Trial Outcomes & Findings for Image Quality Assessment for Screening and Diagnostic Mammography (NCT NCT02786004)
NCT ID: NCT02786004
Last Updated: 2018-11-07
Results Overview
Overall clinical image quality was assessed by Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) qualified radiologists ("readers"). Readers documented acceptability of FFDM and DBT image quality and image characteristics, as set for in the Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff - Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Full Field Digital Mammography System (2012).
COMPLETED
NA
24 participants
At enrollment completion approximately 3 months post initiation
2018-11-07
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Full Field Digital Mammography
2-dimensional breast imaging
Full Field Digital Mammography
|
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
3-dimensional breast imaging
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
14
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
14
|
9
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Full Field Digital Mammography
2-dimensional breast imaging
Full Field Digital Mammography
|
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
3-dimensional breast imaging
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Image Quality Assessment for Screening and Diagnostic Mammography
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Full Field Digital Mammography
n=14 Participants
2-dimensional breast imaging
Full Field Digital Mammography
|
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
n=9 Participants
3-dimensional breast imaging
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
|
Total
n=23 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
14 participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 participants
n=7 Participants
|
23 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At enrollment completion approximately 3 months post initiationOverall clinical image quality was assessed by Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) qualified radiologists ("readers"). Readers documented acceptability of FFDM and DBT image quality and image characteristics, as set for in the Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff - Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Full Field Digital Mammography System (2012).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Full Field Digital Mammography
n=14 Participants
2-dimensional breast imaging
Full Field Digital Mammography
|
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
n=9 Participants
3-dimensional breast imaging
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Acceptable Overall Clinical Image Quality
|
14 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Through study completion, approximately 3 monthsPopulation: Twenty-four subjects were enrolled into the study, of which 14 were enrolled into the FFDM cohort and 10 into the DBT cohort. One (1) subject was withdrawn from the DBT cohort but was followed for AE, SAE, and UADE for the duration of her participation.
Safety-related endpoint data (adverse events, serious adverse event, unanticipated device effect, and device defects) were monitored from all subjects for the duration of their participation. Results were summarized by cohort.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Full Field Digital Mammography
n=14 Participants
2-dimensional breast imaging
Full Field Digital Mammography
|
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
n=10 Participants
3-dimensional breast imaging
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Subjects Experiencing a Device Related Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Event, Unanticipated Device Effect, and Device Defects by Overall Occurrence.
Adverse Events
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects Experiencing a Device Related Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Event, Unanticipated Device Effect, and Device Defects by Overall Occurrence.
Serious Adverse Events
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects Experiencing a Device Related Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Event, Unanticipated Device Effect, and Device Defects by Overall Occurrence.
Unanticipated Device Effect
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects Experiencing a Device Related Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Event, Unanticipated Device Effect, and Device Defects by Overall Occurrence.
Device Defects
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
Adverse Events
Full Field Digital Mammography
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place