Trial Outcomes & Findings for SOFEED: Six Food vs. One Food Eosinophilic Esophagitis Diet Study (NCT NCT02778867)

NCT ID: NCT02778867

Last Updated: 2020-05-26

Results Overview

Percent of participants in histologic remission in 1FED versus 6FED groups. Remission is defined as esophageal peak eosinophil count \< 15 eosinophils per high powered field (eos/hpf)

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Target enrollment

129 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

6 weeks after starting treatment

Results posted on

2020-05-26

Participant Flow

Participants were recruited from eosinophilic esophagitis specialty clinics (10 sites) in the USA between May 20, 2016 and March 2019

143 participants screened, 14 excluded (8 did not meet inclusion criteria, 1 met exclusion criteria, 5 withdrew during screening), and 129 randomized

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
1-Food Elimination Diet (1FED)
Participants eliminate milk from the diet in Phase 1 1 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
6-Food Elimination Diet (6FED)
Participants eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 1 6 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
1FED Non-Responders (6FED)
Participants that fail to respond to 1FED in Phase 1 eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 2 6 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
6FED Non-responders (SGC)
Participants that fail to respond to 6FED in Phase 1 administer swallowed glucocorticoids (SGC) (Flovent HFA) 880 mcg twice daily in Phase 2 Fluticasone Propionate, 880 mcg twice daily
Phase 1
STARTED
67
62
0
0
Phase 1
COMPLETED
65
59
0
0
Phase 1
NOT COMPLETED
2
3
0
0
Phase 2
STARTED
0
0
21
11
Phase 2
COMPLETED
0
0
20
9
Phase 2
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
1
2

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
1-Food Elimination Diet (1FED)
Participants eliminate milk from the diet in Phase 1 1 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
6-Food Elimination Diet (6FED)
Participants eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 1 6 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
1FED Non-Responders (6FED)
Participants that fail to respond to 1FED in Phase 1 eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 2 6 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
6FED Non-responders (SGC)
Participants that fail to respond to 6FED in Phase 1 administer swallowed glucocorticoids (SGC) (Flovent HFA) 880 mcg twice daily in Phase 2 Fluticasone Propionate, 880 mcg twice daily
Phase 1
Withdrawal by Subject
2
3
0
0
Phase 2
Withdrawal by Subject
0
0
1
0
Phase 2
Physician Decision
0
0
0
1
Phase 2
Adverse Event
0
0
0
1

Baseline Characteristics

Clinical counts were used for study entry. Research counts (shown here) were unable to be obtained for some subjects.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
1-Food Elimination Diet (1FED)
n=67 Participants
Participants eliminate milk from the diet in Phase 1 1 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
6-Food Elimination Diet (6FED)
n=62 Participants
Participants eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 1 6 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
Total
n=129 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
36.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2 • n=67 Participants
37.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4 • n=62 Participants
37.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3 • n=129 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
30 Participants
n=67 Participants
29 Participants
n=62 Participants
59 Participants
n=129 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
37 Participants
n=67 Participants
33 Participants
n=62 Participants
70 Participants
n=129 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
n=67 Participants
1 Participants
n=62 Participants
2 Participants
n=129 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
65 Participants
n=67 Participants
61 Participants
n=62 Participants
126 Participants
n=129 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
n=67 Participants
0 Participants
n=62 Participants
1 Participants
n=129 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=67 Participants
0 Participants
n=62 Participants
0 Participants
n=129 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
n=67 Participants
0 Participants
n=62 Participants
2 Participants
n=129 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=67 Participants
0 Participants
n=62 Participants
0 Participants
n=129 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
n=67 Participants
1 Participants
n=62 Participants
1 Participants
n=129 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
63 Participants
n=67 Participants
61 Participants
n=62 Participants
124 Participants
n=129 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
n=67 Participants
0 Participants
n=62 Participants
1 Participants
n=129 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
n=67 Participants
0 Participants
n=62 Participants
1 Participants
n=129 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
67 participants
n=67 Participants
62 participants
n=62 Participants
129 participants
n=129 Participants
Peak Eosinophil Count
56 eosinophils per high power field
n=64 Participants • Clinical counts were used for study entry. Research counts (shown here) were unable to be obtained for some subjects.
38 eosinophils per high power field
n=59 Participants • Clinical counts were used for study entry. Research counts (shown here) were unable to be obtained for some subjects.
44 eosinophils per high power field
n=123 Participants • Clinical counts were used for study entry. Research counts (shown here) were unable to be obtained for some subjects.
Histology scoring system
0.83 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.26 • n=64 Participants • Histology scoring system scores were not obtained for some subjects at baseline (slides were unavailable)
0.81 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.25 • n=59 Participants • Histology scoring system scores were not obtained for some subjects at baseline (slides were unavailable)
0.82 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.26 • n=123 Participants • Histology scoring system scores were not obtained for some subjects at baseline (slides were unavailable)
Endoscopic Reference Score
7.0 score on a scale
n=57 Participants • Baseline endoscopic feature scores were not obtained on some subjects
6.5 score on a scale
n=46 Participants • Baseline endoscopic feature scores were not obtained on some subjects
7.0 score on a scale
n=103 Participants • Baseline endoscopic feature scores were not obtained on some subjects

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks after starting treatment

Population: Intent to treat analysis including participants who had at least one clinical observation post randomization. Participants whose histologic remission could not be determined were imputed as treatment failures.

Percent of participants in histologic remission in 1FED versus 6FED groups. Remission is defined as esophageal peak eosinophil count \< 15 eosinophils per high powered field (eos/hpf)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
1-Food Elimination Diet (1FED)
n=67 Participants
Participants eliminate milk from the diet in Phase 1 1 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
6-Food Elimination Diet (6FED)
n=62 Participants
Participants eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 1 6 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
Percent of Participants in Histologic Remission (<15 Eos/Hpf)
34.3 percentage of participants
40.3 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks after starting treatment

Population: Intent to treat analysis including participants who had at least one clinical observation post randomization. Participants whose histologic remission could not be determined were imputed as treatment failures.

Percent of participants in complete and partial histologic remission in 1FED versus 6FED groups. Complete remission is defined as esophageal peak eosinophil count ≤ 1 eosinophils per high powered field (eos/hpf). Partial remission is defined as esophageal peak eosinophil count of 2 - 14 eos/hpf.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
1-Food Elimination Diet (1FED)
n=67 Participants
Participants eliminate milk from the diet in Phase 1 1 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
6-Food Elimination Diet (6FED)
n=62 Participants
Participants eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 1 6 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
Percent of Participants in Complete and Partial Histologic Remission
Complete remission (≤ 1eos/hpf)
6.0 percentage of participants
21.0 percentage of participants
Percent of Participants in Complete and Partial Histologic Remission
Partial remission (2 - 14 eos/hpf)
28.4 percentage of participants
19.4 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks after starting treatment

Population: Intent to treat analysis including participants who had at least one clinical observation in Phase 2. Participants whose histologic remission could not be determined were imputed as treatment failures.

Percent of participants who failed 6FED in Phase 1 in histologic remission after following swallowed glucocorticoids (SGC) in Phase 2. Remission is defined as esophageal peak eosinophil count \< 15 eos/hpf

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
1-Food Elimination Diet (1FED)
n=11 Participants
Participants eliminate milk from the diet in Phase 1 1 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
6-Food Elimination Diet (6FED)
Participants eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 1 6 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
Percent of Participants Following SGC in Histologic Remission in Phase 2
81.8 percentage of participants
Interval 48.2 to 97.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks after starting treatment

Population: Intent to treat analysis including participants who had at least one clinical observation in Phase 2. Participants whose histologic remission could not be determined were imputed as treatment failures.

Percent of participants who failed 1FED in Phase 1 in histologic remission after following 6FED in Phase 2. Remission is defined as esophageal peak eosinophil count \< 15 eos/hpf

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
1-Food Elimination Diet (1FED)
n=21 Participants
Participants eliminate milk from the diet in Phase 1 1 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
6-Food Elimination Diet (6FED)
Participants eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 1 6 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
Percent of Participants Following 6FED in Histologic Remission in Phase 2
42.9 percentage of participants
Interval 21.8 to 66.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks after starting treatment

Population: Intent to treat analysis including participants who had at least one clinical observation post randomization.

Peak eosinophil counts were obtained at baseline and 6 weeks. The maximum (highest) peak eosinophil count among distal, mid, and proximal esophageal biopsies was obtained. Change in peak eosinophil count is defined as peak count at 6 weeks minus peak count at baseline. Changes in peak count are compared between 1FED and 6FED. A reduction (negative change) in peak count indicates improvement.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
1-Food Elimination Diet (1FED)
n=64 Participants
Participants eliminate milk from the diet in Phase 1 1 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
6-Food Elimination Diet (6FED)
n=59 Participants
Participants eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 1 6 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
Change From Baseline in Peak Eosinophil Count
-18 eosinophils per high power field
Interval -49.0 to 1.0
-22 eosinophils per high power field
Interval -36.0 to -5.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks after starting treatment

Population: Intent to treat analysis including participants who had at least one clinical observation post randomization.

The histology scoring system (HSS) measures the severity (grade) and extent (stage) of eight histologic abnormalities in the esophagus including eosinophilic inflammation, eosinophilic abscess, eosinophilic surface layering, surface epithelial alteration, dilated intercellular spaces, basal zone hyperplasia, dyskeratotic epithelial cells, and lamina propria fibrosis. Total score is the sum of grade and stage scores from the esophageal biopsy (distal, mid, or proximal) with the highest score (worst abnormalities) divided by the maximum possible score for the biopsy. Total scores range from 0 - 2 (higher scores indicate more severe and/or extensive abnormalities). Histology scores were obtained at baseline and 6 weeks. Change in total histology scoring system (HSS) is defined as total HSS score at 6 weeks minus total HSS score at baseline. Changes in scores are compared between 1FED and 6FED. A reduction (negative change) in score indicates improvement.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
1-Food Elimination Diet (1FED)
n=64 Participants
Participants eliminate milk from the diet in Phase 1 1 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
6-Food Elimination Diet (6FED)
n=59 Participants
Participants eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 1 6 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
Change From Baseline in Total Histology Scoring System
-0.15 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.39
-0.23 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.34

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks after starting treatment

Population: Intent to treat analysis including participants who had at least one clinical observation post randomization.

The endoscopic reference score (EREFS) utilizes standardized criteria for the presence and degree of 5 major endoscopic features (edema, fixed rings, exudates, furrows, strictures). Total score is the sum of the five feature scores from the distal and proximal esophagus. Total scores range from 0 - 18 (higher scores indicate worsening features). Endoscopic features were assessed at baseline and 6 weeks. Change in total endoscopic reference score is defined as total score at 6 weeks minus total score at baseline. Changes in scores are compared between 1FED and 6FED. A reduction (negative change) in score indicates improvement.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
1-Food Elimination Diet (1FED)
n=57 Participants
Participants eliminate milk from the diet in Phase 1 1 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
6-Food Elimination Diet (6FED)
n=46 Participants
Participants eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 1 6 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
Change From Baseline in Total Endoscopic Reference Score
-1.0 score on a scale
Interval -4.0 to 0.0
-2.0 score on a scale
Interval -4.0 to 1.0

Adverse Events

1-Food Elimination Diet (1FED)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

6-Food Elimination Diet (6FED)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 2 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

1FED Non-Responders (6FED)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

6FED Non-responders (SGC)

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 4 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
1-Food Elimination Diet (1FED)
n=67 participants at risk
Participants eliminate milk from the diet in Phase 1 1 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
6-Food Elimination Diet (6FED)
n=62 participants at risk
Participants eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 1 6 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
1FED Non-Responders (6FED)
n=21 participants at risk
Participants that fail to respond to 1FED in Phase 1 eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 2 6 Food Elimination Diet (after 1FED failure)
6FED Non-responders (SGC)
n=11 participants at risk
Participants that fail to respond to 6FED in Phase 1 administer swallowed glucocorticoids (SGC) (Flovent HFA) 880 mcg twice daily in Phase 2 Fluticasone Propionate, 880 mcg twice daily (after 6FED failure)
Psychiatric disorders
Suicidal ideation
0.00%
0/67 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
0.00%
0/62 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
0.00%
0/21 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
9.1%
1/11 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
1-Food Elimination Diet (1FED)
n=67 participants at risk
Participants eliminate milk from the diet in Phase 1 1 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
6-Food Elimination Diet (6FED)
n=62 participants at risk
Participants eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 1 6 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
1FED Non-Responders (6FED)
n=21 participants at risk
Participants that fail to respond to 1FED in Phase 1 eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 2 6 Food Elimination Diet (after 1FED failure)
6FED Non-responders (SGC)
n=11 participants at risk
Participants that fail to respond to 6FED in Phase 1 administer swallowed glucocorticoids (SGC) (Flovent HFA) 880 mcg twice daily in Phase 2 Fluticasone Propionate, 880 mcg twice daily (after 6FED failure)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal Pain
0.00%
0/67 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
0.00%
0/62 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
0.00%
0/21 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
9.1%
1/11 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
1.5%
1/67 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
3.2%
2/62 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
0.00%
0/21 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
9.1%
1/11 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
Infections and infestations
Bronchial Infection
0.00%
0/67 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
0.00%
0/62 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
0.00%
0/21 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
9.1%
1/11 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
Endocrine disorders
Adrenal insufficiency
0.00%
0/67 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
0.00%
0/62 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
0.00%
0/21 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
9.1%
1/11 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment

Additional Information

Marc E. Rothenberg, MD, PhD

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

Phone: 513-636-7177

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER