Trial Outcomes & Findings for Clinical Outcome Of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma In Taiwan (NCT NCT02776644)
NCT ID: NCT02776644
Last Updated: 2023-03-16
Results Overview
Treatment durations (in days) of Sunitinib and Pazopanib were calculated from the date of the first prescription to the last dose of Sunitinib and Pazopanib during the 11 year observation period.
COMPLETED
1349 participants
during the observation period of 11 years
2023-03-16
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Sunitinib
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and National health insurance research database (NHIRD) (from January 2004 to December 2015), and were treated with Sunitinib capsule 12.5 milligram (mg), were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
Pazopanib
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic RCC, as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and NHIRD (from January 2004 to December 2014), and were treated with Pazopanib tablets 200 mg, were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
1223
|
126
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
1223
|
126
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Sunitinib
n=1223 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and National health insurance research database (NHIRD) (from January 2004 to December 2015), and were treated with Sunitinib capsule 12.5 milligram (mg), were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
Pazopanib
n=126 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic RCC, as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and NHIRD (from January 2004 to December 2014), and were treated with Pazopanib tablets 200 mg, were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
Total
n=1349 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
64.14 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13 • n=1223 Participants
|
66.45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.95 • n=126 Participants
|
64.33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.99 • n=1349 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
|
318 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=126 Participants
|
355 Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
|
903 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
89 Participants
n=126 Participants
|
992 Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Unknown
|
2 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=126 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
|
Participants by Different Income Levels
Low income
|
279 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=126 Participants
|
303 Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Participants by Different Income Levels
Medium income
|
351 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=126 Participants
|
388 Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Participants by Different Income Levels
High income
|
593 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
65 Participants
n=126 Participants
|
658 Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Participants With Different Co-Morbid Conditions
Hypertension
|
634 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
59 Participants
n=126 Participants
|
693 Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Participants With Different Co-Morbid Conditions
Diabetes mellitus
|
350 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=126 Participants
|
389 Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Participants With Different Co-Morbid Conditions
Dyslipidemia
|
312 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=126 Participants
|
344 Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Participants With Different Co-Morbid Conditions
Coronary artery disease
|
188 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=126 Participants
|
218 Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Participants With Different Co-Morbid Conditions
Chronic kidney disease
|
159 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=126 Participants
|
176 Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Participants With Different Co-Morbid Conditions
Liver cirrhosis
|
26 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
NA Participants
n=126 Participants
|
NA Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Participants Who Had Received Concomitant-Medications
Beta blockers
|
364 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
38 Participants
n=126 Participants
|
402 Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Participants Who Had Received Concomitant-Medications
Calcium channel blockers
|
543 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
57 Participants
n=126 Participants
|
600 Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Participants Who Had Received Concomitant-Medications
Diuretics
|
331 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
38 Participants
n=126 Participants
|
369 Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Participants Who Had Received Concomitant-Medications
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors
|
135 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=126 Participants
|
146 Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Participants Who Had Received Concomitant-Medications
Angiotensin receptor blocker
|
397 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=126 Participants
|
437 Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Participants Who Had Received Concomitant-Medications
Insulin
|
53 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=126 Participants
|
60 Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Participants Who Had Received Concomitant-Medications
Biguanides
|
189 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=126 Participants
|
211 Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Participants Who Had Received Concomitant-Medications
Sulfonylurea
|
186 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=126 Participants
|
202 Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Participants Who Had Received Concomitant-Medications
Glucosidase inhibitors
|
56 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=126 Participants
|
60 Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Participants Who Had Received Concomitant-Medications
Thiazolidinediones
|
46 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
NA Participants
n=126 Participants
|
NA Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Participants Who Had Received Concomitant-Medications
Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors
|
80 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=126 Participants
|
99 Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Participants Who Had Received Concomitant-Medications
Statins
|
242 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=126 Participants
|
269 Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Participants Who Had Received Concomitant-Medications
Fibrates
|
56 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=126 Participants
|
62 Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Participants Who Had Received Concomitant-Medications
Bile acid sequestrants and Nicotinic acid
|
4 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
NA Participants
n=126 Participants
|
NA Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Participants Who Had Received Concomitant-Medications
Ezetimibe
|
18 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
NA Participants
n=126 Participants
|
NA Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Participants Who Had Received Concomitant-Medications
Antiplatelets
|
352 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=126 Participants
|
386 Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Participants Who Had Received Concomitant-Medications
Anticoagulants
|
32 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
NA Participants
n=126 Participants
|
NA Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Participants Admitted/Visited to Hospital by Type of Hospitals
Medical center
|
865 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
91 Participants
n=126 Participants
|
956 Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Participants Admitted/Visited to Hospital by Type of Hospitals
Other than medical center
|
358 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=126 Participants
|
393 Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Participants Admitted/Visited to the Hospital According to the Geographical Location of Hospitals
Capital area hospital
|
447 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=126 Participants
|
487 Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
|
Participants Admitted/Visited to the Hospital According to the Geographical Location of Hospitals
Non-capital area hospital
|
776 Participants
n=1223 Participants
|
86 Participants
n=126 Participants
|
862 Participants
n=1349 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: during the observation period of 11 yearsPopulation: All Taiwanese participants diagnosed with metastatic RCC during the time period of January 2004 to December 2015 and received treatment (Sunitinib or Pazopanib).
Treatment durations (in days) of Sunitinib and Pazopanib were calculated from the date of the first prescription to the last dose of Sunitinib and Pazopanib during the 11 year observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sunitinib
n=1223 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and National health insurance research database (NHIRD) (from January 2004 to December 2015), and were treated with Sunitinib capsule 12.5 milligram (mg), were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
Pazopanib
n=126 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic RCC, as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and NHIRD (from January 2004 to December 2014), and were treated with Pazopanib tablets 200 mg, were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Sunitinib and Pazopanib Treatment in Participants
|
171 days
Interval 1.0 to 2153.0
|
114.5 days
Interval 1.0 to 1219.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: from the time of start of treatment up to Month 3Population: All Taiwanese participants diagnosed with metastatic RCC during the time period of January 2004 to December 2015 and received treatment (Sunitinib or Pazopanib).
The cumulative number of Sunitinib and Pazopanib capsules which were given to the participants from the time of start of treatment up to Month 3 were reported here.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sunitinib
n=1223 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and National health insurance research database (NHIRD) (from January 2004 to December 2015), and were treated with Sunitinib capsule 12.5 milligram (mg), were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
Pazopanib
n=126 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic RCC, as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and NHIRD (from January 2004 to December 2014), and were treated with Pazopanib tablets 200 mg, were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cumulative Number of Capsules of Sunitinib and Pazopanib Administered From the Time of Start of Treatment Up to Month 3
|
190.1 capsules
Standard Deviation 81.5
|
215.1 capsules
Standard Deviation 118.4
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 3 up to Month 6Population: All Taiwanese participants diagnosed with metastatic RCC during the time period of January 2004 to December 2015 and received treatment (Sunitinib or Pazopanib).
The cumulative number of Sunitinib and Pazopanib capsules which were given to the participants from Month 3 (after the start of treatment) to Month 6 were reported here.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sunitinib
n=1223 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and National health insurance research database (NHIRD) (from January 2004 to December 2015), and were treated with Sunitinib capsule 12.5 milligram (mg), were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
Pazopanib
n=126 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic RCC, as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and NHIRD (from January 2004 to December 2014), and were treated with Pazopanib tablets 200 mg, were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cumulative Number of Capsules of Sunitinib and Pazopanib Administered From Month 3 to Month 6
|
165.0 capsules
Standard Deviation 88.4
|
193.2 capsules
Standard Deviation 118.9
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 6 up to Month 9Population: All Taiwanese participants diagnosed with metastatic RCC during the time period of January 2004 to December 2015 and received treatment (Sunitinib or Pazopanib).
The cumulative number of Sunitinib and Pazopanib capsules which were given to the participants from Month 6 (after the start of treatment) to Month 9 were reported here.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sunitinib
n=1223 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and National health insurance research database (NHIRD) (from January 2004 to December 2015), and were treated with Sunitinib capsule 12.5 milligram (mg), were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
Pazopanib
n=126 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic RCC, as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and NHIRD (from January 2004 to December 2014), and were treated with Pazopanib tablets 200 mg, were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cumulative Number of Capsules of Sunitinib and Pazopanib Administered From Month 6 to Month 9
|
174.9 capsules
Standard Deviation 83.5
|
186.5 capsules
Standard Deviation 111.1
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 9 up to Month 12Population: All Taiwanese participants diagnosed with metastatic RCC during the time period of January 2004 to December 2015 and received treatment (Sunitinib or Pazopanib).
The cumulative number of Sunitinib and Pazopanib capsules which were given to the participants from Month 9 (after the start of treatment) to Month 12 were reported here.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sunitinib
n=1223 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and National health insurance research database (NHIRD) (from January 2004 to December 2015), and were treated with Sunitinib capsule 12.5 milligram (mg), were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
Pazopanib
n=126 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic RCC, as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and NHIRD (from January 2004 to December 2014), and were treated with Pazopanib tablets 200 mg, were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cumulative Number of Capsules of Sunitinib and Pazopanib Administered From Month 9 to Month 12
|
176.5 capsules
Standard Deviation 83.4
|
212.1 capsules
Standard Deviation 109.9
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: from the time of start of treatment up to Month 12Population: All Taiwanese participants diagnosed with metastatic RCC during the time period of January 2004 to December 2015 and received treatment (Sunitinib or Pazopanib).
The cumulative number of Sunitinib and Pazopanib capsules which were given to the participants from the time of start of treatment to Month 12 were reported here.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sunitinib
n=1223 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and National health insurance research database (NHIRD) (from January 2004 to December 2015), and were treated with Sunitinib capsule 12.5 milligram (mg), were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
Pazopanib
n=126 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic RCC, as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and NHIRD (from January 2004 to December 2014), and were treated with Pazopanib tablets 200 mg, were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cumulative Number of Capsules of Sunitinib and Pazopanib Administered From the Time of Start of Treatment Up to Month 12
|
435.4 capsules
Standard Deviation 326.8
|
438.0 capsules
Standard Deviation 375.1
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: from the time of disease diagnosis till the first dose of Sunitinib and PazopanibPopulation: All Taiwanese participants diagnosed with metastatic RCC during the time period of January 2004 to December 2015 and received treatment (Sunitinib or Pazopanib). Overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Direct medical costs include the cost of the Sunitinib or Pazopanib and all follow-up costs for other medication and health care interventions in ambulatory, inpatient, and nursing care. All specialist and general practitioner care, including emergency care, as well as rehabilitation and physiotherapy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sunitinib
n=1221 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and National health insurance research database (NHIRD) (from January 2004 to December 2015), and were treated with Sunitinib capsule 12.5 milligram (mg), were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
Pazopanib
n=126 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic RCC, as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and NHIRD (from January 2004 to December 2014), and were treated with Pazopanib tablets 200 mg, were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Related Direct Medical Cost From the Diagnosis Date to the First Dose of Sunitinib and Pazopanib
|
176,969,380 new Taiwan dollars
|
45,442,288 new Taiwan dollars
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From first dose of drug to the end of observation period (up to 11 years)Population: All Taiwanese participants diagnosed with metastatic RCC during the time period of January 2004 to December 2015 and received treatment (Sunitinib or Pazopanib). Overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Direct medical costs include the cost of the Sunitinib or Pazopanib and all follow-up costs for other medication and health care interventions in ambulatory, inpatient, and nursing care. All specialist and general practitioner care, including emergency care, as well as rehabilitation and physiotherapy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sunitinib
n=1221 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and National health insurance research database (NHIRD) (from January 2004 to December 2015), and were treated with Sunitinib capsule 12.5 milligram (mg), were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
Pazopanib
n=126 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic RCC, as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and NHIRD (from January 2004 to December 2014), and were treated with Pazopanib tablets 200 mg, were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Related Direct Medical Cost From the First Dose of the Sunitinib and Pazopanib to the End of Observation Period
|
1,519,649,383 new Taiwan dollars
|
78,745,896 new Taiwan dollars
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: from the time of first prescription of Sunitinib or Pazopanib till date of death (during the observation period of 11 years)Population: All Taiwanese participants diagnosed with metastatic RCC during the time period of January 2004 to December 2015 and received treatment (Sunitinib or Pazopanib).
Overall survival of participants was defined as time (in days) between date of prescribing treatment (Sunitinib or Pazopanib) till date of death.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sunitinib
n=1223 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and National health insurance research database (NHIRD) (from January 2004 to December 2015), and were treated with Sunitinib capsule 12.5 milligram (mg), were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
Pazopanib
n=126 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic RCC, as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and NHIRD (from January 2004 to December 2014), and were treated with Pazopanib tablets 200 mg, were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Survival
|
490 days
Interval 443.0 to 536.0
|
416 days
Interval 312.0 to 807.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: time of first dose of the drug, Month 1Population: All Taiwanese participants diagnosed with metastatic RCC during the time period of January 2004 to December 2015 and received treatment (Sunitinib or Pazopanib). Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Changes in the prescription patterns of antihypertensive medication were categorized as: 1) Unchanged: no change in the count/number of capsules or class(es) of the antihypertensive medication at Month 1 as compared to the time of first dose, 2) Increased: increase in counts/number of capsules of the ongoing class(es) of the antihypertensive medication at Month 1 as compared to the time of first dose, 3) Decreased: Decrease in the counts/number of capsules of ongoing class(es) of antihypertensive medication at Month 1 as compared to the time of first dose, 4) Switched: shifted to other class(es) of antihypertensive medication without changes in counts of antihypertensive medication at Month 1 as compared to the time of first dose. The number of participants with change in prescription patterns based on the specified categories is reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sunitinib
n=189 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and National health insurance research database (NHIRD) (from January 2004 to December 2015), and were treated with Sunitinib capsule 12.5 milligram (mg), were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
Pazopanib
n=43 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic RCC, as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and NHIRD (from January 2004 to December 2014), and were treated with Pazopanib tablets 200 mg, were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Prescription Patterns of Antihypertensive Medication From the Time of First Dose of Drug at Month 1
Switched
|
35 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Prescription Patterns of Antihypertensive Medication From the Time of First Dose of Drug at Month 1
Unchanged
|
96 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Prescription Patterns of Antihypertensive Medication From the Time of First Dose of Drug at Month 1
Increased
|
85 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Prescription Patterns of Antihypertensive Medication From the Time of First Dose of Drug at Month 1
Decreased
|
63 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: time of first dose of the drug, Month 3Population: All Taiwanese participants diagnosed with metastatic RCC during the time period of January 2004 to December 2015 and received treatment (Sunitinib or Pazopanib). Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Changes in the prescription patterns of antihypertensive medication were categorized as: 1) Unchanged: no change in the count/number of capsules or class(es) of the antihypertensive medication at Month 3 as compared to the time of first dose, 2) Increased: increase in counts/number of capsules of the ongoing class(es) of the antihypertensive medication at Month 3 as compared to the time of first dose, 3) Decreased: Decrease in the counts/number of capsules of ongoing class(es) of antihypertensive medication at Month 3 as compared to the time of first dose, 4) Switched: shifted to other class(es) of antihypertensive medication without changes in counts of antihypertensive medication at Month 3 as compared to the time of first dose. The number of participants with change in prescription patterns based on the specified categories is reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sunitinib
n=421 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and National health insurance research database (NHIRD) (from January 2004 to December 2015), and were treated with Sunitinib capsule 12.5 milligram (mg), were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
Pazopanib
n=61 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic RCC, as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and NHIRD (from January 2004 to December 2014), and were treated with Pazopanib tablets 200 mg, were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Prescription Patterns of Antihypertensive Medication From the Time of First Dose of Drug at Month 3
Unchanged
|
142 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Prescription Patterns of Antihypertensive Medication From the Time of First Dose of Drug at Month 3
Increased
|
176 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Prescription Patterns of Antihypertensive Medication From the Time of First Dose of Drug at Month 3
Decreased
|
57 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Prescription Patterns of Antihypertensive Medication From the Time of First Dose of Drug at Month 3
Switched
|
46 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: the first dose of the drug, Month 6Population: All Taiwanese participants diagnosed with metastatic RCC during the time period of January 2004 to December 2015 and received treatment (Sunitinib or Pazopanib). Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Changes in the prescription patterns of antihypertensive medication were categorized as: 1) Unchanged: no change in the count/number of capsules or class(es) of the antihypertensive medication at Month 6 as compared to the time of first dose, 2) Increased: increase in counts/number of capsules of the ongoing class(es) of the antihypertensive medication at Month 6 as compared to the time of first dose, 3) Decreased: Decrease in the counts/number of capsules of ongoing class(es) of antihypertensive medication at Month 6 as compared to the time of first dose, 4) Switched: shifted to other class(es) of antihypertensive medication without changes in counts of antihypertensive medication at Month 6 as compared to the time of first dose. The number of participants with change in prescription patterns based on the specified categories is reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sunitinib
n=442 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and National health insurance research database (NHIRD) (from January 2004 to December 2015), and were treated with Sunitinib capsule 12.5 milligram (mg), were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
Pazopanib
n=64 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic RCC, as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and NHIRD (from January 2004 to December 2014), and were treated with Pazopanib tablets 200 mg, were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Prescription Patterns of Antihypertensive Medication From the Time of First Dose of Drug at Month 6
Unchanged
|
132 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Prescription Patterns of Antihypertensive Medication From the Time of First Dose of Drug at Month 6
Increased
|
213 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Prescription Patterns of Antihypertensive Medication From the Time of First Dose of Drug at Month 6
Decreased
|
54 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Prescription Patterns of Antihypertensive Medication From the Time of First Dose of Drug at Month 6
Switched
|
43 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: the first dose of the medication, Month 12Population: All Taiwanese participants diagnosed with metastatic RCC during the time period of January 2004 to December 2015 and received treatment (Sunitinib or Pazopanib). Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Changes in the prescription patterns of antihypertensive medication were categorized as: 1) Unchanged: no change in the count/number of capsules or class(es) of the antihypertensive medication at Month 12 as compared to the time of first dose, 2) Increased: increase in counts/number of capsules of the ongoing class(es) of the antihypertensive medication at Month 12 as compared to the time of first dose, 3) Decreased: Decrease in the counts/number of capsules of ongoing class(es) of antihypertensive medication at Month 12 as compared to the time of first dose, 4) Switched: shifted to other class(es) of antihypertensive medication without changes in counts of antihypertensive medication at Month 12 as compared to the time of first dose. The number of participants with change in prescription patterns based on the specified categories is reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sunitinib
n=446 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and National health insurance research database (NHIRD) (from January 2004 to December 2015), and were treated with Sunitinib capsule 12.5 milligram (mg), were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
Pazopanib
n=66 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic RCC, as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and NHIRD (from January 2004 to December 2014), and were treated with Pazopanib tablets 200 mg, were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Prescription Patterns of Antihypertensive Medication From the Time of First Dose of Drug at Month 12
Unchanged
|
104 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Prescription Patterns of Antihypertensive Medication From the Time of First Dose of Drug at Month 12
Increased
|
262 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Prescription Patterns of Antihypertensive Medication From the Time of First Dose of Drug at Month 12
Decreased
|
47 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Prescription Patterns of Antihypertensive Medication From the Time of First Dose of Drug at Month 12
Switched
|
33 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (at the beginning of 11 year observation period)Population: All Taiwanese participants diagnosed with metastatic RCC during the time period of January 2004 to December 2015 and received treatment (Sunitinib or Pazopanib). Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
To calculate number of patient receiving antihypertensive prescriptions at baseline for each TKI users and classify the patterns of changes into unchanged, switched, increased and decreased. Shifting to other class(es) of antihypertensive agents without changes in counts of antihypertensive medication is defined as being switched.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sunitinib
n=657 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and National health insurance research database (NHIRD) (from January 2004 to December 2015), and were treated with Sunitinib capsule 12.5 milligram (mg), were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
Pazopanib
n=94 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic RCC, as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and NHIRD (from January 2004 to December 2014), and were treated with Pazopanib tablets 200 mg, were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Received Antihypertensive Medication at Baseline
|
518 Participants
|
77 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (at the beginning of 11 year observation period) up to Month 1Population: All Taiwanese participants diagnosed with metastatic RCC during the time period of January 2004 to December 2015 and received treatment (Sunitinib or Pazopanib). Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
To calculate number of patient receiving antihypertensive prescriptions at Month 1 for each TKI users and classify the patterns of changes into unchanged, switched, increased and decreased. Shifting to other class(es) of antihypertensive agents without changes in counts of antihypertensive medication is defined as being switched.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sunitinib
n=657 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and National health insurance research database (NHIRD) (from January 2004 to December 2015), and were treated with Sunitinib capsule 12.5 milligram (mg), were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
Pazopanib
n=94 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic RCC, as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and NHIRD (from January 2004 to December 2014), and were treated with Pazopanib tablets 200 mg, were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Received Antihypertensive Medication From Baseline to Month 1
|
66 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 1 up to Month 3 since Sunitinib or Pazopanib initiation (during the observation period of 11 years)Population: All Taiwanese participants diagnosed with metastatic RCC during the time period of January 2004 to December 2015 and received treatment (Sunitinib or Pazopanib). Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
To calculate number of patient receiving antihypertensive prescriptions from Month 1 to Month 3 for each TKI users and classify the patterns of changes into unchanged, switched, increased and decreased. Shifting to other class(es) of antihypertensive agents without changes in counts of antihypertensive medication is defined as being switched.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sunitinib
n=657 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and National health insurance research database (NHIRD) (from January 2004 to December 2015), and were treated with Sunitinib capsule 12.5 milligram (mg), were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
Pazopanib
n=94 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic RCC, as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and NHIRD (from January 2004 to December 2014), and were treated with Pazopanib tablets 200 mg, were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Received Antihypertensive Medication From Month 1 to Month 3
|
30 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 3 up to Month 6 since Sunitinib or Pazopanib initiation (during the observation period of 11 years)Population: All Taiwanese participants diagnosed with metastatic RCC during the time period of January 2004 to December 2015 and received treatment (Sunitinib or Pazopanib). Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
To calculate number of patient receiving antihypertensive prescriptions from Month 3 to Month 6 for each TKI users and classify the patterns of changes into unchanged, switched, increased and decreased. Shifting to other class(es) of antihypertensive agents without changes in counts of antihypertensive medication is defined as being switched.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sunitinib
n=657 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and National health insurance research database (NHIRD) (from January 2004 to December 2015), and were treated with Sunitinib capsule 12.5 milligram (mg), were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
Pazopanib
n=94 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic RCC, as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and NHIRD (from January 2004 to December 2014), and were treated with Pazopanib tablets 200 mg, were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Received Antihypertensive Medication From Month 3 to Month 6
|
15 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 6 up to Month 12 since Sunitinib or Pazopanib initiation (during the observation period of 11 years)Population: All Taiwanese participants diagnosed with metastatic RCC during the time period of January 2004 to December 2015 and received treatment (Sunitinib or Pazopanib). Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
To calculate number of patient receiving antihypertensive prescriptions from Month 6 to Month 12 for each TKI users and classify the patterns of changes into unchanged, switched, increased and decreased. Shifting to other class(es) of antihypertensive agents without changes in counts of antihypertensive medication is defined as being switched.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sunitinib
n=657 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and National health insurance research database (NHIRD) (from January 2004 to December 2015), and were treated with Sunitinib capsule 12.5 milligram (mg), were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
Pazopanib
n=94 Participants
Participants who were diagnosed with metastatic RCC, as per the records of Catastrophic illness patient database and NHIRD (from January 2004 to December 2014), and were treated with Pazopanib tablets 200 mg, were included in this study and their data was observed retrospectively.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Received Antihypertensive Medication From Month 6 to Month 12
|
18 Participants
|
NA Participants
Due to NHIRD regulation, data cannot be reported if sample size \<=3.
|
Adverse Events
Sunitinib
Pazopanib
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER