Gentamicin Therapy for Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa (RDEB) Nonsense Mutation Patients
NCT ID: NCT02698735
Last Updated: 2019-10-29
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
5 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-02-25
2017-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Gentamicin for RDEB
NCT03012191
Safety Study of Gene-modified Autologous Fibroblasts in Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa
NCT02493816
Long Term Open-label Study Evaluating Safety of Diacerein 1% Ointment Topical Formulation in Subjects With Epidermolysis Bullosa Simplex
NCT03389308
Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonist for the Treatment of Itch in EB Patients
NCT02654483
Gene Therapy for Netherton Syndrome
NCT01545323
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Injection of gentamicin into the high dermis of RDEB patient skin: In addition, we will identify target 2.0 cm x 2.0 cm areas of unwounded intact skin within areas prone to blister formation and intradermally inject commercially available sterile gentamicin solution (40 mg/ml in saline). A similar control area will be injected with equal volumes of saline. We will inject 200 ul (8 milligrams) into each site once on day 0 and once again on day 1. A single injection will be administered to the site on each of the two days. The total dose will be 16 milligrams injected into the upper dermis where it will contact the patient's dermal fibroblasts and basal keratinocytes. In our published in vitro read-through study, each 1 cm2 of cultured cells was exposed to 400 ugs/ml of gentamicin that showed read-through activity with no cytoxocity. For the proposed intradermal study, we will be using a total dose approximately 5-fold greater than the in vitro dose.
Initial and follow-up Parameters: Prior to any treatment, the RDEB patients will be subjected to a 9 mm shave biopsy of intact skin that will be divided into 3 parts and evaluated for H\&E histology, transmission electron microscopy and direct immunofluorescence for C7 expression. At 1 and 3 months after gentamicin treatment of RDEB erosions or intact skin in blister prone areas, we will biopsy the treated sites and repeat the histological, ultrastructural and C7 expression evaluations. For the assessment of C7 expression at the DEJ by immunofluorescence (IF), 5 micron cryosections will be probed with anti-C7 polyclonal antibodies to the NC1 and NC2 domains of C7. The increased expression of the NC2 domain of C7 at the DEJ of gentamicin-treated skin or erosions will serve as one major "milestone" in this study since it would indicate PTC read-through and restoration of a full-length C7. The third part of the biopsy will be evaluated ultrastructurally, and AFs will be enumerated by computer-assisted morphometry. These studies will assess if there is restoration of normal AFs. Skin sections from normal human subjects will serve as positive controls, while skin sections from the vehicle control site will serve as negative controls.
Patient clinical assessment: Skin Erosion Sites: Patients will be blinded to the gentamicin and vehicle treatments of the Experimental Site and Control Site. Each week, the patients will assess the sites and grade their healing as follows: - 1 = enlargement of the erosion compared to its initial size; 0 = no change in the size of the erosion; +1 = partial healing and a smaller erosion than its initial size, and +2 = complete closure of the wound.
Secondly, baseline photographs of the erosions will be generated and the area of the erosions calculated by computer-assisted planimetry. Identical assessments will be made at 1 and 3 months post treatment. Therefore, a second "milestone" for this study will be decreased surface areas of gentamicin-treated erosions compared with vehicle control-treated erosions.
Evaluation of RDEB intact skin treated by intradermal injections of gentamicin: Patients and Investigators will be blinded to the treatments of the Experimental Area and Control Area. Each week, the patient will evaluate the areas and grade them as follows: - 1 = new blister or erosion formation in the site, and +1 = no new blisters or erosions. At USC visits at 1 and 3 months, biopsies will be obtained from the sites and evaluated as above for the expression of C7 at the DEJ and enumeration of AFs.
Evaluation of Patients' Safety: Patients will have baseline histories, review of systems (ROS), vital signs (including weight) and physical examinations on Day 0 before treatment, and at Day 1 (one day after treatment) and then at 1 and 3 months during their visits to USC. At these same time points, blood tests will be performed and include a complete blood count, electrolytes, liver enzymes, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, creatinine, and BUN. Creatinine clearances will be also calculated, and the patient's treatment sites will be evaluated for erythema, edema, blistering and erosions. At Day 0, 1 month and 3 months after treatment, audiometry evaluations will be done. Patients will complete a ROS questionnaire daily at home, and be telephoned weekly by a USC study member inquiring about any new signs, symptoms, or ROS changes.
E. Characterization of Immune Responses to Gentamicin-Induced C7: Our study patients all express lower levels of C7 including the NC1 domain, which is the most antigenic domain of C7. Therefore, with the exception of patient B, we doubt that reading through the patient's PTC will induce a protein that is viewed as antigenic by the patient's immune system. Nevertheless, we hope that gentamicin will generate a functional, rather than non-functional, species of C7. To evaluate if this change triggers an immune response and generates anti-C7 antibodies, patient serum will be obtained at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months for evaluation of anti-C7 antibodies by salt-split IIF and ELISA. If a patient develops antibodies to C7, we will then examine their skin for C7 antibody deposits by DIF.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Gentamicin
Gentamicin antibiotic
Gentamicin
Gentamicin was either formulated into a 0.1% ointment or solutions for injection were purchased directly from suppliers.
Placebo
Vehicle control
Placebo
There are two placebos used in this study. The ointment vehicle (same as used to formulate gentamicin) and vehicle solution for injection.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Gentamicin
Gentamicin was either formulated into a 0.1% ointment or solutions for injection were purchased directly from suppliers.
Placebo
There are two placebos used in this study. The ointment vehicle (same as used to formulate gentamicin) and vehicle solution for injection.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Southern California
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
David Woodley
Professor of Dermatology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David Woodley, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Southern California Department of Dermatology
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Woodley DT, Cogan J, Hou Y, Lyu C, Marinkovich MP, Keene D, Chen M. Gentamicin induces functional type VII collagen in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa patients. J Clin Invest. 2017 Aug 1;127(8):3028-3038. doi: 10.1172/JCI92707. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HS-15-00821
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.