Trial Outcomes & Findings for CO2-Laser Treatment in Patients With Diabetic Infected Foot Ulcers (NCT NCT02677779)
NCT ID: NCT02677779
Last Updated: 2016-12-06
Results Overview
Percent change in bacterial colonies from baseline.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
Percent change in bacterial colonies from baseline. Variation from baseline and immediately after the end of procedure.
2016-12-06
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
CO2 Laser
Ulcer debridement with laser-CO2 (DEKA SmartXide2 c80-El.En, Florence Italy)
CO2 laser: Single session of CO2 laser debridement
|
Traditional Surgery
Ulcer debridement with traditional surgery
traditional surgery: Single session of traditional debridement
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
10
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
10
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
CO2-Laser Treatment in Patients With Diabetic Infected Foot Ulcers
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
CO2 Laser
n=10 Participants
Ulcer debridement with laser-CO2 (DEKA SmartXide2 c80-El.En, Florence Italy)
CO2 laser: Single session of CO2 laser debridement
|
Traditional Surgery
n=10 Participants
Ulcer debridement with traditional surgery
traditional surgery: Single session of traditional debridement
|
Total
n=20 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
67.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1 • n=93 Participants
|
76.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6 • n=4 Participants
|
71.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
2 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
8 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Italy
|
10 participants
n=93 Participants
|
10 participants
n=4 Participants
|
20 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index
|
25.6 Kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.0 • n=93 Participants
|
30.8 Kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2 • n=4 Participants
|
28.2 Kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Diabetes duration
|
13.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1 • n=93 Participants
|
20.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5 • n=4 Participants
|
17.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2 • n=27 Participants
|
|
HbA1c
|
6.6 percentage of total hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=93 Participants
|
7.4 percentage of total hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4 • n=4 Participants
|
7.0 percentage of total hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Duration of ulcer
|
5.6 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3 • n=93 Participants
|
3.3 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4 • n=4 Participants
|
4.6 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Ulcer area
|
2.0 cm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7 • n=93 Participants
|
2.7 cm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8 • n=4 Participants
|
2.3 cm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2 • n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Percent change in bacterial colonies from baseline. Variation from baseline and immediately after the end of procedure.Population: Per-protocol analysis: patients with no detectable bacterial load at baseline were excluded.
Percent change in bacterial colonies from baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CO2 Laser
n=8 Participants
Ulcer debridement with laser-CO2 (DEKA SmartXide2 c80-El.En, Florence Italy)
CO2 laser: Single session of CO2 laser debridement
|
Traditional Surgery
n=8 Participants
Ulcer debridement with traditional surgery
traditional surgery: Single session of traditional debridement
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bacterial Load
|
-99.9 Percent change from baseline
Interval -100.0 to -90.0
|
-50.0 Percent change from baseline
Interval -96.0 to 0.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During procedure.Population: ITT analysis: patients with no detectable bacterial load at baseline were included.
Scores of Brief Pain Inventory. Scale ranges: from 0 to 10. 0 = No pain; 10= Pain as bad as you can imagine.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CO2 Laser
n=10 Participants
Ulcer debridement with laser-CO2 (DEKA SmartXide2 c80-El.En, Florence Italy)
CO2 laser: Single session of CO2 laser debridement
|
Traditional Surgery
n=10 Participants
Ulcer debridement with traditional surgery
traditional surgery: Single session of traditional debridement
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pain: Scores of Brief Pain Inventory
|
0 cm for a VAS scale.
Interval 0.0 to 1.5
|
1.0 cm for a VAS scale.
Interval 0.0 to 3.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and immediately after the end of procedurePercent change of ulcer area covered by fibrin from baseline to immediately after the end of procedure
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CO2 Laser
n=10 Participants
Ulcer debridement with laser-CO2 (DEKA SmartXide2 c80-El.En, Florence Italy)
CO2 laser: Single session of CO2 laser debridement
|
Traditional Surgery
n=10 Participants
Ulcer debridement with traditional surgery
traditional surgery: Single session of traditional debridement
|
|---|---|---|
|
Fibrin: Percent of Ulcer Area Covered by Fibrin
|
-83.1 Percent change from baseline
Interval -91.9 to -75.9
|
-42.9 Percent change from baseline
Interval -61.7 to -30.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and immediately after procedurePopulation: ITT analysis: patients with no detectable bacterial load at baseline were included.
Percent change of ulcer area covered by granulation from baseline to immediately after the end of procedure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CO2 Laser
n=10 Participants
Ulcer debridement with laser-CO2 (DEKA SmartXide2 c80-El.En, Florence Italy)
CO2 laser: Single session of CO2 laser debridement
|
Traditional Surgery
n=10 Participants
Ulcer debridement with traditional surgery
traditional surgery: Single session of traditional debridement
|
|---|---|---|
|
Granulation: Percent of Ulcer Area Covered by Granulation.
|
307.7 Percent change from baseline
Interval 164.8 to 932.8
|
230.4 Percent change from baseline
Interval 125.4 to 855.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: during procedurePopulation: ITT analysis: patients with no detectable bacterial load at baseline were included.
proportion of patients with bleeding necessitating haemostasis
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CO2 Laser
n=10 Participants
Ulcer debridement with laser-CO2 (DEKA SmartXide2 c80-El.En, Florence Italy)
CO2 laser: Single session of CO2 laser debridement
|
Traditional Surgery
n=10 Participants
Ulcer debridement with traditional surgery
traditional surgery: Single session of traditional debridement
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bleeding: Proportion of Patients With Bleeding Necessitating Haemostasis
|
2 participants
|
8 participants
|
Adverse Events
CO2 Laser
Traditional Surgery
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
CO2 Laser
n=10 participants at risk
Ulcer debridement with laser-CO2 (DEKA SmartXide2 c80-El.En, Florence Italy)
CO2 laser: Single session of CO2 laser debridement
|
Traditional Surgery
n=10 participants at risk
Ulcer debridement with traditional surgery
traditional surgery: Single session of traditional debridement
|
|---|---|---|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Bleeding
|
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 2 • During procedure and after 1h.
|
80.0%
8/10 • Number of events 8 • During procedure and after 1h.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Pain needing anesthesia
|
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 2 • During procedure and after 1h.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • During procedure and after 1h.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • During procedure and after 1h.
|
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 2 • During procedure and after 1h.
|
Additional Information
Dr. Matteo Monami, Director Diabetic Foot Unit
AOU Careggi
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place