Backward Treadmill Training in Patients With Chronic Stroke

NCT ID: NCT02710773

Last Updated: 2016-09-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-04-30

Study Completion Date

2016-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Gait impairment is a common cause of disability in patients who have experienced a stroke and recovery of walking is a priority goal. Gait outcome is a significant factor that influences a patient's chance of returning to the social life activity and rehabilitation is an effective treatment for restoring gait in these patients. Learning to walk backwards correctly has been recommended to improve the movement components required for walking forwards. Several studies demonstrated that during backward walking the muscle activity is higher, more oxygen consumption, metabolic and cardiorespiratory activity are required and the same motor program is used comparing to during the forward walking. It has been suggested that backward walking therapy may be promoted as a treatment strategy to improve gait in stroke patients.

The main goal of this project is to investigate the effectiveness of the backward walking therapy on gait improvement and spasticity in post stroke patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Loss of walking ability is a one of the major problem after stroke and recovery of walking is a priority goal for most patients. Several studies demonstrated that rehabilitation could be an effective treatment on improving gait following stroke. Learning to walk backwards correctly has been recommended to improve the movement components required for walking forwards. Backward walking, therefore, has been promoted as a treatment strategy to improve gait. During backward walking the same motor programme is used as during forward walking, but possibly running in reverse. It has been suggested that backward walking may offer some benefits beyond those experienced through forward walking alone. Backward walking appears to create more muscle activity in proportion to effort than forward walking. This suggests a greater level of energy expenditure in backward walking than in forward walking. Additionally, backward walking also demands a greater oxygen consumption, metabolic response and cardiorespiratory than forward walking. Up to our knowledge, only two studies demonstrated the positive effects of an additional backward walking training in post stroke patients. Yang and coll. examined the effectiveness of additional backward walking training on gait outcome of 25 subacute stroke patients and they demonstrated that asymmetric gait pattern could improve. In a recently study, a randomized control trail was conducted on 36 acute stroke patients evaluating the efficacy of a walk backwards on a treadmill. The patients were randomly allocated to three groups and they received 3 weeks of intervention: first group (n=12) underwent partial body weight support treadmill training in backwards, the second group (n=12) received partial body weight support treadmill training and the third group underwent conventional rehabilitation training. The results showed significant improvements in walking speed and in the rivermead Mobility Index, suggesting that Partial Body Weight Support treadmill backward training for patients in the early phase of acute stroke is effective at improving mobility.

Recently, gait rehabilitation methods in patients with neurological impairment have relied on technological devices, which drive the patient's gait in a body-weight support condition and emphasize the beneficial role of repetitive practice. The rationale for these approaches originates from animal studies which have shown that repetition of gait movements may enhance spinal and supraspinal locomotor circuits.

Two reviews concludes that treadmill training with partial body weight support is effective to improve walking speed and endurance without worsening gait quality

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Backward Walking Treadmill Training

The subjects will perform a backward walking training on treadmill device

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Backward Walking Treadmill Training

Intervention Type OTHER

The intervention will consist of 5 minutes of forward walking (warm-up phase), 10 minutes of backward walking (intervention phase) and 5 minutes of forward walking (cool-down phase). The session will be performed on a treadmill device. The backward training speed will be increase consecutively: during the week 1, the intervention will be performed at 0,8 km/h; during the week 2 the speed will be 1,0 km/h; finally, during the week 3 the speed will be increased till 1,2 km/h.

Treadmill training

The subjects will perform a walking training on treadmill device

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Treadmill Training

Intervention Type OTHER

The intervention will consist of 20 minutes of forward walking on a treadmill device.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Backward Walking Treadmill Training

The intervention will consist of 5 minutes of forward walking (warm-up phase), 10 minutes of backward walking (intervention phase) and 5 minutes of forward walking (cool-down phase). The session will be performed on a treadmill device. The backward training speed will be increase consecutively: during the week 1, the intervention will be performed at 0,8 km/h; during the week 2 the speed will be 1,0 km/h; finally, during the week 3 the speed will be increased till 1,2 km/h.

Intervention Type OTHER

Treadmill Training

The intervention will consist of 20 minutes of forward walking on a treadmill device.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of ischemia brain injury or intracerebral hemorrhage by MRI or computed tomography at least 6 months before the onset of the study;
* age between 18 and 75 years;
* ability to walk independently for at least 15 meters;
* Functional Ambulatory Category level score 2 or less;
* Ability to walk in the treadmill at \>0.3 km/h for 3 minutes handrail support;

Exclusion Criteria

* presence of other concurrent neurological or orthopaedic diseases involving the lower limbs and/or interfering with standing position and/or walking;
* aphasia with inability to follow 2 consecutive step commands, or a cognitive deficit;
* any uncontrolled health condition for which exercise is contraindicated
* Mini Mental State Examination \<20;
* Unstable angina pectoris;
* Unstable cardiac conditions;
* Complex ventricular arrhythmia;
* Resting systolic blood pressure \>200 mm/Hg - Resting diastolic blood pressure \>100 mm/Hg;
* Aphasia (unable to follow two commands);
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universita di Verona

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nicola Smania, MD, Clinical Professor

Prof

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nicola Nicola, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Center Department of Neurological, Neuropsychological, Morfological and Motor Sciences University of Verona, Verona, Italy

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Azienta Ospedaliera, SSO Rehabilitation Unit, Verona

Verona, Italy, Verona, Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Alessandro Picelli, MD

Role: CONTACT

+39 045 8124573

Daniele Munari, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+39 045 8124573

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Nicola Smania

Role: primary

+39 0458124573

Daniele Munari

Role: backup

+39 0458124573

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BWTreadmillSTROKE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Effects of Aerobic Training Post-stroke
NCT02798237 COMPLETED PHASE4