Effectiveness of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Using Glass Ionomer Cement of Different Costs
NCT ID: NCT02778503
Last Updated: 2017-11-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
574 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-04-30
2017-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
High Cost
Restoration using a high-cost glass ionomer cement.
High Cost
Surfaces allocated to this group will be treated with a high-cost glass ionomer cement restoration (Fuji IX, GC America, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Low Cost
Restoration using a low-cost glass ionomer cement.
Low Cost
Surfaces allocated to this group will be treated with a low-cost glass ionomer cement restoration (Maxxion R, FGM, BRA), according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
High Cost
Surfaces allocated to this group will be treated with a high-cost glass ionomer cement restoration (Fuji IX, GC America, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Low Cost
Surfaces allocated to this group will be treated with a low-cost glass ionomer cement restoration (Maxxion R, FGM, BRA), according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Teeth with restorations, sealants, developmental defects, deep carious lesions with pulpal exposure risk, fistula and/or abscess, and those with history of spontaneous pain.
4 Years
9 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Faculty Sao Leopoldo Mandic Campinas
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jose Carlos P Imparato
PhD, Senior Lecturer
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jose Carlos P Imparato, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Faculty Sao Leopoldo Mandic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty Sao Leopoldo Mandic
Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ekstrand KR, Ricketts DN, Kidd EA. Reproducibility and accuracy of three methods for assessment of demineralization depth of the occlusal surface: an in vitro examination. Caries Res. 1997;31(3):224-31. doi: 10.1159/000262404.
Frencken JE, Pilot T, Songpaisan Y, Phantumvanit P. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): rationale, technique, and development. J Public Health Dent. 1996;56(3 Spec No):135-40; discussion 161-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1996.tb02423.x.
Martins MT, Ferreira FM, Oliveira AC, Paiva SM, Vale MP, Allison PJ, Pordeus IA. Preliminary validation of the Brazilian version of the Child Perceptions Questionnaire 8-10. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2009 Sep;10(3):135-40.
Roeleveld AC, van Amerongen WE, Mandari GJ. Influence of residual caries and cervical gaps on the survival rate of Class II glass ionomer restorations. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2006 Jun;7(2):85-91. doi: 10.1007/BF03320820.
Tesch FC, Oliveira BH, Leao A. [Semantic equivalence of the Brazilian version of the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale]. Cad Saude Publica. 2008 Aug;24(8):1897-909. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2008000800018. Portuguese.
Wong DL, Baker CM. Pain in children: comparison of assessment scales. Pediatr Nurs. 1988 Jan-Feb;14(1):9-17. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SLM2
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id