Trial Outcomes & Findings for Using TMS to Increase Executive Function in Older Adults (NCT NCT02767323)

NCT ID: NCT02767323

Last Updated: 2021-04-05

Results Overview

Accuracy (in percentage) will be assessed to evaluate the acute effect of rTMS. The accuracy provided below are the ones obtained in the hardest condition of the working memory task.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

184 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

During the rTMS session, on average 2 hours per visit.

Results posted on

2021-04-05

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Active or Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1a)
excitatory rTMS applied over the DLPFC (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design
Active or Sham rTMS Over the Parietal Cortex (Aim1b)
excitatory rTMS applied over the parietal cortex (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design
Active or Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC and the Parietal Cortex (Aim 1c)
excitatory rTMS applied over the the DLPFC and the parietal cortex (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used. Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design
Active/Sham rTMS Over DLPFC (Aim1a), Then Active/Sham rTMS Over DLPFC and Parietal Cortex (Aim1c)
excitatory rTMS applied over the DLPFC (fMRI-guided) and the Parietal cortex rTMS: excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design
Overall Study
STARTED
83
42
58
1
Overall Study
COMPLETED
49
17
28
1
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
34
25
30
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Active or Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1a)
excitatory rTMS applied over the DLPFC (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design
Active or Sham rTMS Over the Parietal Cortex (Aim1b)
excitatory rTMS applied over the parietal cortex (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design
Active or Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC and the Parietal Cortex (Aim 1c)
excitatory rTMS applied over the the DLPFC and the parietal cortex (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used. Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design
Active/Sham rTMS Over DLPFC (Aim1a), Then Active/Sham rTMS Over DLPFC and Parietal Cortex (Aim1c)
excitatory rTMS applied over the DLPFC (fMRI-guided) and the Parietal cortex rTMS: excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
17
5
13
0
Overall Study
Contraindication, moving during the scan, low behavior, or Covid-19
17
20
17
0

Baseline Characteristics

Using TMS to Increase Executive Function in Older Adults

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Active or Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1a)
n=83 Participants
excitatory rTMS applied over the DLPFC (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz. Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design
Active or Sham rTMS Over the Parietal Cortex (Aim1b)
n=42 Participants
excitatory rTMS applied over the parietal cortex (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz. Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design
Active or Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC and the Parietal Cortex (Aim 1c)
n=58 Participants
excitatory rTMS applied over the the DLPFC and the parietal cortex (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz. Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design
Active or Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1a), Then Active or Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1c)
n=1 Participants
excitatory rTMS applied over the the DLPFC and the parietal cortex (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz. Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design
Total
n=184 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
0 Participants
n=36 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
57 Participants
n=93 Participants
18 Participants
n=4 Participants
58 Participants
n=27 Participants
1 Participants
n=483 Participants
134 Participants
n=36 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
26 Participants
n=93 Participants
24 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
50 Participants
n=36 Participants
Age, Continuous
40.85 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.09 • n=93 Participants
67.26 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.23 • n=4 Participants
23.65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.14 • n=27 Participants
28 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4 • n=483 Participants
41.31 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.47 • n=36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
52 Participants
n=93 Participants
16 Participants
n=4 Participants
34 Participants
n=27 Participants
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
102 Participants
n=36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
31 Participants
n=93 Participants
26 Participants
n=4 Participants
24 Participants
n=27 Participants
1 Participants
n=483 Participants
82 Participants
n=36 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
0 Participants
n=36 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
14 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
13 Participants
n=27 Participants
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
27 Participants
n=36 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
0 Participants
n=36 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants
n=93 Participants
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
11 Participants
n=27 Participants
1 Participants
n=483 Participants
23 Participants
n=36 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
62 Participants
n=93 Participants
37 Participants
n=4 Participants
33 Participants
n=27 Participants
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
132 Participants
n=36 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
1 Participants
n=27 Participants
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
2 Participants
n=36 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
0 Participants
n=36 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
83 Participants
n=93 Participants
42 Participants
n=4 Participants
58 Participants
n=27 Participants
1 Participants
n=483 Participants
184 Participants
n=36 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: During the rTMS session, on average 2 hours per visit.

Population: Subjects who completed the study. Data not collected on five subjects.

Accuracy (in percentage) will be assessed to evaluate the acute effect of rTMS. The accuracy provided below are the ones obtained in the hardest condition of the working memory task.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Active or Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1a)
n=46 Participants
excitatory rTMS applied over the DLPFC (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used. Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design
Active or Sham rTMS Over the Parietal Cortex (Aim1b)
n=15 Participants
excitatory rTMS applied over the parietal cortex (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design
Active or Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC and the Parietal Cortex (Aim 1c)
n=29 Participants
excitatory rTMS applied over the the DLPFC and the parietal cortex (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used. Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design
Acute Effect of a rTMS Session on the Performance for a Working Memory Task, as Measured by Accuracy (in Percentage)
Active rTMS
50.43 percentage of accuracy
Standard Deviation 7.37
55.42 percentage of accuracy
Standard Deviation 5.50
83.93 percentage of accuracy
Standard Deviation 8.09
Acute Effect of a rTMS Session on the Performance for a Working Memory Task, as Measured by Accuracy (in Percentage)
Sham rTMS
46.49 percentage of accuracy
Standard Deviation 7.35
57.76 percentage of accuracy
Standard Deviation 5.70
83.27 percentage of accuracy
Standard Deviation 10.88

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: During the rTMS session, on average 2 hours per visit

Population: Subjects who completed the study. Data not collected on five subjects.

Reaction Time of correct response (in ms) will be assessed to evaluate the acute effect of rTMS. The reaction times provided below are the ones obtained in the hardest condition of the working memory task.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Active or Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1a)
n=46 Participants
excitatory rTMS applied over the DLPFC (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used. Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design
Active or Sham rTMS Over the Parietal Cortex (Aim1b)
n=15 Participants
excitatory rTMS applied over the parietal cortex (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design
Active or Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC and the Parietal Cortex (Aim 1c)
n=29 Participants
excitatory rTMS applied over the the DLPFC and the parietal cortex (fMRI-guided) rTMS: excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used. Active and Sham rTMS will be tested in a within subject design
Acute Effect of a rTMS Session on the Performance for a Working Memory Task, as Measured by Reaction Time of Correct Response (in ms)
Active rTMS
2368 ms
Standard Deviation 335
2214 ms
Standard Deviation 231
1911 ms
Standard Deviation 356
Acute Effect of a rTMS Session on the Performance for a Working Memory Task, as Measured by Reaction Time of Correct Response (in ms)
Sham rTMS
2388 ms
Standard Deviation 345
2224 ms
Standard Deviation 180
1924 ms
Standard Deviation 332

Adverse Events

Active rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1a)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1a)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Active rTMS Over the Parietal Cortex (Aim 1b)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Sham rTMS Over the Parietal Cortex (Aim 1b)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Active rTMS Over the DLPFC and the Parietal Cortex (Aim 1c)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC and the Parietal Cortex (Aim 1c)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Active rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1a) Then Active rTMS Over the DLPFC and Parietal Cortex(Aim1c)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC (Aim1a) Then Sham rTMS Over the DLPFC and Parietal Cortex(Aim1c)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Lysianne Beynel

Duke University

Phone: 9193386273

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place