4-weekly Versus 12-weekly Administration of Bone-targeted Agents in Patients With Bone Metastases

NCT ID: NCT02721433

Last Updated: 2020-12-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

263 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-08-31

Study Completion Date

2020-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The current Rethinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) trial will compare two schedules(12- vs. 4-weekly) of bone-targeting agents (BTAs) to evaluate quality of life, pain and skeletal events within the Canadian Health Care System. This study will use an "integrated consent model" that involves "oral consent" rather than a written informed consent writing process as the study is comparing standard schedules and not a new administration schedule.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Bone metastases are common in patients with advanced breast and prostate cancers. Skeletal metastases can be associated with reduced Quality of Life (QoL), pain and skeletal-related events (SREs) (defined as pathological fractures, surgery/radiotherapy to bone, spinal cord compression and hypercalcaemia). Maintaining QoL while avoiding or delaying SREs are the main goals of therapy. Patients therefore receive bone-targeted agents (e.g. pamidronate, zoledronate and denosumab) which are typically given every 4 weeks. However, this 4 week dosing is based on convenience so the treatment could be given concurrently with chemotherapy. The half-life of these drugs in the bone is many months or even years. Hence studies have been performed evaluating 12-weekly therapy. These have confirmed similar palliative outcomes in the 4 vs 12-weekly groups for both breast and prostate cancer patients. However, there remains clinical equipoise about which dosing interval physicians prescribe. The current trial will compare these two schedules of bone-targeting agents (12- vs. 4-weekly) to evaluate quality of life, pain and skeletal events within the Canadian Health Care System. This study will use an "integrated consent model" that involves "oral consent" rather than a written informed consent writing process as the study is comparing standard schedules and not a new administration schedule.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer Prostate Cancer Metastasis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

4 weekly bone-targeted agent x 1 year

Bone targeting agents as standard of care

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Pamidronate

Intervention Type DRUG

Bone-targeted agent as standard of care

Denosumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Bone-targeted agent as standard of care

Zoledronate

Intervention Type DRUG

Bone-targeted agent as standard of care

12 weekly bone-targeted agent x 1 year

Bone targeting agents as standard of care

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Pamidronate

Intervention Type DRUG

Bone-targeted agent as standard of care

Denosumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Bone-targeted agent as standard of care

Zoledronate

Intervention Type DRUG

Bone-targeted agent as standard of care

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pamidronate

Bone-targeted agent as standard of care

Intervention Type DRUG

Denosumab

Bone-targeted agent as standard of care

Intervention Type DRUG

Zoledronate

Bone-targeted agent as standard of care

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Aredia Prolia Zometa

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with either radiologically and/or histologically confirmed bone metastases from castrate resistant prostate cancer (36) or breast cancer.
* About to start or currently receiving BTA therapy.
* Serum creatinine \>30 ml/min and corrected serum calcium ≥ 2 mmol/l
* Age ≥ 18 years.
* Able to provide verbal consent

Exclusion Criteria

* For CRPC patients - Definite contraindication for denosumab at baseline (e.g. hypocalcaemia \[Albumin-corrected serum calcium \< 2.0 mmol/l\]).
* History of or current evidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw.
* Radiotherapy or surgery to the bone planned within 4 weeks after randomization.
* Known hypersensitivity to trial drug or hypersensitivity to any other component of the trial drug (e.g. fructose).
* Any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the trial protocol.
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mark Clemons, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Ottawa Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tu MM, Clemons M, Stober C, Jeong A, Vandermeer L, Mates M, Blanchette P, Joy AA, Aseyev O, Pond G, Fergusson D, Ng TL, Thavorn K. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of 12-Versus 4-Weekly Administration of Bone-Targeted Agents in Patients with Bone Metastases from Breast and Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Curr Oncol. 2021 May 13;28(3):1847-1856. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28030171.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34068083 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

16-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id