Comparison of Serological Test s for the Virus Chicken Pox Virus (VZV) and Correlation With the Patient's Memory of the Infection or Vaccination

NCT ID: NCT02775422

Last Updated: 2020-08-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

308 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-03-30

Study Completion Date

2020-07-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Comparison of the sensibility and specificity of 3 different serological tests and evaluation of chicken pox immunity in pregnant women.

Secondary goals :

* Correlation memory / Immunity;
* Prevalence of VZV immunity in pregnant women;
* Evaluation of cellular and humoral immunity in cases with discrepancy between tests or between test and memory;
* Evaluation of acceptability of vaccination in the post partum period in non immune patients.

Methods Not randomized prospective study,

Number of patients : 400 Duration : 36 months Inclusion criteria : pregnant women \>18years old, agree to participate (written consent) Exclusion criteria: auto immune disease, HIV +, grafted patients

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pregnancy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Pregnant women

Pregnant women

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Serological Test s for the Virus Chicken Pox Virus

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Serological Test s for the Virus Chicken Pox Virus

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Pregnant women aged over 18
* Affiliated to a social protection scheme or women benefiting from such a regime
* Women who gived a writing consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Women with a maternal disease: autoimmune disease (systemic lupus erythematosus, antiphospholipid syndrome, insulin dependent diabetes, autoimmune thyroiditis ..), it takes an immunosuppressive treatment or not.
* HIV-positive women
* Garfted women whatever organ
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hopital Foch

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Olivier Picone, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Service Gynécologie Hopital Foch

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hopital Foch

Suresnes, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

LAFORET EG, LYNCH CL Jr. Multiple congenital defects following maternal varicella; report of a case. N Engl J Med. 1947 Apr 10;236(15):534-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM194704102361504. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20293114 (View on PubMed)

Alkalay AL, Pomerance JJ, Rimoin DL. Fetal varicella syndrome. J Pediatr. 1987 Sep;111(3):320-3. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(87)80447-x. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3625399 (View on PubMed)

SAUERBREI A. Fetales varizellen syndrom. Monatsschr kinderheiledkd 2003;151:209-213.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Miller E, Cradock-Watson JE, Ridehalgh MK. Outcome in newborn babies given anti-varicella-zoster immunoglobulin after perinatal maternal infection with varicella-zoster virus. Lancet. 1989 Aug 12;2(8659):371-3. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)90547-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2569560 (View on PubMed)

ENDERS G. Varicella and herpes zoster in pregnancy and the newborn. . Varicella-zoster virus and clinical management. Arvin AM and Gershon AA, eds; UK: Cambridge University Press 2000:317-347.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

MIRLESSE V. Varicelle et grossesse. Les virus transmissibles de la mère à l'enfant. Denis F. Ed John Libey Eurotext, In Montrouge 1999:252-269.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Khoshnood B, Debruyne M, Lancon F, Emery C, Fagnani F, Durand I, Floret D. Seroprevalence of varicella in the French population. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006 Jan;25(1):41-4. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000195636.43584.bb.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16395101 (View on PubMed)

Wu MF, Yang YW, Lin WY, Chang CY, Soon MS, Liu CE. Varicella zoster virus infection among healthcare workers in Taiwan: seroprevalence and predictive value of history of varicella infection. J Hosp Infect. 2012 Feb;80(2):162-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.11.011. Epub 2011 Dec 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22188630 (View on PubMed)

Vandersmissen G, Moens G, Vranckx R, de Schryver A, Jacques P. Occupational risk of infection by varicella zoster virus in Belgian healthcare workers: a seroprevalence study. Occup Environ Med. 2000 Sep;57(9):621-6. doi: 10.1136/oem.57.9.621.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10935943 (View on PubMed)

Alp E, Cevahir F, Gokahmetoglu S, Demiraslan H, Doganay M. Prevaccination screening of health-care workers for immunity to measles, rubella, mumps, and varicella in a developing country: What do we save? J Infect Public Health. 2012 Apr;5(2):127-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2011.11.003. Epub 2012 Jan 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22541258 (View on PubMed)

Almuneef M, Memish ZA, Abbas ME, Balkhy HH. Screening healthcare workers for varicella-zoster virus: can we trust the history? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004 Jul;25(7):595-8. doi: 10.1086/502445.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15301033 (View on PubMed)

Saadatian-Elahi M, Mekki Y, Del Signore C, Lina B, Derrough T, Caulin E, Thierry J, Vanhems P. Seroprevalence of varicella antibodies among pregnant women in Lyon-France. Eur J Epidemiol. 2007;22(6):405-9. doi: 10.1007/s10654-007-9136-z. Epub 2007 May 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17534728 (View on PubMed)

Reignier F, Romano L, Thiry N, Beutels P, Van Damme P, Fau C, Gaspard C, Mamoux V, Zanetti A, Floret D. [Varicella-zoster virus seroprevalence in nursery and day-care workers in Lyon (France)]. Med Mal Infect. 2005 Apr;35(4):192-6. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2005.01.007. French.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15914287 (View on PubMed)

Dashraath P, Ong ES, Lee VJ. Seroepidemiology of varicella and the reliability of a self-reported history of varicella infection in Singapore military recruits. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2007 Aug;36(8):636-41.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17767333 (View on PubMed)

Fung LW, Lao TT, Suen SS, Chan OK, Lau TK, Ngai KL, Chan PK, Leung TY. Seroprevalence of varicella zoster virus among pregnant women in Hong Kong: comparison with self-reported history. Vaccine. 2011 Oct 26;29(46):8186-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.08.090. Epub 2011 Sep 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21911021 (View on PubMed)

Pourahmad M, Davami MH, Jahromi AR. Evaluation of anti-varicella antibody in young women before their marriage: A sero-epidemiologic study in Iran. J Clin Virol. 2010 Aug;48(4):260-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2010.04.015. Epub 2010 Jun 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20538515 (View on PubMed)

Perella D, Fiks AG, Jumaan A, Robinson D, Gargiullo P, Pletcher J, Forke CM, Schmid DS, Renwick M, Mankodi F, Watson B, Spain CV. Validity of reported varicella history as a marker for varicella zoster virus immunity among unvaccinated children, adolescents, and young adults in the post-vaccine licensure era. Pediatrics. 2009 May;123(5):e820-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-3310.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19403475 (View on PubMed)

Koturoglu G, Kurugol Z, Turkoglu E. Seroepidemiology of varicella-zoster virus and reliability of varicella history in Turkish children, adolescents and adults. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2011 Jul;25(4):388-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2010.01180.x. Epub 2011 Apr 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21649681 (View on PubMed)

Enders G, Miller E, Cradock-Watson J, Bolley I, Ridehalgh M. Consequences of varicella and herpes zoster in pregnancy: prospective study of 1739 cases. Lancet. 1994 Jun 18;343(8912):1548-51. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)92943-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7802767 (View on PubMed)

Breuer J, Schmid DS, Gershon AA. Use and limitations of varicella-zoster virus-specific serological testing to evaluate breakthrough disease in vaccinees and to screen for susceptibility to varicella. J Infect Dis. 2008 Mar 1;197 Suppl 2:S147-51. doi: 10.1086/529448.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18419389 (View on PubMed)

Maple PA, Rathod P, Smit E, Gray J, Brown D, Boxall EH. Comparison of the performance of the LIAISON VZV-IgG and VIDAS automated enzyme linked fluorescent immunoassays with reference to a VZV-IgG time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay and implications of choice of cut-off for LIAISON assay. J Clin Virol. 2009 Jan;44(1):9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2008.08.012. Epub 2008 Sep 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18823815 (View on PubMed)

Sauerbrei A, Schafler A, Hofmann J, Schacke M, Gruhn B, Wutzler P. Evaluation of three commercial varicella-zoster virus IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays in comparison to the fluorescent-antibody-to-membrane-antigen test. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012 Aug;19(8):1261-8. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00183-12. Epub 2012 Jun 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22718131 (View on PubMed)

Tischer A, Gassner M, Richard JL, Suter-Riniker F, Mankertz A, Heininger U. Vaccinated students with negative enzyme immunoassay results show positive measles virus-specific antibody levels by immunofluorescence and plaque neutralisation tests. J Clin Virol. 2007 Mar;38(3):204-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2006.12.017. Epub 2007 Feb 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17289430 (View on PubMed)

Mancuso JD, Krauss MR, Audet S, Beeler JA. ELISA underestimates measles antibody seroprevalence in US military recruits. Vaccine. 2008 Sep 8;26(38):4877-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.06.028. Epub 2008 Jun 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18586062 (View on PubMed)

Seward JF, Watson BM, Peterson CL, Mascola L, Pelosi JW, Zhang JX, Maupin TJ, Goldman GS, Tabony LJ, Brodovicz KG, Jumaan AO, Wharton M. Varicella disease after introduction of varicella vaccine in the United States, 1995-2000. JAMA. 2002 Feb 6;287(5):606-11. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.5.606.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11829699 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2014-A00707-40

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2014/08

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.