A Comparison of Cotton and Flocked Swabs for Vaginal Self Collection
NCT ID: NCT02785289
Last Updated: 2016-09-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-06-30
2016-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Randomized Comparison of Vaginal Self Sampling for Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Testing by Standard Versus Dry Vaginal Swabs
NCT01316120
Patient Self-sampling of HPV to Screen for Cervical Cancer
NCT05600283
Comparison of Self-collection Using Dry Compared to Wet Swabs for HPV Detection
NCT06213051
Self-collected Swabs for HPV Testing in 18-24 Year Old Women
NCT01101828
HPV Self-sampling to Improve Access to Cervical Cancer Screening for Persons With HIV and/or Underserved Individuals
NCT05528237
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The objective of this study is to compare the performance of cotton vs flocked swabs for cellular retrieval and HPV DNA quantification after vaginal self-sampling.
A total of 120 women will be recruited. Inclusion criteria will be as follows: 21 years of age or older, attending the colposcopy clinic, understanding the study procedures and able to comply with the study protocol. Pregnant women, those having previously had a total hysterectomy, and women with ongoing menstruation will be excluded. Each woman will collect two different vaginal self samples: one with the cotton swab and one with the flocked swab. Subsequently, a flow cytometric analysis, as well as a real time PCR analysis and a cytologic evaluation for specimen adequacy will be run on each sample. Agreement between the two methods will be calculated using the kappa statistic (κ).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SCREENING
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Flocked
Patients will perform vaginal cell collection beginning with the flocked swab, followed by the coton swab.
Vaginal swab
Vaginal cell collection will be performed with the two types of indicated swab.
Coton
Patients will perform vaginal cell collection beginning with the coton swab, followed by the flocked swab.
Vaginal swab
Vaginal cell collection will be performed with the two types of indicated swab.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Vaginal swab
Vaginal cell collection will be performed with the two types of indicated swab.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* accepts voluntarily to take part to the study and signs the informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria
* previous hysterectomy
* ongoing menstruations
21 Years
65 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Geneva
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Manuela Viviano
Dr.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Geneva University Hospitals
Geneva, Switzerland, Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016-00412
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.