Trial Outcomes & Findings for Clinical Study of Approved and Investigational Contact Lenses (NCT NCT02708524)
NCT ID: NCT02708524
Last Updated: 2016-11-09
Results Overview
Subjective Overall Comfort was evaluated using the Contact Lens User Experience Comfort scores (CLUE). CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response.Range is 0 to 120. CLUE was collect at Baseline, Post Lens Fit 1-, 2-, 3- and 4- week follow-ups.
COMPLETED
NA
554 participants
Up to 1 month Follow-up
2016-11-09
Participant Flow
A total of 554 subjects were enrolled in this study. Of the enrolled subjects 6 subjects did not meet the eligibility criteria and 548 subjects were dispensed a study lens. Of the dispensed subjects 535 subjects completed the study and 13 subjects were discontinued.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Senofilcon C
Subjects that were randomized to receive the senofilcon C lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Comfilcon A
Subjects that were randomized to receive the comfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Lotrafilcon B
Subjects that were randomized to receive the lotrafilcon B lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Samfilcon A
Subjects that were randomized to receive the samfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
139
|
136
|
137
|
136
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
135
|
130
|
134
|
136
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
6
|
3
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Senofilcon C
Subjects that were randomized to receive the senofilcon C lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Comfilcon A
Subjects that were randomized to receive the comfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Lotrafilcon B
Subjects that were randomized to receive the lotrafilcon B lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Samfilcon A
Subjects that were randomized to receive the samfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lens Discomfort
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Dispensed incorrect study lens
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Did not wear lens at final visit
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Subject lost study lens
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Clinical Study of Approved and Investigational Contact Lenses
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Senofilcon C
n=139 Participants
All subjects that wore the senofilcon C lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Comfilcon A
n=136 Participants
All subjects that wore the comfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Lotrafilcon B
n=137 Participants
All subjects that wore the lotrafilcon B lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Samfilcon A
n=136 Participants
All subjects that wore the samfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Total
n=548 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
29.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.24 • n=5 Participants
|
27.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.86 • n=7 Participants
|
28.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.63 • n=5 Participants
|
28.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.56 • n=4 Participants
|
28.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.11 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
88 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
98 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
86 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
92 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
364 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
51 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
38 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
51 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
184 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 participants
n=4 Participants
|
20 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
13 participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 participants
n=4 Participants
|
44 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
119 participants
n=5 Participants
|
122 participants
n=7 Participants
|
122 participants
n=5 Participants
|
113 participants
n=4 Participants
|
476 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
139 participants
n=5 Participants
|
136 participants
n=7 Participants
|
137 participants
n=5 Participants
|
136 participants
n=4 Participants
|
548 participants
n=21 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 1 month Follow-upPopulation: All subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation.
Subjective Overall Comfort was evaluated using the Contact Lens User Experience Comfort scores (CLUE). CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response.Range is 0 to 120. CLUE was collect at Baseline, Post Lens Fit 1-, 2-, 3- and 4- week follow-ups.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Senofilcon C
n=134 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the senofilcon C lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Comfilcon A
n=130 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the comfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Lotrafilcon B
n=133 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the lotrafilcon B lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Samfilcon A
n=136 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the samfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subjective Overall Comfort Composite Score
Baseline
|
65.17 average clue score
Standard Deviation 23.612
|
68.58 average clue score
Standard Deviation 21.993
|
66.45 average clue score
Standard Deviation 22.864
|
65.46 average clue score
Standard Deviation 22.220
|
|
Subjective Overall Comfort Composite Score
Post Fit
|
66.65 average clue score
Standard Deviation 16.198
|
62.11 average clue score
Standard Deviation 18.814
|
52.27 average clue score
Standard Deviation 22.762
|
64.40 average clue score
Standard Deviation 19.305
|
|
Subjective Overall Comfort Composite Score
3-Week Follow-up
|
61.31 average clue score
Standard Deviation 23.850
|
55.01 average clue score
Standard Deviation 27.069
|
52.17 average clue score
Standard Deviation 26.585
|
53.72 average clue score
Standard Deviation 26.794
|
|
Subjective Overall Comfort Composite Score
4-Week Follow-up
|
60.74 average clue score
Standard Deviation 26.121
|
56.32 average clue score
Standard Deviation 27.549
|
51.15 average clue score
Standard Deviation 28.609
|
52.61 average clue score
Standard Deviation 27.549
|
|
Subjective Overall Comfort Composite Score
1-Week Follow-up
|
67.29 average clue score
Standard Deviation 22.863
|
55.78 average clue score
Standard Deviation 26.628
|
54.40 average clue score
Standard Deviation 26.260
|
56.96 average clue score
Standard Deviation 25.508
|
|
Subjective Overall Comfort Composite Score
2-Week Follow-up
|
64.18 average clue score
Standard Deviation 22.455
|
55.56 average clue score
Standard Deviation 24.955
|
53.09 average clue score
Standard Deviation 26.908
|
55.01 average clue score
Standard Deviation 24.817
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 month follow-upPopulation: Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation.
Overall Comfort was assessed using a questionnaire item at Baseline, 1-week, 2-week, 3-week and 4-week follow-up. Responses are on a 5 likert scale (Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair and Poor). Only the percentage of participants that reported Excellent or Very good (Top-Two-Box) was reported here.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Senofilcon C
n=134 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the senofilcon C lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Comfilcon A
n=130 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the comfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Lotrafilcon B
n=133 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the lotrafilcon B lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Samfilcon A
n=136 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the samfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Comfort Individual Item
2-Week Follow-up
|
70.9 percentage of participants
|
54.7 percentage of participants
|
48.2 percentage of participants
|
54.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Overall Comfort Individual Item
3-Week Follow-up
|
69.4 percentage of participants
|
50 percentage of participants
|
45.2 percentage of participants
|
53 percentage of participants
|
|
Overall Comfort Individual Item
4-Week Follow-up
|
68.7 percentage of participants
|
54.6 percentage of participants
|
46.2 percentage of participants
|
50 percentage of participants
|
|
Overall Comfort Individual Item
Baseline
|
78 percentage of participants
|
82 percentage of participants
|
80 percentage of participants
|
77 percentage of participants
|
|
Overall Comfort Individual Item
1-Week Follow-up
|
79.1 percentage of participants
|
50.7 percentage of participants
|
51.9 percentage of participants
|
56.6 percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 month Follow-upPopulation: Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation.
Comfort at the End of the Day was assessed using a questionnaire item at Baseline, 1-week, 2-week, 3-week and 4-week follow-up. Reposes are on a 5 like-rt scale (Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair and Poor). Only the percentage of participants that reported Excellent or Very good (Top-Two-Box) was reported here.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Senofilcon C
n=134 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the senofilcon C lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Comfilcon A
n=130 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the comfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Lotrafilcon B
n=133 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the lotrafilcon B lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Samfilcon A
n=136 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the samfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Comfort at the End of the Day Individual Item
2-Week Follow-up
|
59.0 percentage of participants
|
48.4 percentage of participants
|
45.9 percentage of participants
|
49.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Comfort at the End of the Day Individual Item
4-Week Follow-up
|
55.2 percentage of participants
|
43.0 percentage of participants
|
39.8 percentage of participants
|
45.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Comfort at the End of the Day Individual Item
Baseline
|
57.5 percentage of participants
|
64.6 percentage of participants
|
60.9 percentage of participants
|
64.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Comfort at the End of the Day Individual Item
1-Week Follow-up
|
64.2 percentage of participants
|
47.0 percentage of participants
|
43.6 percentage of participants
|
49.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Comfort at the End of the Day Individual Item
3-Week Follow-up
|
52.2 percentage of participants
|
42.3 percentage of participants
|
42.1 percentage of participants
|
45.6 percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 month Follow-upPopulation: Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation.
Comfort each and everyday was assessed using a questionnaire item at Baseline, 1-week, 2-week, 3-week and 4-week follow-up. Reposes are on a 5 likert scale (Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair and Poor). Only the percentage of participants that reported Excellent or Very good (Top-Two-Box) was reported here.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Senofilcon C
n=134 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the senofilcon C lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Comfilcon A
n=130 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the comfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Lotrafilcon B
n=133 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the lotrafilcon B lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Samfilcon A
n=136 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the samfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Comfort Each and Everyday Individual Item
1-Week Follow-up
|
79.1 percentage of participants
|
59.2 percentage of participants
|
54.2 percentage of participants
|
56.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Comfort Each and Everyday Individual Item
2-Week Follow-up
|
70.9 percentage of participants
|
58.5 percentage of participants
|
52.6 percentage of participants
|
53.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Comfort Each and Everyday Individual Item
Baseline
|
73.2 percentage of participants
|
76.1 percentage of participants
|
78.3 percentage of participants
|
76.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Comfort Each and Everyday Individual Item
3-Week Follow-up
|
70.9 percentage of participants
|
54.6 percentage of participants
|
48.2 percentage of participants
|
53.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Comfort Each and Everyday Individual Item
4-Week Follow-up
|
68.7 percentage of participants
|
54.6 percentage of participants
|
48.9 percentage of participants
|
52.2 percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 month Follow-upPopulation: Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation.
Frequency of Lens Awareness was assessed using a questionnaire item at Baseline, 1-week, 2-week, 3-week and 4-week follow-up. Reposes are scaled as (Always, Frequently, Occasionally, Rarely, Never or Don't Know). Only the number of participants that reported Rarely or Never (Top-Two-Box) was reported here.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Senofilcon C
n=134 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the senofilcon C lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Comfilcon A
n=130 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the comfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Lotrafilcon B
n=133 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the lotrafilcon B lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Samfilcon A
n=136 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the samfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Frequency of Lens Awareness Individual Item
4-Week Follow-up
|
75.4 percentage of participants
|
60 percentage of participants
|
51.2 percentage of participants
|
63.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Frequency of Lens Awareness Individual Item
Baseline
|
73.2 percentage of participants
|
74.5 percentage of participants
|
77.4 percentage of participants
|
75.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Frequency of Lens Awareness Individual Item
1-Week Follow-up
|
75.4 percentage of participants
|
61.6 percentage of participants
|
54.9 percentage of participants
|
66.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Frequency of Lens Awareness Individual Item
2-Week Follow-up
|
78.3 percentage of participants
|
63.9 percentage of participants
|
45.6 percentage of participants
|
66.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Frequency of Lens Awareness Individual Item
3-Week Follow-up
|
73.2 percentage of participants
|
60.0 percentage of participants
|
54.2 percentage of participants
|
59.6 percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 month Follow-upPopulation: Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation.
Frequency of Experiencing Dryness was assessed using a questionnaire item at Baseline, 1-week, 2-week, 3-week and 4-week follow-up. Reposes are scaled as (Always, Frequently, Occasionally, Rarely, Never or Don't Know). Only the number of participants that reported Rarely or Never (Top-Two-Box) was reported here.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Senofilcon C
n=134 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the senofilcon C lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Comfilcon A
n=130 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the comfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Lotrafilcon B
n=133 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the lotrafilcon B lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Samfilcon A
n=136 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the samfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Frequency of Experiencing Dryness Individual Item
Baseline
|
62.7 percentage of participants
|
67.7 percentage of participants
|
71.4 percentage of participants
|
67.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Frequency of Experiencing Dryness Individual Item
2-Week Follow-up
|
67.2 percentage of participants
|
50.1 percentage of participants
|
50.4 percentage of participants
|
59.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Frequency of Experiencing Dryness Individual Item
3-Week Follow-up
|
64.2 percentage of participants
|
59.2 percentage of participants
|
51.2 percentage of participants
|
56.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Frequency of Experiencing Dryness Individual Item
4-Week Follow-up
|
68.0 percentage of participants
|
55.4 percentage of participants
|
50.4 percentage of participants
|
55.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Frequency of Experiencing Dryness Individual Item
1-Week Follow-up
|
67.9 percentage of participants
|
62.5 percentage of participants
|
53.4 percentage of participants
|
62.5 percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 1 month Follow-upPopulation: Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation.
Making your eyes feel moist throughout the day was assessed using a questionnaire item at Baseline, 1-week, 2-week, 3-week and 4-week follow-up. Reposes are on a 5 likert scale (Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair and Poor). Only the percentage of participants that reported Excellent or Very good (Top-Two-Box) was reported here.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Senofilcon C
n=134 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the senofilcon C lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Comfilcon A
n=130 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the comfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Lotrafilcon B
n=133 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the lotrafilcon B lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Samfilcon A
n=136 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the samfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Making Your Eyes Feel Moist Throughout the Day Individual Item
2-Week Follow-up
|
58.2 percentage of participants
|
53.1 percentage of participants
|
49.7 percentage of participants
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Making Your Eyes Feel Moist Throughout the Day Individual Item
3-Week Follow-up
|
61.2 percentage of participants
|
48.5 percentage of participants
|
45.9 percentage of participants
|
48.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Making Your Eyes Feel Moist Throughout the Day Individual Item
Baseline
|
68.6 percentage of participants
|
52.3 percentage of participants
|
43.7 percentage of participants
|
55.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Making Your Eyes Feel Moist Throughout the Day Individual Item
1-Week Follow-up
|
58.6 percentage of participants
|
52.3 percentage of participants
|
43.7 percentage of participants
|
55.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Making Your Eyes Feel Moist Throughout the Day Individual Item
4-Week Follow-up
|
64.9 percentage of participants
|
54.6 percentage of participants
|
43.6 percentage of participants
|
49.3 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 1 month Follow-upPopulation: Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation.
Subjective Overall Quality of Vision was evaluated using the Contact Lens User Experience Comfort scores (CLUE). CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response. CLUE was collect at Baseline, Post Lens Fit 1-, 2-, 3- and 4- week follow-ups.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Senofilcon C
n=134 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the senofilcon C lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Comfilcon A
n=130 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the comfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Lotrafilcon B
n=133 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the lotrafilcon B lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Samfilcon A
n=136 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the samfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subjective Overall Quality of Vision Composite Score
Baseline
|
63.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.515
|
63.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.510
|
64.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.822
|
62.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.383
|
|
Subjective Overall Quality of Vision Composite Score
1- Week Follow-up
|
62.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.897
|
63.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.586
|
59.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.076
|
58.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.359
|
|
Subjective Overall Quality of Vision Composite Score
2- Week Follow-up
|
64.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.222
|
61.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.504
|
58.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.543
|
56.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.679
|
|
Subjective Overall Quality of Vision Composite Score
3- Week Follow-up
|
63.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.125
|
61.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.137
|
57.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.463
|
53.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.128
|
|
Subjective Overall Quality of Vision Composite Score
4- Week Follow-up
|
63.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.852
|
60.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.573
|
56.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.879
|
53.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.100
|
|
Subjective Overall Quality of Vision Composite Score
Post Fit
|
69.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.896
|
68.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.272
|
65.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.300
|
67.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.741
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 1 month Follow-upPopulation: Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation.
Overall Quality of Vision was assessed using a questionnaire item at Baseline, 1-week, 2-week, 3-week and 4-week follow-up. Reposes are on a 5 likert scale (Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair and Poor). Only the number of participants that reported Excellent or Very good (Top-Two-Box) was reported here.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Senofilcon C
n=134 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the senofilcon C lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Comfilcon A
n=130 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the comfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Lotrafilcon B
n=133 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the lotrafilcon B lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Samfilcon A
n=136 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the samfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Quality of Vision Individual Item
Baseline
|
82.9 percentage of participants
|
86.9 percentage of participants
|
91.0 percentage of participants
|
84.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Overall Quality of Vision Individual Item
2- Week Follow-up
|
82.8 percentage of participants
|
77.7 percentage of participants
|
69.1 percentage of participants
|
71.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Overall Quality of Vision Individual Item
3- Week Follow-up
|
83.6 percentage of participants
|
76.9 percentage of participants
|
69.9 percentage of participants
|
66.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Overall Quality of Vision Individual Item
4- Week Follow-up
|
85.1 percentage of participants
|
76.2 percentage of participants
|
63.2 percentage of participants
|
61.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Overall Quality of Vision Individual Item
1- Week Follow-up
|
89.5 percentage of participants
|
77.7 percentage of participants
|
74.9 percentage of participants
|
78.7 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 1 month Follow-upPopulation: Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation.
Overall Opinion was assessed using a questionnaire item at Post Fit, 1-week, 2-week, 3-week and 4-week follow-up. Reposes are on a 5 likert scale (Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair and Poor). Only the percentage of participants that reported Excellent or Very good (Top-Two-Box) was reported here.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Senofilcon C
n=134 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the senofilcon C lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Comfilcon A
n=130 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the comfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Lotrafilcon B
n=133 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the lotrafilcon B lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Samfilcon A
n=136 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to receive the samfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Opinion Individual Item
Post Fit
|
85.8 percentage of participants
|
73.8 percentage of participants
|
60.9 percentage of participants
|
80.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Overall Opinion Individual Item
1- Week Follow-up
|
75.4 percentage of participants
|
49.3 percentage of participants
|
42.1 percentage of participants
|
54.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Overall Opinion Individual Item
2- Week Follow-up
|
66.5 percentage of participants
|
47.7 percentage of participants
|
42.1 percentage of participants
|
47.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Overall Opinion Individual Item
3- Week Follow-up
|
62.7 percentage of participants
|
43.9 percentage of participants
|
42.9 percentage of participants
|
39.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Overall Opinion Individual Item
4- Week Follow-up
|
59.0 percentage of participants
|
43.9 percentage of participants
|
38.3 percentage of participants
|
41.1 percentage of participants
|
Adverse Events
Senofilcon C
Comfilcon A
Lotrafilcon B
Samfilcon A
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Senofilcon C
n=139 participants at risk
Subjects that were randomized to receive the senofilcon C lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Comfilcon A
n=136 participants at risk
Subjects that were randomized to receive the comfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Lotrafilcon B
n=137 participants at risk
Subjects that were randomized to receive the lotrafilcon B lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
Samfilcon A
n=136 participants at risk
Subjects that were randomized to receive the samfilcon A lens throughout the duration of the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Muscle Spasm in Chest
|
0.00%
0/139 • Throughout the duration of the study. Approximately 1 month per subject.
|
0.00%
0/136 • Throughout the duration of the study. Approximately 1 month per subject.
|
0.00%
0/137 • Throughout the duration of the study. Approximately 1 month per subject.
|
0.74%
1/136 • Number of events 1 • Throughout the duration of the study. Approximately 1 month per subject.
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Kristy Canavan, O.D. PRINCIPAL RESEARCH OPTOMETRIST
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60