Trial Outcomes & Findings for Fontan Udenafil Exercise Longitudinal Assessment Trial (NCT NCT02741115)

NCT ID: NCT02741115

Last Updated: 2025-06-17

Results Overview

The change in exercise capacity (as measured by peak VO2 at maximum exercise effort) from baseline to 26 weeks

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

400 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline to 26 Weeks

Results posted on

2025-06-17

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Drug
Udenafil. One tablet twice daily for 26 weeks Udenafil: Active drug
Placebo
Placebo. One tablet twice daily for 26 weeks Placebo: Matching Placebo
Overall Study
STARTED
200
200
Overall Study
COMPLETED
188
194
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
12
6

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Drug
Udenafil. One tablet twice daily for 26 weeks Udenafil: Active drug
Placebo
Placebo. One tablet twice daily for 26 weeks Placebo: Matching Placebo
Overall Study
Adverse Event
1
0
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
7
4
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
4
2

Baseline Characteristics

Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Drug
n=200 Participants
Udenafil. One tablet twice daily for 26 weeks Udenafil: Active drug
Placebo
n=200 Participants
Placebo. One tablet twice daily for 26 weeks Placebo: Matching Placebo
Total
n=400 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
15.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.033 • n=200 Participants
15.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.978 • n=200 Participants
15.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.005 • n=400 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
89 Participants
n=200 Participants
72 Participants
n=200 Participants
161 Participants
n=400 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
111 Participants
n=200 Participants
128 Participants
n=200 Participants
239 Participants
n=400 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
31 Participants
n=200 Participants
25 Participants
n=200 Participants
56 Participants
n=400 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
168 Participants
n=200 Participants
174 Participants
n=200 Participants
342 Participants
n=400 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
n=200 Participants
1 Participants
n=200 Participants
2 Participants
n=400 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=200 Participants
0 Participants
n=200 Participants
0 Participants
n=400 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
17 Participants
n=200 Participants
21 Participants
n=200 Participants
38 Participants
n=400 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=200 Participants
0 Participants
n=200 Participants
0 Participants
n=400 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
10 Participants
n=200 Participants
13 Participants
n=200 Participants
23 Participants
n=400 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
169 Participants
n=200 Participants
155 Participants
n=200 Participants
324 Participants
n=400 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants
n=200 Participants
2 Participants
n=200 Participants
4 Participants
n=400 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
n=200 Participants
9 Participants
n=200 Participants
11 Participants
n=400 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
8 participants
n=200 Participants
11 participants
n=200 Participants
19 participants
n=400 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
14 participants
n=200 Participants
19 participants
n=200 Participants
33 participants
n=400 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
178 participants
n=200 Participants
170 participants
n=200 Participants
348 participants
n=400 Participants
Peak VO2
27.84 mL/kg/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.877 • n=200 Participants
28.01 mL/kg/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.128 • n=200 Participants
27.92 mL/kg/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.50 • n=400 Participants
Weight
57.1 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.925 • n=200 Participants
59.0 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.187 • n=200 Participants
58.1 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.577 • n=400 Participants
Maximal V02 at ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT)
18.35 mL/kig/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.633 • n=170 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
17.71 mL/kig/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.304 • n=181 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
18.02 mL/kig/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.471 • n=351 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
Ventilatory equivalents of carbon dioxide (VE/VCO2) at VAT
34.32 Ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.845 • n=170 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
34.75 Ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.157 • n=181 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
34.54 Ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.006 • n=351 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
Respiratory rate at maximal exercise effort
51.11 Breaths per minute
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.257 • n=199 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
51.35 Breaths per minute
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.676 • n=200 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
51.23 Breaths per minute
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.975 • n=399 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
Minute ventilation at maximal exercise effort
70.65 L/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.055 • n=199 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
75.84 L/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.323 • n=200 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
73.25 L/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.828 • n=399 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
Work rate at maximal exercise effort
119.68 Watts
STANDARD_DEVIATION 32.176 • n=198 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
123.11 Watts
STANDARD_DEVIATION 32.140 • n=199 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
121.40 Watts
STANDARD_DEVIATION 32.163 • n=397 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
Work rate at ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT)
66.19 Watts
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.321 • n=167 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
66.10 Watts
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.446 • n=177 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
66.14 Watts
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.847 • n=344 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
Myocardial Performance Index (MPI)
0.45 Ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.172 • n=150 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
0.45 Ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.154 • n=155 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
0.45 Ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.163 • n=305 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
Log-transformed Reactive Hyperemia Index (lnRHI)
0.46 Natural log-transformed RHI (lnRHI)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.250 • n=191 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
0.46 Natural log-transformed RHI (lnRHI)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.332 • n=192 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
0.46 Natural log-transformed RHI (lnRHI)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2936 • n=383 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
Log-transformed B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP)
2.45 log(pg/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.003 • n=200 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
2.26 log(pg/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.140 • n=199 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
2.36 log(pg/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.076 • n=399 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) General Core Scale-Physical Functioning-Child reported
72.52 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.805 • n=196 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
73.35 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.686 • n=200 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
72.94 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.729 • n=396 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
PedsQL General Core Scale-Physical Functioning-Parent reported
71.58 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.155 • n=194 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
73.18 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.006 • n=193 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
72.38 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.075 • n=387 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
PedsQL General Core Scale-Psychosocial Health Summary Score-Child reported
71.90 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.976 • n=196 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
72.30 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.811 • n=200 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
72.10 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.872 • n=396 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
PedsQL General Core Scale-Psychosocial Health Summary Score-Parent reported
68.48 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.130 • n=194 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
70.51 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.525 • n=193 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
69.49 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.849 • n=387 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
PedsQL Cardiac Module Scale-Treatment II
87.84 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.769 • n=178 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
89.35 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.288 • n=185 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
88.61 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.544 • n=363 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
PedsQL Cardiac Module Scale-Perceived Physical Appearance
74.23 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.291 • n=195 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
75.92 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.185 • n=200 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
75.09 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.731 • n=395 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
PedsQL Cardiac Module Scale-Treatment Anxiety
79.99 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.164 • n=194 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
80.09 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.736 • n=200 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
80.04 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.426 • n=394 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
PedsQL Cardiac Module Scale-Cognitive Problems
64.67 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.709 • n=195 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
65.23 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.967 • n=198 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
64.95 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.850 • n=393 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
PedsQL Cardiac Module Scale-Communication Problems
74.74 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.933 • n=195 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
72.63 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.938 • n=199 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
73.67 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.443 • n=394 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment.
Pediatric Cardiac Quality of Life Inventory (PCQLI) Total Score-Ages 8 to 12-Child reported
69.04 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.091 • n=28 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment. Only participants aged 8 to 12 were included in this assessment.
75.55 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.392 • n=19 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment. Only participants aged 8 to 12 were included in this assessment.
71.67 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.005 • n=47 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment. Only participants aged 8 to 12 were included in this assessment.
PCQLI Total Score-Ages 8 to 12-Parent reported
65.56 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.078 • n=29 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment. Only parents with participants aged 8 to 12 were included in this assessment.
70.27 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.809 • n=18 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment. Only parents with participants aged 8 to 12 were included in this assessment.
67.36 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.570 • n=47 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment. Only parents with participants aged 8 to 12 were included in this assessment.
PCQLI Total Score-Ages 13 to 18-Child reported
73.39 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.979 • n=167 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment. Only participants aged 13 to 18 were included in this assessment.
73.62 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.790 • n=179 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment. Only participants aged 13 to 18 were included in this assessment.
73.51 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.860 • n=346 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment. Only participants aged 13 to 18 were included in this assessment.
PCQLI Total Score-Ages 13 to 18-Parent reported
70.23 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.001 • n=163 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment. Only parents of participants aged 13 to 18 were included in this assessment.
72.74 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.970 • n=177 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment. Only parents of participants aged 13 to 18 were included in this assessment.
71.54 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.541 • n=340 Participants • Not all participants had a Baseline value due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment. Only parents of participants aged 13 to 18 were included in this assessment.

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 26 Weeks

Population: Intent to Treat Population

The change in exercise capacity (as measured by peak VO2 at maximum exercise effort) from baseline to 26 weeks

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Udenafil
n=200 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on active drug.
Placebo
n=200 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on Placebo
Change in Maximal VO2 From Baseline to Week 26 Using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
-0.23 mL/kg/min
Standard Deviation 4.056
-0.89 mL/kg/min
Standard Deviation 3.672

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 26

Population: This analysis was performed only on participants with paired data. For variety of technical reasons the quality of echocardiographic images were not sufficient to allow for accurate assessment of the MPI in a subset of participants. These reasons include poor acoustic windows and noisy Doppler signal.

Change in the myocardial performance index (MPI) from baseline to 26 weeks is determined by velocities from blood pool Doppler of the inflow and outflow tract of the dominant ventricle. The measure is the ratio of the sum of isovolumetric contraction time and isovolumetric relaxation time, divided by ventricular ejection time. A lower value is consistent with a more efficient ventricle (better function). A value of zero indicates that there is no isovolumetric contraction or relaxation and, while physiologically implausible, would be consistent with a perfectly efficient ventricle. The mean left ventricular MPI in healthy people without heart disease is approximately 0.35 while the mean right ventricular MPI is approximately 0.1 due to the reduced ventricular afterload of the pulmonary circulation. In general, a decrease in the MPI corresponds to more efficient (better) ventricular function, while an increase in MPI corresponds to less efficient (worse) ventricular function.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Udenafil
n=122 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on active drug.
Placebo
n=128 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on Placebo
Change in Myocardial Performance Index (MPI) From Baseline to Week 26
-0.02 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.112
0.01 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.132

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 26

Population: This analysis was performed only on participants with paired data. For variety of technical reasons the signal for the reactive hyperemia index was not sufficient to allow for accurate assessment of the index in a subset of participants.

Endothelial pulse amplitude tonometry (Endo-PAT) is a technique for the non-invasive assessment of peripheral vascular function. In adults, Endo-PAT has been demonstrated to identify those with coronary artery dysfunction and to correlate with brachial artery reactivity testing. Endo-PAT use in children has been more limited, but has shown excellent reproducibility. Reactive hyperemia index, a measure of the hyperemic response adjusted for baseline blood flow, is a measure of vascular function. A higher value denotes better, or more healthy, vascular (endothelial) function.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Udenafil
n=175 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on active drug.
Placebo
n=184 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on Placebo
Change in Log-transformed Reactive Hyperemia Index (InRH) From Baseline to Week 26
0.06 Natural log-transformed RHI (lnRHI)
Standard Deviation 0.301
0.04 Natural log-transformed RHI (lnRHI)
Standard Deviation 0.364

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 26

Population: This analysis was performed on a subset of patients who had analyzable lab samples at both baseline and 26 weeks.

BNP is a hormone produced when the heart is enlarged or has to work harder to pump blood to the body. Higher levels of BNP can be a sign of heart failure.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Udenafil
n=187 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on active drug.
Placebo
n=191 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on Placebo
Change in Serum Brain-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) From Baseline to Week 26.
0.08 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.905
0.03 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.137

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 26 Weeks

Population: Data from the anaerobic threshold is not calculable for all participants given noise within the data tracings. These data are from the intent to treat (ITT) analyses for all participants for whom a baseline value was calculable.

This outcome measures the change in milliliters of oxygen consumption (VO2) per minute at the ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT) between Week 26 and Baseline Visits using last observation carried forward (ITT Population). The anaerobic threshold is the period in exercise when metabolism switches from aerobic to anaerobic. This is an useful measure of submaximal exercise capacity particularly in the single ventricle population.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Udenafil
n=170 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on active drug.
Placebo
n=181 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on Placebo
Change in VO2 at VAT
-0.07 mL/kg/min
Standard Deviation 2.998
-0.68 mL/kg/min
Standard Deviation 3.216

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 26 Weeks

Population: Data from the anaerobic threshold is not calculable for all participants given noise within the data tracings. These data are from the intent to treat (ITT) analyses for all participants for whom a baseline value was calculable.

This outcome measures the change in work (measured in Watts) at the ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT) between Week 26 and Baseline Visits using last observation carried forward (ITT Population). The anaerobic threshold is the period in exercise when metabolism switches from aerobic to anaerobic. This is an useful measure of submaximal exercise capacity particularly in the single ventricle population.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Udenafil
n=167 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on active drug.
Placebo
n=177 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on Placebo
Change in Work Rate at VAT From Baseline to Week 26 With LOCF
3.46 Watts
Standard Deviation 15.076
0.31 Watts
Standard Deviation 13.246

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 26 Weeks

Population: Data from the anaerobic threshold is not calculable for all participants given noise within the data tracings. These data are from the intent to treat (ITT) analyses for all participants for whom a baseline value was calculable.

This measure is a ratio of the amount of inspired air required to clear a given volume of CO2 from the circulation at the ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT). This measurement is made during exercise stress testing. Decreases in this ratio may reflect an improvement in ventilatory efficiency or an improvement in cardiac function.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Udenafil
n=170 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on active drug.
Placebo
n=181 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on Placebo
Change in VE/VCO2 at VAT From Baseline to Week 26
-0.76 Ratio
Standard Deviation 3.564
-0.05 Ratio
Standard Deviation 2.967

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 26

Population: ITT Population. Of note, some participants may not have had Baseline values due to errors in data capture and/or the participant did not complete the assessment, but was encouraged to come back to complete Week 26 assessments. Only participants with both a Baseline value and a Week 26 value were included in the analysis.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Udenafil
n=199 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on active drug.
Placebo
n=200 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on Placebo
Change in Respiratory Rate at Maximal Exercise Effort From Baseline to Week 26 Using LOCF
-1.01 Breaths/min
Standard Deviation 10.030
-1.44 Breaths/min
Standard Deviation 9.928

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 26

Population: ITT Population. Of note, some participants may not have had baseline values due to errors in data capture and/or not completing the assessment, but were encouraged to come back to complete Week 26 assessments. Only participants with both a baseline value and a Week 26 value were included in the analysis.

The amount of air that enters the lungs per minute at maximal exercise effort.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Udenafil
n=199 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on active drug.
Placebo
n=200 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on Placebo
Change in Minute Oxygen Consumption at Maximal Exercise Effort From Baseline to Week 26
1.15 L/min
Standard Deviation 13.934
-0.10 L/min
Standard Deviation 13.748

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 26

Population: ITT Population. Of note, some participants may not have had baseline values due to errors in data capture and/or not completing the assessment, but were encouraged to come back to complete Week 26 assessments. Only participants with both a baseline value and a Week 26 value were included in the analysis.

Change in power at maximal exercise effort.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Udenafil
n=198 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on active drug.
Placebo
n=199 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on Placebo
Change in Work Rate at Maximal Exercise Effort Between Baseline and Week 26 Using LOCF
2.99 Watts
Standard Deviation 14.334
2.45 Watts
Standard Deviation 13.503

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 26 weeks

Population: ITT Population. Of note, some participants may not have had Baseline values due to errors in data capture and/or not completing the assessment, but were encouraged to come back and complete the Week 26 assessments. Only participants with both a Baseline and a Week 26 value were included in the analysis.

The PedsQL is a short questionnaire that has been used in multiple studies, including a previous study of Fontan patients. A 5-point Likert response scale (0-4) is used. This score was linearly transformed on a scale of 0-100 (0 = 100, 1 = 75, 2 = 50, 3 = 25, 4 = 0). For an individual, a higher score is associated with a higher reported healthcare-related quality of life. For each population (treatment and placebo), population means were calculated at baseline and 26 weeks. The outcome measure is the difference between week 26 and baseline (week 26 - baseline).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Udenafil
n=186 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on active drug.
Placebo
n=193 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on Placebo
Change in Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) Generic Core Scales - Physical Functioning Subscale (Child Reported)
2.08 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.006
1.53 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.823

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 26 weeks

Population: ITT Population. Of note, some participants may not have had Baseline values due to errors in data capture and/or not completing the assessment, but were encouraged to come back and complete the Week 26 assessments. Only participants with both a Baseline and a Week 26 value were included in the analysis.

The PedsQL is a short questionnaire that has been used in multiple studies, including a previous study of Fontan patients. A 5-point Likert response scale (0-4) is used. This score was linearly transformed on a scale of 0-100 (0 = 100, 1 = 75, 2 = 50, 3 = 25, 4 = 0). For an individual, a higher score is associated with a higher reported healthcare-related quality of life. For each population (treatment and placebo), population means were calculated at baseline and 26 weeks. The outcome measure is the difference between week 26 and baseline (week 26 - baseline).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Udenafil
n=181 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on active drug.
Placebo
n=181 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on Placebo
Change in Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) Generic Core Scales - Physical Functioning Subscale (Parent Reported)
2.74 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.011
1.94 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.328

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 26 weeks

Population: ITT Population. Of note, some participants may not have had Baseline values due to errors in data capture and/or not completing the assessment, but were encouraged to come back and complete the Week 26 assessments. Only participants with both a Baseline and a Week 26 value were included in the analysis.

The PedsQL is a short questionnaire that has been used in multiple studies, including a previous study of Fontan patients. A 5-point Likert response scale (0-4) is used. This score was linearly transformed on a scale of 0-100 (0 = 100, 1 = 75, 2 = 50, 3 = 25, 4 = 0). For an individual, a higher score is associated with a higher reported healthcare-related quality of life. For each population (treatment and placebo), population means were calculated at baseline and 26 weeks. The outcome measure is the difference between week 26 and baseline (week 26 - baseline).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Udenafil
n=185 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on active drug.
Placebo
n=193 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on Placebo
Change in Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) Generic Core Scales - Psychosocial Health Subscale (Child Reported)
2.84 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.356
1.74 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.700

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 26 weeks

Population: ITT Population. Of note, some participants may not have had Baseline values due to errors in data capture and/or not completing the assessment, but were encouraged to come back and complete the Week 26 assessments. Only participants with both a Baseline and a Week 26 value were included in the analysis.

The PedsQL is a short questionnaire that has been used in multiple studies, including a previous study of Fontan patients. A 5-point Likert response scale (0-4) is used. This score was linearly transformed on a scale of 0-100 (0 = 100, 1 = 75, 2 = 50, 3 = 25, 4 = 0). For an individual, a higher score is associated with a higher reported healthcare-related quality of life. For each population (treatment and placebo), population means were calculated at baseline and 26 weeks. The outcome measure is the difference between week 26 and baseline (week 26 - baseline).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Udenafil
n=181 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on active drug.
Placebo
n=181 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on Placebo
Change in Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) Generic Core Scales - Psychosocial Health Subscale (Parent Reported)
2.64 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.546
2.15 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.737

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 26 weeks

Population: ITT Population. Of note, some participants may not have had Baseline values due to errors in data capture and/or not completing the assessment, but were encouraged to come back and complete the Week 26 assessments. Only participants with both a Baseline and a Week 26 value were included in the analysis.

The PedsQL is a short questionnaire that has been used in multiple studies, including a previous study of Fontan patients. A 5-point Likert response scale (0-4) is used. This score was linearly transformed on a scale of 0-100 (0 = 100, 1 = 75, 2 = 50, 3 = 25, 4 = 0). For an individual, a higher score is associated with a higher reported healthcare-related quality of life. For each population (treatment and placebo), population means were calculated at baseline and 26 weeks. The outcome measure is the difference between week 26 and baseline (week 26 - baseline).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Udenafil
n=164 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on active drug.
Placebo
n=173 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on Placebo
Change in Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) Inventory - Cardiac Module Scale - Treatment II Subscale (Child-reported)
0.24 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.655
-0.09 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.046

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 26 weeks

Population: ITT Population. Of note, some participants may not have had Baseline values due to errors in data capture and/or not completing the assessment, but were encouraged to come back and complete the Week 26 assessments. Only participants with both a Baseline and a Week 26 value were included in the analysis.

The PedsQL is a short questionnaire that has been used in multiple studies, including a previous study of Fontan patients. A 5-point Likert response scale (0-4) is used. This score was linearly transformed on a scale of 0-100 (0 = 100, 1 = 75, 2 = 50, 3 = 25, 4 = 0). For an individual, a higher score is associated with a higher reported healthcare-related quality of life. For each population (treatment and placebo), population means were calculated at baseline and 26 weeks. The outcome measure is the difference between week 26 and baseline (week 26 - baseline).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Udenafil
n=184 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on active drug.
Placebo
n=192 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on Placebo
Change in Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) Inventory - Cardiac Module Scale - Perceived Physical Appearance Subscale
2.45 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.819
0.78 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.396

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 26 weeks

Population: ITT Population. Of note, some participants may not have had Baseline values due to errors in data capture and/or not completing the assessment, but were encouraged to come back and complete the Week 26 assessments. Only participants with both a Baseline and a Week 26 value were included in the analysis.

The PedsQL is a short questionnaire that has been used in multiple studies, including a previous study of Fontan patients. A 5-point Likert response scale (0-4) is used. This score was linearly transformed on a scale of 0-100 (0 = 100, 1 = 75, 2 = 50, 3 = 25, 4 = 0). For an individual, a higher score is associated with a higher reported healthcare-related quality of life. For each population (treatment and placebo), population means were calculated at baseline and 26 weeks. The outcome measure is the difference between week 26 and baseline (week 26 - baseline).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Udenafil
n=184 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on active drug.
Placebo
n=192 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on Placebo
Change in Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) Inventory - Cardiac Module Scale - Treatment Anxiety Subscale
3.37 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.258
1.66 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.477

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 26 weeks

Population: ITT Population. Of note, some participants may not have had Baseline values due to errors in data capture and/or not completing the assessment, but were encouraged to come back and complete the Week 26 assessments. Only participants with both a Baseline and a Week 26 value were included in the analysis.

The PedsQL is a short questionnaire that has been used in multiple studies, including a previous study of Fontan patients. A 5-point Likert response scale (0-4) is used. This score was linearly transformed on a scale of 0-100 (0 = 100, 1 = 75, 2 = 50, 3 = 25, 4 = 0). For an individual, a higher score is associated with a higher reported healthcare-related quality of life. For each population (treatment and placebo), population means were calculated at baseline and 26 weeks. The outcome measure is the difference between week 26 and baseline (week 26 - baseline).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Udenafil
n=183 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on active drug.
Placebo
n=192 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on Placebo
Change in Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) Inventory - Cardiac Module Scale - Cognitive Problems Subscale
2.19 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.826
3.05 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.027

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 26 weeks

Population: ITT Population. Of note, some participants may not have had Baseline values due to errors in data capture and/or not completing the assessment, but were encouraged to come back and complete the Week 26 assessments. Only participants with both a Baseline and a Week 26 value were included in the analysis.

The PedsQL is a short questionnaire that has been used in multiple studies, including a previous study of Fontan patients. A 5-point Likert response scale (0-4) is used. This score was linearly transformed on a scale of 0-100 (0 = 100, 1 = 75, 2 = 50, 3 = 25, 4 = 0). For an individual, a higher score is associated with a higher reported healthcare-related quality of life. For each population (treatment and placebo), population means were calculated at baseline and 26 week. The outcome measure is the difference between week 26 and baseline (week 26 - baseline).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Udenafil
n=183 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on active drug.
Placebo
n=192 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on Placebo
Change in Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) Inventory - Cardiac Module Scale - Communication Problems Subscale
1.82 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.406
4.36 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.954

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 26 weeks

Population: ITT Population. Of note, some participants may not have had Baseline values due to errors in data capture and/or not completing the assessment, but were encouraged to come back and complete the Week 26 assessments. Only participants with both a Baseline and a Week 26 value who were aged 8 to 12 were included in the analysis.

The PCLQI is a disease-specific measure of health-related quality of life for children and adolescents with congenital or acquired heart disease. The PCQLI score is calculated by adding together the scores from the two subscales: Disease Impact and Psychosocial Impact. Each subscale can score a maximum of 50 points, resulting in a total score with a maximum of 100. Higher scores indicate better perceived health-related quality of life. For each population (treatment and placebo), population means were calculated at baseline and 26 weeks. The outcome measure is the difference between week 26 and baseline (week 26 - baseline).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Udenafil
n=16 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on active drug.
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on Placebo
Change in Pediatric Cardiac Quality of Life Inventory (PCQLI) Total Score-Ages 8 to 12 (Child Reported)
3.26 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.287
-2.37 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.368

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 26 weeks

Population: ITT Population. Of note, some participants may not have had Baseline values due to errors in data capture and/or not completing the assessment, but were encouraged to come back and complete the Week 26 assessments. Only participants with both a Baseline and a Week 26 value were included in the analysis. Only parents with participants aged 8-12 were included in the analysis.

The PCLQI is a disease-specific measure of health-related quality of life for children and adolescents with congenital or acquired heart disease. The PCQLI score is calculated by adding together the scores from the two subscales: Disease Impact and Psychosocial Impact. Each subscale can score a maximum of 50 points, resulting in a total score with a maximum of 100. Higher scores indicate better perceived health-related quality of life. For each population (treatment and placebo), population means were calculated at baseline and 26 weeks. The outcome measure is the difference between week 26 and baseline (week 26 - baseline).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Udenafil
n=17 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on active drug.
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on Placebo
Change in Pediatric Cardiac Quality of Life Inventory (PCQLI) Total Score-Ages 8 to 12 (Parent Reported)
-0.91 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.399
-4.44 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.389

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 26 weeks

Population: ITT Population. Of note, some participants may not have had Baseline values due to errors in data capture and/or not completing the assessment, but were encouraged to come back and complete the Week 26 assessments. Only participants aged 13-18 with both a Baseline and a Week 26 value were included in the analysis.

The PCLQI is a disease-specific measure of health-related quality of life for children and adolescents with congenital or acquired heart disease. The PCQLI score is calculated by adding together the scores from the two subscales: Disease Impact and Psychosocial Impact. Each subscale can score a maximum of 50 points, resulting in a total score with a maximum of 100. Higher scores indicate better perceived health-related quality of life. For each population (treatment and placebo), population means were calculated at baseline and 26 weeks. The outcome measure is the difference between week 26 and baseline (week 26 - baseline).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Udenafil
n=158 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on active drug.
Placebo
n=170 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on Placebo
Change in Pediatric Cardiac Quality of Life Inventory (PCQLI) Total Score-Ages 13 to 18 (Child Reported)
-0.08 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.032
0.09 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.626

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 26 weeks

Population: ITT Population. Of note, some participants may not have had Baseline values due to errors in data capture and/or not completing the assessment, but were encouraged to come back and complete the Week 26 assessments. Only parents of participants aged 13-18 with both a Baseline and a Week 26 value were included in the analysis.

The PCLQI is a disease-specific measure of health-related quality of life for children and adolescents with congenital or acquired heart disease. The PCQLI score is calculated by adding together the scores from the two subscales: Disease Impact and Psychosocial Impact. Each subscale can score a maximum of 50 points, resulting in a total score with a maximum of 100. Higher scores indicate better perceived health-related quality of life. For each population (treatment and placebo), population means were calculated at baseline and 26 weeks. The outcome measure is the difference between week 26 and baseline (week 26 - baseline).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Udenafil
n=152 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on active drug.
Placebo
n=162 Participants
Intent to Treat Population on Placebo
Change in Pediatric Cardiac Quality of Life Inventory (PCQLI) Total Score-Ages 13 to 18 (Parent Reported)
0.36 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.722
-1.60 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.179

Adverse Events

Drug

Serious events: 14 serious events
Other events: 158 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo

Serious events: 10 serious events
Other events: 135 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Drug
n=200 participants at risk
Udenafil. One tablet twice daily for 26 weeks Udenafil: Active drug
Placebo
n=200 participants at risk
Placebo. One tablet twice daily for 26 weeks Placebo: Matching Placebo
Eye disorders
Retinal Artery Thrombosis
0.50%
1/200 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Nervous system disorders
Diplegia
0.50%
1/200 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
1.0%
2/200 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
0.50%
1/200 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Nervous system disorders
Palpitation
0.50%
1/200 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
0.00%
0/200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
1.0%
2/200 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chest Pain
1.0%
2/200 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Infections and infestations
Influenza
1.0%
2/200 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal hemorhage
0.50%
1/200 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Endocrine disorders
Protein-losing gastroenteropathy
0.50%
1/200 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Nervous system disorders
Paralysis
0.50%
1/200 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Vascular disorders
Arrthythema
0.50%
1/200 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
0.50%
1/200 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal obstruction
0.50%
1/200 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Menorrhagia
0.50%
1/200 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal Failure
0.50%
1/200 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Psychiatric disorders
Bipolar I disorder
0.50%
1/200 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Cardiac disorders
Intracardiac Thrombus
0.50%
1/200 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal hemorrhage
0.50%
1/200 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
0.50%
1/200 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
0.00%
0/200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
0.50%
1/200 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac Failure
0.00%
0/200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
0.50%
1/200 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Appendicitis
0.00%
0/200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
0.50%
1/200 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Vascular disorders
Cerebral Vascular Accident
0.00%
0/200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
0.50%
1/200 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Nervous system disorders
Fatigue
0.00%
0/200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
0.50%
1/200 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pharyngitis
0.00%
0/200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
0.50%
1/200 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper respiratory tract infections
0.00%
0/200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
0.50%
1/200 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
0.50%
1/200 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
0.00%
0/200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
0.00%
0/200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
0.50%
1/200 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Drug
n=200 participants at risk
Udenafil. One tablet twice daily for 26 weeks Udenafil: Active drug
Placebo
n=200 participants at risk
Placebo. One tablet twice daily for 26 weeks Placebo: Matching Placebo
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
8.0%
16/200 • Number of events 200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
4.5%
9/200 • Number of events 200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
7.5%
15/200 • Number of events 200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
2.5%
5/200 • Number of events 200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
General disorders
Chest Pain
4.5%
9/200 • Number of events 200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
8.0%
16/200 • Number of events 200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
6.5%
13/200 • Number of events 200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
4.5%
9/200 • Number of events 200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Infections and infestations
Upper Respiratory Tract Infectins
12.0%
24/200 • Number of events 200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
11.0%
22/200 • Number of events 200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
8.0%
16/200 • Number of events 200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
8.5%
17/200 • Number of events 200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
39.5%
79/200 • Number of events 200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
25.5%
51/200 • Number of events 200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
10.5%
21/200 • Number of events 200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
2.5%
5/200 • Number of events 200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
Vascular disorders
Flushing
16.0%
32/200 • Number of events 200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.
6.0%
12/200 • Number of events 200 • Adverse Events were recorded over the 26 weeks of study period plus an additional 3 months of follow-up.

Additional Information

Director of Clinical Trials

Mezzion Pharmaceuticals, Inc

Phone: 5734342579

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place