Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Automated Volume Breast Scanner to Hand Held Ultrasound for Diagnostic Breast Exam
NCT ID: NCT02789163
Last Updated: 2016-06-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
90 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2013-07-31
2013-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Lesion Detection of Automated Breast Ultrasound Compared With Handheld Physician-performed Breast Ultrasound
NCT02310776
Ultrasound in Detecting Lymph Node Metastasis in Older Patients Undergoing Breast Sonography
NCT01681901
Ultrasound Elastography of Breast Lesions
NCT00716482
us Elastography and us Doppler in Differentiating Breast Masses
NCT04574531
Identification of C7; Evaluations of 2 Sonographic Methods Using a Transverse and a Sagittal Scan.
NCT03012893
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
All patients received both a Hand Held (HH) and Automated Breast Volume Scanner (ABVS) ultrasound. Patients were initially randomized to have either a HH or an ABVS. The HH ultrasound was performed by one of 4 sonographers that had a minimum of 10 years experience in breast ultrasound. A different sonographer than the one performing the HH or mammography technician performed ABVS. All technologists performing ABVS participated in a training course on ABVS and performed at least 10 patients satisfactorily before beginning the study. The choice of a mammography technician or sonography to perform the ABVS was randomized. Both the sonographer performing the HH and the sonographer or mammography technologist performing the ABVS were provided the patient's history and results of the mammogram if performed for placement of the ABVS and region of interest for the HH. However the results of the HH or ABVS were not available to the person performing the second examination.
Final diagnosis was performed either by a 12 gauge core biopsy (Celero, Hologic, Marlborough, MA ) or confirmation of a benign lesion by no significant change over 2 years.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ultrasound
breast ultrasound; hand held and automated volume breast scanner
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* breast abnormality greater than one quadrant
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Northeastern Ohio Radiology Research and Education Fund
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Richard G. Barr MD, PhD
Medical Director
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Richard G Barr, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Northeastern Ohio Radiology Research and Education Fund
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AVBS DIAG
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.