, 7
|
0.13 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.036
|
0.18 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.035
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in Blood
TH1 TH17 cells; n=12, 10
|
16.25 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.606
|
16.22 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.759
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in Blood
TH1 TH17 TH2 T cells; n=12, 10
|
7.16 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.750
|
7.16 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.821
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in Blood
TH22 cells; n=12, 10
|
3.00 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.340
|
3.01 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.372
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in Blood
TH17 cells; n=12, 10
|
7.79 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.963
|
7.89 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.055
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in Blood
TH1 cells; n=12, 10
|
19.69 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.895
|
17.60 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 3.172
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in Blood
TH1 TH2 cells; n=12, 10
|
9.30 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.692
|
9.90 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.758
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in Blood
TH2 cells; n=12, 10
|
8.46 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.994
|
6.89 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.089
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN
TFH cells; n=12,10
|
23.02 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.385
|
21.48 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.706
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN
TH1 TH17 cells; n=11,10
|
3.03 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.483
|
2.78 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.558
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN
PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH cells; n=10,10
|
1.30 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.662
|
1.93 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.542
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN
TH17 cells; n=12,10
|
6.56 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.932
|
6.15 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.033
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN
TH1 cells; n=12,10
|
15.08 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.878
|
18.58 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.110
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN
TH1 TH17 TH2 T cells; n=11,10
|
1.94 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.360
|
1.54 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.409
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN
TH1 TH2 cells; n=12,10
|
7.73 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.816
|
7.25 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.942
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN
TH2 cells; n=12,10
|
20.03 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.754
|
16.98 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.975
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, Type 17 T Helper (TH17) Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN
TH22 cells; n=12,10
|
1.50 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.277
|
1.48 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.352
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. NA indicates that data was not availble. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in Blood
TH1 cells-like Reg T cells; n=12, 10
|
5.35 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.643
|
6.18 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.704
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in Blood
TH22 cells-like Reg T cells; n=12, 10
|
11.46 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.953
|
12.63 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.044
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in Blood
TFH cells-like Reg T cells; n=12, 10
|
11.63 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.901
|
16.46 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 2.083
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in Blood
TH1 TH17-like Reg T cells; n=7, 7
|
NA Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
NA Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in Blood
TH1 TH17 TH2 cells-like Reg T cells; n=12, 10
|
10.48 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.036
|
13.36 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.135
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in Blood
TH1 TH2 cells-like Reg T cells; n=12, 10
|
12.04 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.649
|
10.24 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.711
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in Blood
TH17 cells-like Reg T cells; n=12, 10
|
17.37 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.869
|
17.67 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.952
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in Blood
TH2 cells-like Reg T cells; n=12, 10
|
12.47 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.285
|
9.09 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.408
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles). NA indicates that data was not available.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN
TFH cells-like Reg T cells; n=12, 10
|
13.48 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.913
|
12.97 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 2.203
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN
PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH cells-like Reg T cells; n=5,7
|
NA Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
NA Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN
TH1 cells-like Reg T cells; n=12, 10
|
7.31 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.202
|
11.41 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.395
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN
TH1 TH17-like Reg T cells; n=1, 2
|
NA Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
NA Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN
TH1 TH17 TH2 cells-like Reg T cells; n=7, 6
|
2.56 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.839
|
4.11 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.871
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN
TH1 TH2 cells-like Reg T cells; n=12, 10
|
10.12 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.085
|
10.99 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.342
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN
TH17 cells-like Reg T cells; n=12, 10
|
7.20 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.418
|
7.67 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.673
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN
TH2 cells-like Reg T cells; n=12, 10
|
27.83 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 2.262
|
27.24 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 2.546
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN
TH22 cells-like Reg T cells; n=8, 7
|
2.29 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.513
|
2.70 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.628
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T Reg cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Reg T Cells in Blood
|
6.95 Percentage of CD4 T cells
Standard Error 0.405
|
6.56 Percentage of CD4 T cells
Standard Error 0.444
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at specified time point were analyzed.
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T Reg cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=11 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=9 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Reg T Cells in iLN
|
12.04 Percentage of CD4 T cells
Standard Error 0.631
|
12.28 Percentage of CD4 T cells
Standard Error 0.682
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T Reg cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD69+ CD8 and Antigen Ki67 (Ki67)+ CD8 in Blood
CD69+ CD8 cells
|
3.23 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.299
|
2.28 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.327
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD69+ CD8 and Antigen Ki67 (Ki67)+ CD8 in Blood
Ki67+ CD8 cells
|
1.06 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.391
|
1.89 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.429
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T Reg cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD69+ CD8 and Antigen Ki67 (Ki67)+ CD8 in iLN
CD69+ CD8 cells; n=11, 9
|
17.77 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 2.950
|
20.54 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 3.127
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD69+ CD8 and Antigen Ki67 (Ki67)+ CD8 in iLN
Ki67+ CD8 cells; n= 11, 6
|
5.86 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.646
|
3.66 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.828
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T Reg cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in Blood
CD69+ Reg T cells; n= 11, 10
|
3.19 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 0.213
|
2.27 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 0.223
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in Blood
Helios+ Reg T cells; n= 12, 10
|
75.19 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 2.034
|
70.98 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 2.228
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in Blood
Ki67+ T Reg cells; n= 12, 10
|
5.34 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 0.664
|
6.32 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 0.727
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in Blood
Memory Reg T cells; n= 12, 10
|
40.93 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 2.563
|
45.79 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 2.808
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in Blood
Resting Reg T cells n= 12, 10
|
45.34 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 3.191
|
36.74 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 3.496
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in Blood
CD15s+ Reg T cells; n= 12, 10
|
7.84 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 1.492
|
9.13 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 1.635
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T Reg cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN
CD15s+ Reg T cells; n=11, 8
|
16.54 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 3.248
|
10.01 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 3.675
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN
CD69+ Reg T cells; n= 11, 9
|
48.02 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 3.034
|
56.55 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 3.451
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN
Helios+ Reg T cells; n=11,9
|
81.28 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 1.723
|
79.17 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 1.837
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN
Ki67+ T Reg cell; n= 10, 8
|
8.39 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 1.347
|
5.09 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 1.505
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN
Memory Reg T cells; n= 11, 9
|
50.12 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 2.660
|
49.90 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 3.022
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN
Resting Reg T cells; n=11,9
|
35.32 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 3.031
|
27.00 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 3.453
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T Reg cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in Blood
CD69+ Conv T cells
|
2.05 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.206
|
1.41 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.226
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in Blood
CD15s+ Conv T cells
|
2.59 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.405
|
2.28 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.444
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in Blood
Helios+ Conv T cells
|
2.07 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.233
|
1.68 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.255
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in Blood
Ki67+ Conv T cells
|
1.02 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.202
|
1.18 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.221
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T Reg cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in iLN
CD15s+ Conv T cells; n=11, 8
|
4.43 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.653
|
2.65 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.743
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in iLN
Ki67+ Conv T cells; n= 11,8
|
4.39 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.560
|
1.65 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.669
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in iLN
CD69+ Conv T cells; n=11, 9
|
27.74 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 3.060
|
30.29 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 3.589
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in iLN
Helios+ Conv T cells;n=11,9
|
5.50 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.631
|
5.35 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.720
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Peripheral blood samples were collected from both healthy and NOT1D participants at the indicated time points for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T Reg cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in Blood
Helios+ Memory Conv T cells
|
3.46 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.401
|
2.64 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.439
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in Blood
CD15s+ Memory Conv T cells
|
5.39 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.906
|
4.82 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.993
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in Blood
CD69+ Memory Conv T cells
|
2.53 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.237
|
1.69 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.259
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in Blood
Ki67+ Memory Conv T cells
|
2.03 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.397
|
2.34 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.435
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T Reg cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in iLN
CD15s+ Memory Conv T cells; n=11, 8
|
7.60 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.131
|
4.59 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.307
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in iLN
CD69+ Memory Conv T cells; n=11, 9
|
44.32 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.739
|
46.38 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 3.433
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in iLN
Helios+ Memory Conv T cells; n= 11, 9
|
8.25 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.450
|
6.97 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.438
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in iLN
Ki67+ Memory Conv T cells; n=11,8
|
4.47 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.545
|
2.33 Percentage of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.643
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles). NA indicates that data was not available.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Naive B Lymphocytes;FNA; n=9,4
|
36.05 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 3.545
|
44.36 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 4.939
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Naive B Lymphocytes; Core; n= 4, 8
|
35.60 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 4.671
|
43.91 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 3.796
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Transitional B Lymphocytes;Core; n=1, 2
|
NA Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
NA Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Circulating B Lymphocytes; FNA; n=9,4
|
14.36 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 2.104
|
12.07 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 2.272
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Circulating B Lymphocytes; Core; n=4, 8
|
16.66 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 1.668
|
12.20 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 1.633
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Classical B Lymphocytes; FNA; n=9,4
|
39.89 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 4.438
|
28.35 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 6.283
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Classical B Lymphocytes; Core; n= 4, 8
|
37.66 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 4.711
|
32.02 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 3.716
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Double Negative B Lymphocytes; FNA; n=9,4
|
8.48 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 2.285
|
9.85 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 2.430
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Double Negative B Lymphocytes; Core; n= 4, 8
|
8.89 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 1.302
|
10.68 Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error 1.177
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Plasmablast; FNA; n=4, 3
|
NA Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
NA Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Plasmablast; Core; n=0, 5
|
—
|
NA Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B Lymphocytes, Classical B Lymphocytes, Double Negative B Lymphocytes, Naive B Lymphocytes, Plasmablast and Transitional B Lymphocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Transitional B Lymphocytes; FNA; n=2, 1
|
NA Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
NA Percentage of B lymphocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles). NA indicates that data was not available.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
B-cells; FNA; n=9, 4
|
10.48 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 1.417
|
5.51 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 2.106
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
B-cells; Core; n=4, 8
|
7.29 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 2.411
|
9.17 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 1.769
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56+CD16+; FNA; n=8, 2
|
NA Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
NA Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56+CD16+; Core; n=2, 7
|
NA Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
NA Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56bright NK cells; FNA; n=9, 4
|
0.61 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.110
|
0.47 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.154
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56bright NK cells; Core; n=4, 8
|
0.47 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.118
|
0.53 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.089
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56lo CD16+; FNA; n=9, 4
|
0.55 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.215
|
0.94 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.340
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56lo CD16+; Core; n=3, 8
|
0.82 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.272
|
0.45 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.152
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56lo CD16-; FNA; n=8, 4
|
0.19 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.042
|
0.21 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.053
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56lo CD16-; Core; n=3,7
|
0.18 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.054
|
0.21 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.041
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Dendritic cells; FNA; n=9, 4
|
0.47 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.061
|
0.24 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.097
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Dendritic cells; Core; n=4, 8
|
0.44 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.183
|
0.54 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.125
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
NK cells; FNA; n=9, 4
|
1.60 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.425
|
1.66 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.637
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including B-cells, CD56+ CD16+, CD56bright NK Cells, CD56lo CD16+, CD56lo CD16, Dendritic Cells, NK Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
NK cells; Core; n=4, 8
|
1.27 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.333
|
1.35 Percentage of mononuclear cells
Standard Error 0.251
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles). NA indicates that data was not available.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56br NK Cells CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56+CD16+; FNA; n=8, 2
|
NA Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
NA Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56br NK Cells CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56+CD16+; Core; n=2, 7
|
NA Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
NA Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56br NK Cells CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56bright NK cells; FNA; n=9, 4
|
40.37 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 3.934
|
26.65 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 6.356
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56br NK Cells CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56bright NK cells; Core; n=4, 8
|
43.32 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 6.340
|
43.36 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 4.129
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56br NK Cells CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56lo CD16+; FNA; n=9, 4
|
34.66 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 4.476
|
54.69 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 7.327
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56br NK Cells CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56lo CD16+; Core; n=3, 8
|
39.58 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 11.072
|
35.32 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 6.300
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56br NK Cells CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56lo CD16-; FNA; n=8, 4
|
13.17 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 1.321
|
13.31 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 2.039
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD56+CD16+, CD56br NK Cells CD56lo CD16+ and CD56lo CD16- in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD56lo CD16-; Core; n=3, 7
|
12.42 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 3.479
|
15.21 Percentage of NK cells
Standard Error 2.258
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Myeloid Dendritic Cells and Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Myeloid Dendritic cells; FNA; n=8, 4
|
46.76 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 4.383
|
38.50 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 6.298
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Myeloid Dendritic Cells and Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Myeloid Dendritic cells; Core; n=4 ,8
|
39.16 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 4.626
|
22.95 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 4.111
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Myeloid Dendritic Cells and Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Plasmacytoid Dendritic cells; FNA; n=9, 3
|
54.59 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 5.834
|
62.48 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 8.742
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Myeloid Dendritic Cells and Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Plasmacytoid Dendritic cells; Core; n=4, 8
|
60.27 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 4.185
|
74.12 Percentage of total dendritic cells
Standard Error 3.988
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from Monocyte Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles). NA indicates data was not available.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD14+ CD16+ Monocytes, CD14+ Monocytes and CD16+ Monocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD14+ CD16+ monocytes; ;FNA; n=0, 1
|
—
|
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD14+ CD16+ Monocytes, CD14+ Monocytes and CD16+ Monocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD14+ monocytes; ;FNA; n=5, 2
|
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD14+ CD16+ Monocytes, CD14+ Monocytes and CD16+ Monocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD14+ monocytes;Core; n=3, 3
|
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD14+ CD16+ Monocytes, CD14+ Monocytes and CD16+ Monocytes in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD16+ monocytes; ;FNA; n=0, 2
|
—
|
NA Percentage of monocytes
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8; FNA; n=12, 8
|
11.96 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 2.298
|
13.58 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 2.721
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8; Core; n=11, 10
|
17.12 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 2.342
|
13.11 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 2.489
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Central Memory CD8; FNA; n=12, 7
|
4.84 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.895
|
5.00 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 1.113
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Central Memory CD8; Core; n=11, 10
|
6.25 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 1.264
|
7.41 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 1.352
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Effector Memory CD8; FNA; n=12, 8
|
11.32 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 2.026
|
13.43 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 2.389
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Effector Memory CD8; Core; n= 11, 10
|
16.16 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 2.105
|
17.76 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 2.236
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Naive CD8; FNA; n=12, 8
|
61.17 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 4.306
|
57.65 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 4.994
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Naive CD8; Core; n=11, 10
|
49.07 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 4.888
|
51.25 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 5.224
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Stem Cell Memory-like CD8;FNA; n= 12, 6
|
1.73 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.428
|
2.65 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.563
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD45RA+ Effector Memory CD8, Central Memory CD8, Effector Memory CD8, Naive CD8 and Stem Cell Memory-like CD8 in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Stem Cell Memory-like CD8; Core; 9,10
|
1.64 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.257
|
2.06 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.269
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles). NA indicates that data was not available.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cell-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH cell-like Reg T cells; FNA;n=2, 3
|
NA Percentage of TFH cell-like Reg T Cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
NA Percentage of TFH cell-like Reg T Cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cell-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH cell-like Reg T cells; Core; n=4,5
|
NA Percentage of TFH cell-like Reg T Cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
NA Percentage of TFH cell-like Reg T Cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH cells; Core; n=6, 10
|
1.55 Percentage of TFH cells
Standard Error 5.416
|
8.58 Percentage of TFH cells
Standard Error 4.613
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH cells; FNA; n=8, 4
|
3.95 Percentage of TFH cells
Standard Error 1.601
|
9.34 Percentage of TFH cells
Standard Error 1.977
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conv T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Naive Conv T cells; FNA; n=12,8
|
50.43 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 3.672
|
52.52 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 4.395
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conv T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD45RA+ Effector Memory Conv T cells; FNA; n=12, 7
|
1.16 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 0.221
|
0.77 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 0.282
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conv T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD45RA+ Effector Memory Conv T cells;Core;n=11, 10
|
1.13 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 0.126
|
0.99 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 0.133
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conv T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Central Memory Conv T cells; FNA; n= 12, 8
|
21.15 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 2.765
|
21.34 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 3.188
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conv T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Central Memory Conv T cells; Core; n= 11, 10
|
24.99 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 2.881
|
28.71 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 3.087
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conv T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Effector Memory Conv T cells; FNA; n=12, 8
|
17.71 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 2.605
|
15.46 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 3.080
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conv T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Effector Memory Conv T cells; Core; n=11, 10
|
23.16 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 2.736
|
21.10 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 2.909
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conv T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Naive Conv T cells; Core; n=11, 10
|
41.82 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 3.421
|
41.34 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 3.614
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conv T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T cells; FNA; n=12, 7
|
1.39 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 0.191
|
1.40 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 0.249
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Central Memory Conv T Cells, Effector Memory Conv T Cells, Naive Conv T Cells and Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Stem Cell Memory-like Conv T cells; Core; n=11, 10
|
1.31 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 0.224
|
1.73 Percentage of total Conv T cell
Standard Error 0.236
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TFH cells; ; FNA; n=12, 8
|
24.09 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.913
|
17.09 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 3.651
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TFH cells; Core; n=11,10
|
21.94 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 3.335
|
25.86 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 3.491
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH cells; FNA; n=8,4
|
0.89 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.356
|
2.15 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.545
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH cells; Core; n=6,10
|
1.72 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.239
|
1.71 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.859
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH17 cells;FNA; n=12,8
|
7.73 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.122
|
6.96 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.289
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH17 cells; Core; n=11,10
|
5.38 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.915
|
5.33 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.977
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 cells; FNA; n=12,8
|
14.08 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.340
|
15.05 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.777
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 cells; Core; n=11,10
|
16.09 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.858
|
22.12 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.970
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 TH17 cells; FNA; n=10,4
|
2.97 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.510
|
3.07 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.728
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 TH17 cells; Core; n=10,10
|
3.08 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.553
|
2.49 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.559
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 TH17 TH2 T cells; FNA; n=10,4
|
1.87 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.371
|
1.44 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.488
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 TH17 TH2 T cells; Core; n=10,10
|
2.01 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.390
|
1.63 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.409
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 TH2 cells; FNA; n=12,6
|
6.20 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.910
|
5.68 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.250
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 TH2 cells; Core; n=10, 10
|
9.25 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.130
|
8.83 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.147
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH2 cells; FNA; n=12,8
|
20.82 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.168
|
18.67 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.562
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH2 cells; Core; n=11,10
|
19.24 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.685
|
15.29 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 1.821
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH22 cells; FNA; n=12,4
|
1.51 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.336
|
1.46 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.530
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH17 Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 T Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH2 Cells, and TH22 Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH22 cells; Core; n=10, 10
|
1.49 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.308
|
1.50 Percenatge of total memory Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.311
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles). NA indicates that data was not available.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TFH cells-like Reg T cells; FNA; n=11, 5
|
13.52 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 2.224
|
13.22 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 2.869
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TFH cells-like Reg T cells; Core; n=9, 10
|
13.44 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.884
|
12.71 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.926
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH cells-like Reg T cells;FNA;n=2,3
|
NA Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
NA Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH cells-like Reg T cells;Core;n=4,5
|
NA Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
NA Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 cells-like Reg T cells;FNA; n=11,5
|
7.19 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.428
|
12.09 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.900
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 cells-like Reg T cells;Core;n=8, 10
|
7.43 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.211
|
10.72 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.167
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 TH17-like Reg T cells;FNA; n=1, 1
|
NA Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
NA Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 TH17-like Reg T cells;Core; n=0,2
|
—
|
NA Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error NA
NA indicates that data was not available as the cell yield was too low to allow the analysis.
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 TH17 TH2 cells-like Reg T cells;FNA; n=7, 4
|
2.88 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.599
|
3.17 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.845
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 TH17 TH2 cells-like Reg T cells;Core;n=5,5
|
2.25 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.381
|
5.05 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.348
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 TH2 cells-like Reg T cells;FNA; n=11, 4
|
9.08 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.092
|
10.52 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.813
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH1 TH2 cells-like Reg T cells;Core; n=10,10
|
11.15 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.434
|
11.45 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.460
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH17 cells-like Reg T cells;FNA; n=11, 4
|
8.18 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.547
|
9.64 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 2.146
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH17 cells-like Reg T cells;Core; n=10, 10
|
6.23 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.507
|
5.70 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 1.582
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH2 cells-like Reg T cells;FNA; n=12, 8
|
27.38 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 2.749
|
29.63 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 3.305
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH2 cells-like Reg T cells;Core; n=11, 10
|
28.28 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 2.386
|
24.86 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 2.522
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH22 cells-like Reg T cells;FNA; n=6,3
|
2.30 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.653
|
2.95 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.950
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including TFH Cells, PD-1+ ICOS+ TFH Cells, TH1 Cells, TH1 TH17 Cells, TH1 TH17 TH2 Cells, TH1 TH2 Cells, TH17 Cells, TH2 Cells and TH22 Cells-like Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
TH22 cells-like Reg T cells;Core; n=7,7
|
2.28 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.619
|
2.45 Percentage of total memory Reg T cells
Standard Error 0.610
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T Reg cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Reg T cells; FNA; n=10, 4
|
11.98 Percentage of CD4 T cells
Standard Error 0.750
|
11.52 Percentage of CD4 T cells
Standard Error 1.067
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Reg T cells; Core; n=5, 9
|
12.11 Percentage of CD4 T cells
Standard Error 0.871
|
13.05 Percentage of CD4 T cells
Standard Error 0.597
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T Reg cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD69+ CD8 and Antigen Ki67 (Ki67)+ CD8 in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD69+ CD8 cells; FNA; n=10, 4
|
16.80 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 2.837
|
17.97 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 4.201
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD69+ CD8 and Antigen Ki67 (Ki67)+ CD8 in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD69+ CD8 cells; Core; n=5, 9
|
18.74 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 4.287
|
23.12 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 3.117
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD69+ CD8 and Antigen Ki67 (Ki67)+ CD8 in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Ki67+ CD8 cells; FNA; n=9, 3
|
4.82 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.689
|
3.33 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 1.189
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD69+ CD8 and Antigen Ki67 (Ki67)+ CD8 in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Ki67+ CD8 cells; Core; n=4, 6
|
6.90 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 1.025
|
3.99 Percentage of CD8 T cells
Standard Error 0.785
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T Reg cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD15s+ Reg T cells; FNA; n=9, 4
|
12.99 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 2.022
|
8.13 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 2.327
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD15s+ Reg T cells; Core; n=4, 8
|
20.10 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 4.531
|
11.89 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 5.044
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD69+ Reg T cells; FNA; n=10, 4
|
48.55 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 3.666
|
59.74 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 4.510
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD69+ Reg T cells; Core; n=5, 9
|
47.48 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 2.744
|
53.37 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 2.708
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Helios+ Reg T cells; FNA; n=10, 4
|
80.88 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 1.559
|
79.23 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 1.929
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Helios+ Reg T cells; Core; n=5, 9
|
81.68 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 2.180
|
79.10 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 1.968
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Ki67+ T Reg cells; FNA; n=8, 4
|
8.02 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 1.855
|
4.80 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 2.072
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Ki67+ T Reg cells; Core; n=4, 7
|
8.76 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 0.893
|
5.38 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 0.996
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Memory Reg T cells; FNA; n=10, 4
|
47.10 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 2.842
|
48.55 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 3.788
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Memory Reg T cells; Core; n=5, 9
|
53.13 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 3.036
|
51.25 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 2.818
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Resting Reg T cells; FNA; n=9, 4
|
38.09 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 3.392
|
27.64 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 4.692
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Reg T Cells, CD69+ Reg T Cells, Helios+ Reg T Cells, Ki67+ T Reg Cells, Memory Reg T Cells and Resting Reg T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Resting Reg T cells; Core; n=5, 9
|
32.54 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 3.828
|
26.37 Percentage of T Reg cells
Standard Error 3.080
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T Reg cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD15s+ Conv T cells;FNA;n=9, 4
|
3.02 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.448
|
1.64 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.533
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD15s+ Conv T cells; Core; n=5, 8
|
5.85 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.892
|
3.66 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.978
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD69+ Conv T cells;FNA;n=10, 4
|
27.95 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 3.498
|
28.86 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 5.346
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD69+ Conv T cells; Core; n=5, 9
|
27.54 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 3.870
|
31.73 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 2.943
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Helios+ Conv T cells ; FNA;n=10, 4
|
5.14 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.750
|
5.27 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.980
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Helios+ Conv T cells ; Core; n=5, 9
|
5.85 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.644
|
5.44 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.570
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Ki67+ Conv T cells; FNA;n=9, 4
|
4.07 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.760
|
0.86 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.935
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Conv T Cells, CD69+ Conv T Cells, Helios+ Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Ki67+ Conv T cells ; Core; n=5, 8
|
4.72 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.502
|
2.45 Percentage of total Conv T cells
Standard Error 0.505
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Biopsy session on Day 1Population: Safety Population
Samples were collected including up to two FNA passages of iLN and up to five core biopsies of iLN at the indicated time point from both healthy and NOT1D participants for the analysis of leukocyte subsets from T Reg cell Panel. Candidate biomarkers associated with either location of cells and/or disease-status were identified using flow cytometry technique. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze data separately for each flow cytometry cell type to provide estimates for comparisons. Fixed categorical were group, sample type, and the interaction of group with sample type, where Group was HV or NOT1D, and sample type was peripheral blood, core biopsy or FNA. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed (represented by n=x in category titles).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD15s+ Memory Conv T cells; FNA; n=9, 4
|
6.39 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 0.889
|
3.12 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 1.042
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD15s+ Memory Conv T cells; Core; n=5, 8
|
8.80 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 1.390
|
6.06 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 1.585
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD69+ Memory Conv T cells; FNA; n=10, 4
|
45.74 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 3.604
|
45.74 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 5.662
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
CD69+ Memory Conv T cells; Core; n=5, 9
|
42.91 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 3.198
|
47.03 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 2.314
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Helios+ Memory Conv T cells; FNA; n=9, 4
|
7.68 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 1.312
|
6.35 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 2.661
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Helios+ Memory Conv T cells; Core; n=5, 9
|
8.82 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 2.144
|
7.59 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 0.794
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Ki67+ Memory Conv T cells; FNA; n=9, 4
|
4.32 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 0.659
|
1.62 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 0.777
|
|
Percentage of Leukocyte Subsets Including CD15s+ Memory Conv T Cells, CD69+ Memory Conv T Cells, Helios+ Memory Conv T Cells and Ki67+ Memory Conv T Cells in iLN Core Biopsies and iLN FNA
Ki67+ Memory Conv T cells; Core; n=4, 8
|
4.63 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 0.482
|
3.04 Percentage of total memory Conv cells
Standard Error 0.558
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 14Population: Safety Population
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/ incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/ birth defect or other situations.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-SAEs
Any SAE
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-SAEs
Any non-SAE
|
9 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 4Population: Safety Population
Participants were asked to complete Pre-Biopsy Lymph Node Questionnaire about their expectations/experiences of undergoing the procedure of FNA biopsy followed by core needle biopsy. The number of participants who underwent procedure under local anesthetics have been presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Undergoing Procedure Under Local Anesthetics
|
6 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 4Population: Safety Population
Participants were asked to complete Pre-Biopsy Lymph Node Questionnaire about their expectations/experiences of undergoing the procedure of FNA biopsy followed by core needle biopsy. The number of participants who underwent iLN biopsy under local anesthetics have been presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Undergoing iLN Biopsy Under Local Anesthetics
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 4Population: Safety Population
Participants were asked to complete Pre-Biopsy Lymph Node Questionnaire about their expectations/experiences of undergoing the procedure of FNA biopsy followed by core needle biopsy. The different reasons have been listed as follows; have friend with diabetes mellitus (DM)/ to progress knowledge, to improve medicines development, participating in the study because of the honorarium, any other reason not listed above was categorized as "other" and participants having all three reasons as listed above to participate in the study were included in "All reasons" category
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Different Reasons for Participating in the Study
Have friend with DM/ to progress knowledge
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Different Reasons for Participating in the Study
To improve medicines development
|
10 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Different Reasons for Participating in the Study
Honorarium
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Different Reasons for Participating in the Study
Other
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Different Reasons for Participating in the Study
All reasons
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 4Population: Safety Population
Participants were asked to complete Pre-Biopsy Lymph Node Questionnaire about their expectations/experiences of undergoing the procedure of FNA biopsy followed by core needle biopsy. The number of participants with extreme anxiety towards the procedure have been presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Extreme Anxiety Towards the Lymph Node Biopsy
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 4Population: Safety Population
Participants were asked to complete Pre-Biopsy Lymph Node Questionnaire about their expectations/experiences of undergoing the procedure of FNA biopsy followed by core needle biopsy. The number of participants looking forward to undergo the procedure have been presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Looking Forward to Undergo the Procedure
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 4Population: Safety Population
Participants were asked to complete Post-Biopsy Lymph Node Questionnaire about their expectations/experiences of undergoing the procedure of FNA biopsy followed by core needle biopsy. The aspects better explained were as follows; itself, anesthetic procedure, after-care, none and any other procedure not listed above was categorized as "other".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Aspects Better Explained About the Lymph Node Biopsy Procedure
Procedure itself
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Aspects Better Explained About the Lymph Node Biopsy Procedure
Anesthetic procedure
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Aspects Better Explained About the Lymph Node Biopsy Procedure
After-care
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Aspects Better Explained About the Lymph Node Biopsy Procedure
None
|
9 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Aspects Better Explained About the Lymph Node Biopsy Procedure
Other
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 4Population: Safety Population
Participants were asked to complete Post-Biopsy Lymph Node Questionnaire about their expectations/experiences of undergoing the procedure of FNA biopsy followed by core needle biopsy. The number of participants who considered to undergo procedure another time have been presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Considered to Undergo Lymph Node Biopsy Procedure Another Time
|
10 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 4Population: Safety Population
Participants were asked to complete Post-Biopsy Lymph Node Questionnaire about their expectations/experiences of undergoing the procedure of FNA biopsy followed by core needle biopsy. Participants who were encouraged in study for iLN biopsy have been presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Were Encouraged to be Included in Study for iLN Biopsy
|
11 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 4Population: Safety Population
Participants were asked to complete Post-Biopsy Lymph Node Questionnaire about their expectations/experiences of undergoing the procedure of FNA biopsy followed by core needle biopsy. Participants who appreciated receiving study feedback have been presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 Participants
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 Participants
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Appreciated Receiving Study Feedback
|
12 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Healthy Participants
Participants With NOT1D
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
n=12 participants at risk
Participants were considered healthy if values for the following parameters: fasted glucose, glycated hemoglobin, International normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet count, red blood cells and total lymphocyte count were within the normal range at screening.
|
Participants With NOT1D
n=10 participants at risk
NOT1D participants with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and consistent with Type 1a (autoimmune) Diabetes Mellitus, were included in the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (non-SAEs) were collected up to Day 14.
SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Safety Population which comprised of all participants who completed any study assessment.
|
0.00%
0/10 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (non-SAEs) were collected up to Day 14.
SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Safety Population which comprised of all participants who completed any study assessment.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (non-SAEs) were collected up to Day 14.
SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Safety Population which comprised of all participants who completed any study assessment.
|
0.00%
0/10 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (non-SAEs) were collected up to Day 14.
SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Safety Population which comprised of all participants who completed any study assessment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural contusion
|
33.3%
4/12 • Number of events 4 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (non-SAEs) were collected up to Day 14.
SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Safety Population which comprised of all participants who completed any study assessment.
|
40.0%
4/10 • Number of events 4 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (non-SAEs) were collected up to Day 14.
SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Safety Population which comprised of all participants who completed any study assessment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pain
|
50.0%
6/12 • Number of events 6 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (non-SAEs) were collected up to Day 14.
SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Safety Population which comprised of all participants who completed any study assessment.
|
40.0%
4/10 • Number of events 4 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (non-SAEs) were collected up to Day 14.
SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Safety Population which comprised of all participants who completed any study assessment.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER