Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety and Efficacy of 5% Monolaurin Vaginal Gel Administered Intravaginally for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis (NCT NCT02709005)
NCT ID: NCT02709005
Last Updated: 2018-12-28
Results Overview
A clinical cure was defined by normal Amsel criteria, including: normal physiological vaginal discharge, whiff test negative for any amine "fishy" odor, saline wet mount less than 20% for clue cells, and vaginal pH is \<=4.5. All four criteria had to be normal with none of the clinical failure criteria met to be considered a clinical cure. A clinical failure was defined by at least one of the following: one or more abnormal Amsel criteria, early discontinuation of study therapy due to lack of treatment effect, use of any vaginosis therapy other than study product during the study, or in the investigator's opinion, required additional treatment for vaginosis.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
109 participants
Visit 2 (Day 8-15)
2018-12-28
Participant Flow
Women, 18-50 years old, with clinical evidence of bacterial vaginosis, were identified during a routine clinic visit, referred by their care provider, or recruited directly to the research clinic between May 11, 2016 and November 16, 2017.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
5% Monolaurin Vaginal Gel
Monolaurin Vaginal Gel is a clear and colorless, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration, and commonly referred to as glycerol monolaurate (GML). Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
Vehicle Placebo
The placebo gel is a clear to opaque, colorless to light gray, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration. The placebo gel contains the same excipients as the Monolaurin vaginal gel. Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
73
|
36
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
69
|
35
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
5% Monolaurin Vaginal Gel
Monolaurin Vaginal Gel is a clear and colorless, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration, and commonly referred to as glycerol monolaurate (GML). Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
Vehicle Placebo
The placebo gel is a clear to opaque, colorless to light gray, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration. The placebo gel contains the same excipients as the Monolaurin vaginal gel. Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Safety and Efficacy of 5% Monolaurin Vaginal Gel Administered Intravaginally for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
5% Monolaurin Vaginal Gel
n=73 Participants
Monolaurin Vaginal Gel is a clear and colorless, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration, and commonly referred to as glycerol monolaurate (GML). Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
Vehicle Placebo
n=36 Participants
The placebo gel is a clear to opaque, colorless to light gray, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration. The placebo gel contains the same excipients as the Monolaurin vaginal gel. Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
Total
n=109 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
73 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
109 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
29.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4 • n=5 Participants
|
31.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4 • n=7 Participants
|
30.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
73 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
109 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
68 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
99 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
64 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
73 participants
n=5 Participants
|
36 participants
n=7 Participants
|
109 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Nugent score <4
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Positive HIV, Chlamydia, or Neisseria gonorrhoeae test
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Visit 2 (Day 8-15)Population: The mITT population includes randomized participants who met inclusion/exclusion criteria, excluding those with Nugent score \<4 at Visit 1 or a positive Visit 1 HIV, Chlamydia, or Neisseria gonorrhoeae test. In the event of an error in randomization or study product administration, participants were grouped by their intended randomized assignment.
A clinical cure was defined by normal Amsel criteria, including: normal physiological vaginal discharge, whiff test negative for any amine "fishy" odor, saline wet mount less than 20% for clue cells, and vaginal pH is \<=4.5. All four criteria had to be normal with none of the clinical failure criteria met to be considered a clinical cure. A clinical failure was defined by at least one of the following: one or more abnormal Amsel criteria, early discontinuation of study therapy due to lack of treatment effect, use of any vaginosis therapy other than study product during the study, or in the investigator's opinion, required additional treatment for vaginosis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
5% Monolaurin Vaginal Gel
n=64 Participants
Monolaurin Vaginal Gel is a clear and colorless, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration, and commonly referred to as glycerol monolaurate (GML). Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
Vehicle Placebo
n=32 Participants
The placebo gel is a clear to opaque, colorless to light gray, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration. The placebo gel contains the same excipients as the Monolaurin vaginal gel. Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Cure in Each Study Arm
|
11 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1 through 5Population: The safety population includes all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. If a subject did not have solicited symptom data she was not included. In the event of an error in randomization or study product administration (i.e., incorrect product), participants were grouped by the product they actually received.
Solicited event assessments were captured on a memory aid starting on Day 1, the first day of therapy and continuing for 5 days. The participant recorded the presence and intensity of vulvovaginal solicited events on the memory aid. Any symptom that was present at the time that the participant was screened was considered as baseline and not reported as a solicited urogenital AE. However, if the symptom deteriorated during the reporting period, it was considered an AE. If a symptom was reported that was not present at baseline, it too was considered an AE. Any symptoms still present on Day 5 were followed by participant memory aid notations until symptom resolution. Solicited events collected include vaginal odor, vaginal pain, vaginal tenderness, vaginal itching, vaginal dryness, vaginal discharge, and vaginal inflammation. Severity of solicited events symptoms were graded as mild, moderate, or severe according to the grading table in the protocol.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
5% Monolaurin Vaginal Gel
n=71 Participants
Monolaurin Vaginal Gel is a clear and colorless, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration, and commonly referred to as glycerol monolaurate (GML). Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
Vehicle Placebo
n=37 Participants
The placebo gel is a clear to opaque, colorless to light gray, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration. The placebo gel contains the same excipients as the Monolaurin vaginal gel. Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Reporting Solicited Urogenital Adverse Events (AEs) Following the First Dose of the Study Product
Vaginal Odor
|
10 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Reporting Solicited Urogenital Adverse Events (AEs) Following the First Dose of the Study Product
Any Symptom
|
50 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Reporting Solicited Urogenital Adverse Events (AEs) Following the First Dose of the Study Product
Vaginal Pain
|
16 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Reporting Solicited Urogenital Adverse Events (AEs) Following the First Dose of the Study Product
Vaginal Tenderness
|
10 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Reporting Solicited Urogenital Adverse Events (AEs) Following the First Dose of the Study Product
Vulvar/Vaginal Itching
|
23 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Reporting Solicited Urogenital Adverse Events (AEs) Following the First Dose of the Study Product
Vaginal Dryness
|
10 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Reporting Solicited Urogenital Adverse Events (AEs) Following the First Dose of the Study Product
Vaginal Discharge
|
12 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Reporting Solicited Urogenital Adverse Events (AEs) Following the First Dose of the Study Product
Vulvar Inflammation
|
9 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Visit 1 (Day 1) through Visit 3 (Day 22-31)Population: The safety population includes all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. In the event of an error in randomization or study product administration (i.e., incorrect product), participants were grouped by the product they actually received.
The number of participants in each treatment group with product-related SAEs was assessed. An AE was considered "serious" if, in the view of either the investigator or sponsor, it resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, a life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, or a persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Important medical events that may not result in death, be life-threatening, or require hospitalizations could be considered serious when, based upon appropriate medical judgment, they could jeopardize the participant and require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed. An AE was considered related if there was a reasonable possibility that the study product caused the AE, meaning that there is evidence to suggest a causal relationship between the study product and the AE.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
5% Monolaurin Vaginal Gel
n=72 Participants
Monolaurin Vaginal Gel is a clear and colorless, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration, and commonly referred to as glycerol monolaurate (GML). Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
Vehicle Placebo
n=37 Participants
The placebo gel is a clear to opaque, colorless to light gray, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration. The placebo gel contains the same excipients as the Monolaurin vaginal gel. Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Reporting Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Considered Product-related
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Visit 2 (Day 8-15)Population: The mITT population includes randomized participants who met inclusion/exclusion criteria, excluding those with Nugent score \<4 at Visit 1 or a positive Visit 1 HIV, Chlamydia, or Neisseria gonorrhoeae test. In the event of an error in randomization or study product administration, participants were grouped by their intended randomized assignment.
Therapeutic cure was defined as both a clinical cure and a bacteriological cure. All four Amsel criteria had to be normal with none of the clinical failure criteria listed met to be considered a clinical cure, including normal physiological vaginal discharge, whiff test negative for any amine "fishy" odor, saline wet mount less than 20% for clue cells, and vaginal pH is \<=4.5. A clinical failure was defined by at least one of the following: one or more abnormal Amsel criteria, early discontinuation of study therapy due to lack of treatment effect, use of any vaginosis therapy other than study product during the study, or in the investigator's opinion, required additional treatment for vaginosis. A vaginal swab for bacteriological assessment of BV by Nugent criteria was performed. The Nugent score can range from 0 to 10. Bacteriological cure of BV was defined as a normal Nugent score of 0-3. Participants who were clinical failures, or had a Nugent score \>3 were therapeutic failures.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
5% Monolaurin Vaginal Gel
n=64 Participants
Monolaurin Vaginal Gel is a clear and colorless, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration, and commonly referred to as glycerol monolaurate (GML). Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
Vehicle Placebo
n=32 Participants
The placebo gel is a clear to opaque, colorless to light gray, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration. The placebo gel contains the same excipients as the Monolaurin vaginal gel. Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Therapeutic Cure in Each Study Arm
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Visit 3 (Day 22-31)Population: The mITT population includes randomized participants who met inclusion/exclusion criteria, excluding those with Nugent score \<4 at Visit 1 or a positive Visit 1 HIV, Chlamydia, or Neisseria gonorrhoeae test. In the event of an error in randomization or study product administration, participants were grouped by their intended randomized assignment.
Therapeutic cure was defined as both a clinical cure and a bacteriological cure. All four Amsel criteria had to be normal with none of the clinical failure criteria listed met to be considered a clinical cure, including normal physiological vaginal discharge, whiff test negative for any amine "fishy" odor, saline wet mount less than 20% for clue cells, and vaginal pH is \<=4.5. A clinical failure was defined by at least one of the following: one or more abnormal Amsel criteria, early discontinuation of study therapy due to lack of treatment effect, use of any vaginosis therapy other than study product during the study, or in the investigator's opinion, required additional treatment for vaginosis. A vaginal swab for bacteriological assessment of BV by Nugent criteria was performed. The Nugent score can range from 0 to 10. Bacteriological cure of BV was defined as a normal Nugent score of 0-3. Participants who were clinical failures, or had a Nugent score \>3 were therapeutic failures.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
5% Monolaurin Vaginal Gel
n=64 Participants
Monolaurin Vaginal Gel is a clear and colorless, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration, and commonly referred to as glycerol monolaurate (GML). Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
Vehicle Placebo
n=32 Participants
The placebo gel is a clear to opaque, colorless to light gray, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration. The placebo gel contains the same excipients as the Monolaurin vaginal gel. Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Therapeutic Cure in Each Study Arm
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Visit 2 (Day 8-15)Population: The mITT population includes randomized participants who met inclusion/exclusion criteria, excluding those with Nugent score \<4 at Visit 1 or a positive Visit 1 HIV, Chlamydia, or Neisseria gonorrhoeae test. In the event of an error in randomization or study product administration, participants were grouped by their intended randomized assignment.
A vaginal swab for bacteriological assessment of BV by Nugent criteria was performed. The Nugent score utilizes a 10-point scale for evaluation of vaginal flora. The Nugent score can range from 0 to 10. A score of 7 to 10 is consistent with BV while 4-6 is considered intermediate and 0-3 is negative for BV. Bacteriological cure of BV was defined as a normal Nugent score of 0-3.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
5% Monolaurin Vaginal Gel
n=61 Participants
Monolaurin Vaginal Gel is a clear and colorless, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration, and commonly referred to as glycerol monolaurate (GML). Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
Vehicle Placebo
n=31 Participants
The placebo gel is a clear to opaque, colorless to light gray, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration. The placebo gel contains the same excipients as the Monolaurin vaginal gel. Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Nugent Score of 3 or Less (Negative for BV) in Each Study Arm
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Visit 3 (Day 22-31)Population: The mITT population includes randomized participants who met inclusion/exclusion criteria, excluding those with Nugent score \<4 at Visit 1 or a positive Visit 1 HIV, Chlamydia, or Neisseria gonorrhoeae test. In the event of an error in randomization or study product administration, participants were grouped by their intended randomized assignment.
A vaginal swab for bacteriological assessment of BV by Nugent criteria was performed. The Nugent score utilizes a 10-point scale for evaluation of vaginal flora. The Nugent score can range from 0 to 10. A score of 7 to 10 is consistent with BV while 4-6 is considered intermediate and 0-3 is negative for BV. Bacteriological cure of BV was defined as a normal Nugent score of 0-3.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
5% Monolaurin Vaginal Gel
n=60 Participants
Monolaurin Vaginal Gel is a clear and colorless, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration, and commonly referred to as glycerol monolaurate (GML). Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
Vehicle Placebo
n=31 Participants
The placebo gel is a clear to opaque, colorless to light gray, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration. The placebo gel contains the same excipients as the Monolaurin vaginal gel. Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Nugent Score of 3 or Less (Negative for BV) in Each Study Arm
|
5 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Visit 2 (Day 8-15)Population: The mITT population includes randomized participants who met inclusion/exclusion criteria, excluding those with Nugent score \<4 at Visit 1 or a positive Visit 1 HIV, Chlamydia, or Neisseria gonorrhoeae test. In the event of an error in randomization or study product administration, participants were grouped by their intended randomized assignment.
A vaginal swab for bacteriological assessment of BV by Nugent criteria was performed. The Nugent score utilizes a 10-point scale for evaluation of vaginal flora. The Nugent score can range from 0 to 10. A score of 7 to 10 is consistent with BV while 4-6 is considered intermediate and 0-3 is negative for BV. Bacteriological cure of BV was defined as a normal Nugent score of 0-3.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
5% Monolaurin Vaginal Gel
n=61 Participants
Monolaurin Vaginal Gel is a clear and colorless, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration, and commonly referred to as glycerol monolaurate (GML). Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
Vehicle Placebo
n=31 Participants
The placebo gel is a clear to opaque, colorless to light gray, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration. The placebo gel contains the same excipients as the Monolaurin vaginal gel. Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Nugent Score of 4-6 (Intermediate BV) in Each Study Arm
|
8 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Visit 3 (Day 22-31)Population: The mITT population includes randomized participants who met inclusion/exclusion criteria, excluding those with Nugent score \<4 at Visit 1 or a positive Visit 1 HIV, Chlamydia, or Neisseria gonorrhoeae test. In the event of an error in randomization or study product administration, participants were grouped by their intended randomized assignment.
A vaginal swab for bacteriological assessment of BV by Nugent criteria was performed. The Nugent score utilizes a 10-point scale for evaluation of vaginal flora. The Nugent score can range from 0 to 10. A score of 7 to 10 is consistent with BV while 4-6 is considered intermediate and 0-3 is negative for BV. Bacteriological cure of BV was defined as a normal Nugent score of 0-3.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
5% Monolaurin Vaginal Gel
n=60 Participants
Monolaurin Vaginal Gel is a clear and colorless, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration, and commonly referred to as glycerol monolaurate (GML). Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
Vehicle Placebo
n=31 Participants
The placebo gel is a clear to opaque, colorless to light gray, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration. The placebo gel contains the same excipients as the Monolaurin vaginal gel. Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Nugent Score of 4-6 (Intermediate BV) in Each Study Arm
|
9 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Visit 3 (Day 22-31)Population: The mITT population includes randomized participants who met inclusion/exclusion criteria, excluding those with Nugent score \<4 at Visit 1 or a positive Visit 1 HIV, Chlamydia, or Neisseria gonorrhoeae test. In the event of an error in randomization or study product administration, participants were grouped by their intended randomized assignment.
A clinical cure was defined by normal Amsel criteria, including: normal physiological vaginal discharge, whiff test negative for any amine "fishy" odor, saline wet mount less than 20% for clue cells, and vaginal pH is \<=4.5. All four criteria had to be normal with none of the clinical failure criteria met to be considered a clinical cure. A clinical failure was defined by at least one of the following: one or more abnormal Amsel criteria, early discontinuation of study therapy due to lack of treatment effect, use of any vaginosis therapy other than study product during the study, or in the investigator's opinion, requires additional treatment for vaginosis. Participants who did not have enough information to determine a clinical cure or clinical failure status were not evaluable for clinical cure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
5% Monolaurin Vaginal Gel
n=64 Participants
Monolaurin Vaginal Gel is a clear and colorless, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration, and commonly referred to as glycerol monolaurate (GML). Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
Vehicle Placebo
n=32 Participants
The placebo gel is a clear to opaque, colorless to light gray, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration. The placebo gel contains the same excipients as the Monolaurin vaginal gel. Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Cure in Each Study Arm
|
10 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Visit 1 (Day 1) through Visit 3 (Day 22-31)Population: The safety population includes all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. In the event of an error in randomization or study product administration (i.e., incorrect product), participants were grouped by the product they actually received.
The number of participants who experienced non-laboratory, non-solicited AEs following the first dose of the study product through Visit 3 (Day 22-31) was assessed. Events involving laboratory parameters that were not collected as part of the protocol were counted as non-laboratory, non-solicited adverse events.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
5% Monolaurin Vaginal Gel
n=72 Participants
Monolaurin Vaginal Gel is a clear and colorless, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration, and commonly referred to as glycerol monolaurate (GML). Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
Vehicle Placebo
n=37 Participants
The placebo gel is a clear to opaque, colorless to light gray, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration. The placebo gel contains the same excipients as the Monolaurin vaginal gel. Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Non-laboratory Non-solicited AEs Following the First Dose of the Study Product
|
52 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Visit 2 (Day 8-15)Population: The safety population includes all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. In the event of an error in randomization or study product administration (i.e., incorrect product), participants were grouped by the product they actually received.
The number of participants experiencing laboratory AEs following the first dose of the study product was assessed at Visit 2 (Day 8-15). A laboratory abnormality was considered an adverse event if there was a worsening of the laboratory value at Visit 2 from the baseline value and it increased in laboratory toxicity grading from the baseline toxicity grading. Protocol-defined hematology parameters assessed were white blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, and neutrophils. Protocol-defined clinical chemistry parameters assessed were creatinine, AST, ALT, total bilirubin, and glucose (random).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
5% Monolaurin Vaginal Gel
n=72 Participants
Monolaurin Vaginal Gel is a clear and colorless, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration, and commonly referred to as glycerol monolaurate (GML). Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
Vehicle Placebo
n=37 Participants
The placebo gel is a clear to opaque, colorless to light gray, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration. The placebo gel contains the same excipients as the Monolaurin vaginal gel. Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Laboratory AEs Following the First Dose of the Study Product
White blood cells Increase
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Laboratory AEs Following the First Dose of the Study Product
Glucose Decrease
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Laboratory AEs Following the First Dose of the Study Product
Creatinine Increase
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Laboratory AEs Following the First Dose of the Study Product
AST Increase
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Laboratory AEs Following the First Dose of the Study Product
Any Laboratory AE
|
12 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Laboratory AEs Following the First Dose of the Study Product
Hemoglobin decrease
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Laboratory AEs Following the First Dose of the Study Product
White blood cells Decrease
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Laboratory AEs Following the First Dose of the Study Product
Platelets Decrease
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Laboratory AEs Following the First Dose of the Study Product
Neutrophils Decrease
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Laboratory AEs Following the First Dose of the Study Product
Glucose Increase
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Laboratory AEs Following the First Dose of the Study Product
ALT Increase
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Laboratory AEs Following the First Dose of the Study Product
Bilirubin Increase
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
5% Monolaurin Vaginal Gel
Vehicle Placebo
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
5% Monolaurin Vaginal Gel
n=72 participants at risk
Monolaurin Vaginal Gel is a clear and colorless, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration, and commonly referred to as glycerol monolaurate (GML). Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
Vehicle Placebo
n=37 participants at risk
The placebo gel is a clear to opaque, colorless to light gray, non-sterile glycol-based gel for vaginal administration. The placebo gel contains the same excipients as the Monolaurin vaginal gel. Participants were to receive intravaginal gel twice daily for three successive days for a total of 6 doses.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal Odour
|
5.6%
4/72 • Number of events 4 • Solicited urogenital AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Day 5. Laboratory AEs were collected at Visit 2 (Day 8-15). Serious adverse events and non-laboratory non-solicited AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Visit 3 (Day 22-31).
Solicited symptoms were counted as AEs if they developed or worsened after the baseline symptom toxicity. Laboratory abnormalities for protocol-specified labs were considered AEs if they worsened at Visit 2 from the baseline value and increased in laboratory toxicity grading from the baseline toxicity grading. Protocol-defined laboratory parameters collected were white blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, creatinine, AST, ALT, total bilirubin, and glucose (random).
|
0.00%
0/37 • Solicited urogenital AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Day 5. Laboratory AEs were collected at Visit 2 (Day 8-15). Serious adverse events and non-laboratory non-solicited AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Visit 3 (Day 22-31).
Solicited symptoms were counted as AEs if they developed or worsened after the baseline symptom toxicity. Laboratory abnormalities for protocol-specified labs were considered AEs if they worsened at Visit 2 from the baseline value and increased in laboratory toxicity grading from the baseline toxicity grading. Protocol-defined laboratory parameters collected were white blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, creatinine, AST, ALT, total bilirubin, and glucose (random).
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vulvovaginal Pain
|
31.0%
22/71 • Number of events 22 • Solicited urogenital AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Day 5. Laboratory AEs were collected at Visit 2 (Day 8-15). Serious adverse events and non-laboratory non-solicited AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Visit 3 (Day 22-31).
Solicited symptoms were counted as AEs if they developed or worsened after the baseline symptom toxicity. Laboratory abnormalities for protocol-specified labs were considered AEs if they worsened at Visit 2 from the baseline value and increased in laboratory toxicity grading from the baseline toxicity grading. Protocol-defined laboratory parameters collected were white blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, creatinine, AST, ALT, total bilirubin, and glucose (random).
|
13.5%
5/37 • Number of events 5 • Solicited urogenital AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Day 5. Laboratory AEs were collected at Visit 2 (Day 8-15). Serious adverse events and non-laboratory non-solicited AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Visit 3 (Day 22-31).
Solicited symptoms were counted as AEs if they developed or worsened after the baseline symptom toxicity. Laboratory abnormalities for protocol-specified labs were considered AEs if they worsened at Visit 2 from the baseline value and increased in laboratory toxicity grading from the baseline toxicity grading. Protocol-defined laboratory parameters collected were white blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, creatinine, AST, ALT, total bilirubin, and glucose (random).
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vulvovaginal Pruritus
|
4.2%
3/72 • Number of events 3 • Solicited urogenital AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Day 5. Laboratory AEs were collected at Visit 2 (Day 8-15). Serious adverse events and non-laboratory non-solicited AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Visit 3 (Day 22-31).
Solicited symptoms were counted as AEs if they developed or worsened after the baseline symptom toxicity. Laboratory abnormalities for protocol-specified labs were considered AEs if they worsened at Visit 2 from the baseline value and increased in laboratory toxicity grading from the baseline toxicity grading. Protocol-defined laboratory parameters collected were white blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, creatinine, AST, ALT, total bilirubin, and glucose (random).
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • Solicited urogenital AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Day 5. Laboratory AEs were collected at Visit 2 (Day 8-15). Serious adverse events and non-laboratory non-solicited AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Visit 3 (Day 22-31).
Solicited symptoms were counted as AEs if they developed or worsened after the baseline symptom toxicity. Laboratory abnormalities for protocol-specified labs were considered AEs if they worsened at Visit 2 from the baseline value and increased in laboratory toxicity grading from the baseline toxicity grading. Protocol-defined laboratory parameters collected were white blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, creatinine, AST, ALT, total bilirubin, and glucose (random).
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vulvovaginal Dryness
|
14.1%
10/71 • Number of events 10 • Solicited urogenital AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Day 5. Laboratory AEs were collected at Visit 2 (Day 8-15). Serious adverse events and non-laboratory non-solicited AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Visit 3 (Day 22-31).
Solicited symptoms were counted as AEs if they developed or worsened after the baseline symptom toxicity. Laboratory abnormalities for protocol-specified labs were considered AEs if they worsened at Visit 2 from the baseline value and increased in laboratory toxicity grading from the baseline toxicity grading. Protocol-defined laboratory parameters collected were white blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, creatinine, AST, ALT, total bilirubin, and glucose (random).
|
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 3 • Solicited urogenital AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Day 5. Laboratory AEs were collected at Visit 2 (Day 8-15). Serious adverse events and non-laboratory non-solicited AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Visit 3 (Day 22-31).
Solicited symptoms were counted as AEs if they developed or worsened after the baseline symptom toxicity. Laboratory abnormalities for protocol-specified labs were considered AEs if they worsened at Visit 2 from the baseline value and increased in laboratory toxicity grading from the baseline toxicity grading. Protocol-defined laboratory parameters collected were white blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, creatinine, AST, ALT, total bilirubin, and glucose (random).
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal Discharge
|
16.9%
12/71 • Number of events 12 • Solicited urogenital AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Day 5. Laboratory AEs were collected at Visit 2 (Day 8-15). Serious adverse events and non-laboratory non-solicited AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Visit 3 (Day 22-31).
Solicited symptoms were counted as AEs if they developed or worsened after the baseline symptom toxicity. Laboratory abnormalities for protocol-specified labs were considered AEs if they worsened at Visit 2 from the baseline value and increased in laboratory toxicity grading from the baseline toxicity grading. Protocol-defined laboratory parameters collected were white blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, creatinine, AST, ALT, total bilirubin, and glucose (random).
|
21.6%
8/37 • Number of events 8 • Solicited urogenital AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Day 5. Laboratory AEs were collected at Visit 2 (Day 8-15). Serious adverse events and non-laboratory non-solicited AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Visit 3 (Day 22-31).
Solicited symptoms were counted as AEs if they developed or worsened after the baseline symptom toxicity. Laboratory abnormalities for protocol-specified labs were considered AEs if they worsened at Visit 2 from the baseline value and increased in laboratory toxicity grading from the baseline toxicity grading. Protocol-defined laboratory parameters collected were white blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, creatinine, AST, ALT, total bilirubin, and glucose (random).
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vulvovaginal Inflammation
|
12.7%
9/71 • Number of events 9 • Solicited urogenital AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Day 5. Laboratory AEs were collected at Visit 2 (Day 8-15). Serious adverse events and non-laboratory non-solicited AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Visit 3 (Day 22-31).
Solicited symptoms were counted as AEs if they developed or worsened after the baseline symptom toxicity. Laboratory abnormalities for protocol-specified labs were considered AEs if they worsened at Visit 2 from the baseline value and increased in laboratory toxicity grading from the baseline toxicity grading. Protocol-defined laboratory parameters collected were white blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, creatinine, AST, ALT, total bilirubin, and glucose (random).
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • Solicited urogenital AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Day 5. Laboratory AEs were collected at Visit 2 (Day 8-15). Serious adverse events and non-laboratory non-solicited AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Visit 3 (Day 22-31).
Solicited symptoms were counted as AEs if they developed or worsened after the baseline symptom toxicity. Laboratory abnormalities for protocol-specified labs were considered AEs if they worsened at Visit 2 from the baseline value and increased in laboratory toxicity grading from the baseline toxicity grading. Protocol-defined laboratory parameters collected were white blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, creatinine, AST, ALT, total bilirubin, and glucose (random).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain
|
0.00%
0/72 • Solicited urogenital AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Day 5. Laboratory AEs were collected at Visit 2 (Day 8-15). Serious adverse events and non-laboratory non-solicited AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Visit 3 (Day 22-31).
Solicited symptoms were counted as AEs if they developed or worsened after the baseline symptom toxicity. Laboratory abnormalities for protocol-specified labs were considered AEs if they worsened at Visit 2 from the baseline value and increased in laboratory toxicity grading from the baseline toxicity grading. Protocol-defined laboratory parameters collected were white blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, creatinine, AST, ALT, total bilirubin, and glucose (random).
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • Solicited urogenital AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Day 5. Laboratory AEs were collected at Visit 2 (Day 8-15). Serious adverse events and non-laboratory non-solicited AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Visit 3 (Day 22-31).
Solicited symptoms were counted as AEs if they developed or worsened after the baseline symptom toxicity. Laboratory abnormalities for protocol-specified labs were considered AEs if they worsened at Visit 2 from the baseline value and increased in laboratory toxicity grading from the baseline toxicity grading. Protocol-defined laboratory parameters collected were white blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, creatinine, AST, ALT, total bilirubin, and glucose (random).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
1.4%
1/72 • Number of events 1 • Solicited urogenital AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Day 5. Laboratory AEs were collected at Visit 2 (Day 8-15). Serious adverse events and non-laboratory non-solicited AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Visit 3 (Day 22-31).
Solicited symptoms were counted as AEs if they developed or worsened after the baseline symptom toxicity. Laboratory abnormalities for protocol-specified labs were considered AEs if they worsened at Visit 2 from the baseline value and increased in laboratory toxicity grading from the baseline toxicity grading. Protocol-defined laboratory parameters collected were white blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, creatinine, AST, ALT, total bilirubin, and glucose (random).
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • Solicited urogenital AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Day 5. Laboratory AEs were collected at Visit 2 (Day 8-15). Serious adverse events and non-laboratory non-solicited AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Visit 3 (Day 22-31).
Solicited symptoms were counted as AEs if they developed or worsened after the baseline symptom toxicity. Laboratory abnormalities for protocol-specified labs were considered AEs if they worsened at Visit 2 from the baseline value and increased in laboratory toxicity grading from the baseline toxicity grading. Protocol-defined laboratory parameters collected were white blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, creatinine, AST, ALT, total bilirubin, and glucose (random).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
|
5.6%
4/72 • Number of events 4 • Solicited urogenital AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Day 5. Laboratory AEs were collected at Visit 2 (Day 8-15). Serious adverse events and non-laboratory non-solicited AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Visit 3 (Day 22-31).
Solicited symptoms were counted as AEs if they developed or worsened after the baseline symptom toxicity. Laboratory abnormalities for protocol-specified labs were considered AEs if they worsened at Visit 2 from the baseline value and increased in laboratory toxicity grading from the baseline toxicity grading. Protocol-defined laboratory parameters collected were white blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, creatinine, AST, ALT, total bilirubin, and glucose (random).
|
13.5%
5/37 • Number of events 5 • Solicited urogenital AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Day 5. Laboratory AEs were collected at Visit 2 (Day 8-15). Serious adverse events and non-laboratory non-solicited AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Visit 3 (Day 22-31).
Solicited symptoms were counted as AEs if they developed or worsened after the baseline symptom toxicity. Laboratory abnormalities for protocol-specified labs were considered AEs if they worsened at Visit 2 from the baseline value and increased in laboratory toxicity grading from the baseline toxicity grading. Protocol-defined laboratory parameters collected were white blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, creatinine, AST, ALT, total bilirubin, and glucose (random).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Vulvovaginal Mycotic Infection
|
8.3%
6/72 • Number of events 7 • Solicited urogenital AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Day 5. Laboratory AEs were collected at Visit 2 (Day 8-15). Serious adverse events and non-laboratory non-solicited AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Visit 3 (Day 22-31).
Solicited symptoms were counted as AEs if they developed or worsened after the baseline symptom toxicity. Laboratory abnormalities for protocol-specified labs were considered AEs if they worsened at Visit 2 from the baseline value and increased in laboratory toxicity grading from the baseline toxicity grading. Protocol-defined laboratory parameters collected were white blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, creatinine, AST, ALT, total bilirubin, and glucose (random).
|
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 3 • Solicited urogenital AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Day 5. Laboratory AEs were collected at Visit 2 (Day 8-15). Serious adverse events and non-laboratory non-solicited AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Visit 3 (Day 22-31).
Solicited symptoms were counted as AEs if they developed or worsened after the baseline symptom toxicity. Laboratory abnormalities for protocol-specified labs were considered AEs if they worsened at Visit 2 from the baseline value and increased in laboratory toxicity grading from the baseline toxicity grading. Protocol-defined laboratory parameters collected were white blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, creatinine, AST, ALT, total bilirubin, and glucose (random).
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vulvovaginal Burning Sensation
|
41.7%
30/72 • Number of events 46 • Solicited urogenital AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Day 5. Laboratory AEs were collected at Visit 2 (Day 8-15). Serious adverse events and non-laboratory non-solicited AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Visit 3 (Day 22-31).
Solicited symptoms were counted as AEs if they developed or worsened after the baseline symptom toxicity. Laboratory abnormalities for protocol-specified labs were considered AEs if they worsened at Visit 2 from the baseline value and increased in laboratory toxicity grading from the baseline toxicity grading. Protocol-defined laboratory parameters collected were white blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, creatinine, AST, ALT, total bilirubin, and glucose (random).
|
10.8%
4/37 • Number of events 6 • Solicited urogenital AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Day 5. Laboratory AEs were collected at Visit 2 (Day 8-15). Serious adverse events and non-laboratory non-solicited AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Visit 3 (Day 22-31).
Solicited symptoms were counted as AEs if they developed or worsened after the baseline symptom toxicity. Laboratory abnormalities for protocol-specified labs were considered AEs if they worsened at Visit 2 from the baseline value and increased in laboratory toxicity grading from the baseline toxicity grading. Protocol-defined laboratory parameters collected were white blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, creatinine, AST, ALT, total bilirubin, and glucose (random).
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
1.4%
1/72 • Number of events 1 • Solicited urogenital AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Day 5. Laboratory AEs were collected at Visit 2 (Day 8-15). Serious adverse events and non-laboratory non-solicited AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Visit 3 (Day 22-31).
Solicited symptoms were counted as AEs if they developed or worsened after the baseline symptom toxicity. Laboratory abnormalities for protocol-specified labs were considered AEs if they worsened at Visit 2 from the baseline value and increased in laboratory toxicity grading from the baseline toxicity grading. Protocol-defined laboratory parameters collected were white blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, creatinine, AST, ALT, total bilirubin, and glucose (random).
|
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • Solicited urogenital AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Day 5. Laboratory AEs were collected at Visit 2 (Day 8-15). Serious adverse events and non-laboratory non-solicited AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Visit 3 (Day 22-31).
Solicited symptoms were counted as AEs if they developed or worsened after the baseline symptom toxicity. Laboratory abnormalities for protocol-specified labs were considered AEs if they worsened at Visit 2 from the baseline value and increased in laboratory toxicity grading from the baseline toxicity grading. Protocol-defined laboratory parameters collected were white blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, creatinine, AST, ALT, total bilirubin, and glucose (random).
|
|
Investigations
Haemoglobin decreased
|
2.8%
2/72 • Number of events 2 • Solicited urogenital AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Day 5. Laboratory AEs were collected at Visit 2 (Day 8-15). Serious adverse events and non-laboratory non-solicited AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Visit 3 (Day 22-31).
Solicited symptoms were counted as AEs if they developed or worsened after the baseline symptom toxicity. Laboratory abnormalities for protocol-specified labs were considered AEs if they worsened at Visit 2 from the baseline value and increased in laboratory toxicity grading from the baseline toxicity grading. Protocol-defined laboratory parameters collected were white blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, creatinine, AST, ALT, total bilirubin, and glucose (random).
|
10.8%
4/37 • Number of events 4 • Solicited urogenital AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Day 5. Laboratory AEs were collected at Visit 2 (Day 8-15). Serious adverse events and non-laboratory non-solicited AEs were collected following the first dose of the study product (Day 1) through Visit 3 (Day 22-31).
Solicited symptoms were counted as AEs if they developed or worsened after the baseline symptom toxicity. Laboratory abnormalities for protocol-specified labs were considered AEs if they worsened at Visit 2 from the baseline value and increased in laboratory toxicity grading from the baseline toxicity grading. Protocol-defined laboratory parameters collected were white blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, creatinine, AST, ALT, total bilirubin, and glucose (random).
|
Additional Information
Patricia Winokur, MD
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60