Trial Outcomes & Findings for Feasibility of mindBEAGLE in Disorders of Consciousness or Locked-In Syndrome (NCT NCT02772302)

NCT ID: NCT02772302

Last Updated: 2021-06-03

Results Overview

LoC will be defined using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised behavioral evaluation (score range 0-23). Higher scores are generally associated with a higher level of consciousness.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

20 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

on the day of intervention

Results posted on

2021-06-03

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
mindBEAGLE
Application of bedside, EEG-based mindBEAGLE Brain-Computer Interface mindBEAGLE EEG-based brain-computer interface
Healthy Controls
healthy subjects with no history of neurological disease
Overall Study
STARTED
10
10
Overall Study
COMPLETED
10
10
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Feasibility of mindBEAGLE in Disorders of Consciousness or Locked-In Syndrome

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
mindBEAGLE (Inpatient Participants)
n=10 Participants
Application of bedside, EEG-based mindBEAGLE Brain-Computer Interface mindBEAGLE EEG-based brain-computer interface
mindBEAGLE (Healthy Controls)
n=10 Participants
Application of bedside, EEG-based mindBEAGLE Brain-Computer Interface tested in healthy controls to provide baseline validation of the technology.
Total
n=20 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
56 years
n=5 Participants
34 years
n=7 Participants
41 years
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 participants
n=5 Participants
10 participants
n=7 Participants
20 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: on the day of intervention

Population: patients in the ICU (n=10) and healthy control subjects (n=10)

LoC will be defined using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised behavioral evaluation (score range 0-23). Higher scores are generally associated with a higher level of consciousness.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
mindBEAGLE
n=10 Participants
Application of bedside, EEG-based mindBEAGLE Brain-Computer Interface mindBEAGLE EEG-based brain-computer interface
Healthy Control Subjects
n=10 Participants
Application of bedside, EEG-based mindBEAGLE Brain-Computer Interface mindBEAGLE EEG-based brain-computer interface
Behavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)
patient 1
0 score on a scale
23 score on a scale
Behavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)
patient 2
2 score on a scale
23 score on a scale
Behavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)
patient 3
2 score on a scale
23 score on a scale
Behavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)
patient 4
2 score on a scale
23 score on a scale
Behavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)
patient 5
5 score on a scale
23 score on a scale
Behavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)
patient 6
3 score on a scale
23 score on a scale
Behavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)
patient 7
10 score on a scale
23 score on a scale
Behavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)
patient 8
13 score on a scale
23 score on a scale
Behavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)
patient 9
16 score on a scale
23 score on a scale
Behavioral Diagnosis of Level of Consciousness (LoC)
patient 10
16 score on a scale
23 score on a scale

Adverse Events

mindBEAGLE

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Healthy Controls

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
mindBEAGLE
n=10 participants at risk
Application of bedside, EEG-based mindBEAGLE Brain-Computer Interface mindBEAGLE EEG-based brain-computer interface
Healthy Controls
n=10 participants at risk
healthy subjects with no history of neurological disease
General disorders
Hypotension
10.0%
1/10 • During mindBEAGLE assessment in the intensive care unit, which lasted up to 4 hours.
Participants with Disorders of Consciousness or Locked in Syndrome were enrolled in the Neuro-ICU where adverse events, related or unrelated to the intervention/device were systematically monitored through regular investigator assessment and regular laboratory testing.
0.00%
0/10 • During mindBEAGLE assessment in the intensive care unit, which lasted up to 4 hours.
Participants with Disorders of Consciousness or Locked in Syndrome were enrolled in the Neuro-ICU where adverse events, related or unrelated to the intervention/device were systematically monitored through regular investigator assessment and regular laboratory testing.

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Brian Edlow

Massachusetts General Hospital

Phone: 6177246352

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place