Plerixafor in Diabetic Wound Healing

NCT ID: NCT02790957

Last Updated: 2019-12-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

25 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-06-30

Study Completion Date

2019-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Chronic non-healing wounds represent a major source of morbidity, disability, and mortality in diabetic patients. Diabetes is the leading cause of non-traumatic limb amputations worldwide. Many patients with ischemic or neuroischemic wounds are not candidate to surgical/endovascular revascularization, owing to anatomical vascular reasons or for the underlying conditions and co-morbidities. Therefore, identification of novel medical treatment strategies to improve wound healing in diabetic patients is a major challenge for clinicians, researchers, and health care systems.

Defects in bone marrow (BM)-derive stem and progenitor cells, including EPCs (endothelial progenitor cells), contribute to diabetic complications. Stem cell mobilizing agents have been previously studied as an adjunctive therapy for critical limb ischemia and chronic non-healing wounds in diabetic and non-diabetic patients, as well as for the treatment of diabetic wound infections . Meta-analyses of such studies indicate that stem cell mobilization in these clinical conditions is safe and potentially effective in improving surrogate outcome measures and hard endpoints (such as rates of wound healing and amputation).

This study plans to evaluate whether a single injection of Plerixafor improves wound healing in diabetic patients with stage III-IV (neuro)ischemic wounds.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Chronic non-healing wounds represent a major source of morbidity, disability, and mortality in diabetic patients. Diabetes is the leading cause of non-traumatic limb amputations worldwide. Many patients with ischemic or neuroischemic wounds are not candidate to surgical/endovascular revascularization, owing to anatomical vascular reasons or for the underlying conditions and co-morbidities. Therefore, identification of novel medical treatment strategies to improve wound healing in diabetic patients is a major challenge for clinicians, researchers, and health care systems.

Defects in bone marrow (BM)-derive stem and progenitor cells, including EPCs, contribute to diabetic complications. Stem cell mobilizing agents have been previously studied as an adjunctive therapy for critical limb ischemia and chronic non-healing wounds in diabetic and non-diabetic patients, as well as for the treatment of diabetic wound infections . Meta-analyses of such studies indicate that stem cell mobilization in these clinical conditions is safe and potentially effective in improving surrogate outcome measures and hard endpoints (such as rates of wound healing and amputation).

However, diabetes impairs the response to the most commonly agent used to mobilize stem cells, namely human recombinant granulocyte colony stimulating factor (hrG-CSF). This notion comes from extensive data in animal models, a retrospective case series in patients with hematological disorders, a meta-analysis of studies conducted in patients with cardiovascular disease, and our proof-of-concept prospective study in otherwise healthy outpatients. Vice versa, our data strongly indicate that diabetic patients adequately mobilize stem/progenitor cells (including vascular progenitors, like EPCs) in response to the CXCR4 antagonist Plerixafor. Plerixafor (Mozobil, Sanofi) is clinically available in Europe (including Italy) as a second-line regimen for stem cell mobilization in patients with myeloma or lymphoma scheduled for autotransplantation, only in combination with hrG-CSF, after failure of hrG-CSF alone, to mobilize a sufficient amount of CD34+ stem cells to start apheresis. Preclinical studies in animal models of delayed and diabetic wound healing support the idea that Plerixafor can be effective as an adjunct therapy to accelerate diabetic wound healing.

This study plans to evaluate whether a single injection of Plerixafor improves wound healing in diabetic patients with stage III-IV (neuro)ischemic wounds.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Wounds Critical Limb Ischemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
Double blind

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Plerixafor

Single subcutaneous injection of Plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Plerixafor

Intervention Type DRUG

Single injection of 0.24 mg/kg Plerixafor

Placebo

Single injection of an equal volume of NaCl solution

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Single injection of an equal volume of NaCl solution

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Plerixafor

Single injection of 0.24 mg/kg Plerixafor

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Single injection of an equal volume of NaCl solution

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Mozobil

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Type 1 or type 2 diabetes
* Men of 18-85 years or post-menopausal women \<85 years of age
* Presence of neuroischemic or ischemic diabetic wound(s) of the leg(s) / foot(s) Texas grade 3 or 4, with or without infection.
* Ability to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Sepsis
* Dialysis or severe chronic kidney disease (eGFR \<20ml/min/1.73 mq)
* Advanced liver disease (defined as cirrhosis or transaminases \>3 times ULN)
* Clinically relevant abnormalities in white blood cell counts at baseline.
* Hematologic disorders (lymphoma, myeloma, acute or chronic leukemia, chronic myeloproliferative disorders)
* Known or highly suspected solid cancer
* Women with childbearing potential
* Known hypersensitivity to Mozobil (Plerixafor or its components)
* Inability to provide informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital Padova

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Gian Paolo Fadini

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gian Paolo Fadini

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gian Paolo Fadini, MD PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Padova

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital of Padova

Padua, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Albiero M, D'Anna M, Bonora BM, Zuccolotto G, Rosato A, Giorgio M, Iori E, Avogaro A, Fadini GP. Hematopoietic and Nonhematopoietic p66Shc Differentially Regulates Stem Cell Traffic and Vascular Response to Ischemia in Diabetes. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2022 Apr;36(10-12):593-607. doi: 10.1089/ars.2021.0097. Epub 2022 Jan 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34538132 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

3694/Ao/15

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id