Cytomegalovirus Testing and Intervention Protocol for Newborn Nursery and Newborn Intensive Care Unit
NCT ID: NCT02680743
Last Updated: 2023-09-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-03-28
2018-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study will investigate how testing newborns for congenital cytomegalovirus infection (cCMV) after a failed newborn hearing screens can improve early identification of cCMV infection and therefore reduce the delay in referral of the newborn to appropriate specialists for intervention.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Development of Potential Biomarkers for Foetal Brain Development After Congenital CMV Infection
NCT03188679
Primary Prevention of Cytomegalovirus in Pregnancy: Addressing the Gaps (CMV GAP)
NCT04879784
Evaluation of Software for Interpreting Virological Results Indicated for the Diagnosis of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Infection During Pregnancy and Intended for Health Professionals
NCT06694428
Short-Term vs. Long-Term Valganciclovir Therapy for Symptomatic Congenital CMV Infections
NCT00466817
Valganciclovir Therapy in Infants and Children With Congenital CMV Infection and Hearing Loss
NCT01649869
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Specific Aim 2: Demonstrate that a majority of infants who test positive for cCMV at the time of failed hearing screen are referred within 14 days for appropriate confirmatory testing and treatment.
Specific Aim 3: Improve cCMV prevalence data estimates for the State of Nebraska.
Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) affects 20,000-40,000 infants in the United States annually and is the most common congenital viral infection in newborns1. cCMV is the most common non-genetic cause of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in children and it is estimated that the 1 in 10 children with SNHL have cCMV related hearing loss. SNHL is the most common sequela of cCMV infection but the overall disease burden is much greater as cCMV is an important contributor to neurodevelopmental delay2.
The most common physical exam findings for identification of cCMV include petechiae, hepatosplenomegaly, microcephaly, hypotonia, hearing loss, purpura, chorioretinitis, and seizure activity and the most common laboratory findings include elevated AST and ALT, thrombocytopenia, conjugated hyperbilirubinemia, and elevated CSF protein3,4. Infants may also be identified based on radiologic abnormalities including abnormal cranial ultrasound, head CT, and brain MRI that may show cerebral calcifications and ventriculomegaly4. Infants with cCMV infections are categorized as either symptomatic or asymptomatic based on the physical exam, laboratory, and radiologic findings that are present at birth3. Approximately 10%-15% of cCMV cases are classified as symptomatic due to the any of these clinical findings and the outcomes for these infants are poor with approximately half suffering from severe neurologic sequelae including SNHL, mental retardation with IQs \< 70, and microcephaly2,3. Approximately 85-90% of children with cCMV do not have these clinical findings at birth and are therefore considered asymptomatic3.However, some cases of otherwise asymptomatic cCMV do have hearing loss as detected during newborn hearing test screening and these patients fall into a sub-categorization of asymptomatic with a failed hearing screening.The hearing loss of cCMV is significant as it is often severe to profound in both the symptomatic and asymptomatic cases. In the asymptomatic children who had hearing impairment, 42% required amplification and rehabilitation2.
There is currently no universal systematic screening of newborns for cCMV and while symptomatic infants may be tested for CMV due to clinical suspicion, asymptomatic infants present a greater challenge to early identification. Screening techniques are available and these include urine or saliva cultures with and without PCR, as well as blood PCR that can be run on dried blood samples (i.e. blood obtained as part of statewide newborn screening exams)2. Recent studies have shown that CMV PCR assays of liquid and dried saliva samples have a high sensitivity and specificity as compared to saliva cultures5. Although these tests are available, they are not routinely used for neonatal universal screening either before or after failed hearing screens even though it is known that detecting hearing loss early leads to earlier intervention and therefore better long term hearing and developmental outcomes, especially when the infants are treated with antiviral therapy such as ganciclovir or valgancyclovir2,6.
Birth data collected from Nebraska Medicine (including Bellevue) for 2014 show 2,660 births with 2,592 infants passing the hearing screen and 43 (1.6%) infants being referred There is no system in place to track how many of these children then failed further testing, how many were tested for cCMV, or how many were diagnosed with cCMV. The Nebraska Birth Defects Registry, maintained by the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), has sparse data on the number of babies identified with cCMV going back to 2007 and the data is as follows: 2 cases in 2007, 2 in 2009, 1 in 2011, and 1 in 2013. The mechanism by which the registry receives the data is through birth certificate clerk entry and the data is most certainly not complete.In order to be treated for cCMV with valgancyclovir diagnosis of cCMV must be made within 14 days of birth and treatment initiated by 30 days of life; a timeframe currently not feasible for the majority of infants currently identified by the current status quo with follow-up hearing evaluation performed weeks and sometimes months after initial referral on newborn hearing screen.
With this project we intend to institute testing for CMV in infants who fail their newborn hearing screen in order to quickly identify those with cCMV. After identification, they will be referred for further audiology testing and referred to Pediatric Infectious Diseases for further diagnostic and confirmatory testing and treatment if indicated. Additionally, by having a confirmed positive cCMV test, the parents and PCP can receive additional counseling on the importance of proper follow up with early intervention specialists in order to improve the infants long-term outcome. A secondary benefit will be improved data on cCMV prevalence in Nebraska.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
SCREENING
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention Group
Patients who fail newborn hearing screen will be screened for CMV by saliva PCR. If positive they will be referred for early hearing screen follow-up and early intervention.
They will also receive a consult with PEdiatric Infectious Disease to evaluate need for treatment.
Intervention:Education of parents to pursue prompt hearing screening.
Education of parents to pursue prompt hearing screening.
Parents of patients will be counseled on the risks of hearing loss with a positive screen.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Education of parents to pursue prompt hearing screening.
Parents of patients will be counseled on the risks of hearing loss with a positive screen.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
24 Hours
14 Days
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Nebraska
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ann L Anderson Berry, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Nebraska
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nebraska Medicine Bellevue
Bellevue, Nebraska, United States
Unversity of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0828-15-EP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.