Trial Outcomes & Findings for Triple Combination Therapy in High Risk Crohn's Disease (CD) (NCT NCT02764762)
NCT ID: NCT02764762
Last Updated: 2023-07-14
Results Overview
Endoscopic remission was defined as simple endoscopic score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) scale score from 0-2. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, proportion of the surface area that was ulcerated, proportion of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was the sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
55 participants
Week 26
2023-07-14
Participant Flow
Participants took part in the study at 23 investigative sites in Canada and United States from 18 April 2017 to 05 July 2022.
Participants with newly-diagnosed Crohn's Disease (CD) with higher risk for complications were enrolled into triple combination therapy to assess efficacy and safety of vedolizumab 300 mg, adalimumab 160/80/40 mg, and methotrexate 15 mg, following monotherapy of vedolizumab 300 mg.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV) + Adalimumab 160-80-40 mg (SC) + Methotrexate 15 mg (Oral)
Participants received triple combination therapy of vedolizumab 300 milligram (mg), intravenous (IV) infusion, once at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22, with adalimumab 160 mg subcutaneously (SC), once at Week 0, then 80 mg once at Week 2, then 40 mg once at Week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter until Week 26 along with oral Methotrexate 15 mg tablets orally once weekly from Weeks 0 up to Week 34. Following the triple combination treatment participants received monotherapy of vedolizumab 300 mg IV infusion once at Weeks 30, 38, 46, 54, 62, 70, 78, 86, 94 and 102.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
55
|
|
Overall Study
Triple Combination Therapy
|
55
|
|
Overall Study
Monotherapy
|
45
|
|
Overall Study
Safety Follow-up
|
53
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
39
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV) + Adalimumab 160-80-40 mg (SC) + Methotrexate 15 mg (Oral)
Participants received triple combination therapy of vedolizumab 300 milligram (mg), intravenous (IV) infusion, once at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22, with adalimumab 160 mg subcutaneously (SC), once at Week 0, then 80 mg once at Week 2, then 40 mg once at Week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter until Week 26 along with oral Methotrexate 15 mg tablets orally once weekly from Weeks 0 up to Week 34. Following the triple combination treatment participants received monotherapy of vedolizumab 300 mg IV infusion once at Weeks 30, 38, 46, 54, 62, 70, 78, 86, 94 and 102.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Pretreatment Event/Adverse Event
|
9
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Voluntary Withdrawal
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
Site Termination
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
Reason not Specified
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Triple Combination Therapy in High Risk Crohn's Disease (CD)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV) + Adalimumab 160-80-40 mg (SC) + Methotrexate 15mg (Oral)
n=55 Participants
Participants received triple combination therapy of vedolizumab 300 mg, IV infusion, once at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22, with adalimumab 160 mg SC, once at Week 0, then 80 mg once at Week 2, then 40 mg once at Week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter until Week 26 along with oral Methotrexate 15 mg tablets orally once weekly from Weeks 0 up to Week 34. Following the triple combination treatment participants received monotherapy of vedolizumab 300 mg IV infusion once at Weeks 30, 38, 46, 54, 62, 70, 78, 86, 94 and 102.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
32.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.38 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
40 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
49 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Height
|
171.4 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.55 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Weight
|
71.87 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.373 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
|
24.26 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.029 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Canada
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 26Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and have a post-enrollment efficacy assessment. As pre-specified in the protocol, this outcome measure reports data only in the Triple Combination Therapy Phase at Week 26.
Endoscopic remission was defined as simple endoscopic score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) scale score from 0-2. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, proportion of the surface area that was ulcerated, proportion of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was the sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV) + Adalimumab 160-80-40 mg (SC) + Methotrexate 15 mg (Oral)
n=55 Participants
Participants received triple combination therapy of vedolizumab 300 mg, IV infusion, once at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22, with adalimumab 160 mg SC, once at Week 0, then 80 mg once at Week 2, then 40 mg once at Week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter until Week 26 along with oral Methotrexate 15 mg tablets orally once weekly from Weeks 0 up to Week 34.
|
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV)
Following the triple combination treatment participants received monotherapy of vedolizumab 300 mg IV infusion once at Weeks 30, 38, 46, 54, 62, 70, 78, 86, 94 and 102.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Remission at Week 26
|
34.5 percentage of participants
Interval 21.1 to 48.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 26Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had a post-enrollment efficacy assessment.
Endoscopic healing was defined as SES-CD score ≤4 and reduction from Baseline in SES-CD score of at least 2 points and no individual SES-CD subscore \>1. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, proportion of the surface area that is ulcerated, proportion of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was the sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV) + Adalimumab 160-80-40 mg (SC) + Methotrexate 15 mg (Oral)
n=55 Participants
Participants received triple combination therapy of vedolizumab 300 mg, IV infusion, once at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22, with adalimumab 160 mg SC, once at Week 0, then 80 mg once at Week 2, then 40 mg once at Week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter until Week 26 along with oral Methotrexate 15 mg tablets orally once weekly from Weeks 0 up to Week 34.
|
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV)
Following the triple combination treatment participants received monotherapy of vedolizumab 300 mg IV infusion once at Weeks 30, 38, 46, 54, 62, 70, 78, 86, 94 and 102.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Healing at Week 26
|
43.6 percentage of participants
Interval 29.6 to 57.7
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 26Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had a post-enrollment efficacy assessment.
Endoscopic response was defined as 50% reduction in SES-CD score from Baseline. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV) + Adalimumab 160-80-40 mg (SC) + Methotrexate 15 mg (Oral)
n=55 Participants
Participants received triple combination therapy of vedolizumab 300 mg, IV infusion, once at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22, with adalimumab 160 mg SC, once at Week 0, then 80 mg once at Week 2, then 40 mg once at Week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter until Week 26 along with oral Methotrexate 15 mg tablets orally once weekly from Weeks 0 up to Week 34.
|
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV)
Following the triple combination treatment participants received monotherapy of vedolizumab 300 mg IV infusion once at Weeks 30, 38, 46, 54, 62, 70, 78, 86, 94 and 102.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Response at Week 26
|
56.4 percentage of participants
Interval 42.3 to 70.4
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had a post-enrollment efficacy assessment. Number analyzed indicates the number of participants available for analysis at the given timepoint.
The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, proportion of the surface area that is ulcerated, proportion of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was the sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Negative change indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV) + Adalimumab 160-80-40 mg (SC) + Methotrexate 15 mg (Oral)
n=55 Participants
Participants received triple combination therapy of vedolizumab 300 mg, IV infusion, once at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22, with adalimumab 160 mg SC, once at Week 0, then 80 mg once at Week 2, then 40 mg once at Week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter until Week 26 along with oral Methotrexate 15 mg tablets orally once weekly from Weeks 0 up to Week 34.
|
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV)
Following the triple combination treatment participants received monotherapy of vedolizumab 300 mg IV infusion once at Weeks 30, 38, 46, 54, 62, 70, 78, 86, 94 and 102.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in SES-CD Score at Week 26
Baseline
|
12.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.67
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in SES-CD Score at Week 26
Change From Baseline at Week 26
|
-8.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.29
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 26Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had a post-enrollment efficacy assessment.
Deep remission was defined as Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) score \<150 and SES-CD score from 0-2. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below were associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV) + Adalimumab 160-80-40 mg (SC) + Methotrexate 15 mg (Oral)
n=55 Participants
Participants received triple combination therapy of vedolizumab 300 mg, IV infusion, once at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22, with adalimumab 160 mg SC, once at Week 0, then 80 mg once at Week 2, then 40 mg once at Week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter until Week 26 along with oral Methotrexate 15 mg tablets orally once weekly from Weeks 0 up to Week 34.
|
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV)
Following the triple combination treatment participants received monotherapy of vedolizumab 300 mg IV infusion once at Weeks 30, 38, 46, 54, 62, 70, 78, 86, 94 and 102.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Deep Remission at Week 26
|
21.8 percentage of participants
Interval 10.0 to 33.6
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 26Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had a post-enrollment efficacy assessment.
Clinical remission was defined as CDAI score \<150. Endoscopic response was defined as 50% reduction in SES-CD score from Baseline, as mucosal healing. CDAI was scoring system for assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below are associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The SES-CD total was sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV) + Adalimumab 160-80-40 mg (SC) + Methotrexate 15 mg (Oral)
n=55 Participants
Participants received triple combination therapy of vedolizumab 300 mg, IV infusion, once at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22, with adalimumab 160 mg SC, once at Week 0, then 80 mg once at Week 2, then 40 mg once at Week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter until Week 26 along with oral Methotrexate 15 mg tablets orally once weekly from Weeks 0 up to Week 34.
|
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV)
Following the triple combination treatment participants received monotherapy of vedolizumab 300 mg IV infusion once at Weeks 30, 38, 46, 54, 62, 70, 78, 86, 94 and 102.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission and Endoscopic Response as a Measure of Mucosal Healing at Week 26
|
38.2 percentage of participants
Interval 24.4 to 51.9
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 10 and 26Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had a post-enrollment efficacy assessment.
Clinical remission was defined as CDAI score \<150. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below were associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV) + Adalimumab 160-80-40 mg (SC) + Methotrexate 15 mg (Oral)
n=55 Participants
Participants received triple combination therapy of vedolizumab 300 mg, IV infusion, once at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22, with adalimumab 160 mg SC, once at Week 0, then 80 mg once at Week 2, then 40 mg once at Week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter until Week 26 along with oral Methotrexate 15 mg tablets orally once weekly from Weeks 0 up to Week 34.
|
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV)
Following the triple combination treatment participants received monotherapy of vedolizumab 300 mg IV infusion once at Weeks 30, 38, 46, 54, 62, 70, 78, 86, 94 and 102.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Weeks 10 and 26
Week 10
|
60.0 percentage of participants
Interval 46.1 to 73.9
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Weeks 10 and 26
Week 26
|
54.5 percentage of participants
Interval 40.5 to 68.6
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 10 and 26Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had a post-enrollment efficacy assessment.
Clinical response was defined as ≥100-point decrease in CDAI score. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below were associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV) + Adalimumab 160-80-40 mg (SC) + Methotrexate 15 mg (Oral)
n=55 Participants
Participants received triple combination therapy of vedolizumab 300 mg, IV infusion, once at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22, with adalimumab 160 mg SC, once at Week 0, then 80 mg once at Week 2, then 40 mg once at Week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter until Week 26 along with oral Methotrexate 15 mg tablets orally once weekly from Weeks 0 up to Week 34.
|
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV)
Following the triple combination treatment participants received monotherapy of vedolizumab 300 mg IV infusion once at Weeks 30, 38, 46, 54, 62, 70, 78, 86, 94 and 102.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response at Weeks 10 and 26
Week 10
|
49.1 percentage of participants
Interval 35.0 to 63.2
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response at Weeks 10 and 26
Week 26
|
43.6 percentage of participants
Interval 29.6 to 57.7
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 10 and 26Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had a post-enrollment efficacy assessment. Number analyzed indicates the number of participants available for analysis at the given timepoint.
The change between the CRP levels were collected at Weeks 10 and 26 relative to Baseline. Negative change indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV) + Adalimumab 160-80-40 mg (SC) + Methotrexate 15 mg (Oral)
n=55 Participants
Participants received triple combination therapy of vedolizumab 300 mg, IV infusion, once at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22, with adalimumab 160 mg SC, once at Week 0, then 80 mg once at Week 2, then 40 mg once at Week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter until Week 26 along with oral Methotrexate 15 mg tablets orally once weekly from Weeks 0 up to Week 34.
|
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV)
Following the triple combination treatment participants received monotherapy of vedolizumab 300 mg IV infusion once at Weeks 30, 38, 46, 54, 62, 70, 78, 86, 94 and 102.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Weeks 10 and 26
Baseline
|
7.60 milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Interval 0.6 to 135.8
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Weeks 10 and 26
Change From Baseline at Week 10
|
-4.80 milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Interval -84.0 to 29.7
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Weeks 10 and 26
Change From Baseline at Week 26
|
-5.50 milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Interval -79.3 to 104.3
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 10, 14, 26, 52, 78 and 102Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had a post-enrollment efficacy assessment. Number analyzed indicates the number of participants available for analysis at the given timepoint.
The change between the fecal calprotectin concentrations collected at Weeks 10, 14, 26, 52, 78, and 102 relative to Baseline were reported. Baseline is defined as the last observation prior to the first dose of the study drug.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV) + Adalimumab 160-80-40 mg (SC) + Methotrexate 15 mg (Oral)
n=55 Participants
Participants received triple combination therapy of vedolizumab 300 mg, IV infusion, once at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22, with adalimumab 160 mg SC, once at Week 0, then 80 mg once at Week 2, then 40 mg once at Week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter until Week 26 along with oral Methotrexate 15 mg tablets orally once weekly from Weeks 0 up to Week 34.
|
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV)
n=45 Participants
Following the triple combination treatment participants received monotherapy of vedolizumab 300 mg IV infusion once at Weeks 30, 38, 46, 54, 62, 70, 78, 86, 94 and 102.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Concentrations at Weeks 10, 14, 26, 52, 78, and 102
Baseline
|
1301.0 micrograms per gram
Interval 23.0 to 17707.0
|
1210.0 micrograms per gram
Interval 23.0 to 17707.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Concentrations at Weeks 10, 14, 26, 52, 78, and 102
Change From Baseline at Week 10
|
-864.0 micrograms per gram
Interval -16406.0 to 471.0
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Concentrations at Weeks 10, 14, 26, 52, 78, and 102
Change From Baseline at Week 14
|
-556.0 micrograms per gram
Interval -14742.0 to 6892.0
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Concentrations at Weeks 10, 14, 26, 52, 78, and 102
Change From Baseline at Week 26
|
-860.5 micrograms per gram
Interval -7911.0 to 440.0
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Concentrations at Weeks 10, 14, 26, 52, 78, and 102
Change From Baseline at Week 52
|
—
|
-350.0 micrograms per gram
Interval -7365.0 to 8021.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Concentrations at Weeks 10, 14, 26, 52, 78, and 102
Change From Baseline at Week 78
|
—
|
-396.5 micrograms per gram
Interval -7844.0 to 9434.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Concentrations at Weeks 10, 14, 26, 52, 78, and 102
Change From Baseline at Week 102
|
—
|
-452.0 micrograms per gram
Interval -8052.0 to 106.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 26, 52, 78 and 102Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had a post-enrollment efficacy assessment. Overall number of participants analyzed are the number of participants with Elevated CRP at Baseline. Number analyzed indicates the number of participants available for analysis at the given timepoint.
Clinical remission was defined as CDAI score \<150 and CRP level \<5 mg/L in participants with elevated CRP level at Baseline. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below were associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicate active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV) + Adalimumab 160-80-40 mg (SC) + Methotrexate 15 mg (Oral)
n=39 Participants
Participants received triple combination therapy of vedolizumab 300 mg, IV infusion, once at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22, with adalimumab 160 mg SC, once at Week 0, then 80 mg once at Week 2, then 40 mg once at Week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter until Week 26 along with oral Methotrexate 15 mg tablets orally once weekly from Weeks 0 up to Week 34.
|
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV)
n=34 Participants
Following the triple combination treatment participants received monotherapy of vedolizumab 300 mg IV infusion once at Weeks 30, 38, 46, 54, 62, 70, 78, 86, 94 and 102.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission and CRP <5 Milligram Per Liter (mg/L) at Weeks 26, 52, 78, and 102
Week 26
|
51.3 percentage of participants
Interval 34.3 to 68.3
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission and CRP <5 Milligram Per Liter (mg/L) at Weeks 26, 52, 78, and 102
Week 52
|
—
|
44.1 percentage of participants
Interval 26.0 to 62.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission and CRP <5 Milligram Per Liter (mg/L) at Weeks 26, 52, 78, and 102
Week 78
|
—
|
26.5 percentage of participants
Interval 10.2 to 42.8
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission and CRP <5 Milligram Per Liter (mg/L) at Weeks 26, 52, 78, and 102
Week 102
|
—
|
20.6 percentage of participants
Interval 5.5 to 35.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 10, 26 and 102Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had a post-enrollment efficacy assessment. Overall number of participants analyzed are the number of participants with Baseline concomitant oral corticosteroid use. Number analyzed indicates the number of participants available for analysis at the given timepoint.
Percentage of participants using oral corticosteroids at Baseline who had discontinued corticosteroids and were in clinical remission at weeks 10, 26, and 102 were reported. Clinical remission was defined as CDAI score \<150. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below are associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicate active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV) + Adalimumab 160-80-40 mg (SC) + Methotrexate 15 mg (Oral)
n=16 Participants
Participants received triple combination therapy of vedolizumab 300 mg, IV infusion, once at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22, with adalimumab 160 mg SC, once at Week 0, then 80 mg once at Week 2, then 40 mg once at Week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter until Week 26 along with oral Methotrexate 15 mg tablets orally once weekly from Weeks 0 up to Week 34.
|
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV)
n=14 Participants
Following the triple combination treatment participants received monotherapy of vedolizumab 300 mg IV infusion once at Weeks 30, 38, 46, 54, 62, 70, 78, 86, 94 and 102.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Using Oral Corticosteroids at Baseline Who Have Discontinued Corticosteroids and Are in Clinical Remission at Weeks 10, 26, and 102
Week 10
|
50.0 percentage of participants
Interval 22.4 to 77.6
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Using Oral Corticosteroids at Baseline Who Have Discontinued Corticosteroids and Are in Clinical Remission at Weeks 10, 26, and 102
Week 26
|
56.3 percentage of participants
Interval 28.8 to 83.7
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Using Oral Corticosteroids at Baseline Who Have Discontinued Corticosteroids and Are in Clinical Remission at Weeks 10, 26, and 102
Week 102
|
—
|
21.4 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 46.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 52, 78 and 102Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had a post-enrollment efficacy assessment. Overall number of participants analyzed are the number of participants with clinical remission at Week 26.
Clinical remission was defined as CDAI score \<150. Clinical remission was defined as CDAI score \<150. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below are associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV) + Adalimumab 160-80-40 mg (SC) + Methotrexate 15 mg (Oral)
n=30 Participants
Participants received triple combination therapy of vedolizumab 300 mg, IV infusion, once at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22, with adalimumab 160 mg SC, once at Week 0, then 80 mg once at Week 2, then 40 mg once at Week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter until Week 26 along with oral Methotrexate 15 mg tablets orally once weekly from Weeks 0 up to Week 34.
|
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV)
Following the triple combination treatment participants received monotherapy of vedolizumab 300 mg IV infusion once at Weeks 30, 38, 46, 54, 62, 70, 78, 86, 94 and 102.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Clinical Remission at Weeks 52, 78, and 102
Week 52
|
50.0 percentage of participants
Interval 30.4 to 69.6
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Clinical Remission at Weeks 52, 78, and 102
Week 78
|
33.3 percentage of participants
Interval 14.8 to 51.9
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Clinical Remission at Weeks 52, 78, and 102
Week 102
|
20.0 percentage of participants
Interval 4.0 to 36.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 52, 78 and 102Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had a post-enrollment efficacy assessment. Overall number of participants analyzed are the number of participants with clinical response at Week 26.
Clinical response was defined as ≥100-point decrease in CDAI score. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below were associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV) + Adalimumab 160-80-40 mg (SC) + Methotrexate 15 mg (Oral)
n=24 Participants
Participants received triple combination therapy of vedolizumab 300 mg, IV infusion, once at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22, with adalimumab 160 mg SC, once at Week 0, then 80 mg once at Week 2, then 40 mg once at Week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter until Week 26 along with oral Methotrexate 15 mg tablets orally once weekly from Weeks 0 up to Week 34.
|
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV)
Following the triple combination treatment participants received monotherapy of vedolizumab 300 mg IV infusion once at Weeks 30, 38, 46, 54, 62, 70, 78, 86, 94 and 102.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Clinical Response at Weeks 52, 78, and 102
Week 52
|
66.7 percentage of participants
Interval 45.7 to 87.6
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Clinical Response at Weeks 52, 78, and 102
Week 78
|
45.8 percentage of participants
Interval 23.8 to 67.9
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Clinical Response at Weeks 52, 78, and 102
Week 102
|
29.2 percentage of participants
Interval 8.9 to 49.4
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 102Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had a post-enrollment efficacy assessment. Overall number of participants analyzed are the number of participants with endoscopic remission at Week 26.
Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD score 0-2. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicated more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV) + Adalimumab 160-80-40 mg (SC) + Methotrexate 15 mg (Oral)
n=18 Participants
Participants received triple combination therapy of vedolizumab 300 mg, IV infusion, once at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22, with adalimumab 160 mg SC, once at Week 0, then 80 mg once at Week 2, then 40 mg once at Week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter until Week 26 along with oral Methotrexate 15 mg tablets orally once weekly from Weeks 0 up to Week 34.
|
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV)
Following the triple combination treatment participants received monotherapy of vedolizumab 300 mg IV infusion once at Weeks 30, 38, 46, 54, 62, 70, 78, 86, 94 and 102.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Endoscopic Remission at Week 102
|
27.8 percentage of participants
Interval 4.3 to 51.2
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 102Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had a post-enrollment efficacy assessment. Overall number of participants analyzed are the number of participants with deep remission at Week 26.
Deep remission was defined as CDAI score \<150 and SES-CD score 0-2. Clinical remission was defined as CDAI score \<150. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below are associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 were seen with extremely severe disease. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV) + Adalimumab 160-80-40 mg (SC) + Methotrexate 15 mg (Oral)
n=12 Participants
Participants received triple combination therapy of vedolizumab 300 mg, IV infusion, once at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22, with adalimumab 160 mg SC, once at Week 0, then 80 mg once at Week 2, then 40 mg once at Week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter until Week 26 along with oral Methotrexate 15 mg tablets orally once weekly from Weeks 0 up to Week 34.
|
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV)
Following the triple combination treatment participants received monotherapy of vedolizumab 300 mg IV infusion once at Weeks 30, 38, 46, 54, 62, 70, 78, 86, 94 and 102.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Deep Remission at Week 102
|
8.3 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 28.1
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 102Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had a post-enrollment efficacy assessment. Overall number of participants analyzed are the number of participants with endoscopic healing at Week 26.
Endoscopic healing was defined as SES-CD score \<=4 and reduction from Baseline in SES-CD score of at least 2 points and no individual SES-CD subscore \>1. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV) + Adalimumab 160-80-40 mg (SC) + Methotrexate 15 mg (Oral)
n=23 Participants
Participants received triple combination therapy of vedolizumab 300 mg, IV infusion, once at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22, with adalimumab 160 mg SC, once at Week 0, then 80 mg once at Week 2, then 40 mg once at Week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter until Week 26 along with oral Methotrexate 15 mg tablets orally once weekly from Weeks 0 up to Week 34.
|
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV)
Following the triple combination treatment participants received monotherapy of vedolizumab 300 mg IV infusion once at Weeks 30, 38, 46, 54, 62, 70, 78, 86, 94 and 102.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Endoscopic Healing at Week 102
|
34.8 percentage of participants
Interval 13.1 to 56.4
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 102Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had a post-enrollment efficacy assessment. Overall number of participants analyzed are the number of participants with endoscopic response at Week 26.
Endoscopic response was defined as 50% reduction in SES-CD score from Baseline. The SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable was sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total was the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV) + Adalimumab 160-80-40 mg (SC) + Methotrexate 15 mg (Oral)
n=30 Participants
Participants received triple combination therapy of vedolizumab 300 mg, IV infusion, once at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22, with adalimumab 160 mg SC, once at Week 0, then 80 mg once at Week 2, then 40 mg once at Week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter until Week 26 along with oral Methotrexate 15 mg tablets orally once weekly from Weeks 0 up to Week 34.
|
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV)
Following the triple combination treatment participants received monotherapy of vedolizumab 300 mg IV infusion once at Weeks 30, 38, 46, 54, 62, 70, 78, 86, 94 and 102.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Endoscopic Response at Week 102
|
50.0 percentage of participants
Interval 30.4 to 69.6
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 102Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had a post-enrollment efficacy assessment. Overall number of participants analyzed are the number of participants with clinical remission and endoscopic response at Week 26.
Clinical remission is defined as CDAI score \<150. Endoscopic response defined as 50% reduction in SES-CD score from Baseline, as mucosal healing. CDAI is scoring system for assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below are associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicate active disease and values above 450 are seen with extremely severe disease. The SES-CD evaluates 4 endoscopic variables (ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The SES-CD total is sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV) + Adalimumab 160-80-40 mg (SC) + Methotrexate 15 mg (Oral)
n=21 Participants
Participants received triple combination therapy of vedolizumab 300 mg, IV infusion, once at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22, with adalimumab 160 mg SC, once at Week 0, then 80 mg once at Week 2, then 40 mg once at Week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter until Week 26 along with oral Methotrexate 15 mg tablets orally once weekly from Weeks 0 up to Week 34.
|
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV)
Following the triple combination treatment participants received monotherapy of vedolizumab 300 mg IV infusion once at Weeks 30, 38, 46, 54, 62, 70, 78, 86, 94 and 102.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Clinical Remission and Endoscopic Response as a Measure of Mucosal Healing at Week 102
|
19.0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 38.2
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: After 26 Weeks up to Week 120Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had a post-enrollment efficacy assessment. Overall number of participants analyzed are the number of participants with data available for analysis.
First exacerbation of CD after 26 weeks was defined as either: 1) a CDAI increase of \>70 from the prior visit on 2 occasions separated by a 2-week interval, objective evidence of disease activity by colonoscopy or CRP above normal OR 2) fecal calprotectin \>250 microgram per gram (mcg/g) alone. CDAI was scoring system for the assessment of CD activity, index values of 150 and below were associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicated active disease and values above 450 are seen with extremely severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV) + Adalimumab 160-80-40 mg (SC) + Methotrexate 15 mg (Oral)
n=45 Participants
Participants received triple combination therapy of vedolizumab 300 mg, IV infusion, once at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22, with adalimumab 160 mg SC, once at Week 0, then 80 mg once at Week 2, then 40 mg once at Week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter until Week 26 along with oral Methotrexate 15 mg tablets orally once weekly from Weeks 0 up to Week 34.
|
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV)
Following the triple combination treatment participants received monotherapy of vedolizumab 300 mg IV infusion once at Weeks 30, 38, 46, 54, 62, 70, 78, 86, 94 and 102.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With First Exacerbation of CD
|
62.2 percentage of participants
Interval 46.9 to 77.5
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV) + Adalimumab 160-80-40 mg (SC) + Methotrexate 15 mg (Oral)
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV)
Safety Follow-up
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV) + Adalimumab 160-80-40 mg (SC) + Methotrexate 15 mg (Oral)
n=55 participants at risk
Participants received triple combination therapy of vedolizumab 300 mg, IV infusion, once at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22, with adalimumab 160 mg SC, once at Week 0, then 80 mg once at Week 2, then 40 mg once at Week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter until Week 26 along with oral Methotrexate 15 mg tablets orally once weekly from Weeks 0 up to Week 34.
|
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV)
n=45 participants at risk
Following the triple combination treatment participants received monotherapy of vedolizumab 300 mg IV infusion once at Weeks 30, 38, 46, 54, 62, 70, 78, 86, 94 and 102.
|
Safety Follow-up
n=53 participants at risk
Participants who completed the study treatment or were terminated early from the study were followed-up for safety up to 18 weeks after receiving the last dose of study drug.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Abdominal wall abscess
|
0.00%
0/55 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/45 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
1.9%
1/53 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
|
0.00%
0/55 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
2.2%
1/45 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/53 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colonic fistula
|
0.00%
0/55 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/45 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
1.9%
1/53 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Crohn's disease
|
1.8%
1/55 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/45 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/53 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
1.8%
1/55 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/45 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/53 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphadenopathy
|
1.8%
1/55 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/45 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/53 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Perirectal abscess
|
1.8%
1/55 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/45 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/53 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
1.8%
1/55 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/45 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/53 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal obstruction
|
3.6%
2/55 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/45 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
1.9%
1/53 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV) + Adalimumab 160-80-40 mg (SC) + Methotrexate 15 mg (Oral)
n=55 participants at risk
Participants received triple combination therapy of vedolizumab 300 mg, IV infusion, once at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22, with adalimumab 160 mg SC, once at Week 0, then 80 mg once at Week 2, then 40 mg once at Week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter until Week 26 along with oral Methotrexate 15 mg tablets orally once weekly from Weeks 0 up to Week 34.
|
Vedolizumab 300 mg (IV)
n=45 participants at risk
Following the triple combination treatment participants received monotherapy of vedolizumab 300 mg IV infusion once at Weeks 30, 38, 46, 54, 62, 70, 78, 86, 94 and 102.
|
Safety Follow-up
n=53 participants at risk
Participants who completed the study treatment or were terminated early from the study were followed-up for safety up to 18 weeks after receiving the last dose of study drug.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
9.1%
5/55 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
8.9%
4/45 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/53 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
5.5%
3/55 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
2.2%
1/45 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/53 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal fissure
|
0.00%
0/55 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
6.7%
3/45 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/53 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
18.2%
10/55 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
6.7%
3/45 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/53 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased
|
5.5%
3/55 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
4.4%
2/45 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/53 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
|
Investigations
C-reactive protein increased
|
1.8%
1/55 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
8.9%
4/45 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/53 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
3.6%
2/55 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
8.9%
4/45 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/53 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Crohn's disease
|
16.4%
9/55 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
44.4%
20/45 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
7.5%
4/53 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
1.8%
1/55 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
6.7%
3/45 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/53 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
|
Investigations
Faecal calprotectin increased
|
3.6%
2/55 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
8.9%
4/45 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/53 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
7.3%
4/55 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
2.2%
1/45 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/53 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
5.5%
3/55 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/45 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/53 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haematochezia
|
1.8%
1/55 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
6.7%
3/45 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/53 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
9.1%
5/55 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
4.4%
2/45 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/53 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
10.9%
6/55 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
6.7%
3/45 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/53 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
7.3%
4/55 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
2.2%
1/45 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/53 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
3.6%
2/55 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
6.7%
3/45 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/53 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
5.5%
3/55 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
11.1%
5/45 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/53 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
5.5%
3/55 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
4.4%
2/45 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
0.00%
0/53 • From the first dose up to EOS (up to 120 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data for the safety was collected and reported separately for triple combination therapy, monotherapy, and the safety follow up.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The first study related publication will be a multi-center publication submitted within 24 months after conclusion or termination of a study at all sites. After such multi site publication, all proposed site publications and presentations will be submitted to sponsor for review 60 days in advance of publication. Site will remove Sponsor confidential information unrelated to study results. Sponsor can delay a proposed publication for another 60 days to preserve intellectual property.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER