The Effectiveness of a Decision-Support Tool for Adult Consumers With Mental Health Needs and Their Care Managers

NCT ID: NCT02761733

Last Updated: 2017-04-26

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 240 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2013-09-30
• Study Completion Date: 2016-10-31

Brief Summary

The primary goal of the proposed study is to investigate the implementation and effectiveness of the mPOWR (Moving Patient-centered Outcomes through Wellness and Recovery) in diverse urban and rural community mental health settings. The study compares patient participation and outcomes using the mPOWR system to a usual care control condition. Four community mental health agencies participate in the research: two in San Francisco (urban) and two in N.M. (rural). One site in each setting serves as the mPOWR implementation site and the other serves as the control site. Service sites were randomly assigned to intervention or usual care conditions. A quasi experimental design was used; only eligible participants were enrolled in the study (e.g., exclusion criteria of moderate to severe cognitive impairment, patient services structured for provision of mPOWR implementation, etc.). The study design will employ repeated quantitative measures to assess change in outcomes within and across conditions over time. Qualitative methods in the form of focus group interviews will also be used to round out the information obtained about patient and provider expectations and experiences. Primary outcomes of interest include: Short Form Health Survey-12 (SF-12; physical and mental health aspects of health and well-being); Outcome Rating Scale (ORS; general well-being, personal well-being, close relationships, and work/school/friend relationships); Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (congruence of patient's and provider's participation in therapeutic decision making and patient's understanding of treatment and treatment options); Working Alliance Inventory (perception of therapeutic alliance); and Satisfaction Questionnaire (communication patterns between physicians and their patients).

Detailed Description

Research on the impact of decision-support tools for providers and patients has not included frontline care managers within community mental health settings. In particular, the care management field lacks effective models for integrating results-based and patient-centered care into routine practice with diverse adults with complex mental health and social service needs. For over five years, Family Service Agency of San Francisco (FSA) developed and piloted a mental health decision-support tool entitled the Assessment Diagnostic Evaluation and Planning Tool (ADEPT) for use by patients and front-line providers. The ADEPT was developed by a team of researchers, frontline providers, and FSA patients to collect data and track patient progress over time. Yet, its strong focus on diagnostic screening and excessive length limited its relevance to patients in guiding service decisions. Over the past two years, a team of FSA patients and care managers revised the tool, eliminating its diagnostic component and retaining two measures of quality of life and community living skills that were reviewed and/or adapted by patients to reflect meaningful outcomes in the delivery of services. Decision aids and a communications toolkit were also developed to support the use of shared-decision making (SDM) processes in the provision of services. Together, these instruments and tools make up the Moving Patient Outcomes toward Wellness and Recovery (mPOWR) system. mPOWR ensures that the patient-provider relationship remains focused on patient identified outcomes and use of SDM throughout care. The primary goal of the study is to investigate the implementation and effectiveness of the mPOWR in diverse urban and rural community mental health settings.

FSA has partnered with senior faculty from the University of New Mexico to serve as independent researchers for this study. The study involves four community mental health agencies: two in San Francisco (urban) and two in N.M. (rural). One (randomly chosen) site in each setting serves as the mPOWR implementation site and the other serves as the control site. The study population initially enrolled included 240 (60/site X 4 sites) diverse adults with chronic mental health conditions. The specific aims for this study are: (1) To improve patient and provider participation in shared-decision making and engagement in mental health treatment, to improve [patient] personal Quality of Life, and to improve [patient] access to community/social services; (2) To increase patient understanding of their treatment and of treatment options; to increase their personal treatment progress; (3) To increase patient functionality and sense of perceived support for their therapeutic outcomes.

Primary outcomes of interest include: Short Form Health Survey-12 (SF-12; physical and mental health aspects of health and well-being); Outcome Rating Scale (ORS; general well-being, personal well-being, close relationships, and work/school/friend relationships); Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (congruence of patient's and provider's participation in therapeutic decision making and patient's understanding of treatment and treatment options); Working Alliance Inventory (perception of therapeutic alliance); and Satisfaction Questionnaire (communication patterns between physicians and their patients). Qualitative methods in the form of focus group interviews will also be used to round out the information obtained about patient and provider expectations and experiences. Data will be collected in a time series design.

Conditions

Mental Disorders

Study Design

• Allocation Method: NON_RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
• Blinding Strategy: NONE

Study Groups

mPOWR System

Moving Patient Outcomes toward Wellness and Recovery (mPOWR) consists of an assessment questionnaire and decision support tools which map onto 6 life domains which are measured by the questionnaire.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Moving Patient Outcomes toward Wellness and Recovery (mPOWR)

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

An mPOWR intervention and toolkit that consists of strategies, prompts, and decision aids designed to foster patient involvement in treatment. The mPOWR intervention includes a questionnaire that assesses quality of life and consumer functioning for use in the development of consumer-centered goals and outcomes within the mPOWR intervention.

Control

Treatment as usual

Group Type: NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Moving Patient Outcomes toward Wellness and Recovery (mPOWR)

An mPOWR intervention and toolkit that consists of strategies, prompts, and decision aids designed to foster patient involvement in treatment. The mPOWR intervention includes a questionnaire that assesses quality of life and consumer functioning for use in the development of consumer-centered goals and outcomes within the mPOWR intervention.

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Men and women over the age of 18 who are receiving mental health services.

Exclusion Criteria

Temporary Exclusion:

• Disruptive, aggressive, or severely disorganized behaviors;
• Visibly intoxicated or under the influence of illicit drugs.

General Exclusion:

• Moderate to severe cognitive impairment;
• Developmental disability that precludes comprehension;
• Language issues: Intervention is only offered in English and Chinese;
• Patient services structured for provision of mPOWR implementation (e.g., not in and out of inpatient or crisis stabilization services).

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role: collaborator

University of New Mexico

OTHER

Sponsor Role: collaborator

Felton Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Joyce Chu, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Felton Institute

References

Larson CO, Schlundt D, Patel K, Beard K, Hargreaves M. Validity of the SF-12 for use in a low-income African American community-based research initiative (REACH 2010). Prev Chronic Dis. 2008 Apr;5(2):A44. Epub 2008 Mar 15.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 18341779 (View on PubMed)

Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 8628042 (View on PubMed)

Johnson JA, Coons SJ. Comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-12 in an adult US sample. Qual Life Res. 1998 Feb;7(2):155-66. doi: 10.1023/a:1008809610703.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 9523497 (View on PubMed)

Miller, S., et al., The Outcome Rating Scale: A Preliminary Study of the Reliability, Validity, and Feasibility of a Brief Visual Analog Measure. J Brief Therapy, 2003. 2(2): p. 91-100.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Kriston L, Scholl I, Holzel L, Simon D, Loh A, Harter M. The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample. Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jul;80(1):94-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.034. Epub 2009 Oct 30.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19879711 (View on PubMed)

Hanson, W., K. Curry, and D. Bandalos, Reliability Generalization of Working Alliance Inventory Scale Scores. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2002. 62(4): p. 659-673.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Horvath, A. and L. Greenberg, Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. J Counseling Psychology, 1989. 36: p. 223-233.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Campbell C, Lockyer J, Laidlaw T, Macleod H. Assessment of a matched-pair instrument to examine doctor-patient communication skills in practising doctors. Med Educ. 2007 Feb;41(2):123-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02657.x.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 17269944 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

CE-12-11-4309

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id