Trial Outcomes & Findings for Feasibility of mindBEAGLE in Disorders of Consciousness or Locked-In Syndrome (NCT NCT02772302)
NCT ID: NCT02772302
Last Updated: 2021-06-03
Results Overview
LoC will be defined using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised behavioral evaluation (score range 0-23). Higher scores are generally associated with a higher level of consciousness.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
on the day of intervention
2021-06-03
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
mindBEAGLE
Application of bedside, EEG-based mindBEAGLE Brain-Computer Interface
mindBEAGLE EEG-based brain-computer interface
|
Healthy Controls
healthy subjects with no history of neurological disease
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
10
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
10
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Feasibility of mindBEAGLE in Disorders of Consciousness or Locked-In Syndrome
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
mindBEAGLE (Inpatient Participants)
n=10 Participants
Application of bedside, EEG-based mindBEAGLE Brain-Computer Interface
mindBEAGLE EEG-based brain-computer interface
|
mindBEAGLE (Healthy Controls)
n=10 Participants
Application of bedside, EEG-based mindBEAGLE Brain-Computer Interface tested in healthy controls to provide baseline validation of the technology.
|
Total
n=20 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
56 years
n=5 Participants
|
34 years
n=7 Participants
|
41 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
10 participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 participants
n=7 Participants
|
20 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: on the day of interventionPopulation: patients in the ICU (n=10) and healthy control subjects (n=10)
LoC will be defined using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised behavioral evaluation (score range 0-23). Higher scores are generally associated with a higher level of consciousness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
mindBEAGLE
n=10 Participants
Application of bedside, EEG-based mindBEAGLE Brain-Computer Interface
mindBEAGLE EEG-based brain-computer interface
|
Healthy Control Subjects
n=10 Participants
Application of bedside, EEG-based mindBEAGLE Brain-Computer Interface mindBEAGLE EEG-based brain-computer interface
|
|---|---|---|
|
Behavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)
patient 1
|
0 score on a scale
|
23 score on a scale
|
|
Behavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)
patient 2
|
2 score on a scale
|
23 score on a scale
|
|
Behavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)
patient 3
|
2 score on a scale
|
23 score on a scale
|
|
Behavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)
patient 4
|
2 score on a scale
|
23 score on a scale
|
|
Behavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)
patient 5
|
5 score on a scale
|
23 score on a scale
|
|
Behavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)
patient 6
|
3 score on a scale
|
23 score on a scale
|
|
Behavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)
patient 7
|
10 score on a scale
|
23 score on a scale
|
|
Behavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)
patient 8
|
13 score on a scale
|
23 score on a scale
|
|
Behavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)
patient 9
|
16 score on a scale
|
23 score on a scale
|
|
Behavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)
patient 10
|
16 score on a scale
|
23 score on a scale
|
Adverse Events
mindBEAGLE
Healthy Controls
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
mindBEAGLE
n=10 participants at risk
Application of bedside, EEG-based mindBEAGLE Brain-Computer Interface
mindBEAGLE EEG-based brain-computer interface
|
Healthy Controls
n=10 participants at risk
healthy subjects with no history of neurological disease
|
|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Hypotension
|
10.0%
1/10 • During mindBEAGLE assessment in the intensive care unit, which lasted up to 4 hours.
Participants with Disorders of Consciousness or Locked in Syndrome were enrolled in the Neuro-ICU where adverse events, related or unrelated to the intervention/device were systematically monitored through regular investigator assessment and regular laboratory testing.
|
0.00%
0/10 • During mindBEAGLE assessment in the intensive care unit, which lasted up to 4 hours.
Participants with Disorders of Consciousness or Locked in Syndrome were enrolled in the Neuro-ICU where adverse events, related or unrelated to the intervention/device were systematically monitored through regular investigator assessment and regular laboratory testing.
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place