Trial Outcomes & Findings for A 14 Week Study of Mindfulness Effects on Attentional Control in Older Adults (NCT NCT02714426)

NCT ID: NCT02714426

Last Updated: 2019-03-07

Results Overview

The Attention Network Task is a computerized test that measures three different components of attention (alerting, orienting, and conflict monitoring). Score is the computed as the difference between reaction time on correct trials in cued and uncued conditions. Scores have been normalized via Blom transformation and computed to T-score metric (mean=50, standard deviation = 10, minimum = 0, maximum = 100, higher = worse)

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

42 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Performance in weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14

Results posted on

2019-03-07

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Brain Health
Eight weekly group brain health sessions lasting 90-120 minutes. The intervention is psychoeducational, and each week presents information from NIH regarding factors that may promote cognitive health in late life (e.g., sleep, physical activity, social engagement and leisure, cognitive training). Weekly sessions are supplemented with educational videos and group discussion. Weekly homework consists of readings about brain health. Participants in both interventions receive all study measures equivalently at all occasions
Mindfulness-inspired Treatment/Testing
Eight weekly group mindfulness sessions lasting 90-120 minutes, along with a ½ day Mindfulness Retreat at the end of the training period, will include 1) psychoeducation, 2) formal exercises in the form of guided practice mentioned above, and 3) thoughtful exploration of ideas and questions. Formal mindfulness training will follow 21 guided pre-recorded meditative Moving Picture Experts Group Layer-3 Audio (MP3) tracks from the authors for use in class and at home, promoting both fidelity to the model and uniformity in intervention across training groups. Mindfulness activities in the protocol include mindful breathing, eating, walking, and various other practices well documented in the literature to promote mindfulness. Participants will be asked to practice mindfulness on their own time, and to log this. Participants receive all of the same measures as the active comparator "Brain Health" condition in Weeks 1-14. In weeks 4-11, participants receive Mindfulness Inspired Treatment
Overall Study
STARTED
21
21
Overall Study
COMPLETED
19
19
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
2
2

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Brain Health
Eight weekly group brain health sessions lasting 90-120 minutes. The intervention is psychoeducational, and each week presents information from NIH regarding factors that may promote cognitive health in late life (e.g., sleep, physical activity, social engagement and leisure, cognitive training). Weekly sessions are supplemented with educational videos and group discussion. Weekly homework consists of readings about brain health. Participants in both interventions receive all study measures equivalently at all occasions
Mindfulness-inspired Treatment/Testing
Eight weekly group mindfulness sessions lasting 90-120 minutes, along with a ½ day Mindfulness Retreat at the end of the training period, will include 1) psychoeducation, 2) formal exercises in the form of guided practice mentioned above, and 3) thoughtful exploration of ideas and questions. Formal mindfulness training will follow 21 guided pre-recorded meditative Moving Picture Experts Group Layer-3 Audio (MP3) tracks from the authors for use in class and at home, promoting both fidelity to the model and uniformity in intervention across training groups. Mindfulness activities in the protocol include mindful breathing, eating, walking, and various other practices well documented in the literature to promote mindfulness. Participants will be asked to practice mindfulness on their own time, and to log this. Participants receive all of the same measures as the active comparator "Brain Health" condition in Weeks 1-14. In weeks 4-11, participants receive Mindfulness Inspired Treatment
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
2
2

Baseline Characteristics

A 14 Week Study of Mindfulness Effects on Attentional Control in Older Adults

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Brain Health
n=21 Participants
Eight weekly group brain health sessions lasting 90-120 minutes. The intervention is psychoeducational, and each week presents information from NIH regarding factors that may promote cognitive health in late life (e.g., sleep, physical activity, social engagement and leisure, cognitive training). Weekly sessions are supplemented with educational videos and group discussion. Weekly homework consists of readings about brain health. Participants in both interventions receive all study measures equivalently at all occasions
Mindfulness-inspired Treatment/Testing
n=21 Participants
Eight weekly group mindfulness sessions lasting 90-120 minutes, along with a ½ day Mindfulness Retreat at the end of the training period, will include 1) psychoeducation, 2) formal exercises in the form of guided practice mentioned above, and 3) thoughtful exploration of ideas and questions. Formal mindfulness training will follow 21 guided pre-recorded meditative Moving Picture Experts Group Layer-3 Audio (MP3) tracks from the authors for use in class and at home, promoting both fidelity to the model and uniformity in intervention across training groups. Mindfulness activities in the protocol include mindful breathing, eating, walking, and various other practices well documented in the literature to promote mindfulness. Participants will be asked to practice mindfulness on their own time, and to log this. Participants receive all of the same measures as the active comparator "Brain Health" condition in Weeks 1-14. In weeks 4-11, participants receive Mindfulness treatment.
Total
n=42 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
72.75 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.83 • n=5 Participants
74.95 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.18 • n=7 Participants
73.85 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.98 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
21 Participants
n=7 Participants
42 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
19 Participants
n=7 Participants
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
21 participants
n=5 Participants
21 participants
n=7 Participants
42 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Performance in weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14

Population: Intent to treat analysis via mixed effects modeling; all available data were used at each occasion. Participants were not able to attend all sessions.

The Attention Network Task is a computerized test that measures three different components of attention (alerting, orienting, and conflict monitoring). Score is the computed as the difference between reaction time on correct trials in cued and uncued conditions. Scores have been normalized via Blom transformation and computed to T-score metric (mean=50, standard deviation = 10, minimum = 0, maximum = 100, higher = worse)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Brain Health
n=20 Participants
Eight weekly group brain health sessions lasting 90-120 minutes. The intervention is psychoeducational, and each week presents information from NIH regarding factors that may promote cognitive health in late life (e.g., sleep, physical activity, social engagement and leisure, cognitive training). Weekly sessions are supplemented with educational videos and group discussion. Weekly homework consists of readings about brain health. Participants in both interventions receive all study measures equivalently at all occasions
Mindfulness-inspired Treatment/Testing
n=20 Participants
Eight weekly group mindfulness sessions lasting 90-120 minutes, along with a ½ day Mindfulness Retreat at the end of the training period, will include 1) psychoeducation, 2) formal exercises in the form of guided practice mentioned above, and 3) thoughtful exploration of ideas and questions. Formal mindfulness training will follow 21 guided pre-recorded meditative Moving Picture Experts Group Layer-3 Audio (MP3) tracks from the authors for use in class and at home, promoting both fidelity to the model and uniformity in intervention across training groups. Mindfulness activities in the protocol include mindful breathing, eating, walking, and various other practices well documented in the literature to promote mindfulness. Participants will be asked to practice mindfulness on their own time, and to log this. Participants receive all of the same measures as the active comparator "Brain Health" condition in Weeks 1-14. In weeks 4-11, participants receive Mindfulness Inspired Treatment
Performance in Attention Network Task Conflict Monitoring Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week13
45.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.4
50.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.8
Performance in Attention Network Task Conflict Monitoring Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week1
51.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.4
60.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.0
Performance in Attention Network Task Conflict Monitoring Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week2
51.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.7
57.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.9
Performance in Attention Network Task Conflict Monitoring Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week3
50.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.6
57.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.7
Performance in Attention Network Task Conflict Monitoring Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week4
48.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.3
57.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.9
Performance in Attention Network Task Conflict Monitoring Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week5
48.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.8
53.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.4
Performance in Attention Network Task Conflict Monitoring Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week6
45.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.8
54.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.8
Performance in Attention Network Task Conflict Monitoring Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week7
47.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.5
51.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.2
Performance in Attention Network Task Conflict Monitoring Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week8
46.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.7
49.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.1
Performance in Attention Network Task Conflict Monitoring Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week9
46.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.9
49.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.6
Performance in Attention Network Task Conflict Monitoring Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week10
48.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.1
46.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.0
Performance in Attention Network Task Conflict Monitoring Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week11
44.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.3
49.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.1
Performance in Attention Network Task Conflict Monitoring Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week12
47.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.4
47.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.9
Performance in Attention Network Task Conflict Monitoring Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week14
44.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.9
49.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Performance in weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14

Population: Intent to treat analysis via mixed effects modeling; all available data were used at each occasion. Participants were not able to attend all sessions.

The useful field of view task is a computer-administered selective visual attention test that determines the minimum presentation time needed (between 16-500 msec) to correctly make two visual judgments: (a) is a centrally presented line drawing of a car or truck? and (b) where on the screen is a peripheral car located? Score is the fastest presentation time at which participants achieve at least 75% accuracy. Scores have been normalized via Blom transformation and computed to T-score metric (mean=50, standard deviation = 10, minimum = 0, maximum = 100, higher = worse)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Brain Health
n=20 Participants
Eight weekly group brain health sessions lasting 90-120 minutes. The intervention is psychoeducational, and each week presents information from NIH regarding factors that may promote cognitive health in late life (e.g., sleep, physical activity, social engagement and leisure, cognitive training). Weekly sessions are supplemented with educational videos and group discussion. Weekly homework consists of readings about brain health. Participants in both interventions receive all study measures equivalently at all occasions
Mindfulness-inspired Treatment/Testing
n=20 Participants
Eight weekly group mindfulness sessions lasting 90-120 minutes, along with a ½ day Mindfulness Retreat at the end of the training period, will include 1) psychoeducation, 2) formal exercises in the form of guided practice mentioned above, and 3) thoughtful exploration of ideas and questions. Formal mindfulness training will follow 21 guided pre-recorded meditative Moving Picture Experts Group Layer-3 Audio (MP3) tracks from the authors for use in class and at home, promoting both fidelity to the model and uniformity in intervention across training groups. Mindfulness activities in the protocol include mindful breathing, eating, walking, and various other practices well documented in the literature to promote mindfulness. Participants will be asked to practice mindfulness on their own time, and to log this. Participants receive all of the same measures as the active comparator "Brain Health" condition in Weeks 1-14. In weeks 4-11, participants receive Mindfulness Inspired Treatment
Performance in Useful Field of View Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week2
52.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.0
53.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.0
Performance in Useful Field of View Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week3
52.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.4
53.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.8
Performance in Useful Field of View Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week1
52.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.4
57.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.3
Performance in Useful Field of View Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week4
52.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.0
51.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.6
Performance in Useful Field of View Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week5
49.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.1
55.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.6
Performance in Useful Field of View Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week6
47.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.0
51.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.2
Performance in Useful Field of View Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week7
46.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.3
47.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.4
Performance in Useful Field of View Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week8
49.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.6
49.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.4
Performance in Useful Field of View Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week9
49.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.6
46.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.4
Performance in Useful Field of View Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week10
50.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.1
45.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.2
Performance in Useful Field of View Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week11
45.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.1
49.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.4
Performance in Useful Field of View Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week12
48.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.3
45.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.6
Performance in Useful Field of View Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week13
47.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.2
46.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.2
Performance in Useful Field of View Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week14
48.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.5
47.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Performance in weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14

Population: Intent to treat analysis via mixed effects modeling; all available data were used at each occasion. Participants were not able to attend all sessions.

This task set is computerized presents participants with a word (red or green or blue) that may be presented in (a) congruent (same) color as the word itself (e.g., red word is printed in red), or (b) incongruent (word red printed in green or blue). Participants are cued to either select the word or the color, this varies from trial to trial. Score is the reaction time difference between correct responses to congruent and incongruent stimuli. Scores have been normalized via Blom transformation and computed to T-score metric (mean=50, standard deviation = 10, minimum = 0, maximum = 100, higher = worse)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Brain Health
n=20 Participants
Eight weekly group brain health sessions lasting 90-120 minutes. The intervention is psychoeducational, and each week presents information from NIH regarding factors that may promote cognitive health in late life (e.g., sleep, physical activity, social engagement and leisure, cognitive training). Weekly sessions are supplemented with educational videos and group discussion. Weekly homework consists of readings about brain health. Participants in both interventions receive all study measures equivalently at all occasions
Mindfulness-inspired Treatment/Testing
n=20 Participants
Eight weekly group mindfulness sessions lasting 90-120 minutes, along with a ½ day Mindfulness Retreat at the end of the training period, will include 1) psychoeducation, 2) formal exercises in the form of guided practice mentioned above, and 3) thoughtful exploration of ideas and questions. Formal mindfulness training will follow 21 guided pre-recorded meditative Moving Picture Experts Group Layer-3 Audio (MP3) tracks from the authors for use in class and at home, promoting both fidelity to the model and uniformity in intervention across training groups. Mindfulness activities in the protocol include mindful breathing, eating, walking, and various other practices well documented in the literature to promote mindfulness. Participants will be asked to practice mindfulness on their own time, and to log this. Participants receive all of the same measures as the active comparator "Brain Health" condition in Weeks 1-14. In weeks 4-11, participants receive Mindfulness Inspired Treatment
Performance in Stroop Interference Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week1
51.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.6
54.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.0
Performance in Stroop Interference Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week2
53.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.4
49.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.0
Performance in Stroop Interference Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week3
50.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.0
49.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.1
Performance in Stroop Interference Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week4
52.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.1
51.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.4
Performance in Stroop Interference Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week5
50.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.9
50.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.2
Performance in Stroop Interference Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week6
50.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.1
51.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.2
Performance in Stroop Interference Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week7
49.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.1
50.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.1
Performance in Stroop Interference Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week8
49.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.8
49.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.9
Performance in Stroop Interference Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week9
47.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.5
51.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.5
Performance in Stroop Interference Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week10
49.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.2
45.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.8
Performance in Stroop Interference Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week11
50.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.5
50.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.1
Performance in Stroop Interference Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week12
47.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.9
45.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.3
Performance in Stroop Interference Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week13
48.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.8
51.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.2
Performance in Stroop Interference Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week14
48.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.8
47.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.4

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Self-ratings of weeks 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11

Population: Intent to treat analysis via mixed effects modeling; all available data were used at each occasion. Participants were not able to attend all sessions.

Participants in both arms are asked, at the end of each of their eight intervention sessions, to focus on breathing. They are interrupted five times during this breathing exercise and asked what proportion of their attention (0-100) was wandering off the breathing task. Score is the average proportion of self-rated mind-wandering over five probes. Scores have been normalized via Blom transformation and computed to T-score metric (mean=50, standard deviation = 10, minimum = 0, maximum = 100, higher = worse)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Brain Health
n=20 Participants
Eight weekly group brain health sessions lasting 90-120 minutes. The intervention is psychoeducational, and each week presents information from NIH regarding factors that may promote cognitive health in late life (e.g., sleep, physical activity, social engagement and leisure, cognitive training). Weekly sessions are supplemented with educational videos and group discussion. Weekly homework consists of readings about brain health. Participants in both interventions receive all study measures equivalently at all occasions
Mindfulness-inspired Treatment/Testing
n=20 Participants
Eight weekly group mindfulness sessions lasting 90-120 minutes, along with a ½ day Mindfulness Retreat at the end of the training period, will include 1) psychoeducation, 2) formal exercises in the form of guided practice mentioned above, and 3) thoughtful exploration of ideas and questions. Formal mindfulness training will follow 21 guided pre-recorded meditative Moving Picture Experts Group Layer-3 Audio (MP3) tracks from the authors for use in class and at home, promoting both fidelity to the model and uniformity in intervention across training groups. Mindfulness activities in the protocol include mindful breathing, eating, walking, and various other practices well documented in the literature to promote mindfulness. Participants will be asked to practice mindfulness on their own time, and to log this. Participants receive all of the same measures as the active comparator "Brain Health" condition in Weeks 1-14. In weeks 4-11, participants receive Mindfulness Inspired Treatment
Self-ratings of Perceived Mind Wandering Over 8 Weekly Measurements
Week4
50.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.9
54.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.3
Self-ratings of Perceived Mind Wandering Over 8 Weekly Measurements
Week5
50.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.7
51.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.6
Self-ratings of Perceived Mind Wandering Over 8 Weekly Measurements
Week6
51.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.5
52.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.4
Self-ratings of Perceived Mind Wandering Over 8 Weekly Measurements
Week7
50.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.5
49.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.2
Self-ratings of Perceived Mind Wandering Over 8 Weekly Measurements
Week8
51.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.3
51.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.1
Self-ratings of Perceived Mind Wandering Over 8 Weekly Measurements
Week9
50.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.7
47.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.1
Self-ratings of Perceived Mind Wandering Over 8 Weekly Measurements
Week10
48.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.7
44.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.3
Self-ratings of Perceived Mind Wandering Over 8 Weekly Measurements
Week11
46.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.7
44.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.7

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Self-ratings in weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14

Population: Intent to treat analysis via mixed effects modeling; all available data were used at each occasion. Participants were not able to attend all sessions.

Participants will answer computer 7 administered questions about anxiety in the past week. Score is a Likert-type scale response from the following scale: 0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, 3=nearly every day. Scores have been normalized via Blom transformation and computed to T-score metric (mean=50, standard deviation = 10, minimum = 0, maximum = 100, higher = worse)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Brain Health
n=20 Participants
Eight weekly group brain health sessions lasting 90-120 minutes. The intervention is psychoeducational, and each week presents information from NIH regarding factors that may promote cognitive health in late life (e.g., sleep, physical activity, social engagement and leisure, cognitive training). Weekly sessions are supplemented with educational videos and group discussion. Weekly homework consists of readings about brain health. Participants in both interventions receive all study measures equivalently at all occasions
Mindfulness-inspired Treatment/Testing
n=20 Participants
Eight weekly group mindfulness sessions lasting 90-120 minutes, along with a ½ day Mindfulness Retreat at the end of the training period, will include 1) psychoeducation, 2) formal exercises in the form of guided practice mentioned above, and 3) thoughtful exploration of ideas and questions. Formal mindfulness training will follow 21 guided pre-recorded meditative Moving Picture Experts Group Layer-3 Audio (MP3) tracks from the authors for use in class and at home, promoting both fidelity to the model and uniformity in intervention across training groups. Mindfulness activities in the protocol include mindful breathing, eating, walking, and various other practices well documented in the literature to promote mindfulness. Participants will be asked to practice mindfulness on their own time, and to log this. Participants receive all of the same measures as the active comparator "Brain Health" condition in Weeks 1-14. In weeks 4-11, participants receive Mindfulness Inspired Treatment
Self-ratings in Anxiety (GAD-7) Questionnaire Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week1
50.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.6
53.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.0
Self-ratings in Anxiety (GAD-7) Questionnaire Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week2
51.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.9
50.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.7
Self-ratings in Anxiety (GAD-7) Questionnaire Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week3
50.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.1
53.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.4
Self-ratings in Anxiety (GAD-7) Questionnaire Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week4
47.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.3
51.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.6
Self-ratings in Anxiety (GAD-7) Questionnaire Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week5
50.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.6
52.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.3
Self-ratings in Anxiety (GAD-7) Questionnaire Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week6
59.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.8
51.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.4
Self-ratings in Anxiety (GAD-7) Questionnaire Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week7
49.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.8
50.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.2
Self-ratings in Anxiety (GAD-7) Questionnaire Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week8
49.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.2
49.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.2
Self-ratings in Anxiety (GAD-7) Questionnaire Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week9
52.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.5
49.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.9
Self-ratings in Anxiety (GAD-7) Questionnaire Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week10
50.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.4
50.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.2
Self-ratings in Anxiety (GAD-7) Questionnaire Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week11
51.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.9
50.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.8
Self-ratings in Anxiety (GAD-7) Questionnaire Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week12
50.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.2
50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10
Self-ratings in Anxiety (GAD-7) Questionnaire Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week13
50.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.7
49.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.9
Self-ratings in Anxiety (GAD-7) Questionnaire Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week14
48.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.0
49.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.3

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Self-ratings weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14

Population: Intent to treat analysis via mixed effects modeling; all available data were used at each occasion. Participants were not able to attend all sessions.

Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMSr) will be computer administered. It is a psychological measurement to explore mindfulness. Each week ten items are rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale (1=rarely/never, 2=sometimes, 3=often, 4=almost always). Higher scores indicate greater cognitive and emotional focus. Scores are the average of the ten items, normalized and converted to T-score (mean=50, standard deviation = 10, minimum = 0, maximum = 100, higher = better) metric.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Brain Health
n=20 Participants
Eight weekly group brain health sessions lasting 90-120 minutes. The intervention is psychoeducational, and each week presents information from NIH regarding factors that may promote cognitive health in late life (e.g., sleep, physical activity, social engagement and leisure, cognitive training). Weekly sessions are supplemented with educational videos and group discussion. Weekly homework consists of readings about brain health. Participants in both interventions receive all study measures equivalently at all occasions
Mindfulness-inspired Treatment/Testing
n=20 Participants
Eight weekly group mindfulness sessions lasting 90-120 minutes, along with a ½ day Mindfulness Retreat at the end of the training period, will include 1) psychoeducation, 2) formal exercises in the form of guided practice mentioned above, and 3) thoughtful exploration of ideas and questions. Formal mindfulness training will follow 21 guided pre-recorded meditative Moving Picture Experts Group Layer-3 Audio (MP3) tracks from the authors for use in class and at home, promoting both fidelity to the model and uniformity in intervention across training groups. Mindfulness activities in the protocol include mindful breathing, eating, walking, and various other practices well documented in the literature to promote mindfulness. Participants will be asked to practice mindfulness on their own time, and to log this. Participants receive all of the same measures as the active comparator "Brain Health" condition in Weeks 1-14. In weeks 4-11, participants receive Mindfulness Inspired Treatment
Self-ratings on Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMSr) Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week1
48.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.3
48.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.5
Self-ratings on Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMSr) Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week2
49.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.9
50.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.8
Self-ratings on Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMSr) Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week3
49.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.9
47.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.6
Self-ratings on Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMSr) Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week4
53.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.3
46.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.1
Self-ratings on Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMSr) Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week5
51.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.6
47.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.8
Self-ratings on Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMSr) Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week6
51.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.8
48.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.5
Self-ratings on Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMSr) Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week7
50.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.7
49.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.4
Self-ratings on Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMSr) Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week8
49.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.1
50.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.2
Self-ratings on Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMSr) Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week9
50.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.0
47.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.0
Self-ratings on Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMSr) Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week10
50.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.8
49.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.6
Self-ratings on Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMSr) Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week11
51.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.0
48.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.2
Self-ratings on Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMSr) Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week12
50.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.3
48.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.6
Self-ratings on Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMSr) Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week13
51.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.8
51.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.0
Self-ratings on Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMSr) Over 14 Weekly Measurements
Week14
51.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10
51.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.6

Adverse Events

Brain Health

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Mindfulness-inspired Treatment/Testing

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Michael Marsiske, Ph.D.

University of Florida

Phone: 352.273.5097

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place