Study of Efficacy and Safety of MEXIDOL® in Ischemic Stroke Therapy
NCT ID: NCT02793687
Last Updated: 2025-02-24
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
150 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-03-06
2016-05-27
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy and Safety of Mexidol® in Stroke Therapy
NCT06437626
Safety and Efficacy of Sequential Therapy With Mexidol® in Patients With Chronic Cerebral Ischemia
NCT06834490
Efficacy and Safety of Metamizole Versus Placebo as Antithermic Therapy in the Acute Phase of Ischemic Stroke
NCT02184260
Single Bolus Non-immunogenic Staphylokinase in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Within 4.5-24 Hours of Symptom Onset
NCT07324837
Safety and Pharmacokinetics of MCI-186 in Subjects With Acute Ischemic Stroke
NCT00821821
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Throughout the study, both the investigational drug Mexidol® and the placebo, used alongside baseline therapy, were tolerated satisfactorily. In this clinical study, 37 cases of adverse events (AEs) not meeting the criteria for severity were recorded in 28 patients, along with 4 AEs that were categorized as serious adverse events (SAEs) in 4 patients. Most of the registered AEs required appropriate corrective therapy but did not necessitate other medical interventions and resolved by the end of the patient's participation in the study. According to the researchers, in the majority of recorded AEs, the relationship with the investigational drugs was determined to be absent (no relationship).
When comparing the frequency of registration of both individual AEs and SAEs, no statistically significant differences (p \< 0.05) were found in the frequency of AEs/SAEs in patients after taking the investigational drug (Mexidol®) and the comparison drug (placebo). According to the conducted clinical study, the safety profile of Mexidol® remained unchanged and favorable. No new safety signals were recorded during the course of the study.
The primary endpoint is the results of testing using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at the end of the therapy course (in both the investigational and control groups). In the overall population of patients included in the efficacy analysis, positive dynamics were observed in both the Mexidol® group and the placebo group (p \< 0.001): a decrease in the mean scores on the scale throughout the study; a statistically significant difference was also identified between the mean scores on the mRS at visit 5 compared to baseline values (visit 1) in both groups. Additionally, at visit 5, a statistically significant difference was observed between the treatment groups (p = 0.04) regarding the total scores on the modified Rankin Scale: the average score for the Mexidol® group was 1.098 points, while for the placebo group, it was 1.46 points. No statistically significant differences between the groups were found at other visits. The assessment of the change in mRS score from baseline (visit 1) to the end of therapy (visit 5) showed statistically significant differences (p = 0.04) between the treatment groups: in the Mexidol® group, the value was 1.098; in the placebo group, it was 1.460.
Thus, Mexidol® demonstrated greater efficacy compared to placebo when used alongside baseline therapy in patients with hemispheric ischemic stroke during the acute and early recovery period based on the primary efficacy criterion, which is the results of testing using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at the end of the therapy course.
Furthermore, the study demonstrated the efficacy of Mexidol® therapy concerning several secondary efficacy endpoints. Mexidol® showed greater efficacy in treating hemispheric ischemic stroke compared to placebo when using the specialized scale for this condition-the NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale). In testing using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the efficacy of Mexidol® regarding cognitive disorders in patients who suffered strokes with concurrent diabetes was also identified.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Mexidol®
Participants received Mexidol® solution IV 500 mg daily for 10 days, then Mexidol 125 mg orally 1 tablet 3 times a day for 8 weeks.
Mexidol
50 mg/ml IV solution, 125 mg tablet
Placebo
Participants received Mexidol Placebo matching Mexidol solution IV 500 mg daily for 10 days, then Mexidol 125 mg orally 1 tablet 3 times a day for 8 weeks.
Placebo
Placebo IV solution, Placebo tablet
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Mexidol
50 mg/ml IV solution, 125 mg tablet
Placebo
Placebo IV solution, Placebo tablet
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age 18-80 years
3. The ability to understand the purpose of research, risks associated with the research intervention, obligations and consequences of research participation and their right of withdrawing consent any time during the study.
4. The time from onset of a stroke \<72 hours.
5. The Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≥3.
6. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score from 5 to 15 points.
7. The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) score \<19 points.
8. The written informed consent form (ICF) is signed and personally dated by the participant or by an impartial witness (by a person who is independent of the trial and cannot be unduly influenced by the people involved with the trial and who attends the informed consent process).
9. Negative pregnancy test for women of childbearing age.
10. Willingness to use reliable methods of contraception, and/or abstinence, for the duration of therapeutic product exposure.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Age \<40 and \> 80 years.
3. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score is \<5 or \>15 points.
4. Hemorrhagic stroke confirmed with CT/MRI.
5. Hemorrhagic transformation of ischemic stroke.
6. Recurrent ischemic stroke.
7. Parkinson's disease.
8. Epilepsy.
9. Demyelinating diseases of central nervous system.
10. Hereditary and degenerative diseases of the central nervous system.
11. Infectious diseases of central nervous system in medical history.
12. Traumatic brain injury with severe neurocognitive impairment in medical history.
13. Unstable angina pectoris.
14. The participant had a heart attack within 3 months prior to enrollment.
15. Heart failure class IV (NYHA).
16. 2nd and 3rd-degree atrioventricular block.
17. Systemic connective tissue disorders.
18. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (stage III or IV).
19. Acute surgical pathology
20. Severe decompensated heart failure/liver disease/kidney disease (including acute or chronic kidney/hepatic failure).
21. Medical history of oncology diseases, tuberculosis, immunodeficiency disorders, mental disorders or alcohol/drug addiction.
22. The investigator's decision not to enroll participant due to any severe condition that can be issue of safety or treatment efficacy.
23. Acute infectious diseases (influenza, SARS, etc.) within 4 weeks prior to enrollment.
24. Evidence of lactose intolerance, galactose intolerance, Lapp lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption.
25. Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
26. Any reason (including mental or physical states) that can affect participant's capability to follow protocol procedures.
27. The participant (or their relative) is affiliated with the clinical site or Sponsor company.
28. Participation in another clinical trial within 3 months prior to enrollment.
29. Evidence of hypersensitivity reactions or intolerance associated with ethylmethylhydroxypyridine, succinate drugs or Vitamin B6.
30. Medical contraindications for Mexidol®.
31. The written informed consent form (ICF) is not signed and personally dated by the participant or by an impartial witness.
40 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pharmasoft
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tatarstan Republican Clinical Hospital
Kazan', , Russia
Interregional Clinical Diagnostic Center
Kazan', , Russia
Kazan Clinical Hospital № 7
Kazan', , Russia
Research Institute of Experimental and Clinical Medicine
Novosibirsk, , Russia
St. Petersburg Clinical Hospital № 26
Saint Petersburg, , Russia
St. Petersburg Clinical Hospital № 2
Saint Petersburg, , Russia
St. Petersburg "Nikolaevskaya" Hospital
Saint Petersburg, , Russia
Samara Regional Clinical Hospital n.a. V. D. Seredavin
Samara, , Russia
Samara Clinical Hospital № 1 n.a. N. I. Pirogov
Samara, , Russia
City Hospital № 40 of Kurortny District
Sestroretsk, , Russia
Vsevolozhsk Clinical Interdistrict Hospital
Vsevolozhsk, , Russia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Stakhovskaya LV, Shamalov NA, Khasanova DR, Melnikova EV, Agafiina AS, Golikov KV, Bogdanov EI, Yakupova AA, Roshkovskaya LV, Lukinykh LV, Lokshtanova TM, Poverennova IE, Shepankevich LA. [Results of a randomized double blind multicenter placebo-controlled, in parallel groups trial of the efficacy and safety of prolonged sequential therapy with mexidol in the acute and early recovery stages of hemispheric ischemic stroke (EPICA)]. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2017;117(3. Vyp. 2):55-65. doi: 10.17116/jnevro20171173255-65. Russian.
Stakhovskaya LV, Mkhitaryan EA, Tkacheva ON, Ostroumova TM, Ostroumova OD. [Efficacy and safety of mexidol across age groups in the acute and early recovery stages of hemispheric ischemic stroke (results of additional sub-analysis of a randomized double blind multicenter placebo-controlled study, in parallel groups trial EPICA)]. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2020;120(8. Vyp. 2):49-57. doi: 10.17116/jnevro202012008249. Russian.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Results of a randomized double blind multicenter placebo-controlled, in parallel groups trial of the efficacy and safety of prolonged sequential therapy with mexidol in the acute and early recovery stages of hemispheric ischemic stroke (EPICA)
Results of additional sub-analysis of a randomized double blind multicenter placebo-controlled study, in parallel groups trial EPICA
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2013-08-11
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
EPICA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.