Trial to Compare Radiation Fibrosis With Five Versus Three Fractions
NCT ID: NCT02755896
Last Updated: 2025-12-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
PHASE2
350 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-10-14
2027-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prone Partial Breast Irradiation (PBI): a Prospective Randomized Trial
NCT02276885
Single Fraction High-Gradient Partial Breast Irradiation in Treating Patients With Low-Risk Stage 0-I Breast Cancer
NCT02076074
Partial-Breast Radiation Therapy in Treating Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer
NCT01008514
Partial Breast Irradiation (PBI) for Selected Patients With Early Invasive or Non-Invasive Breast Cancer
NCT00694577
Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Before or After Breast Surgery for Treatment of Patients With Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer
NCT06635980
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A prone approach for partial breast radiation has been tested at NYU in a clinical trial sponsored by an IDEA grant of the Department of Defense (NYU 00-23). Results of the first 47 patient accrued originally demonstrated feasibility. Eligibility to this study was limited to post-menopausal women with non-palpable, mammographically detected tumors. In addition, the protocol required patients to have first refused to undergo standard six-week radiotherapy. Five fractions of 6 Gy were delivered to the Planning Target Volume (PTV) over ten days (Monday-Wednesday-Friday, Monday-Wednesday). The dose and fractionation was based on radiobiological modeling, aimed at determining a dose to deliver in five fractions that would achieve equivalence to the tumor control estimates of 50 Gy in 25 fractions, while maintaining a risk of fibrosis at the tumor bed comparable to that of a standard regimen of 60 Gy in 30 fractions. An α/β = 4 for tumor control was used, and its validity has been recently confirmed by the results of a prospective randomized trial comparing accelerated to standard whole breast radiotherapy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm 1 - 600 cGY x 5 fractions
Patients will receive 600 cGY x 5 fractions of radiation therapy over 5 consecutive days.
Arm 1 600 cGY x 5 fractions
Patients who are randomized to Arm 1 will receive either 600 cGY x 5 fractions over 5 consecutive days
Arm 2 - 800 cGY x 3 fractions
Patients will receive 800 cGY x 3 fractions of radiation therapy every other day for 3 days.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Arm 1 600 cGY x 5 fractions
Patients who are randomized to Arm 1 will receive either 600 cGY x 5 fractions over 5 consecutive days
Arm 2 800 cGY x 3 fractions
Patients who are randomized to Arm 2 will receive 800 cGY x 3 fractions given every other day
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Stage 1 (pT1) breast cancer, excised with negative margins.
3. clinically N0 or No Regional Lymph node (pN0) or sentinel node negative
Exclusion Criteria
2. Presence of a proportion of Ductal Carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) in the core biopsy specimen which is compatible with extensive intraductal component (EIC).
50 Years
90 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Silvia C Formenti, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, United States
Weill Cornell Medical College
New York, New York, United States
Brooklyn Methodist Hospital - NewYork Presbyterian
New York, New York, United States
New York Presbyterian Hospital - Queens
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1505016201
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.