Trial Outcomes & Findings for Development of a MR Scanner Capable of Being Sited in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (Firefly Sheffield) (NCT NCT02785588)
NCT ID: NCT02785588
Last Updated: 2019-09-13
Results Overview
Number of subject whose images were rated as Evaluable.
COMPLETED
NA
54 participants
1 Day
2019-09-13
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
3.0 T Neonatal MRI Scanner
All subjects who participate in this study will be scanned using the 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner.
3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner: eligible subjects will undergo neonatal MRI scan procedure
|
|---|---|
|
Phase 1: Initial Feasibility Assessment
STARTED
|
49
|
|
Phase 1: Initial Feasibility Assessment
COMPLETED
|
47
|
|
Phase 1: Initial Feasibility Assessment
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
|
Phase2 Controlled Image &Data Collection
STARTED
|
5
|
|
Phase2 Controlled Image &Data Collection
COMPLETED
|
5
|
|
Phase2 Controlled Image &Data Collection
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
3.0 T Neonatal MRI Scanner
All subjects who participate in this study will be scanned using the 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner.
3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner: eligible subjects will undergo neonatal MRI scan procedure
|
|---|---|
|
Phase 1: Initial Feasibility Assessment
Breakdown of investigational device
|
1
|
|
Phase 1: Initial Feasibility Assessment
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
3.0 T Neonatal MRI Scanner
n=52 Participants
All subjects who participate in this study will be scanned using the 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner.
3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner: eligible subjects will undergo neonatal MRI scan procedure
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
52 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
0 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
29 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
23 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
|
52 participants
n=52 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 DayNumber of subject whose images were rated as Evaluable.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
3.0 T Neonatal MRI Scanner
n=47 Participants
All subjects who participate in this study will be scanned using the 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner.
3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner: eligible subjects will undergo neonatal MRI scan procedure
|
|---|---|
|
Image Diagnostic Quality for Phase 1
|
24 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 DaySafety will be assessed based on the number of Adverse Events in Phase 1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
3.0 T Neonatal MRI Scanner
n=47 Participants
All subjects who participate in this study will be scanned using the 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner.
3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner: eligible subjects will undergo neonatal MRI scan procedure
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event in Phase 1
|
1 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 DayNumber of subject whose images were rated as Evaluable.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
3.0 T Neonatal MRI Scanner
n=5 Participants
All subjects who participate in this study will be scanned using the 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner.
3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner: eligible subjects will undergo neonatal MRI scan procedure
|
|---|---|
|
Image Diagnostic Quality for Phase 2
|
5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 DaySafety will be assessed based on the number of Adverse Events in Phase 2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
3.0 T Neonatal MRI Scanner
n=5 Participants
All subjects who participate in this study will be scanned using the 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner.
3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner: eligible subjects will undergo neonatal MRI scan procedure
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event in Phase 2
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 DayScores range from 1-Very Poor image quality to 5-Excellent image quality.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
3.0 T Neonatal MRI Scanner
n=47 Participants
All subjects who participate in this study will be scanned using the 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner.
3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner: eligible subjects will undergo neonatal MRI scan procedure
|
|---|---|
|
Summary of Image Quality and Assessment for Phase 1
Presence Artifact
|
3.02 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.821
|
|
Summary of Image Quality and Assessment for Phase 1
Signal to noise ratio
|
3.72 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.926
|
|
Summary of Image Quality and Assessment for Phase 1
Overall Quality
|
3.57 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.773
|
|
Summary of Image Quality and Assessment for Phase 1
Image Contrast
|
3.85 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.834
|
|
Summary of Image Quality and Assessment for Phase 1
Tissue Contrast
|
3.98 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.766
|
|
Summary of Image Quality and Assessment for Phase 1
Fat/Water Homogeneity
|
3.64 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.673
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 DayScores range from 1-Very Poor image quality to 5-Excellent image quality.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
3.0 T Neonatal MRI Scanner
n=5 Participants
All subjects who participate in this study will be scanned using the 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner.
3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner: eligible subjects will undergo neonatal MRI scan procedure
|
|---|---|
|
Summary of Image Quality and Assessments for Phase 2
Overall Quality
|
4.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.447
|
|
Summary of Image Quality and Assessments for Phase 2
Image Contrast
|
4.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.548
|
|
Summary of Image Quality and Assessments for Phase 2
Presence Artifact
|
3.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.447
|
|
Summary of Image Quality and Assessments for Phase 2
Signal to noise ratio
|
4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
|
Summary of Image Quality and Assessments for Phase 2
Tissue Contrast
|
4.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.837
|
|
Summary of Image Quality and Assessments for Phase 2
Fat/Water Homogeneity
|
4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 DayPopulation: There were 54 enrolled subjects, with 2 withdrawn, resulting in 52 completed subjects for Phases 1 and 2 together. Additionally, the data from these 2 withdrawn subjects were not included in any statistical analysis.
Summary of means and standard deviations.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
3.0 T Neonatal MRI Scanner
n=52 Participants
All subjects who participate in this study will be scanned using the 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner.
3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner: eligible subjects will undergo neonatal MRI scan procedure
|
|---|---|
|
Per Subject Workflow and Transport Information
Time in sponsor swaddle
|
66 minutes
Standard Deviation 13.73
|
|
Per Subject Workflow and Transport Information
Entire procedure time
|
66.33 minutes
Standard Deviation 9.70
|
|
Per Subject Workflow and Transport Information
MRI Scan time
|
35.15 minutes
Standard Deviation 8.02
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 DayPopulation: There were 54 enrolled subjects, with 2 withdrawn, resulting in 52 completed subjects for Phases 1 and 2 together. Additionally, the data from these 2 withdrawn subjects were not included in any statistical analysis.
User survey results on a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree. Question 1. I think that I would like to use this system frequently Question 2. I found the system unnecessarily complex Question 3. I thought the system was easy to use Question 4. I think that I would need support from a technician to be able to use this system Question 5. I found the various functions in this system were well integrated Question 6. I thought there was too much inconsistency in this system Question 7. I think that most people would learn to use this system very quickly Question 8. I found the system very cumbersome to use Question 9. I felt very confident using the system Question 10. I needed to learn a lot of things before I could get going with this system Question 11. I feel confident this system will meet my patient's needs Question 12. How likely is it that you would recommend this system to other professionals in your field?
Outcome measures
| Measure |
3.0 T Neonatal MRI Scanner
n=52 Participants
All subjects who participate in this study will be scanned using the 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner.
3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner: eligible subjects will undergo neonatal MRI scan procedure
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Experience With the Neonatal MR Scanner Device Summary
Question 1
|
4.13 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.40
|
|
Overall Experience With the Neonatal MR Scanner Device Summary
Question 2
|
1.77 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.47
|
|
Overall Experience With the Neonatal MR Scanner Device Summary
Question 3
|
4.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.44
|
|
Overall Experience With the Neonatal MR Scanner Device Summary
Question 4
|
1.90 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.45
|
|
Overall Experience With the Neonatal MR Scanner Device Summary
Question 5
|
4.02 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
|
|
Overall Experience With the Neonatal MR Scanner Device Summary
Question 6
|
2.17 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.68
|
|
Overall Experience With the Neonatal MR Scanner Device Summary
Question 7
|
4.20 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.43
|
|
Overall Experience With the Neonatal MR Scanner Device Summary
Question 8
|
1.73 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.45
|
|
Overall Experience With the Neonatal MR Scanner Device Summary
Question 9
|
4.12 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.38
|
|
Overall Experience With the Neonatal MR Scanner Device Summary
Question 10
|
1.88 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.38
|
|
Overall Experience With the Neonatal MR Scanner Device Summary
Question 11
|
4.06 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.42
|
|
Overall Experience With the Neonatal MR Scanner Device Summary
Question 12
|
4.15 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 DayPopulation: There were 54 enrolled subjects, with 2 withdrawn, resulting in 52 completed subjects for Phases 1 and 2 together. Additionally, the data from these 2 withdrawn subjects were not included in any statistical analysis.
A measure of bi-polar items (opposite items), rated on a scale from 1 to 7. Closer to 1 indicates a measure closer to the first item and closer to 7 indicates a measure closer to the second item.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
3.0 T Neonatal MRI Scanner
n=52 Participants
All subjects who participate in this study will be scanned using the 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner.
3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner: eligible subjects will undergo neonatal MRI scan procedure
|
|---|---|
|
Bi-polar Product Description Scale
Unfamiliar-Familiar
|
6.37 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.63
|
|
Bi-polar Product Description Scale
Easy-Difficult
|
1.53 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.70
|
|
Bi-polar Product Description Scale
Useful-Useless
|
1.61 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.78
|
|
Bi-polar Product Description Scale
Bad-Good
|
6.51 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.70
|
|
Bi-polar Product Description Scale
Routine-Unusual
|
1.65 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
|
Bi-polar Product Description Scale
Learnable-Not Learnable
|
1.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.44
|
|
Bi-polar Product Description Scale
Inefficient-Efficient
|
6.47 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
|
Bi-polar Product Description Scale
Resistant-Responsive
|
6.51 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.61
|
|
Bi-polar Product Description Scale
Annoying-Pleasing
|
6.22 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
|
Bi-polar Product Description Scale
Satisfying-Dissatisfying
|
1.92 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
|
Bi-polar Product Description Scale
Ineffective-Effective
|
6.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.80
|
|
Bi-polar Product Description Scale
Fast-Slow
|
1.57 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 DayPopulation: There were 54 enrolled subjects, with 2 withdrawn, resulting in 52 completed subjects for Phases 1 and 2 together. Additionally, the data from these 2 withdrawn subjects were not included in any statistical analysis.
Number and type of technical issues and device malfunctions
Outcome measures
| Measure |
3.0 T Neonatal MRI Scanner
n=52 Participants
All subjects who participate in this study will be scanned using the 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner.
3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner: eligible subjects will undergo neonatal MRI scan procedure
|
|---|---|
|
Technical Issues and Malfunctions
Device Malfunction
|
5 number of occurrences
|
|
Technical Issues and Malfunctions
Technical Issues
|
0 number of occurrences
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 DayPopulation: There were 54 enrolled subjects, with 2 withdrawn, resulting in 52 completed subjects for Phases 1 and 2 together. Additionally, the data from these 2 withdrawn subjects were not included in any statistical analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
3.0 T Neonatal MRI Scanner
n=52 Participants
All subjects who participate in this study will be scanned using the 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner.
3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner: eligible subjects will undergo neonatal MRI scan procedure
|
|---|---|
|
Subject Change in Temperature
|
0.17 Degrees Celsius
Standard Deviation 0.23
|
Adverse Events
3.0 T Neonatal MRI Scanner
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
3.0 T Neonatal MRI Scanner
n=54 participants at risk
All subjects who participate in this study will be scanned using the 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner.
3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner: eligible subjects will undergo neonatal MRI scan procedure
|
|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
|
1.9%
1/54 • Number of events 1 • 1 day
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place