Trial Outcomes & Findings for SOFEED: Six Food vs. One Food Eosinophilic Esophagitis Diet Study (NCT NCT02778867)
NCT ID: NCT02778867
Last Updated: 2020-05-26
Results Overview
Percent of participants in histologic remission in 1FED versus 6FED groups. Remission is defined as esophageal peak eosinophil count \< 15 eosinophils per high powered field (eos/hpf)
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
129 participants
6 weeks after starting treatment
2020-05-26
Participant Flow
Participants were recruited from eosinophilic esophagitis specialty clinics (10 sites) in the USA between May 20, 2016 and March 2019
143 participants screened, 14 excluded (8 did not meet inclusion criteria, 1 met exclusion criteria, 5 withdrew during screening), and 129 randomized
Participant milestones
| Measure |
1-Food Elimination Diet (1FED)
Participants eliminate milk from the diet in Phase 1
1 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
|
6-Food Elimination Diet (6FED)
Participants eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 1
6 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
|
1FED Non-Responders (6FED)
Participants that fail to respond to 1FED in Phase 1 eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 2
6 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
|
6FED Non-responders (SGC)
Participants that fail to respond to 6FED in Phase 1 administer swallowed glucocorticoids (SGC) (Flovent HFA) 880 mcg twice daily in Phase 2
Fluticasone Propionate, 880 mcg twice daily
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1
STARTED
|
67
|
62
|
0
|
0
|
|
Phase 1
COMPLETED
|
65
|
59
|
0
|
0
|
|
Phase 1
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
|
Phase 2
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
21
|
11
|
|
Phase 2
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
20
|
9
|
|
Phase 2
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
1-Food Elimination Diet (1FED)
Participants eliminate milk from the diet in Phase 1
1 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
|
6-Food Elimination Diet (6FED)
Participants eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 1
6 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
|
1FED Non-Responders (6FED)
Participants that fail to respond to 1FED in Phase 1 eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 2
6 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
|
6FED Non-responders (SGC)
Participants that fail to respond to 6FED in Phase 1 administer swallowed glucocorticoids (SGC) (Flovent HFA) 880 mcg twice daily in Phase 2
Fluticasone Propionate, 880 mcg twice daily
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
|
Phase 2
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Phase 2
Physician Decision
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Phase 2
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Clinical counts were used for study entry. Research counts (shown here) were unable to be obtained for some subjects.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
1-Food Elimination Diet (1FED)
n=67 Participants
Participants eliminate milk from the diet in Phase 1
1 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
|
6-Food Elimination Diet (6FED)
n=62 Participants
Participants eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 1
6 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
|
Total
n=129 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
36.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2 • n=67 Participants
|
37.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4 • n=62 Participants
|
37.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3 • n=129 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
30 Participants
n=67 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=62 Participants
|
59 Participants
n=129 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
37 Participants
n=67 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=62 Participants
|
70 Participants
n=129 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
1 Participants
n=67 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=62 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=129 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
65 Participants
n=67 Participants
|
61 Participants
n=62 Participants
|
126 Participants
n=129 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=67 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=62 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=129 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=67 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=62 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=129 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
2 Participants
n=67 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=62 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=129 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=67 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=62 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=129 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=67 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=62 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=129 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
63 Participants
n=67 Participants
|
61 Participants
n=62 Participants
|
124 Participants
n=129 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=67 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=62 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=129 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=67 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=62 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=129 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
67 participants
n=67 Participants
|
62 participants
n=62 Participants
|
129 participants
n=129 Participants
|
|
Peak Eosinophil Count
|
56 eosinophils per high power field
n=64 Participants • Clinical counts were used for study entry. Research counts (shown here) were unable to be obtained for some subjects.
|
38 eosinophils per high power field
n=59 Participants • Clinical counts were used for study entry. Research counts (shown here) were unable to be obtained for some subjects.
|
44 eosinophils per high power field
n=123 Participants • Clinical counts were used for study entry. Research counts (shown here) were unable to be obtained for some subjects.
|
|
Histology scoring system
|
0.83 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.26 • n=64 Participants • Histology scoring system scores were not obtained for some subjects at baseline (slides were unavailable)
|
0.81 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.25 • n=59 Participants • Histology scoring system scores were not obtained for some subjects at baseline (slides were unavailable)
|
0.82 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.26 • n=123 Participants • Histology scoring system scores were not obtained for some subjects at baseline (slides were unavailable)
|
|
Endoscopic Reference Score
|
7.0 score on a scale
n=57 Participants • Baseline endoscopic feature scores were not obtained on some subjects
|
6.5 score on a scale
n=46 Participants • Baseline endoscopic feature scores were not obtained on some subjects
|
7.0 score on a scale
n=103 Participants • Baseline endoscopic feature scores were not obtained on some subjects
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeks after starting treatmentPopulation: Intent to treat analysis including participants who had at least one clinical observation post randomization. Participants whose histologic remission could not be determined were imputed as treatment failures.
Percent of participants in histologic remission in 1FED versus 6FED groups. Remission is defined as esophageal peak eosinophil count \< 15 eosinophils per high powered field (eos/hpf)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
1-Food Elimination Diet (1FED)
n=67 Participants
Participants eliminate milk from the diet in Phase 1
1 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
|
6-Food Elimination Diet (6FED)
n=62 Participants
Participants eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 1
6 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Participants in Histologic Remission (<15 Eos/Hpf)
|
34.3 percentage of participants
|
40.3 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeks after starting treatmentPopulation: Intent to treat analysis including participants who had at least one clinical observation post randomization. Participants whose histologic remission could not be determined were imputed as treatment failures.
Percent of participants in complete and partial histologic remission in 1FED versus 6FED groups. Complete remission is defined as esophageal peak eosinophil count ≤ 1 eosinophils per high powered field (eos/hpf). Partial remission is defined as esophageal peak eosinophil count of 2 - 14 eos/hpf.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
1-Food Elimination Diet (1FED)
n=67 Participants
Participants eliminate milk from the diet in Phase 1
1 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
|
6-Food Elimination Diet (6FED)
n=62 Participants
Participants eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 1
6 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Participants in Complete and Partial Histologic Remission
Complete remission (≤ 1eos/hpf)
|
6.0 percentage of participants
|
21.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percent of Participants in Complete and Partial Histologic Remission
Partial remission (2 - 14 eos/hpf)
|
28.4 percentage of participants
|
19.4 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeks after starting treatmentPopulation: Intent to treat analysis including participants who had at least one clinical observation in Phase 2. Participants whose histologic remission could not be determined were imputed as treatment failures.
Percent of participants who failed 6FED in Phase 1 in histologic remission after following swallowed glucocorticoids (SGC) in Phase 2. Remission is defined as esophageal peak eosinophil count \< 15 eos/hpf
Outcome measures
| Measure |
1-Food Elimination Diet (1FED)
n=11 Participants
Participants eliminate milk from the diet in Phase 1
1 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
|
6-Food Elimination Diet (6FED)
Participants eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 1
6 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Participants Following SGC in Histologic Remission in Phase 2
|
81.8 percentage of participants
Interval 48.2 to 97.7
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeks after starting treatmentPopulation: Intent to treat analysis including participants who had at least one clinical observation in Phase 2. Participants whose histologic remission could not be determined were imputed as treatment failures.
Percent of participants who failed 1FED in Phase 1 in histologic remission after following 6FED in Phase 2. Remission is defined as esophageal peak eosinophil count \< 15 eos/hpf
Outcome measures
| Measure |
1-Food Elimination Diet (1FED)
n=21 Participants
Participants eliminate milk from the diet in Phase 1
1 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
|
6-Food Elimination Diet (6FED)
Participants eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 1
6 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Participants Following 6FED in Histologic Remission in Phase 2
|
42.9 percentage of participants
Interval 21.8 to 66.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeks after starting treatmentPopulation: Intent to treat analysis including participants who had at least one clinical observation post randomization.
Peak eosinophil counts were obtained at baseline and 6 weeks. The maximum (highest) peak eosinophil count among distal, mid, and proximal esophageal biopsies was obtained. Change in peak eosinophil count is defined as peak count at 6 weeks minus peak count at baseline. Changes in peak count are compared between 1FED and 6FED. A reduction (negative change) in peak count indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
1-Food Elimination Diet (1FED)
n=64 Participants
Participants eliminate milk from the diet in Phase 1
1 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
|
6-Food Elimination Diet (6FED)
n=59 Participants
Participants eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 1
6 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Peak Eosinophil Count
|
-18 eosinophils per high power field
Interval -49.0 to 1.0
|
-22 eosinophils per high power field
Interval -36.0 to -5.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeks after starting treatmentPopulation: Intent to treat analysis including participants who had at least one clinical observation post randomization.
The histology scoring system (HSS) measures the severity (grade) and extent (stage) of eight histologic abnormalities in the esophagus including eosinophilic inflammation, eosinophilic abscess, eosinophilic surface layering, surface epithelial alteration, dilated intercellular spaces, basal zone hyperplasia, dyskeratotic epithelial cells, and lamina propria fibrosis. Total score is the sum of grade and stage scores from the esophageal biopsy (distal, mid, or proximal) with the highest score (worst abnormalities) divided by the maximum possible score for the biopsy. Total scores range from 0 - 2 (higher scores indicate more severe and/or extensive abnormalities). Histology scores were obtained at baseline and 6 weeks. Change in total histology scoring system (HSS) is defined as total HSS score at 6 weeks minus total HSS score at baseline. Changes in scores are compared between 1FED and 6FED. A reduction (negative change) in score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
1-Food Elimination Diet (1FED)
n=64 Participants
Participants eliminate milk from the diet in Phase 1
1 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
|
6-Food Elimination Diet (6FED)
n=59 Participants
Participants eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 1
6 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Total Histology Scoring System
|
-0.15 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.39
|
-0.23 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.34
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeks after starting treatmentPopulation: Intent to treat analysis including participants who had at least one clinical observation post randomization.
The endoscopic reference score (EREFS) utilizes standardized criteria for the presence and degree of 5 major endoscopic features (edema, fixed rings, exudates, furrows, strictures). Total score is the sum of the five feature scores from the distal and proximal esophagus. Total scores range from 0 - 18 (higher scores indicate worsening features). Endoscopic features were assessed at baseline and 6 weeks. Change in total endoscopic reference score is defined as total score at 6 weeks minus total score at baseline. Changes in scores are compared between 1FED and 6FED. A reduction (negative change) in score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
1-Food Elimination Diet (1FED)
n=57 Participants
Participants eliminate milk from the diet in Phase 1
1 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
|
6-Food Elimination Diet (6FED)
n=46 Participants
Participants eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 1
6 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Total Endoscopic Reference Score
|
-1.0 score on a scale
Interval -4.0 to 0.0
|
-2.0 score on a scale
Interval -4.0 to 1.0
|
Adverse Events
1-Food Elimination Diet (1FED)
6-Food Elimination Diet (6FED)
1FED Non-Responders (6FED)
6FED Non-responders (SGC)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
1-Food Elimination Diet (1FED)
n=67 participants at risk
Participants eliminate milk from the diet in Phase 1
1 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
|
6-Food Elimination Diet (6FED)
n=62 participants at risk
Participants eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 1
6 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
|
1FED Non-Responders (6FED)
n=21 participants at risk
Participants that fail to respond to 1FED in Phase 1 eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 2
6 Food Elimination Diet (after 1FED failure)
|
6FED Non-responders (SGC)
n=11 participants at risk
Participants that fail to respond to 6FED in Phase 1 administer swallowed glucocorticoids (SGC) (Flovent HFA) 880 mcg twice daily in Phase 2
Fluticasone Propionate, 880 mcg twice daily (after 6FED failure)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicidal ideation
|
0.00%
0/67 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
|
0.00%
0/62 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
|
0.00%
0/21 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
|
9.1%
1/11 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
1-Food Elimination Diet (1FED)
n=67 participants at risk
Participants eliminate milk from the diet in Phase 1
1 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
|
6-Food Elimination Diet (6FED)
n=62 participants at risk
Participants eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 1
6 Food Elimination Diet Therapy
|
1FED Non-Responders (6FED)
n=21 participants at risk
Participants that fail to respond to 1FED in Phase 1 eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy, nuts, fish from the diet in Phase 2
6 Food Elimination Diet (after 1FED failure)
|
6FED Non-responders (SGC)
n=11 participants at risk
Participants that fail to respond to 6FED in Phase 1 administer swallowed glucocorticoids (SGC) (Flovent HFA) 880 mcg twice daily in Phase 2
Fluticasone Propionate, 880 mcg twice daily (after 6FED failure)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal Pain
|
0.00%
0/67 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
|
0.00%
0/62 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
|
0.00%
0/21 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
|
9.1%
1/11 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
1.5%
1/67 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
|
3.2%
2/62 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
|
0.00%
0/21 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
|
9.1%
1/11 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchial Infection
|
0.00%
0/67 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
|
0.00%
0/62 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
|
0.00%
0/21 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
|
9.1%
1/11 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Adrenal insufficiency
|
0.00%
0/67 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
|
0.00%
0/62 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
|
0.00%
0/21 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
|
9.1%
1/11 • From informed consent to 30 days after the cessation of treatment
|
Additional Information
Marc E. Rothenberg, MD, PhD
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER