Trial Outcomes & Findings for SmartMouth Advanced Clinical Formula Clinical Research Design Protocol (NCT NCT02709785)

NCT ID: NCT02709785

Last Updated: 2018-12-04

Results Overview

Gingival Index scores gingival inflammation from 0 (healthy) to 3 (severe inflammation). The higher the score, the greater the gingival inflammation (worse outcome). Differences were assessed between treatment groups for changes in values from baseline to 6 weeks. If data were normally distributed, the paired t test was used to assess changes; otherwise the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

80 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

6 weeks

Results posted on

2018-12-04

Participant Flow

Subjects recruited from Graduate Periodontics clinic at two universities.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Group 1 SmartMouth
24 subjects with plaque and gingival inflammation SmartMouth Clinical DDS Advanced Oral Rinse
Group 2 Chlorhexidine
28 subjects with plaque and gingival inflammation 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse
Group 3 Placebo
28 subjects with plaque and gingival inflammation Placebo rinse
Overall Study
STARTED
24
28
28
Overall Study
3 Weeks
23
27
27
Overall Study
6 Weeks
23
26
27
Overall Study
COMPLETED
23
26
27
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
1
2
1

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Group 1 SmartMouth
24 subjects with plaque and gingival inflammation SmartMouth Clinical DDS Advanced Oral Rinse
Group 2 Chlorhexidine
28 subjects with plaque and gingival inflammation 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse
Group 3 Placebo
28 subjects with plaque and gingival inflammation Placebo rinse
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
1
2
1

Baseline Characteristics

Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Group 1 SmartMouth
n=24 Participants
24 subjects with plaque and gingival inflammation SmartMouth Clinical DDS Advanced Oral Rinse
Group 2 Chlorhexidine
n=28 Participants
28 subjects with plaque and gingival inflammation 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse
Group 3 Placebo
n=28 Participants
28 subjects with plaque and gingival inflammation Placebo rinse
Total
n=80 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
0 Participants
n=28 Participants
0 Participants
n=28 Participants
0 Participants
n=80 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
24 Participants
n=24 Participants
28 Participants
n=28 Participants
28 Participants
n=28 Participants
80 Participants
n=80 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
0 Participants
n=28 Participants
0 Participants
n=28 Participants
0 Participants
n=80 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants
n=24 Participants
14 Participants
n=28 Participants
13 Participants
n=28 Participants
40 Participants
n=80 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants
n=24 Participants
14 Participants
n=28 Participants
15 Participants
n=28 Participants
40 Participants
n=80 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Region of Enrollment
United States
24 Participants
n=24 Participants
28 Participants
n=28 Participants
28 Participants
n=28 Participants
80 Participants
n=80 Participants
Gingival Index
0.890 units on a scale
n=24 Participants
0.970 units on a scale
n=28 Participants
1.010 units on a scale
n=28 Participants
0.965 units on a scale
n=80 Participants
Bleeding Score
0.540 units on a scale
n=24 Participants
0.640 units on a scale
n=28 Participants
0.860 units on a scale
n=28 Participants
0.645 units on a scale
n=80 Participants
Plaque Index
1.740 units on a scale
n=24 Participants
1.895 units on a scale
n=28 Participants
1.680 units on a scale
n=28 Participants
1.745 units on a scale
n=80 Participants
Tooth Stain Index
1.000 units on a scale
n=24 Participants
3.000 units on a scale
n=28 Participants
3.000 units on a scale
n=28 Participants
2.000 units on a scale
n=80 Participants
Calculus Index
8.000 units on a scale
n=24 Participants
9.500 units on a scale
n=28 Participants
9.000 units on a scale
n=28 Participants
9.000 units on a scale
n=80 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks

Gingival Index scores gingival inflammation from 0 (healthy) to 3 (severe inflammation). The higher the score, the greater the gingival inflammation (worse outcome). Differences were assessed between treatment groups for changes in values from baseline to 6 weeks. If data were normally distributed, the paired t test was used to assess changes; otherwise the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 1 SmartMouth
n=23 Participants
23 subjects with plaque and gingival inflammation SmartMouth Clinical DDS Advanced Oral Rinse
Group 2 Chlorhexidine
n=26 Participants
26 subjects with plaque and gingival inflammation 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse
Group 3 Placebo
n=27 Participants
27 subjects with plaque and gingival inflammation Placebo rinse
Gingival Index
-0.22 units on a scale
Interval -0.34 to -0.16
-0.34 units on a scale
Interval -0.5 to -0.17
-0.19 units on a scale
Interval -0.29 to -0.11

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks

Calculus Index scores the amount of calculus accumulation by adding surfaces from the lingual of the mandibular anterior teeth. The higher the score, the worse the calculus accumulation. Differences were assessed between treatment groups for changes in values from baseline to 6 weeks. If data were normally distributed, the paired t test was used to assess changes; otherwise the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 1 SmartMouth
n=23 Participants
23 subjects with plaque and gingival inflammation SmartMouth Clinical DDS Advanced Oral Rinse
Group 2 Chlorhexidine
n=26 Participants
26 subjects with plaque and gingival inflammation 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse
Group 3 Placebo
n=27 Participants
27 subjects with plaque and gingival inflammation Placebo rinse
Calculus Index
-3.00 units on a scale
Interval -7.75 to 1.75
-5.00 units on a scale
Interval -9.0 to 2.0
-3.00 units on a scale
Interval -7.0 to 0.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks

Tooth Stain Index scores the amount of tooth stain from 0 (no stain) to 3 (greater than 2/3 of surface). The higher the score, the worse the staining. Differences were assessed between treatment groups for changes in values from baseline to 6 weeks. If data were normally distributed, the paired t test was used to assess changes; otherwise the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used. The score (0-3) for each tooth are summed for the total score. The 8 incisor teeth are scored. The minimum score for a subject is "0" and the maximum score for a subject is "24" (worse outcome).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 1 SmartMouth
n=23 Participants
23 subjects with plaque and gingival inflammation SmartMouth Clinical DDS Advanced Oral Rinse
Group 2 Chlorhexidine
n=26 Participants
26 subjects with plaque and gingival inflammation 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse
Group 3 Placebo
n=27 Participants
27 subjects with plaque and gingival inflammation Placebo rinse
Tooth Stain Index
0 units on a scale
Interval -1.0 to 0.75
3.5 units on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 7.0
0 units on a scale
Interval -1.75 to 0.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks

Plaque Index scores plaque accumulation from 0 (no plaque) to 5 (plaque covering 2/3 of surface or more). The higher the score, the more plaque accumulation (worse outcome). Differences were assessed between treatment groups for changes in values from baseline to 6 weeks. If data were normally distributed, the paired t test was used to assess changes; otherwise the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 1 SmartMouth
n=23 Participants
23 subjects with plaque and gingival inflammation SmartMouth Clinical DDS Advanced Oral Rinse
Group 2 Chlorhexidine
n=26 Participants
26 subjects with plaque and gingival inflammation 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse
Group 3 Placebo
n=27 Participants
27 subjects with plaque and gingival inflammation Placebo rinse
Plaque Index
-0.36 units on a scale
Interval -0.64 to 0.0
-0.62 units on a scale
Interval -0.91 to -0.28
-0.22 units on a scale
Interval -0.62 to -0.02

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 weeks

Bleeding Score is determined by adding the number of bleeding sites and dividing by the number of teeth to assess gingival inflammation. The higher the score, the worse the inflammation. Differences were assessed between treatment groups for changes in values from baseline to 6 weeks. If data were normally distributed, the paired t test was used to assess changes; otherwise the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 1 SmartMouth
n=23 Participants
23 subjects with plaque and gingival inflammation SmartMouth Clinical DDS Advanced Oral Rinse
Group 2 Chlorhexidine
n=26 Participants
26 subjects with plaque and gingival inflammation 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse
Group 3 Placebo
n=27 Participants
27 subjects with plaque and gingival inflammation Placebo rinse
Bleeding Score
-0.39 units on a scale
Interval -0.54 to -0.13
-0.52 units on a scale
Interval -0.79 to -0.18
-0.43 units on a scale
Interval -0.73 to -0.21

Adverse Events

Group 1 SmartMouth

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Group 2 Chlorhexidine

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Group 3 Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

D. Douglas Miley

Saint Louis University

Phone: 314-977-8381

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place