Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy of Three Toothpastes Using an in Situ Caries Model (NCT NCT02751320)

NCT ID: NCT02751320

Last Updated: 2017-10-13

Results Overview

SMHR test was used to assess the changes in mineralization status of partially demineralized enamel specimens using a Wilson 2100 Hardness tester. SMH was determined by measuring the length of the indentations of enamel specimens. % SMHR was calculated from indentation length (micrometer \[μm\]) of sound enamel specimen at baseline (B), indentation length (μm) after in vitro demineralization(D), indentation length (μm) after intra-oral exposure (R): \[D-R/D-B\]\*100.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

58 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline upto 2 weeks

Results posted on

2017-10-13

Participant Flow

Participants were recruited at one center in United States.

A total of 58 participants were screened, of which 45 participants were randomized and 42 completed the study.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Overall Study
This was a single-centre, randomized, blinded (examiner and laboratory analyst), placebo-controlled, 6-treatment, 4-period cross-over, incomplete block design, in situ caries study in healthy adults who wore a removable bilateral mandibular partial denture. Each participant received Test Product 1 (Dentifrice containing 0.425 % weight by weight (w/w) phytate, and 1150 parts per million \[ppm\] fluoride \[F\]), Test Product 2 (Dentifrice containing 0.85 % w/w phytate, and 1150 ppm fluoride), Test Product 3 (Dentifrice containing 0.85 % w/w phytate, 0.3% zinc chloride, 0.5% sodium citrate, and 1150 ppm fluoride), Reference Product 1 (0 ppm fluoride), Reference Product 2 (Dentrifrice containing 1150 ppm fluoride toothpaste and Reference Product 3 (Dentrifrice containing 0.3% zinc chloride , 0.5% sodium citrate, and 1150 ppm fluoride).
Overall Study
STARTED
45
Overall Study
Received Test Product 1
29
Overall Study
Received Test Prodcut 2
28
Overall Study
Received Test Prodcut 3
28
Overall Study
Received Reference Product 1
29
Overall Study
Received Reference Product 2
28
Overall Study
Received Reference Product 3
28
Overall Study
COMPLETED
42
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
3

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Overall Study
This was a single-centre, randomized, blinded (examiner and laboratory analyst), placebo-controlled, 6-treatment, 4-period cross-over, incomplete block design, in situ caries study in healthy adults who wore a removable bilateral mandibular partial denture. Each participant received Test Product 1 (Dentifrice containing 0.425 % weight by weight (w/w) phytate, and 1150 parts per million \[ppm\] fluoride \[F\]), Test Product 2 (Dentifrice containing 0.85 % w/w phytate, and 1150 ppm fluoride), Test Product 3 (Dentifrice containing 0.85 % w/w phytate, 0.3% zinc chloride, 0.5% sodium citrate, and 1150 ppm fluoride), Reference Product 1 (0 ppm fluoride), Reference Product 2 (Dentrifrice containing 1150 ppm fluoride toothpaste and Reference Product 3 (Dentrifrice containing 0.3% zinc chloride , 0.5% sodium citrate, and 1150 ppm fluoride).
Overall Study
Adverse Event
2
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
1

Baseline Characteristics

Efficacy of Three Toothpastes Using an in Situ Caries Model

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
All Randomized Participants
n=45 Participants
All randomized participants were included for baseline evaluation.
Age, Continuous
64.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.69 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline upto 2 weeks

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all participants who were randomized, received the study products at least once and provided at least one post-baseline assessment of efficacy. Number of participants who missed enamel specimens were: Test product 1- \[1\], Test product 2- \[1\], Reference Product 1- \[1\], and Reference Product 2- \[1\].

SMHR test was used to assess the changes in mineralization status of partially demineralized enamel specimens using a Wilson 2100 Hardness tester. SMH was determined by measuring the length of the indentations of enamel specimens. % SMHR was calculated from indentation length (micrometer \[μm\]) of sound enamel specimen at baseline (B), indentation length (μm) after in vitro demineralization(D), indentation length (μm) after intra-oral exposure (R): \[D-R/D-B\]\*100.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Test Product 1
n=28 Participants
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned experimental dentifrice (containing 0.425 % phytate, 1150 ppm F) for one timed minute twice daily, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15 milliliters (ml) of tap water for approximately 10 seconds (s).
Test Product 2
n=28 Participants
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned experimental dentifrice (containing 0.85 % phytate, 1150 ppm F) for one timed minute twice daily, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Reference Product 1
n=29 Participants
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned reference dentifrice (containing 0 ppm fluoride) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Reference Product 2
n=28 Participants
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned reference dentifrice (containing 1150ppm F) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Reference Product 2
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned dentifrice (containing 1150ppm F) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Reference Product 3
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned dentifrice (containing 1150ppm F, 0.3% ZnCl2) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Percentage Surface Microhardness Recovery (SMHR) of Phyte (0% 0.425% and 0.85%) at 2 Weeks
25.53 % SMHR
Standard Deviation 21.513
26.81 % SMHR
Standard Deviation 18.059
7.41 % SMHR
Standard Deviation 18.648
28.88 % SMHR
Standard Deviation 21.046

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline upto 2 weeks

Population: ITT population, all participants who were randomized, received the study products at least once and provided at least one post-baseline assessment of efficacy. Number of participants who missed enamel specimens were: Test product 2- \[1\], Test product 3- \[2\], Reference Product 2- \[1\], and Reference Product 3- \[1\].

SMHR test was used to assess the changes in mineralization status of partially demineralized enamel specimens using a Wilson 2100 Hardness tester. SMH was determined by measuring the length of the indentations of enamel specimens. % SMHR was calculated from indentation length (μm) of sound enamel specimen at baseline (B), indentation length (μm) after in vitro demineralization(D), indentation length (μm) after intra-oral exposure (R): \[D-R/D-B\]\*100.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Test Product 1
n=28 Participants
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned experimental dentifrice (containing 0.425 % phytate, 1150 ppm F) for one timed minute twice daily, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15 milliliters (ml) of tap water for approximately 10 seconds (s).
Test Product 2
n=28 Participants
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned experimental dentifrice (containing 0.85 % phytate, 1150 ppm F) for one timed minute twice daily, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Reference Product 1
n=28 Participants
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned reference dentifrice (containing 0 ppm fluoride) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Reference Product 2
n=28 Participants
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned reference dentifrice (containing 1150ppm F) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Reference Product 2
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned dentifrice (containing 1150ppm F) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Reference Product 3
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned dentifrice (containing 1150ppm F, 0.3% ZnCl2) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
% SMHR of 0.85% Phytate Compared to 0% Phytate, in Presence of 1150ppm Fluoride and 0.3% ZnCl2, 0.3% ZnCl2 Compared to 0% ZnCl2 in the Presence of 1150ppm Fluoride and 0.3% ZnCl2 Compared to 0% ZnCl2 in the Presence of 1150ppm Fluoride and 0.85% Phytate
26.81 % SMHR
Standard Deviation 18.059
23.38 % SMHR
Standard Deviation 20.177
28.88 % SMHR
Standard Deviation 21.046
28.80 % SMHR
Standard Deviation 20.830

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline upto 4 weeks

Population: ITT population, all participants who were randomized, received the study products at least once and provided at least one post-baseline assessment of efficacy. Number of participants who missed enamel specimens were: Test product 1- \[1\], Test product 2- \[1\], and Reference Product 2- \[1\].

TMR was used to assess changes in the mineral status of partially demineralized enamel specimens. Lesions were analyzed at baseline and Integrated Mineral Loss (∆Z): (∆Z =(lesion depth x 87) - area under the curve \[Area under the curve which relates volume % mineral at distances from the specimen surface with respect to section thickness\]). After treatment a further section was taken from each lesion specimen for radiography assessment; ∆Z was calculated. The change which occurred in mineral content (∆M) of the lesions as a result of treatment was calculated by: ∆M= (baseline ∆Z - Post-treatment ∆Z).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Test Product 1
n=28 Participants
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned experimental dentifrice (containing 0.425 % phytate, 1150 ppm F) for one timed minute twice daily, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15 milliliters (ml) of tap water for approximately 10 seconds (s).
Test Product 2
n=27 Participants
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned experimental dentifrice (containing 0.85 % phytate, 1150 ppm F) for one timed minute twice daily, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Reference Product 1
n=29 Participants
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned reference dentifrice (containing 0 ppm fluoride) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Reference Product 2
n=28 Participants
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned reference dentifrice (containing 1150ppm F) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Reference Product 2
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned dentifrice (containing 1150ppm F) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Reference Product 3
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned dentifrice (containing 1150ppm F, 0.3% ZnCl2) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Transverse Microradiography (TMR) Net Remineralization Change (ΔM) Value of Phytate (0% 0.452% and 0.85%) at 4 Weeks
3055.36 [%vol mineral x µm
Standard Deviation 1459.283
2772.96 [%vol mineral x µm
Standard Deviation 989.567
3849.83 [%vol mineral x µm
Standard Deviation 1978.088
2720.00 [%vol mineral x µm
Standard Deviation 1151.914

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline upto 4 weeks

Population: ITT population, all participants who were randomized, received the study products at least once and provided at least one post-baseline assessment of efficacy. Number of participants who missed enamel specimens were: Test product 2 - \[1\], Test product 3 - \[2\], Reference Product 2 - \[1\] and Reference Product 3 \[1\].

TMR was used to assess changes in the mineral status of partially demineralized enamel specimens. Lesions were analyzed at baseline and Integrated Mineral Loss (∆Z): (∆Z =(lesion depth x 87) - area under the curve \[Area under the curve which relates volume % mineral at distances from the specimen surface with respect to section thickness\]). After treatment a further section was taken from each lesion specimen for radiography assessment; ∆Z was calculated. The change which occurred in mineral content (∆M) of the lesions as a result of treatment was calculated by: ∆M= (baseline ∆Z - Post-treatment ∆Z).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Test Product 1
n=27 Participants
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned experimental dentifrice (containing 0.425 % phytate, 1150 ppm F) for one timed minute twice daily, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15 milliliters (ml) of tap water for approximately 10 seconds (s).
Test Product 2
n=27 Participants
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned experimental dentifrice (containing 0.85 % phytate, 1150 ppm F) for one timed minute twice daily, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Reference Product 1
n=28 Participants
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned reference dentifrice (containing 0 ppm fluoride) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Reference Product 2
n=28 Participants
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned reference dentifrice (containing 1150ppm F) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Reference Product 2
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned dentifrice (containing 1150ppm F) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Reference Product 3
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned dentifrice (containing 1150ppm F, 0.3% ZnCl2) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
TMR Δm Value of 0.85% Phytate Compared to 0% Phytate, in the Presence of 1150ppm F and 0.3% ZnCl2, 0.3% ZnCl2 Compared to 0% ZnCl2 in the Presence of 1150ppm F and 0.3% ZnCl2 Compared to 0% ZnCl2 in the Presence of 1150ppm F and 0.85% Phytate
2772.96 [%vol mineral x µm
Standard Deviation 989.567
2733.33 [%vol mineral x µm
Standard Deviation 1051.738
2720.00 [%vol mineral x µm
Standard Deviation 1151.914
2421.25 [%vol mineral x µm
Standard Deviation 677.286

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At Week 2

Population: ITT population, all participants who were randomized, received the study products at least once and provided at least one post-baseline assessment of efficacy. Number of participants who missed enamel specimens were: Test product1-\[1\], Test product2-\[1\], Test product3-\[2\], Reference Product1-\[1\], Reference Product2-\[1\] and Reference Product3-\[1\].

The microdrill enamel biopsy technique was used to analyze the fluoride uptake by enamel. Each enamel specimen was mounted on the long axis of a drill attached to a microdrill and drilled to a depth of approximately 100 μm through the entire lesion (four cores per specimen). The enamel powder pooled from four drilling samples was then immediately analyzed for fluoride content using fluoride specific electrode and pH/ion meter. The amount of fluoride-uptake by enamel was calculated based on the amount of fluoride divided by the area of the enamel cores and expressed as μg/cm\^2.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Test Product 1
n=28 Participants
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned experimental dentifrice (containing 0.425 % phytate, 1150 ppm F) for one timed minute twice daily, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15 milliliters (ml) of tap water for approximately 10 seconds (s).
Test Product 2
n=28 Participants
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned experimental dentifrice (containing 0.85 % phytate, 1150 ppm F) for one timed minute twice daily, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Reference Product 1
n=28 Participants
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned reference dentifrice (containing 0 ppm fluoride) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Reference Product 2
n=29 Participants
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned reference dentifrice (containing 1150ppm F) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Reference Product 2
n=28 Participants
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned dentifrice (containing 1150ppm F) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Reference Product 3
n=28 Participants
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned dentifrice (containing 1150ppm F, 0.3% ZnCl2) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Enamel Fluoride Uptake (EFU) of All Study Formulation Variables
5.35 μg/cm^2
Standard Deviation 2.038
4.78 μg/cm^2
Standard Deviation 2.655
5.02 μg/cm^2
Standard Deviation 2.499
1.09 μg/cm^2
Standard Deviation 0.397
5.87 μg/cm^2
Standard Deviation 2.772
5.37 μg/cm^2
Standard Deviation 2.384

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At Week 4

Population: ITT population, all participants who were randomized, received the study products at least once and provided at least one post-baseline assessment of efficacy. Number of participants who missed enamel specimens were: Test product1-\[1\], Test product2-\[2\], Test product3-\[3\], Reference Product1-\[1\], Reference Product2-\[1\] and Reference Product3-\[1\].

The microdrill enamel biopsy technique was used to analyze the fluoride uptake by enamel. Each enamel specimen was mounted on the long axis of a drill attached to a microdrill and drilled to a depth of approximately 100 μm through the entire lesion (four cores per specimen). The enamel powder pooled from four drilling samples was then immediately analyzed for fluoride content using fluoride specific electrode and pH/ion meter. The amount of fluoride-uptake by enamel was calculated based on the amount of fluoride divided by the area of the enamel cores and expressed as μg/cm\^2.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Test Product 1
n=28 Participants
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned experimental dentifrice (containing 0.425 % phytate, 1150 ppm F) for one timed minute twice daily, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15 milliliters (ml) of tap water for approximately 10 seconds (s).
Test Product 2
n=27 Participants
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned experimental dentifrice (containing 0.85 % phytate, 1150 ppm F) for one timed minute twice daily, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Reference Product 1
n=27 Participants
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned reference dentifrice (containing 0 ppm fluoride) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Reference Product 2
n=29 Participants
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned reference dentifrice (containing 1150ppm F) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Reference Product 2
n=28 Participants
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned dentifrice (containing 1150ppm F) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Reference Product 3
n=28 Participants
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned dentifrice (containing 1150ppm F, 0.3% ZnCl2) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Enamel Fluoride Uptake (EFU) of All Study Formulation Variables
12.28 μg/cm^2
Standard Deviation 6.756
11.09 μg/cm^2
Standard Deviation 6.336
14.16 μg/cm^2
Standard Deviation 12.851
1.64 μg/cm^2
Standard Deviation 0.974
15.29 μg/cm^2
Standard Deviation 10.177
15.11 μg/cm^2
Standard Deviation 10.180

Adverse Events

Test Product 1

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 9 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Test Product 2

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 9 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Test Product 3

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 10 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Reference Product 1

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 7 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Reference Product 2

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 4 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Reference Product 3

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 8 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Test Product 1
n=28 participants at risk
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned dentifrice (containing 0.425 % phytate, 1150 ppm F) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Test Product 2
n=28 participants at risk
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned dentifrice (containing 0.85 % phytate, 1150 ppm F) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Test Product 3
n=28 participants at risk
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned dentifrice (containing 0.85 % phytate, 1150 ppm F, 0.3% ZnCl2) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s
Reference Product 1
n=29 participants at risk
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned dentifrice (containing 0 ppm fluoride) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Reference Product 2
n=27 participants at risk
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned dentifrice (containing 1150ppm F) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Reference Product 3
n=28 participants at risk
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned dentifrice (containing 1150ppm F, 0.3% ZnCl2) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
INVASIVE DUCTAL BREAST CARCINOMA
3.6%
1/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/29
0.00%
0/27
0.00%
0/28

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Test Product 1
n=28 participants at risk
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned dentifrice (containing 0.425 % phytate, 1150 ppm F) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Test Product 2
n=28 participants at risk
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned dentifrice (containing 0.85 % phytate, 1150 ppm F) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Test Product 3
n=28 participants at risk
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned dentifrice (containing 0.85 % phytate, 1150 ppm F, 0.3% ZnCl2) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s
Reference Product 1
n=29 participants at risk
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned dentifrice (containing 0 ppm fluoride) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Reference Product 2
n=27 participants at risk
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned dentifrice (containing 1150ppm F) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Reference Product 3
n=28 participants at risk
Participants brushed their natural teeth with a pre-wetted toothbrush and their assigned dentifrice (containing 1150ppm F, 0.3% ZnCl2) for one timed minute, ensuring the enamel specimens retained within their mouths were not directly brushed. Participants then rinsed their mouths with 15ml of tap water for approximately 10s.
Gastrointestinal disorders
GINGIVAL ERYTHEMA
7.1%
2/28
10.7%
3/28
7.1%
2/28
3.4%
1/29
3.7%
1/27
3.6%
1/28
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mouth ulceration
7.1%
2/28
3.6%
1/28
3.6%
1/28
3.4%
1/29
0.00%
0/27
0.00%
0/28
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
3.6%
1/28
0.00%
0/28
3.6%
1/28
0.00%
0/29
0.00%
0/27
0.00%
0/28
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gingival ulceration
3.6%
1/28
0.00%
0/28
3.6%
1/28
0.00%
0/29
0.00%
0/27
7.1%
2/28
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oral mucosal erythema
3.6%
1/28
7.1%
2/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/29
0.00%
0/27
3.6%
1/28
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
3.6%
1/28
0.00%
0/28
3.6%
1/28
0.00%
0/29
0.00%
0/27
0.00%
0/28
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/29
0.00%
0/27
3.6%
1/28
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gingival oedema
0.00%
0/28
3.6%
1/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/29
3.7%
1/27
0.00%
0/28
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gingival pain
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
3.6%
1/28
0.00%
0/29
0.00%
0/27
0.00%
0/28
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gingival swelling
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
3.4%
1/29
0.00%
0/27
0.00%
0/28
Gastrointestinal disorders
Leukoplakia oral
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
3.4%
1/29
0.00%
0/27
3.6%
1/28
Gastrointestinal disorders
Lip dry
0.00%
0/28
3.6%
1/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/29
3.7%
1/27
0.00%
0/28
Gastrointestinal disorders
Noninfective gingivitis
0.00%
0/28
3.6%
1/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/29
0.00%
0/27
0.00%
0/28
Gastrointestinal disorders
Tongue coated
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
3.4%
1/29
0.00%
0/27
0.00%
0/28
Gastrointestinal disorders
Tongue oedema
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/29
0.00%
0/27
3.6%
1/28
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Thermal burn
3.6%
1/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/29
0.00%
0/27
0.00%
0/28
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Laceration
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
3.6%
1/28
0.00%
0/29
0.00%
0/27
0.00%
0/28
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lip injury
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
3.6%
1/28
0.00%
0/29
0.00%
0/27
0.00%
0/28
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Muscle strain
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
3.4%
1/29
0.00%
0/27
0.00%
0/28
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Traumatic ulcer
0.00%
0/28
3.6%
1/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/29
0.00%
0/27
0.00%
0/28
Nervous system disorders
Headache
3.6%
1/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/29
0.00%
0/27
0.00%
0/28
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/29
0.00%
0/27
3.6%
1/28
Product Issues
Device Failure
3.6%
1/28
3.6%
1/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/29
3.7%
1/27
0.00%
0/28
General disorders
Injury Associated With Device
0.00%
0/28
3.6%
1/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/29
0.00%
0/27
0.00%
0/28
Immune system disorders
Seasonal Allergy
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
3.4%
1/29
0.00%
0/27
0.00%
0/28
Infections and infestations
Angular cheilitis
0.00%
0/28
3.6%
1/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/29
0.00%
0/27
0.00%
0/28
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
3.4%
1/29
0.00%
0/27
0.00%
0/28
Infections and infestations
Oral herpes
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
3.6%
1/28
0.00%
0/29
0.00%
0/27
0.00%
0/28
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
0.00%
0/28
3.6%
1/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/29
0.00%
0/27
0.00%
0/28
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
3.6%
1/28
0.00%
0/29
0.00%
0/27
0.00%
0/28
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Glucose Tolerance Impaired
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/29
0.00%
0/27
3.6%
1/28
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal Pain
0.00%
0/28
3.6%
1/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/29
0.00%
0/27
0.00%
0/28
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Allergic sinusitis
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/29
3.7%
1/27
0.00%
0/28
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
3.6%
1/28
0.00%
0/29
0.00%
0/27
0.00%
0/28
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
0.00%
0/28
3.6%
1/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/29
0.00%
0/27
0.00%
0/28
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
3.4%
1/29
0.00%
0/27
0.00%
0/28
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pharyngeal erythema
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/28
3.4%
1/29
0.00%
0/27
0.00%
0/28
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Skin cancer
0.00%
0/28
3.6%
1/28
0.00%
0/28
0.00%
0/29
0.00%
0/27
0.00%
0/28

Additional Information

GSK Response Center

GlaxoSmithKline

Phone: 866-435-7343

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER