CROSSFIRE Trial: Comparing the Efficacy of Irreversible Electroporation With Radiotherapy
NCT ID: NCT02791503
Last Updated: 2022-12-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
74 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-05-30
2022-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
For patients diagnosed with LAPC, a combination of chemotherapy plus local tumor destruction using irreversible electroporation (IRE), a novel tumor ablation technique, has recently shown great promise. IRE is based on permeabilization of the cell membrane through electrical pulses leading to apoptosis. Theoretically, IRE only affects viable tumor tissue, leaving surrounding vital structures relatively intact. It is therefore considered to cause less morbidity than thermal ablative strategies.
The CROSSFIRE-trial is a prospective, randomized controlled phase-II/III trial.The primary aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of chemotherapy and IRE (experimental arm) to the efficacy of chemotherapy and radiation (control arm) in patients with locally advanced, non-resectable, non-metastasized, pancreatic cancer.
In total, 138 patients with histologically proven locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (AJCC stage III), aged ≥ 18 years will be included. Patients with a specific cardiac history (arrhythmias, pacemaker), pre-existent ECG-abnormalities and/or non-retrievable metallic self-expanding biliary stents are excluded from participation. Patients will be randomly allocated to receive either chemotherapy and radiation (control arm) or chemotherapy and IRE (experimental arm).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
IRE group
FOLFIRINOX + IRE For patients diagnosed with LAPC, a combination of chemotherapy plus local tumor destruction using irreversible electroporation (IRE), a novel tumor ablation technique, has recently shown great promise. IRE is based on permeabilization of the cell membrane through electrical pulses leading to apoptosis. Theoretically, IRE only affects viable tumor tissue, leaving surrounding vital structures relatively intact. It is therefore considered to cause less morbidity than thermal ablative strategies.
Irreversible electroporation (IRE)
IRE is based on permeabilization of the cell membrane through electrical pulses leading to apoptosis. Theoretically, IRE only affects viable tumor tissue, leaving surrounding vital structures relatively intact. It is therefore considered to cause less morbidity than thermal ablative strategies.
SABR group
FOLFIRINOX + SABR Focal therapy using external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) may further improve survival, but outcome remains poor. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a form of EBRT that has important advantages over conventional radiotherapy such as a more precise and greater biological dose delivery and hence less toxicity and presumably better outcome.
Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR)
Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a form of external beam radiation that has important advantages over conventional radiotherapy such as a more precise and greater biological dose delivery and hence less toxicity and presumably better outcome.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Irreversible electroporation (IRE)
IRE is based on permeabilization of the cell membrane through electrical pulses leading to apoptosis. Theoretically, IRE only affects viable tumor tissue, leaving surrounding vital structures relatively intact. It is therefore considered to cause less morbidity than thermal ablative strategies.
Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR)
Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a form of external beam radiation that has important advantages over conventional radiotherapy such as a more precise and greater biological dose delivery and hence less toxicity and presumably better outcome.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Maximum tumor diameter ≤ 5 cm;
* Histological or cytological confirmation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma;
* Age \> 18 years;
* ASA-classification 0 - 3; World Health Organisation scale (WHO) performance status 0 - 1 ;
* Adequate bile drainage in case of biliary obstruction;
* Written informed consent;
Exclusion Criteria
* The presence of suspect lymph nodes
* Stage IV pancreatic carcinoma;
* Trans-mucosal tumor invasion into surrounding duodenum or stomach;
* History of epilepsy;
* History of cardiac disease:
* Congestive heart failure \>NYHA class 2;
* Active Coronary Artery Disease (defined as myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to screening);
* Ventricular cardiac arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy or pacemaker (beta blockers for antihypertensive regimen are permitted; atrial fibrillation is not contra-indicated);
* Uncontrolled hypertension. Blood pressure must be ≤160/95 mmHg at the time of screening on a stable antihypertensive regimen;
* Compromised liver function (e.g. signs of portal hypertension, INR \> 1,5 without use of anticoagulants, ascites);
* Uncontrolled infections (\> grade 2 NCI-CTC version 3.0);
* Pregnant or breast-feeding subjects. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test performed within 7 days of the start of treatment;
* Immunotherapy prior to the procedure;
* Radiotherapy prior to study enrollment;
* Previous surgical therapy for pancreatic cancer;
* Second primary malignancy, except adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancer, in situ carcinoma of the cervis uteri or other malignancies treated at least 5 years previously without signs of recurrence;
* Allergic to contrast agent.
* Any implanted stimulation device;
* Any condition that is unstable or that could jeopardize the safety of the subject and their compliance in the study;
* Non-removable Self Expanding Metal biliary Stent (SEMS), which cannot be removed during surgery.
* Contra-indications for MRI since no safety data for 0.35 Tesla MRI scanners are available on electronic devices such as pacemakers or implanted defibrillators, deep brain stimulators, cochlear implants, this constitutes an absolute contraindication for this study, even for devices that have been considered safe for MRI scans with higher field strengths.
* Patients who have a metallic foreign body in their eye, or who have an aneurysm clip in their brain, cannot have an MRI scan since the magnetic field may dislodge the metal
* Patients with severe claustrophobia may not be able to tolerate an MRI scan
* Patients with a hip prosthesis will not be eligible for the MRI scan
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dr. M.R. Meijerink
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. M.R. Meijerink
dr.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Bart Geboers
Amsterdam, Non-US/Non-Canadian, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Geboers B, Timmer F, Vos D, Scheffer H, Bakker J, Ruarus A, Vroomen L, Stam A, Lougheed S, Schouten E, Puijk R, van den Tol P, Lagerwaard F, de Vries J, Bruynzeel A, Meijerink M, de Gruijl T. Systemic immunomodulation by irreversible electroporation versus stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: the CROSSFIRE trial. J Immunother Cancer. 2025 Mar 26;13(3):e010222. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2024-010222.
Timmer FEF, Geboers B, Ruarus AH, Vroomen LGPH, Schouten EAC, van der Lei S, Vos DJW, Dijkstra M, Schulz HH, Bakker J, van den Bemd BAT, van den Tol PM, Puijk RS, Lissenberg-Witte BI, de Gruijl TD, de Vries JJJ, Lagerwaard FJ, Scheffer HJ, Bruynzeel AME, Meijerink MR. MRI-guided stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy versus CT-guided percutaneous irreversible electroporation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (CROSSFIRE): a single-centre, open-label, randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 May;9(5):448-459. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00017-7. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NL55158.029.15
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id