Trial Outcomes & Findings for Colorectal Cancer: Screening vs. Non-Screening (NCT NCT02727894)

NCT ID: NCT02727894

Last Updated: 2019-03-05

Results Overview

Differences between colorectal cancer stage (0,I,II) in screening vs. non-screening group. * 0\. stage (Tis N0 M0) * I. stage (T1-2 N0 M0) * II. stage (T3-4 N0 M0) * III. stage (T1-4 N1-2 M0) * IV. stage (T1-4 N1-2 M1) Stages 0,I II were considered to have better outcome

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Target enrollment

276 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

at time of diagnosis

Results posted on

2019-03-05

Participant Flow

From March 2013 till September 2015 in 12 centres across the Czech Republic 276 patients were enrolled.

Patients with diagnosed colorectal carcinoma were enrolled (276). 11 patients were excluded because of the inability to categorise those patients into the screening or non-screening group.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Screening Group
CRC diagnosed by screening was defined as cancer diagnosed by primary screening colonoscopy, or colonoscopy after a positive immunochemical based faecal occult blood test (iFOBT) in patients without symptoms invited to examination according to the national screening programme policy
Non-screening Group
Symptomatic CRC was defined as cancer diagnosed in symptomatic patients.
Overall Study
STARTED
73
192
Overall Study
COMPLETED
73
192
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Colorectal Cancer: Screening vs. Non-Screening

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Screening
n=73 Participants
Patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed by screening procedures (primary screening colonoscopy, colonoscopy after FOBT).
Others
n=192 Participants
Patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed by other diagnostic procedures (diagnostic colonoscopy, CT, magnetic resonance, ultrasonography, urgent surgery, etc.)
Total
n=265 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Customized
Age (years, median)
67.5 years
n=5 Participants
70 years
n=7 Participants
68 years
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
77 Participants
n=7 Participants
106 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
44 Participants
n=5 Participants
115 Participants
n=7 Participants
159 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: at time of diagnosis

Differences between colorectal cancer stage (0,I,II) in screening vs. non-screening group. * 0\. stage (Tis N0 M0) * I. stage (T1-2 N0 M0) * II. stage (T3-4 N0 M0) * III. stage (T1-4 N1-2 M0) * IV. stage (T1-4 N1-2 M1) Stages 0,I II were considered to have better outcome

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Screening Group
n=73 Participants
Patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed by screening procedures (primary screening colonoscopy, colonoscopy after iFOBT).
Non-Screening Group
n=192 Participants
Symptomatic CRC was defined as cancer diagnosed in symptomatic patients by colonoscopy, or by CT, MRI or ultrasonography before verification by colonoscopy.
Colorectal Cancer Stage (pTNM)
46 Participants
85 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: after surgery was performed

Differences between colorectal cancer grade in screening vs. non-screening group. * GX (cannot be identified) * G1 (well diff.) * G2 (moderately diff.) * G3 (poorly diff.) * G4 (undifferentiated) Grades 1,2 were considered to have connection with lower stage

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Screening Group
n=73 Participants
Patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed by screening procedures (primary screening colonoscopy, colonoscopy after iFOBT).
Non-Screening Group
n=192 Participants
Symptomatic CRC was defined as cancer diagnosed in symptomatic patients by colonoscopy, or by CT, MRI or ultrasonography before verification by colonoscopy.
Colorectal Cancer Grade
53 Participants
120 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: after surgery was performed

Difference between colorectal cancer resection margins (RX, R0, R1, R2) in screening vs. non-screening group. * RX: cannot be identified * R0: no cancer cells seen microscopically at the resection margin * R1: cancer cells present microscopically at the resection margin (microscopic positive margin) * R2: gross examination by the naked eye shows tumor tissue present at the resection margin (macroscopic positive margin)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Screening Group
n=62 Participants
Patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed by screening procedures (primary screening colonoscopy, colonoscopy after iFOBT).
Non-Screening Group
n=154 Participants
Symptomatic CRC was defined as cancer diagnosed in symptomatic patients by colonoscopy, or by CT, MRI or ultrasonography before verification by colonoscopy.
Colorectal Cancer Resection Margins
48 Participants
94 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: at time of diagnosis

Differences between occurrence of colorectal cancer metastasis (MX, M0, M1) between screening vs. non-screening group. * MX: cannot be measured * M0: cancer has not spread to other parts of the body * M1: cancer has spread to other parts of the body

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Screening Group
n=73 Participants
Patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed by screening procedures (primary screening colonoscopy, colonoscopy after iFOBT).
Non-Screening Group
n=192 Participants
Symptomatic CRC was defined as cancer diagnosed in symptomatic patients by colonoscopy, or by CT, MRI or ultrasonography before verification by colonoscopy.
Colorectal Cancer Metastasis
55 Participants
104 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: time between diagnosis and surgery, measured after surgery was performed

Median time between diagnosis and surgery.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Screening Group
n=73 Participants
Patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed by screening procedures (primary screening colonoscopy, colonoscopy after iFOBT).
Non-Screening Group
n=192 Participants
Symptomatic CRC was defined as cancer diagnosed in symptomatic patients by colonoscopy, or by CT, MRI or ultrasonography before verification by colonoscopy.
Colorectal Cancer Surgery
30 Number of day betw. diagnosis and surg.
Interval 24.0 to 35.0
21.5 Number of day betw. diagnosis and surg.
Interval 19.0 to 24.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: during treatment plan setting

Differences between neoadjuvant, adjuvant and systemic palliative therapy in screening vs. non-screening group. Number of patients treated with palliative therapy in both groups.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Screening Group
n=73 Participants
Patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed by screening procedures (primary screening colonoscopy, colonoscopy after iFOBT).
Non-Screening Group
n=192 Participants
Symptomatic CRC was defined as cancer diagnosed in symptomatic patients by colonoscopy, or by CT, MRI or ultrasonography before verification by colonoscopy.
Colorectal Cancer and Palliative Therapy
2 Participants
23 Participants

Adverse Events

Screening Group

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Non-screening Group

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Jan Král

Institution for Clinical and Experimental Medicine

Phone: +420605273008

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Results can be published exclusively by the main investigator or after main investigator approval.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER