Trial Outcomes & Findings for Clinical Study of Approved and Investigational Contact Lenses (NCT NCT02708524)

NCT ID: NCT02708524

Last Updated: 2016-11-09

Results Overview

Subjective Overall Comfort was evaluated using the Contact Lens User Experience Comfort scores (CLUE). CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response.Range is 0 to 120. CLUE was collect at Baseline, Post Lens Fit 1-, 2-, 3- and 4- week follow-ups.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

554 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Up to 1 month Follow-up

Results posted on

2016-11-09

Participant Flow

A total of 554 subjects were enrolled in this study. Of the enrolled subjects 6 subjects did not meet the eligibility criteria and 548 subjects were dispensed a study lens. Of the dispensed subjects 535 subjects completed the study and 13 subjects were discontinued.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Senofilcon C
Subjects that were randomized to receive the senofilcon C lens throughout the duration of the study.
Comfilcon A
Subjects that were randomized to receive the comfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
Lotrafilcon B
Subjects that were randomized to receive the lotrafilcon B lens throughout the duration of the study.
Samfilcon A
Subjects that were randomized to receive the samfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
Overall Study
STARTED
139
136
137
136
Overall Study
COMPLETED
135
130
134
136
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
4
6
3
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Senofilcon C
Subjects that were randomized to receive the senofilcon C lens throughout the duration of the study.
Comfilcon A
Subjects that were randomized to receive the comfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
Lotrafilcon B
Subjects that were randomized to receive the lotrafilcon B lens throughout the duration of the study.
Samfilcon A
Subjects that were randomized to receive the samfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
Overall Study
Adverse Event
0
1
0
0
Overall Study
Lens Discomfort
1
0
1
0
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
1
1
1
0
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
0
1
0
0
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
1
1
0
0
Overall Study
Dispensed incorrect study lens
0
1
1
0
Overall Study
Did not wear lens at final visit
0
1
0
0
Overall Study
Subject lost study lens
1
0
0
0

Baseline Characteristics

Clinical Study of Approved and Investigational Contact Lenses

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Senofilcon C
n=139 Participants
All subjects that wore the senofilcon C lens throughout the duration of the study.
Comfilcon A
n=136 Participants
All subjects that wore the comfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
Lotrafilcon B
n=137 Participants
All subjects that wore the lotrafilcon B lens throughout the duration of the study.
Samfilcon A
n=136 Participants
All subjects that wore the samfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
Total
n=548 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
29.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.24 • n=5 Participants
27.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.86 • n=7 Participants
28.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.63 • n=5 Participants
28.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.56 • n=4 Participants
28.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.11 • n=21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
88 Participants
n=5 Participants
98 Participants
n=7 Participants
86 Participants
n=5 Participants
92 Participants
n=4 Participants
364 Participants
n=21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
51 Participants
n=5 Participants
38 Participants
n=7 Participants
51 Participants
n=5 Participants
44 Participants
n=4 Participants
184 Participants
n=21 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 participants
n=5 Participants
0 participants
n=7 Participants
0 participants
n=5 Participants
0 participants
n=4 Participants
1 participants
n=21 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 participants
n=5 Participants
2 participants
n=7 Participants
6 participants
n=5 Participants
10 participants
n=4 Participants
20 participants
n=21 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
13 participants
n=5 Participants
10 participants
n=7 Participants
9 participants
n=5 Participants
12 participants
n=4 Participants
44 participants
n=21 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 participants
n=5 Participants
1 participants
n=7 Participants
0 participants
n=5 Participants
0 participants
n=4 Participants
2 participants
n=21 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
119 participants
n=5 Participants
122 participants
n=7 Participants
122 participants
n=5 Participants
113 participants
n=4 Participants
476 participants
n=21 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
3 participants
n=5 Participants
1 participants
n=7 Participants
0 participants
n=5 Participants
1 participants
n=4 Participants
5 participants
n=21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
139 participants
n=5 Participants
136 participants
n=7 Participants
137 participants
n=5 Participants
136 participants
n=4 Participants
548 participants
n=21 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 1 month Follow-up

Population: All subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation.

Subjective Overall Comfort was evaluated using the Contact Lens User Experience Comfort scores (CLUE). CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response.Range is 0 to 120. CLUE was collect at Baseline, Post Lens Fit 1-, 2-, 3- and 4- week follow-ups.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Senofilcon C
n=134 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the senofilcon C lens throughout the duration of the study.
Comfilcon A
n=130 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the comfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
Lotrafilcon B
n=133 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the lotrafilcon B lens throughout the duration of the study.
Samfilcon A
n=136 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the samfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
Subjective Overall Comfort Composite Score
Baseline
65.17 average clue score
Standard Deviation 23.612
68.58 average clue score
Standard Deviation 21.993
66.45 average clue score
Standard Deviation 22.864
65.46 average clue score
Standard Deviation 22.220
Subjective Overall Comfort Composite Score
Post Fit
66.65 average clue score
Standard Deviation 16.198
62.11 average clue score
Standard Deviation 18.814
52.27 average clue score
Standard Deviation 22.762
64.40 average clue score
Standard Deviation 19.305
Subjective Overall Comfort Composite Score
3-Week Follow-up
61.31 average clue score
Standard Deviation 23.850
55.01 average clue score
Standard Deviation 27.069
52.17 average clue score
Standard Deviation 26.585
53.72 average clue score
Standard Deviation 26.794
Subjective Overall Comfort Composite Score
4-Week Follow-up
60.74 average clue score
Standard Deviation 26.121
56.32 average clue score
Standard Deviation 27.549
51.15 average clue score
Standard Deviation 28.609
52.61 average clue score
Standard Deviation 27.549
Subjective Overall Comfort Composite Score
1-Week Follow-up
67.29 average clue score
Standard Deviation 22.863
55.78 average clue score
Standard Deviation 26.628
54.40 average clue score
Standard Deviation 26.260
56.96 average clue score
Standard Deviation 25.508
Subjective Overall Comfort Composite Score
2-Week Follow-up
64.18 average clue score
Standard Deviation 22.455
55.56 average clue score
Standard Deviation 24.955
53.09 average clue score
Standard Deviation 26.908
55.01 average clue score
Standard Deviation 24.817

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 month follow-up

Population: Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation.

Overall Comfort was assessed using a questionnaire item at Baseline, 1-week, 2-week, 3-week and 4-week follow-up. Responses are on a 5 likert scale (Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair and Poor). Only the percentage of participants that reported Excellent or Very good (Top-Two-Box) was reported here.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Senofilcon C
n=134 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the senofilcon C lens throughout the duration of the study.
Comfilcon A
n=130 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the comfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
Lotrafilcon B
n=133 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the lotrafilcon B lens throughout the duration of the study.
Samfilcon A
n=136 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the samfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
Overall Comfort Individual Item
2-Week Follow-up
70.9 percentage of participants
54.7 percentage of participants
48.2 percentage of participants
54.5 percentage of participants
Overall Comfort Individual Item
3-Week Follow-up
69.4 percentage of participants
50 percentage of participants
45.2 percentage of participants
53 percentage of participants
Overall Comfort Individual Item
4-Week Follow-up
68.7 percentage of participants
54.6 percentage of participants
46.2 percentage of participants
50 percentage of participants
Overall Comfort Individual Item
Baseline
78 percentage of participants
82 percentage of participants
80 percentage of participants
77 percentage of participants
Overall Comfort Individual Item
1-Week Follow-up
79.1 percentage of participants
50.7 percentage of participants
51.9 percentage of participants
56.6 percentage of participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 month Follow-up

Population: Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation.

Comfort at the End of the Day was assessed using a questionnaire item at Baseline, 1-week, 2-week, 3-week and 4-week follow-up. Reposes are on a 5 like-rt scale (Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair and Poor). Only the percentage of participants that reported Excellent or Very good (Top-Two-Box) was reported here.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Senofilcon C
n=134 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the senofilcon C lens throughout the duration of the study.
Comfilcon A
n=130 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the comfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
Lotrafilcon B
n=133 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the lotrafilcon B lens throughout the duration of the study.
Samfilcon A
n=136 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the samfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
Comfort at the End of the Day Individual Item
2-Week Follow-up
59.0 percentage of participants
48.4 percentage of participants
45.9 percentage of participants
49.3 percentage of participants
Comfort at the End of the Day Individual Item
4-Week Follow-up
55.2 percentage of participants
43.0 percentage of participants
39.8 percentage of participants
45.6 percentage of participants
Comfort at the End of the Day Individual Item
Baseline
57.5 percentage of participants
64.6 percentage of participants
60.9 percentage of participants
64.0 percentage of participants
Comfort at the End of the Day Individual Item
1-Week Follow-up
64.2 percentage of participants
47.0 percentage of participants
43.6 percentage of participants
49.3 percentage of participants
Comfort at the End of the Day Individual Item
3-Week Follow-up
52.2 percentage of participants
42.3 percentage of participants
42.1 percentage of participants
45.6 percentage of participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 month Follow-up

Population: Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation.

Comfort each and everyday was assessed using a questionnaire item at Baseline, 1-week, 2-week, 3-week and 4-week follow-up. Reposes are on a 5 likert scale (Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair and Poor). Only the percentage of participants that reported Excellent or Very good (Top-Two-Box) was reported here.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Senofilcon C
n=134 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the senofilcon C lens throughout the duration of the study.
Comfilcon A
n=130 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the comfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
Lotrafilcon B
n=133 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the lotrafilcon B lens throughout the duration of the study.
Samfilcon A
n=136 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the samfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
Comfort Each and Everyday Individual Item
1-Week Follow-up
79.1 percentage of participants
59.2 percentage of participants
54.2 percentage of participants
56.6 percentage of participants
Comfort Each and Everyday Individual Item
2-Week Follow-up
70.9 percentage of participants
58.5 percentage of participants
52.6 percentage of participants
53.0 percentage of participants
Comfort Each and Everyday Individual Item
Baseline
73.2 percentage of participants
76.1 percentage of participants
78.3 percentage of participants
76.5 percentage of participants
Comfort Each and Everyday Individual Item
3-Week Follow-up
70.9 percentage of participants
54.6 percentage of participants
48.2 percentage of participants
53.0 percentage of participants
Comfort Each and Everyday Individual Item
4-Week Follow-up
68.7 percentage of participants
54.6 percentage of participants
48.9 percentage of participants
52.2 percentage of participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 month Follow-up

Population: Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation.

Frequency of Lens Awareness was assessed using a questionnaire item at Baseline, 1-week, 2-week, 3-week and 4-week follow-up. Reposes are scaled as (Always, Frequently, Occasionally, Rarely, Never or Don't Know). Only the number of participants that reported Rarely or Never (Top-Two-Box) was reported here.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Senofilcon C
n=134 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the senofilcon C lens throughout the duration of the study.
Comfilcon A
n=130 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the comfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
Lotrafilcon B
n=133 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the lotrafilcon B lens throughout the duration of the study.
Samfilcon A
n=136 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the samfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
Frequency of Lens Awareness Individual Item
4-Week Follow-up
75.4 percentage of participants
60 percentage of participants
51.2 percentage of participants
63.2 percentage of participants
Frequency of Lens Awareness Individual Item
Baseline
73.2 percentage of participants
74.5 percentage of participants
77.4 percentage of participants
75.8 percentage of participants
Frequency of Lens Awareness Individual Item
1-Week Follow-up
75.4 percentage of participants
61.6 percentage of participants
54.9 percentage of participants
66.2 percentage of participants
Frequency of Lens Awareness Individual Item
2-Week Follow-up
78.3 percentage of participants
63.9 percentage of participants
45.6 percentage of participants
66.2 percentage of participants
Frequency of Lens Awareness Individual Item
3-Week Follow-up
73.2 percentage of participants
60.0 percentage of participants
54.2 percentage of participants
59.6 percentage of participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 month Follow-up

Population: Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation.

Frequency of Experiencing Dryness was assessed using a questionnaire item at Baseline, 1-week, 2-week, 3-week and 4-week follow-up. Reposes are scaled as (Always, Frequently, Occasionally, Rarely, Never or Don't Know). Only the number of participants that reported Rarely or Never (Top-Two-Box) was reported here.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Senofilcon C
n=134 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the senofilcon C lens throughout the duration of the study.
Comfilcon A
n=130 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the comfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
Lotrafilcon B
n=133 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the lotrafilcon B lens throughout the duration of the study.
Samfilcon A
n=136 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the samfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
Frequency of Experiencing Dryness Individual Item
Baseline
62.7 percentage of participants
67.7 percentage of participants
71.4 percentage of participants
67.6 percentage of participants
Frequency of Experiencing Dryness Individual Item
2-Week Follow-up
67.2 percentage of participants
50.1 percentage of participants
50.4 percentage of participants
59.6 percentage of participants
Frequency of Experiencing Dryness Individual Item
3-Week Follow-up
64.2 percentage of participants
59.2 percentage of participants
51.2 percentage of participants
56.6 percentage of participants
Frequency of Experiencing Dryness Individual Item
4-Week Follow-up
68.0 percentage of participants
55.4 percentage of participants
50.4 percentage of participants
55.9 percentage of participants
Frequency of Experiencing Dryness Individual Item
1-Week Follow-up
67.9 percentage of participants
62.5 percentage of participants
53.4 percentage of participants
62.5 percentage of participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 1 month Follow-up

Population: Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation.

Making your eyes feel moist throughout the day was assessed using a questionnaire item at Baseline, 1-week, 2-week, 3-week and 4-week follow-up. Reposes are on a 5 likert scale (Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair and Poor). Only the percentage of participants that reported Excellent or Very good (Top-Two-Box) was reported here.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Senofilcon C
n=134 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the senofilcon C lens throughout the duration of the study.
Comfilcon A
n=130 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the comfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
Lotrafilcon B
n=133 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the lotrafilcon B lens throughout the duration of the study.
Samfilcon A
n=136 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the samfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
Making Your Eyes Feel Moist Throughout the Day Individual Item
2-Week Follow-up
58.2 percentage of participants
53.1 percentage of participants
49.7 percentage of participants
50.0 percentage of participants
Making Your Eyes Feel Moist Throughout the Day Individual Item
3-Week Follow-up
61.2 percentage of participants
48.5 percentage of participants
45.9 percentage of participants
48.6 percentage of participants
Making Your Eyes Feel Moist Throughout the Day Individual Item
Baseline
68.6 percentage of participants
52.3 percentage of participants
43.7 percentage of participants
55.2 percentage of participants
Making Your Eyes Feel Moist Throughout the Day Individual Item
1-Week Follow-up
58.6 percentage of participants
52.3 percentage of participants
43.7 percentage of participants
55.2 percentage of participants
Making Your Eyes Feel Moist Throughout the Day Individual Item
4-Week Follow-up
64.9 percentage of participants
54.6 percentage of participants
43.6 percentage of participants
49.3 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 1 month Follow-up

Population: Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation.

Subjective Overall Quality of Vision was evaluated using the Contact Lens User Experience Comfort scores (CLUE). CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response. CLUE was collect at Baseline, Post Lens Fit 1-, 2-, 3- and 4- week follow-ups.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Senofilcon C
n=134 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the senofilcon C lens throughout the duration of the study.
Comfilcon A
n=130 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the comfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
Lotrafilcon B
n=133 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the lotrafilcon B lens throughout the duration of the study.
Samfilcon A
n=136 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the samfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
Subjective Overall Quality of Vision Composite Score
Baseline
63.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.515
63.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.510
64.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.822
62.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.383
Subjective Overall Quality of Vision Composite Score
1- Week Follow-up
62.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.897
63.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.586
59.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.076
58.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.359
Subjective Overall Quality of Vision Composite Score
2- Week Follow-up
64.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.222
61.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.504
58.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.543
56.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.679
Subjective Overall Quality of Vision Composite Score
3- Week Follow-up
63.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.125
61.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.137
57.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.463
53.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.128
Subjective Overall Quality of Vision Composite Score
4- Week Follow-up
63.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.852
60.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.573
56.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.879
53.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.100
Subjective Overall Quality of Vision Composite Score
Post Fit
69.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.896
68.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.272
65.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.300
67.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.741

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 1 month Follow-up

Population: Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation.

Overall Quality of Vision was assessed using a questionnaire item at Baseline, 1-week, 2-week, 3-week and 4-week follow-up. Reposes are on a 5 likert scale (Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair and Poor). Only the number of participants that reported Excellent or Very good (Top-Two-Box) was reported here.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Senofilcon C
n=134 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the senofilcon C lens throughout the duration of the study.
Comfilcon A
n=130 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the comfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
Lotrafilcon B
n=133 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the lotrafilcon B lens throughout the duration of the study.
Samfilcon A
n=136 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the samfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
Overall Quality of Vision Individual Item
Baseline
82.9 percentage of participants
86.9 percentage of participants
91.0 percentage of participants
84.5 percentage of participants
Overall Quality of Vision Individual Item
2- Week Follow-up
82.8 percentage of participants
77.7 percentage of participants
69.1 percentage of participants
71.3 percentage of participants
Overall Quality of Vision Individual Item
3- Week Follow-up
83.6 percentage of participants
76.9 percentage of participants
69.9 percentage of participants
66.9 percentage of participants
Overall Quality of Vision Individual Item
4- Week Follow-up
85.1 percentage of participants
76.2 percentage of participants
63.2 percentage of participants
61.0 percentage of participants
Overall Quality of Vision Individual Item
1- Week Follow-up
89.5 percentage of participants
77.7 percentage of participants
74.9 percentage of participants
78.7 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 1 month Follow-up

Population: Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation.

Overall Opinion was assessed using a questionnaire item at Post Fit, 1-week, 2-week, 3-week and 4-week follow-up. Reposes are on a 5 likert scale (Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair and Poor). Only the percentage of participants that reported Excellent or Very good (Top-Two-Box) was reported here.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Senofilcon C
n=134 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the senofilcon C lens throughout the duration of the study.
Comfilcon A
n=130 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the comfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
Lotrafilcon B
n=133 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the lotrafilcon B lens throughout the duration of the study.
Samfilcon A
n=136 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the samfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
Overall Opinion Individual Item
Post Fit
85.8 percentage of participants
73.8 percentage of participants
60.9 percentage of participants
80.9 percentage of participants
Overall Opinion Individual Item
1- Week Follow-up
75.4 percentage of participants
49.3 percentage of participants
42.1 percentage of participants
54.5 percentage of participants
Overall Opinion Individual Item
2- Week Follow-up
66.5 percentage of participants
47.7 percentage of participants
42.1 percentage of participants
47.8 percentage of participants
Overall Opinion Individual Item
3- Week Follow-up
62.7 percentage of participants
43.9 percentage of participants
42.9 percentage of participants
39.7 percentage of participants
Overall Opinion Individual Item
4- Week Follow-up
59.0 percentage of participants
43.9 percentage of participants
38.3 percentage of participants
41.1 percentage of participants

Adverse Events

Senofilcon C

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Comfilcon A

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Lotrafilcon B

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Samfilcon A

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Senofilcon C
n=139 participants at risk
Subjects that were randomized to receive the senofilcon C lens throughout the duration of the study.
Comfilcon A
n=136 participants at risk
Subjects that were randomized to receive the comfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
Lotrafilcon B
n=137 participants at risk
Subjects that were randomized to receive the lotrafilcon B lens throughout the duration of the study.
Samfilcon A
n=136 participants at risk
Subjects that were randomized to receive the samfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
Cardiac disorders
Muscle Spasm in Chest
0.00%
0/139 • Throughout the duration of the study. Approximately 1 month per subject.
0.00%
0/136 • Throughout the duration of the study. Approximately 1 month per subject.
0.00%
0/137 • Throughout the duration of the study. Approximately 1 month per subject.
0.74%
1/136 • Number of events 1 • Throughout the duration of the study. Approximately 1 month per subject.

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Kristy Canavan, O.D. PRINCIPAL RESEARCH OPTOMETRIST

Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc.

Phone: 904-443-1474

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: GT60