Study of Chemoradiotherapy in Oesophageal Cancer Including PET Response and Dose Escalation
NCT ID: NCT02741856
Last Updated: 2018-10-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE2/PHASE3
584 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-11-04
2023-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A comparison will also be made regarding the effects of the standard drugs used in chemotherapy (cisplatin and capecitabine) with an alternative combination (carboplatin and paclitaxel) in patients that do not show a response to chemotherapy with standard drugs early on in treatment.
All patients will receive 6 weeks of chemotherapy and 5 weeks of chemoradiotherapy.
How the study will be conducted:
Prior to the commencement of treatment each patient will have a special scan called a PET scan. Patients will receive a second PET scan two weeks after the start of standard chemotherapy. The changes between the two scans will then be used to allocate treatment into the different arms of the study. All study subjects will be randomised to receive either the standard radiotherapy dose or the high radiotherapy dose. The participants that do not respond to the first cycle of standard chemotherapy will be eligible to take part in the aspect of the trial looking at an alternative chemotherapy regimen. Patients will be randomised as follows;
On the basis of the second PET scan, patients who are not responding to standard chemotherapy will be allocated by a computer to one of the four groups detailed below:
* Standard chemotherapy and standard dose of radiotherapy
* Standard chemotherapy and higher dose of radiotherapy
* Alternative chemotherapy and standard dose of radiotherapy
* Alternative chemotherapy and higher dose of radiotherapy
Patients who are responding to standard chemotherapy (or where the response is unknown or those who were not eligible for PET scan portion of the study) will be allocated by a computer to one of two groups detailed below:
* Standard chemotherapy and standard dose of radiotherapy
* Standard chemotherapy and higher dose of radiotherapy
The arms within each of the groups above (responders and non-responders) will be equal in size and patients will be allocated randomly by a computer.
This study will also compare the way that this treatment affects the two different cell types found in oesophageal tumours.
The effects of the different treatment, together with the costs of the different treatment and the effects on quality of life will be analysed to see which is more effective for each of the different groups.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
PET/CT-directed Hyperfractionated Radiation Dose Escalation in Esophageal Cancer
NCT03113214
Cisplatin, Capecitabine, and Radiation Therapy With or Without Cetuximab in Treating Patients With Esophageal Cancer
NCT00509561
Efficacy Comparison Study of Combination Regimens to Treat Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
NCT00816634
Combination Chemotherapy Combined With Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients Who Have Stage II or Stage III Cancer of the Esophagus
NCT00008047
Chemotherapy, Radiation Therapy, and Cetuximab Followed by Surgery, Docetaxel, and Cetuximab in Treating Patients With Esophageal Cancer or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer
NCT00551759
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm 1 (carboplatin/paclitaxel+standard RT dose)
Cycle 1: Week 1-3: cisplatin 60mg/m2 on D1 and capecitabine 625mg/m2 bd D1-21
Cycle 2: Week 4-6: carboplatin AUC 5 on D1 and paclitaxel 175mg/m2 on D1
Week 7-11: Weekly carboplatin AUC 2 and paclitaxel 50mg/m2 concomitant with radiotherapy (50Gy/25 fractions)
Carboplatin
For more information please see the arm descriptions section.
Paclitaxel
For more information please see the arm descriptions section.
Cisplatin
For more information please see the arm descriptions section.
Capecitabine
For more information please see the arm descriptions section.
Radiotherapy
For more information please see the arm descriptions section.
Arm 2 (cisplatin/capecitabine+standard RT dose)
Cycle 1: Week 1-3: cisplatin 60mg/m2 on D1 and capecitabine 625mg/m2 bd D1-21
Cycle 2: Week 4-6: cisplatin 60mg/m2 on D1 and capecitabine 625mg/m2 bd D1-21
Cycle 3: Week 7-9: cisplatin 60mg/m2 on D1 and capecitabine 625mg/m2 bd D1-21
Cycle 4: Week 10-11: cisplatin 60mg/m2 on D1 and capecitabine 625mg/m2 bd D1-14
Cycles 3 and 4 are given concomitantly with radiotherapy (50Gy/25 fractions). Capecitabine stops on last day of RT.
Cisplatin
For more information please see the arm descriptions section.
Capecitabine
For more information please see the arm descriptions section.
Radiotherapy
For more information please see the arm descriptions section.
Arm 3 (carboplatin/paclitaxel+high RT dose)
Cycle 1: Week 1-3: cisplatin 60mg/m2 on D1 and capecitabine 625mg/m2 bd D1-21
Cycle 2: Week 4-6: carboplatin AUC 5 on D1 and paclitaxel 175mg/m2 on D1
Week 7-11: Weekly carboplatin AUC 2 and paclitaxel 50mg/m2 concomitant with radiotherapy (60Gy/25 fractions)
Carboplatin
For more information please see the arm descriptions section.
Paclitaxel
For more information please see the arm descriptions section.
Cisplatin
For more information please see the arm descriptions section.
Capecitabine
For more information please see the arm descriptions section.
Radiotherapy
For more information please see the arm descriptions section.
Arm 4 (Cisplatin+Capecitabine+high RT dose)
Cycle 1: Week 1-3: cisplatin 60mg/m2 on D1 and capecitabine 625mg/m2 bd D1-21
Cycle 2: Week 4-6: cisplatin 60mg/m2 on D1 and capecitabine 625mg/m2 bd D1-21
Cycle 3: Week 7-9: cisplatin 60mg/m2 on D1 and capecitabine 625mg/m2 bd D1-21
Cycle 4: Week 10-11: cisplatin 60mg/m2 on D1 and capecitabine 625mg/m2 bd D1-14 Cycles 3 and 4 are given concomitantly with radiotherapy (60Gy/25 fractions). Capecitabine stops on last day of RT.
Cisplatin
For more information please see the arm descriptions section.
Capecitabine
For more information please see the arm descriptions section.
Radiotherapy
For more information please see the arm descriptions section.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Carboplatin
For more information please see the arm descriptions section.
Paclitaxel
For more information please see the arm descriptions section.
Cisplatin
For more information please see the arm descriptions section.
Capecitabine
For more information please see the arm descriptions section.
Radiotherapy
For more information please see the arm descriptions section.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Have been selected to receive potentially curative definitive chemoradiotherapy by a specialist Upper GI MDT.
3. Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma, undifferentiated cancer or squamous cell carcinoma.
4. Tumours of the cervical, thoracic oesophagus, or gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) with proximal extent of disease no more proximal than 15cm ab oral and distal extent of primary tumour no more than 2 cm beyond the GOJ.
5. Tumours staged with endoscopic ultrasound\*, CT and PET-CT to be T1-4 and N+/- (provided total tumour length including nodes is ≤10).
6. Total contiguous disease length ≤10cm defined by CT, EUS and/or PET. The primary tumour should also be ≤8cm.
7. WHO performance status 0 or 1.
8. Adequate cardiovascular function for safe delivery of chemo-radiation in the opinion of the principal investigator. Where there is clinical concern patients should have an adequate cardiac ejection fraction ≥ 40% as determined by MUGA scan or ECHO (within 4 weeks prior to enrolment).
9. Adequate respiratory function for safe delivery of chemo-radiation in the opinion of the Principal Investigator. Where there is clinical concern FEV1 ≥ 1 litre as determined by spirometry (within 4 weeks prior to enrolment).
10. Patients with clinically significant hearing impairment (hearing loss with hearing aid, or hearing loss where intervention indicated, or limiting daily activities or tinnitus limiting daily activities or sensory-motor neuropathy are eligible, however, cisplatin will be replaced by carboplatin (AUC 5)
11. Adequate haematological, hepatic and renal function
12. Patients agree to use effective forms of contraception during the trial (if applicable to patient).
13. Patients who have provided written informed consent prior to enrolment.
14. Baseline SUVmax ≥ 5.
15. PET scan 14 days after start of chemo (-2/+3 days from this date is acceptable)
16. Not responding to early cis/cape chemotherapy (this is defined as patients having a \<35% reduction in SUVmax)
18\. To be eligible for PET randomisation, the baseline PET-CT must have been within 4 weeks prior to start date of treatment.
Patients that are eligible for the trial but are ineligible for PET randomisation will be randomised to receive 50/60Gy radiotherapy plus cisplatin and capecitabine.
\* Patients where the EUS scope is unable to pass are eligible.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with metastatic disease i.e. M1a or M1b according to UICC TNM version 7.
3. Patients with other active malignancy or past malignancy in remission for less than 3 years are not eligible for the trial. However, patients with the following conditions which have been curatively treated will NOT be excluded: basal cell carcinoma, carcinoma-in-situ breast and carcinoma-in-situ cervix.
4. Patients with \>2cm mucosal extension of tumour into the stomach or where the superior extent is proximal to 15 cm ab oral.
5. Patients with unstable angina or uncontrolled hypertension or cardiac failure or other clinically significant cardiac disease.
6. Patients who need continued treatment with a contraindicated concomitant medication or therapy.
7. Patients with known dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency.
9\. Patients with serious infections
10\. Known hypersensitivity to IMPs.
11\. Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
12\. Oesophageal stent (patients requiring a PEG/RIG/feeding jejunostomy for nutritional purposes are eligible).
13\. Any other situation, which in the opinion of the local PI, makes the patient an unsuitable candidate for this trial.
17 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cancer Research UK
OTHER
Lisette Nixon
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lisette Nixon
Senior Trial Manager
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Tom Crosby
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Velindre University NHS Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary
Aberdeen, , United Kingdom
Bristol Haematology & Oncology
Bristol, , United Kingdom
Addenbrooke's Hospital
Cambridge, , United Kingdom
Kent and Canterbury
Canterbury, , United Kingdom
Velindre Cancer Care Centre
Cardiff, , United Kingdom
Cheltenham General Hospital
Cheltenham, , United Kingdom
University Hospital Coventry
Coventry, , United Kingdom
Derby Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Derby, , United Kingdom
Glan Clwyd Hospital
Glan Clwyd, , United Kingdom
Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre
Glasgow, , United Kingdom
Gloucestershire Royal Hospital
Gloucester, , United Kingdom
Castle Hill Hospital
Hull, , United Kingdom
The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre nhs Foundation Trust
Liverpool, , United Kingdom
Guy's and St Thomas'
London, , United Kingdom
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
London, , United Kingdom
North Middlesex Hospital
London, , United Kingdom
The Royal Marsden Hospitals (Fulham)
London, , United Kingdom
The James Cook University Hospital
Middlesbrough, , United Kingdom
Churchill Hospital
Oxford, , United Kingdom
Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Peterborough, , United Kingdom
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals - Weston Park Hospital
Sheffield, , United Kingdom
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Southampton, , United Kingdom
The Royal Marsden Hospitals (Sutton, Surrey)
Sutton, , United Kingdom
Singleton Hospital
Swansea, , United Kingdom
Worcestershire Royal Hospital
Worcester, , United Kingdom
Wrexham Maelor
Wrexham, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Lucy Wells
Role: primary
Stephen Falk
Role: primary
Susan Harden
Role: primary
Mathilda Cominos
Role: primary
Charles Candish
Role: primary
Sharmila Sothi
Role: primary
Prantik Das
Role: primary
Angel Garcia
Role: primary
David McIntosh
Role: primary
Charles Candish
Role: primary
Raj Roy
Role: primary
Raj Sripadam
Role: primary
Asad Qureshi
Role: primary
Danielle Power
Role: primary
Lucinda Melcher
Role: primary
Katharine Aitken
Role: primary
David Wilson
Role: primary
Somnath Mukherjee
Role: primary
Catherine Jephcott
Role: primary
Jon Wadsley
Role: primary
Andrew Bateman
Role: primary
Katharine Aitken
Role: primary
Sarah Gwynne
Role: primary
Cheng Boon
Role: primary
Simon Gollins
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Holland-Hart D, Longo M, Bridges S, Nixon L, Hawkins M, Crosby T, Nelson A. A qualitative study exploring participants' experiences of the SCOPE2 trial: chemoradiotherapy dose escalation in oesophageal cancer. Trials. 2025 Feb 26;26(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08768-z.
Holland-Hart D, Longo M, Bridges S, Nixon LS, Hawkins M, Crosby T, Nelson A. The experiences of patients with oesophageal cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy treatment: a qualitative study embedded in the SCOPE2 trial. BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 23;14(9):e076394. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076394.
Mukherjee S, Hurt CN, Adams R, Bateman A, Bradley KM, Bridges S, Falk S, Griffiths G, Gwynne S, Jones CM, Markham PJ, Maughan T, Nixon LS, Radhakrishna G, Roy R, Schoenbuchner S, Sheikh H, Spezi E, Hawkins M, Crosby TDL. Efficacy of early PET-CT directed switch to carboplatin and paclitaxel based definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with oesophageal cancer who have a poor early response to induction cisplatin and capecitabine in the UK: a multi-centre randomised controlled phase II trial. EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Jun 26;61:102059. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102059. eCollection 2023 Jul.
Sakanaka K, Ishida Y, Fujii K, Ishihara Y, Nakamura M, Hiraoka M, Mizowaki T. Radiation Dose-escalated Chemoradiotherapy Using Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Unresectable Thoracic Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Single-institution Phase I Study. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2021 Mar;33(3):191-201. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.07.012. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2015-001740-11
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
Ethics Reference Number
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2014/VCC/0015
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.