Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study Comparing SB8 and Avastin® in Patients With Advanced Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NCT NCT02754882)
NCT ID: NCT02754882
Last Updated: 2024-12-16
Results Overview
The best ORR was defined as the proportion of subjects whose best overall response was either Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) according to RECIST v1.1 during the induction treatment period by 24 weeks. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
763 participants
24 weeks from randomisation
2024-12-16
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Bevacizumab (Avastin)
Avastin® + Carboplatin/Paclitaxel
Bevacizumab: Avastin® 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks on Day 1
Carboplatin: Carboplatin AUC 6 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
Paclitaxel: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
|
SB8 (A Proposed Bevacizumab Biosimilar)
SB8 + Carboplatin/Paclitaxel
SB8: SB8 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks on Day 1
Carboplatin: Carboplatin AUC 6 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
Paclitaxel: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
384
|
379
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
38
|
35
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
346
|
344
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
A Study Comparing SB8 and Avastin® in Patients With Advanced Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Bevacizumab (Avastin)
n=384 Participants
Avastin® + Carboplatin/Paclitaxel
Bevacizumab: Avastin® 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks on Day 1
Carboplatin: Carboplatin AUC 6 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
Paclitaxel: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
|
SB8 (A Proposed Bevacizumab Biosimilar)
n=379 Participants
SB8 + Carboplatin/Paclitaxel
SB8: SB8 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks on Day 1
Carboplatin: Carboplatin AUC 6 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
Paclitaxel: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
|
Total
n=763 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
269 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
255 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
524 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
115 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
124 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
239 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
60.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.18 • n=5 Participants
|
60.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.95 • n=7 Participants
|
60.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.84 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
128 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
127 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
255 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
256 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
252 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
508 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
67 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
348 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
347 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
695 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
|
25.49 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.707 • n=5 Participants
|
25.50 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.809 • n=7 Participants
|
25.50 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.755 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeks from randomisationPopulation: The Full Analysis Set consisted of all randomised subjects. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they were randomised to by intention-to-treat principle. However, subjects who did not qualify for randomisation and were inadvertently randomised into the study were excluded from FAS, provided these subjects did not receive any IP, and there was one subject who met these criteria. So, there is a difference between "Started" in Participant Flow module and Analysis Population.
The best ORR was defined as the proportion of subjects whose best overall response was either Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) according to RECIST v1.1 during the induction treatment period by 24 weeks. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bevacizumab (Avastin)
n=383 Participants
Avastin® + Carboplatin/Paclitaxel
Bevacizumab: Avastin® 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks on Day 1
Carboplatin: Carboplatin AUC 6 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
Paclitaxel: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
|
SB8 (A Proposed Bevacizumab Biosimilar)
n=379 Participants
SB8 + Carboplatin/Paclitaxel
SB8: SB8 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks on Day 1
Carboplatin: Carboplatin AUC 6 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
Paclitaxel: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (Best Overall Response Rate[ORR]) by 24 Weeks
|
42.8 percentage of participants
|
47.6 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: from the date of randomisation to the date of disease progression or death up to 12 months from randomisation of the last subjectPopulation: Full Analysis Set (FAS): Consisted of all randomised subjects. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they were randomised to by intention-to-treat principle. Per-protocol Set (PPS): Consisted of all FAS subjects who completed at least first 2 cycles of combination chemotherapy with a tumour assessment and did not have any major protocol deviations that impacted the primary efficacy assessment.
PFS is defined as the time from the date of Randomisation to the date of disease progression (progressive disease \[PD\]) or death regardless of the cause of death. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), PD: At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bevacizumab (Avastin)
n=379 Participants
Avastin® + Carboplatin/Paclitaxel
Bevacizumab: Avastin® 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks on Day 1
Carboplatin: Carboplatin AUC 6 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
Paclitaxel: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
|
SB8 (A Proposed Bevacizumab Biosimilar)
n=383 Participants
SB8 + Carboplatin/Paclitaxel
SB8: SB8 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks on Day 1
Carboplatin: Carboplatin AUC 6 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
Paclitaxel: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Progression Free Survival
FAS
|
8.50 months
Interval 7.4 to 9.7
|
7.90 months
Interval 7.4 to 9.5
|
|
Progression Free Survival
PPS
|
8.50 months
Interval 7.2 to 9.7
|
7.90 months
Interval 7.3 to 9.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: from the date of randomisation to the date of death up to 12 months from randomisation of the last subjectPopulation: Full Analysis Set (FAS): Consisted of all randomised subjects. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they were randomised to by intention-to-treat principle. Per-protocol Set (PPS): Consisted of all FAS subjects who completed at least first 2 cycles of combination chemotherapy with a tumour assessment and did not have any major protocol deviations that impacted the primary efficacy assessment.
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomisation to the date of death regardless of the cause of death. Subjects who were alive at the time of analysis were censored at the date of last known alive.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bevacizumab (Avastin)
n=379 Participants
Avastin® + Carboplatin/Paclitaxel
Bevacizumab: Avastin® 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks on Day 1
Carboplatin: Carboplatin AUC 6 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
Paclitaxel: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
|
SB8 (A Proposed Bevacizumab Biosimilar)
n=383 Participants
SB8 + Carboplatin/Paclitaxel
SB8: SB8 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks on Day 1
Carboplatin: Carboplatin AUC 6 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
Paclitaxel: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Survival
PPS
|
14.80 months
Interval 13.0 to 17.1
|
15.80 months
Interval 13.8 to 17.7
|
|
Overall Survival
FAS
|
14.90 months
Interval 13.3 to 17.1
|
15.80 months
Interval 13.6 to 17.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: from documented tumour response until disease progression up to 12 months from randomisation of the last subjectPopulation: Full Analysis Set (FAS): Consisted of all randomised subjects. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they were randomised to by intention-to-treat principle. Per-protocol Set (PPS): Consisted of all FAS subjects who completed at least first 2 cycles of combination chemotherapy with a tumour assessment and did not have any major protocol deviations that impacted the primary efficacy assessment.
DoR in subjects with response from documented tumour response until disease progression up to 12 months from randomisation of the last subject
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bevacizumab (Avastin)
n=379 Participants
Avastin® + Carboplatin/Paclitaxel
Bevacizumab: Avastin® 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks on Day 1
Carboplatin: Carboplatin AUC 6 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
Paclitaxel: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
|
SB8 (A Proposed Bevacizumab Biosimilar)
n=383 Participants
SB8 + Carboplatin/Paclitaxel
SB8: SB8 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks on Day 1
Carboplatin: Carboplatin AUC 6 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
Paclitaxel: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Response (DoR)
FAS
|
6.38 months
Standard Deviation 3.773
|
6.79 months
Standard Deviation 4.117
|
|
Duration of Response (DoR)
PPS
|
6.33 months
Standard Deviation 3.784
|
6.81 months
Standard Deviation 4.177
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: AEs were reported from the time the informed consent form (ICF) was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.Population: Safety Set (SAF): The Safety Set consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once.
After the end of treatment (EOT) visit, SAEs should be reported to the Sponsor if the Investigator becomes aware of them. Severity Grade of NCI-CTCAE v4.03 Grade 1: Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated Grade 2: Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL) (Instrumental ADL refers to preparing meals, shopping for groceries or clothes, using the telephone, managing money, etc.) Grade 3: Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalisation or prolongation of hospitalisation indicated; disabling; limiting self-care ADL (Self-care ADL refer to bathing, dressing and undressing, feeding self, using the toilet, taking medications, and not bedridden.) Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death related to AE
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bevacizumab (Avastin)
n=378 Participants
Avastin® + Carboplatin/Paclitaxel
Bevacizumab: Avastin® 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks on Day 1
Carboplatin: Carboplatin AUC 6 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
Paclitaxel: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
|
SB8 (A Proposed Bevacizumab Biosimilar)
n=380 Participants
SB8 + Carboplatin/Paclitaxel
SB8: SB8 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks on Day 1
Carboplatin: Carboplatin AUC 6 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
Paclitaxel: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events Using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v4.03
TEAEs
|
348 Participants
|
346 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events Using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v4.03
CTCAE Grade 1
|
47 Participants
|
57 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events Using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v4.03
CTCAE Grade 2
|
127 Participants
|
134 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events Using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v4.03
CTCAE Grade 3
|
119 Participants
|
97 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events Using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v4.03
CTCAE Grade 4
|
33 Participants
|
31 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events Using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v4.03
CTCAE Grade 5
|
22 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 21 weeks (Cycle 1,3,5 and 7. Each cycle is 21 days.)Population: Pharmacokinetic Population (PK Population): This set consisted of subjects allocated to PK sub-study who had at least one measured serum concentration of bevacizumab. PK analyses were performed on the PK population. The number of participants analyzed in each Cycle is the number of participants in PK population with non-missing values or without protocol deviation for PK blood sampling at the cycle.
Ctrough at selected cycles (i.e., Cycle 1, 3, 5 and 7)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bevacizumab (Avastin)
n=161 Participants
Avastin® + Carboplatin/Paclitaxel
Bevacizumab: Avastin® 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks on Day 1
Carboplatin: Carboplatin AUC 6 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
Paclitaxel: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
|
SB8 (A Proposed Bevacizumab Biosimilar)
n=180 Participants
SB8 + Carboplatin/Paclitaxel
SB8: SB8 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks on Day 1
Carboplatin: Carboplatin AUC 6 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
Paclitaxel: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetics: Trough Level [Ctrough]
Cycle 1
|
0.0000 ug/mL
Standard Deviation 0.00000
|
0.0000 ug/mL
Standard Deviation 0.00000
|
|
Pharmacokinetics: Trough Level [Ctrough]
Cycle 3
|
83.7568 ug/mL
Standard Deviation 44.49701
|
102.3939 ug/mL
Standard Deviation 69.36822
|
|
Pharmacokinetics: Trough Level [Ctrough]
Cycle 5
|
109.0906 ug/mL
Standard Deviation 50.65915
|
119.9343 ug/mL
Standard Deviation 54.65786
|
|
Pharmacokinetics: Trough Level [Ctrough]
Cycle 7
|
121.7382 ug/mL
Standard Deviation 62.62150
|
133.7669 ug/mL
Standard Deviation 58.84136
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 21 weeks (Cycle 1,3,5 and 7. Each cycle is 21 days.)Population: Pharmacokinetic Population (PK Population): This set consisted of subjects allocated to PK sub-study who had at least one measured serum concentration of bevacizumab. PK analyses were performed on the PK population. The number of participants analyzed in each Cycle is the number of participants in PK population with non-missing values or without protocol deviation for PK blood sampling at the cycle.
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) at selected cycles (i.e., Cycle 1, 3, 5 and 7)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bevacizumab (Avastin)
n=161 Participants
Avastin® + Carboplatin/Paclitaxel
Bevacizumab: Avastin® 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks on Day 1
Carboplatin: Carboplatin AUC 6 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
Paclitaxel: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
|
SB8 (A Proposed Bevacizumab Biosimilar)
n=180 Participants
SB8 + Carboplatin/Paclitaxel
SB8: SB8 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks on Day 1
Carboplatin: Carboplatin AUC 6 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
Paclitaxel: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetics: Maximum Plasma Concentration [Cmax]
Cycle 1
|
306.0352 ug/mL
Standard Deviation 98.71872
|
302.6362 ug/mL
Standard Deviation 87.10467
|
|
Pharmacokinetics: Maximum Plasma Concentration [Cmax]
Cycle 3
|
374.9657 ug/mL
Standard Deviation 106.54366
|
399.4598 ug/mL
Standard Deviation 136.27431
|
|
Pharmacokinetics: Maximum Plasma Concentration [Cmax]
Cycle 5
|
389.3132 ug/mL
Standard Deviation 123.07791
|
397.6183 ug/mL
Standard Deviation 125.84175
|
|
Pharmacokinetics: Maximum Plasma Concentration [Cmax]
Cycle 7
|
397.5435 ug/mL
Standard Deviation 120.74092
|
426.1350 ug/mL
Standard Deviation 144.24538
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 21 weeks (Cycle 1,3,5, 7 and EOT visit. Each cycle is 21 days.), approximately 24 months from study initiation.Population: The analysis was performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
Incidence of anti-drug (bevacizumab) antibodies (ADA) The incidence of overall ADA results (i.e. Positive, Negative, Inconclusive) was presented by treatment group at Cycle 7 and the end of treatment (EOT). Overall ADA result was defined as below: * 'Positive' for a subject with treatment-induced or treatment-boosted ADA, where treatment-induced ADA indicated at least one positive result after pre-dose of Cycle 1 for subjects with negative ADA at pre-dose of Cycle 1, and treatment-boosted ADA indicated at least one positive result with higher titre level compared to pre-dose of Cycle 1 after pre-dose of Cycle 1 for subjects with positive ADA at pre-dose of Cycle 1. * 'Negative' for a subject without positive ADA until Cycle 7 and EOT. * 'Inconclusive' for a subject with positive ADA at Cycle 1 and without positive result with higher titre level observed after pre-dose of Cycle 1 up to Cycle 7 and EOT.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bevacizumab (Avastin)
n=378 Participants
Avastin® + Carboplatin/Paclitaxel
Bevacizumab: Avastin® 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks on Day 1
Carboplatin: Carboplatin AUC 6 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
Paclitaxel: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
|
SB8 (A Proposed Bevacizumab Biosimilar)
n=380 Participants
SB8 + Carboplatin/Paclitaxel
SB8: SB8 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks on Day 1
Carboplatin: Carboplatin AUC 6 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
Paclitaxel: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Immunogenicity Assessments (Anti-drug Antibodies)
Cycle 1 (BL) · Positive
|
15 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity Assessments (Anti-drug Antibodies)
Cycle 1 (BL) · Negative
|
357 Participants
|
356 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity Assessments (Anti-drug Antibodies)
Cycle 1 (BL) · Inconclusive (only applicable for "Overall")
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity Assessments (Anti-drug Antibodies)
Cycle 3 · Positive
|
29 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity Assessments (Anti-drug Antibodies)
Cycle 3 · Negative
|
309 Participants
|
316 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity Assessments (Anti-drug Antibodies)
Cycle 3 · Inconclusive (only applicable for "Overall")
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity Assessments (Anti-drug Antibodies)
Cycle 5 · Positive
|
15 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity Assessments (Anti-drug Antibodies)
Cycle 5 · Negative
|
286 Participants
|
275 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity Assessments (Anti-drug Antibodies)
Cycle 5 · Inconclusive (only applicable for "Overall")
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity Assessments (Anti-drug Antibodies)
Cycle 7 · Positive
|
28 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity Assessments (Anti-drug Antibodies)
Cycle 7 · Negative
|
238 Participants
|
259 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity Assessments (Anti-drug Antibodies)
Cycle 7 · Inconclusive (only applicable for "Overall")
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity Assessments (Anti-drug Antibodies)
EOT · Positive
|
21 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity Assessments (Anti-drug Antibodies)
EOT · Negative
|
129 Participants
|
152 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity Assessments (Anti-drug Antibodies)
EOT · Inconclusive (only applicable for "Overall")
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity Assessments (Anti-drug Antibodies)
Cycle 7 Overall · Positive
|
46 Participants
|
34 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity Assessments (Anti-drug Antibodies)
Cycle 7 Overall · Negative
|
284 Participants
|
294 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity Assessments (Anti-drug Antibodies)
Cycle 7 Overall · Inconclusive (only applicable for "Overall")
|
11 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity Assessments (Anti-drug Antibodies)
EOT Overall · Positive
|
55 Participants
|
37 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity Assessments (Anti-drug Antibodies)
EOT Overall · Negative
|
276 Participants
|
291 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity Assessments (Anti-drug Antibodies)
EOT Overall · Inconclusive (only applicable for "Overall")
|
10 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 21 weeks (Cycle 1,3,5, 7 and EOT visit. Each cycle is 21 days.), approximately 24 months from study initiation.Population: The analysis was performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
Incidence of anti-drug (bevacizumab) antibodies (ADA) - neutralizing antibodies (NAb) The analysis was performed using the Safety Set (SAF). Overall Number of Participants Analyzed represents the number of subjects in SAF. The total number is not the sum of the number of subjects of each visits, since NAb results only for subjects with ADA positive against SB8 or Avastin were used for the summary. Number Analyzed of each visit is equal to the number of subjects with ADA positive of each visit, which is displayed in 8. Secondary Outcome: Immunogenicity Assessments (Anti-drug Antibodies).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bevacizumab (Avastin)
n=378 Participants
Avastin® + Carboplatin/Paclitaxel
Bevacizumab: Avastin® 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks on Day 1
Carboplatin: Carboplatin AUC 6 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
Paclitaxel: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
|
SB8 (A Proposed Bevacizumab Biosimilar)
n=380 Participants
SB8 + Carboplatin/Paclitaxel
SB8: SB8 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks on Day 1
Carboplatin: Carboplatin AUC 6 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
Paclitaxel: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Immunogenicity Assessments (Neutralizing Antibodies)
EOT · Negative
|
12 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity Assessments (Neutralizing Antibodies)
Cycle 1 (BL) · Positive
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity Assessments (Neutralizing Antibodies)
Cycle 1 (BL) · Negative
|
15 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity Assessments (Neutralizing Antibodies)
Cycle 3 · Positive
|
9 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity Assessments (Neutralizing Antibodies)
Cycle 3 · Negative
|
20 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity Assessments (Neutralizing Antibodies)
Cycle 5 · Positive
|
5 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity Assessments (Neutralizing Antibodies)
Cycle 5 · Negative
|
10 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity Assessments (Neutralizing Antibodies)
Cycle 7 · Positive
|
12 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity Assessments (Neutralizing Antibodies)
Cycle 7 · Negative
|
16 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity Assessments (Neutralizing Antibodies)
EOT · Positive
|
9 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 11 weeks and 17 weeks from randomisationPopulation: Full Analysis Set (FAS): Consisted of all randomised subjects. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they were randomised to by intention-to-treat principle. Per-protocol Set (PPS): Consisted of all FAS subjects who completed at least first 2 cycles of combination chemotherapy with a tumour assessment and did not have any major protocol deviations that impacted the primary efficacy assessment.
Best Objective Response Rate (ORR) by 11 weeks and 17 weeks
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bevacizumab (Avastin)
n=379 Participants
Avastin® + Carboplatin/Paclitaxel
Bevacizumab: Avastin® 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks on Day 1
Carboplatin: Carboplatin AUC 6 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
Paclitaxel: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
|
SB8 (A Proposed Bevacizumab Biosimilar)
n=383 Participants
SB8 + Carboplatin/Paclitaxel
SB8: SB8 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks on Day 1
Carboplatin: Carboplatin AUC 6 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
Paclitaxel: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Best Objective Response Rate by 11 and 17 Weeks
17 Weeks (FAS)
|
159 Participants
|
152 Participants
|
|
Best Objective Response Rate by 11 and 17 Weeks
11 Weeks (PPS)
|
99 Participants
|
89 Participants
|
|
Best Objective Response Rate by 11 and 17 Weeks
17 Weeks (PPS)
|
149 Participants
|
137 Participants
|
|
Best Objective Response Rate by 11 and 17 Weeks
11 Weeks (FAS)
|
107 Participants
|
100 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Bevacizumab (Avastin)
SB8 (A Proposed Bevacizumab Biosimilar)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Bevacizumab (Avastin)
n=380 participants at risk
Avastin® + Carboplatin/Paclitaxel
Bevacizumab: Avastin® 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks on Day 1
Carboplatin: Carboplatin AUC 6 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
Paclitaxel: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
|
SB8 (A Proposed Bevacizumab Biosimilar)
n=378 participants at risk
SB8 + Carboplatin/Paclitaxel
SB8: SB8 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks on Day 1
Carboplatin: Carboplatin AUC 6 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
Paclitaxel: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
1.1%
4/380 • Number of events 4 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
1.6%
6/378 • Number of events 9 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile neutropenia
|
1.6%
6/380 • Number of events 7 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.53%
2/378 • Number of events 2 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
0.53%
2/380 • Number of events 2 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.53%
2/378 • Number of events 2 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.53%
2/378 • Number of events 2 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
0.79%
3/380 • Number of events 6 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute coronary syndrome
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial flutter
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial ischaemia
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiovascular insufficiency
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Right ventricular failure
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Eye disorders
Optic atrophy
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.53%
2/378 • Number of events 2 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileus paralytic
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Inguinal hernia strangulated
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal ischaemia
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis acute
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal perforation
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric hypomotility
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric ulcer haemorrhage
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haemorrhoidal haemorrhage
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Large intestinal haemorrhage
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis chronic
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.53%
2/380 • Number of events 3 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Sudden death
|
1.6%
6/380 • Number of events 6 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
1.1%
4/378 • Number of events 4 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Infusion site extravasation
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.53%
2/378 • Number of events 2 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Death
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
General disorders
General physical health deterioration
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.53%
2/380 • Number of events 2 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Portal vein thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.53%
2/378 • Number of events 2 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Anaphylactic reaction
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Anaphylactic shock
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Drug hypersensitivity
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
1.9%
7/378 • Number of events 8 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.53%
2/378 • Number of events 2 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Atypical pneumonia
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infectious pleural effusion
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Device related infection
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Enterocolitis infectious
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lung abscess
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis chronic
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Wound infection
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pneumothorax
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Toxicity to various agents
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Craniocerebral injury
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Spinal compression fracture
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Suture rupture
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Creatinine renal clearance decreased
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.53%
2/378 • Number of events 2 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Tumour lysis syndrome
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pathological fracture
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Tumour haemorrhage
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Carotid artery occlusion
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral ischaemia
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cognitive disorder
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Encephalopathy
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Haemorrhagic stroke
|
0.79%
3/380 • Number of events 3 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Intercostal neuralgia
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ischaemic stroke
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischaemic attack
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Brachial plexopathy
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicidal ideation
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional state
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Panic attack
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicide attempt
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Proteinuria
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Cystitis glandularis
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Ovarian cyst
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
2.4%
9/380 • Number of events 9 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
1.1%
4/378 • Number of events 4 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
|
0.79%
3/380 • Number of events 4 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.79%
3/378 • Number of events 3 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary haemorrhage
|
1.3%
5/380 • Number of events 5 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.79%
3/378 • Number of events 3 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Haemoptysis
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonia aspiration
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Atelectasis
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary oedema
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
0.53%
2/380 • Number of events 2 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Decubitus ulcer
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 3 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Shock haemorrhagic
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.79%
3/378 • Number of events 3 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.53%
2/378 • Number of events 2 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertensive crisis
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.53%
2/378 • Number of events 2 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Internal haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Jugular vein thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral artery thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Superior vena cava syndrome
|
0.00%
0/380 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Circulatory collapse
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Essential hypertension
|
0.26%
1/380 • Number of events 1 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
0.00%
0/378 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Bevacizumab (Avastin)
n=380 participants at risk
Avastin® + Carboplatin/Paclitaxel
Bevacizumab: Avastin® 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks on Day 1
Carboplatin: Carboplatin AUC 6 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
Paclitaxel: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
|
SB8 (A Proposed Bevacizumab Biosimilar)
n=378 participants at risk
SB8 + Carboplatin/Paclitaxel
SB8: SB8 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks on Day 1
Carboplatin: Carboplatin AUC 6 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
Paclitaxel: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4-6 cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
22.9%
87/380 • Number of events 107 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
23.0%
87/378 • Number of events 102 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
18.2%
69/380 • Number of events 119 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
19.6%
74/378 • Number of events 122 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
11.8%
45/380 • Number of events 68 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
15.1%
57/378 • Number of events 96 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
6.1%
23/380 • Number of events 44 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
10.3%
39/378 • Number of events 59 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
20.8%
79/380 • Number of events 224 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
19.6%
74/378 • Number of events 177 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
6.3%
24/380 • Number of events 26 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
7.7%
29/378 • Number of events 38 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
5.3%
20/380 • Number of events 23 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
6.3%
24/378 • Number of events 32 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
4.7%
18/380 • Number of events 24 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
5.3%
20/378 • Number of events 24 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
11.3%
43/380 • Number of events 55 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
13.0%
49/378 • Number of events 58 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
12.1%
46/380 • Number of events 58 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
12.2%
46/378 • Number of events 56 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Weight decreased
|
7.4%
28/380 • Number of events 30 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
9.8%
37/378 • Number of events 37 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
6.3%
24/380 • Number of events 38 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
8.5%
32/378 • Number of events 48 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
7.9%
30/380 • Number of events 42 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
7.7%
29/378 • Number of events 47 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Blood urea increased
|
4.7%
18/380 • Number of events 37 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
7.4%
28/378 • Number of events 50 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased
|
7.1%
27/380 • Number of events 34 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
6.9%
26/378 • Number of events 36 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
8.9%
34/380 • Number of events 47 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
9.5%
36/378 • Number of events 39 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
12.1%
46/380 • Number of events 92 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
12.2%
46/378 • Number of events 117 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
9.2%
35/380 • Number of events 57 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
6.3%
24/378 • Number of events 37 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
4.2%
16/380 • Number of events 31 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
5.0%
19/378 • Number of events 55 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neuropathy peripheral
|
14.2%
54/380 • Number of events 59 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
10.1%
38/378 • Number of events 39 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
8.4%
32/380 • Number of events 34 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
8.5%
32/378 • Number of events 33 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
7.1%
27/380 • Number of events 49 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
6.9%
26/378 • Number of events 29 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Peripheral sensory neuropathy
|
9.2%
35/380 • Number of events 36 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
6.3%
24/378 • Number of events 25 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Proteinuria
|
6.3%
24/380 • Number of events 40 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
4.5%
17/378 • Number of events 25 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dysphonia
|
4.2%
16/380 • Number of events 16 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
6.3%
24/378 • Number of events 26 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
5.3%
20/380 • Number of events 21 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
6.1%
23/378 • Number of events 25 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
7.9%
30/380 • Number of events 31 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
5.6%
21/378 • Number of events 21 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
3.7%
14/380 • Number of events 16 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
5.3%
20/378 • Number of events 28 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
48.2%
183/380 • Number of events 184 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
48.7%
184/378 • Number of events 185 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
9.2%
35/380 • Number of events 45 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
12.2%
46/378 • Number of events 60 • AEs were reported from the time the ICF was signed until the EOT visit, approximately 24 months from study initiation.
All safety analyses were performed using the Safety Set (SAF). The SAF consisted of all subjects who received the study drug at least once. This analysis set was used for the safety analyses. The subjects were analysed based on the treatment they received. There were 4 subjects in Avastin group and 1 subject in SB8 group who had not received any IP or non-IP treatment.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place