3D Versus 2D Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy

NCT ID: NCT02775344

Last Updated: 2019-11-25

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

83 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-05-31

Study Completion Date

2016-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a prospective randomized study involving 80 patients. All participates will be given written information on 3D laparoscopy. They will be randomized according to computer-generated random sequence into two groups, 2D and 3D group. The operation will then be performed either using 2D or 3D laparoscopy. Surgeons are allowed to change to the other type of laparoscopy if difficulty encountered. After the operation, the surgeons will be required to fill in a questionnaire self-evaluating the performance using Global rating scale component of the intraoperative assessment tool (GOALS), any discomfort encountered, any need for change of laparoscopy and their preference on the type of laparoscopy.

The level of complexity of the operation, duration of operation, blood loss and complications will be recorded.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Laparoscopy has greatly replaced laparotomy in most gynaecological operations including oncological procedures. Laparoscopic approach is the mainstay for ovarian cystectomy nowadays. However the loss of depth perception and dexterity remains the drawback of laparoscopy. With the development of robotic surgery, the three-dimension vision and presence of "wrist" motion allowed surgeon to perform more complicated operations in sophisticated manner. Expensive instruments and the need for prolonged time of setup restricted the extensive use of it. Having those considerations in mind, three-dimension (3D) laparoscopy is another possible alternative. With the advancement of technology in 3D vision, it may provide better precision especially in perception of depth and spatial orientation. Dizziness, nausea, headache and ocular fatique are occasional side effects in 3D surgery which created concerns of the surgeons.

There have been studies using standardized tasks shown that 3D laparoscopy will improve the performance in surgeon both objectively and subjectively especially when performing complex task. It was suggested to be able to fasten the learning curve for beginners. The operation time was shorter when laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed using 3D imaging without any major complications encountered.

Yet evidence in the applicability and use in clinical service in gynaecological operations are still inadequate. The investigators would like to evaluate the difference of 2D versus 3D laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Surgical Procedure, Unspecified

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

three dimension laparoscopy

This group of patients will have laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy performed using three-dimension laparoscopy. The procedure will be performed in usual manner.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Three dimension laparoscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Surgery will be performed either with three dimension laparoscopy or two dimension laparoscopy.

Two dimension laparoscopy

Two-dimension laparosocpy would be used in this group of patient. The procedure will be performed in usual manner.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Three dimension laparoscopy

Surgery will be performed either with three dimension laparoscopy or two dimension laparoscopy.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Planned for laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy
* Willing and able to participate after the study has been explained
* Those understand either Cantonese, Putonghua or English

Exclusion Criteria

* essential data are missing from the participants records making it impossible to judge treatment outcome.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Lui Man Wa

Dr

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Man Wa Lui, MBBS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Mary Hospital

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hong Kong

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Storz P, Buess GF, Kunert W, Kirschniak A. 3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasks. Surg Endosc. 2012 May;26(5):1454-60. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2055-9. Epub 2011 Dec 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22179446 (View on PubMed)

Lusch A, Bucur PL, Menhadji AD, Okhunov Z, Liss MA, Perez-Lanzac A, McDougall EM, Landman J. Evaluation of the impact of three-dimensional vision on laparoscopic performance. J Endourol. 2014 Feb;28(2):261-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0344. Epub 2014 Jan 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24059674 (View on PubMed)

Tanagho YS, Andriole GL, Paradis AG, Madison KM, Sandhu GS, Varela JE, Benway BM. 2D versus 3D visualization: impact on laparoscopic proficiency using the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skill set. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012 Nov;22(9):865-70. doi: 10.1089/lap.2012.0220. Epub 2012 Oct 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23072406 (View on PubMed)

Wagner OJ, Hagen M, Kurmann A, Horgan S, Candinas D, Vorburger SA. Three-dimensional vision enhances task performance independently of the surgical method. Surg Endosc. 2012 Oct;26(10):2961-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2295-3. Epub 2012 May 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22580874 (View on PubMed)

Cicione A, Autorino R, Breda A, De Sio M, Damiano R, Fusco F, Greco F, Carvalho-Dias E, Mota P, Nogueira C, Pinho P, Mirone V, Correia-Pinto J, Rassweiler J, Lima E. Three-dimensional vs standard laparoscopy: comparative assessment using a validated program for laparoscopic urologic skills. Urology. 2013 Dec;82(6):1444-50. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.047. Epub 2013 Oct 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24094658 (View on PubMed)

Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS, Andrew CG, Bergman S, Leffondre K, Stanbridge D, Fried GM. A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg. 2005 Jul;190(1):107-13. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.04.004.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15972181 (View on PubMed)

Bilgen K, Ustun M, Karakahya M, Isik S, Sengul S, Cetinkunar S, Kucukpinar TH. Comparison of 3D imaging and 2D imaging for performance time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Apr;23(2):180-3. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182827e17.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23579515 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UW 14-096

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.