Trial Outcomes & Findings for CO2-Laser Treatment in Patients With Diabetic Infected Foot Ulcers (NCT NCT02677779)

NCT ID: NCT02677779

Last Updated: 2016-12-06

Results Overview

Percent change in bacterial colonies from baseline.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

20 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Percent change in bacterial colonies from baseline. Variation from baseline and immediately after the end of procedure.

Results posted on

2016-12-06

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
CO2 Laser
Ulcer debridement with laser-CO2 (DEKA SmartXide2 c80-El.En, Florence Italy) CO2 laser: Single session of CO2 laser debridement
Traditional Surgery
Ulcer debridement with traditional surgery traditional surgery: Single session of traditional debridement
Overall Study
STARTED
10
10
Overall Study
COMPLETED
10
10
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

CO2-Laser Treatment in Patients With Diabetic Infected Foot Ulcers

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
CO2 Laser
n=10 Participants
Ulcer debridement with laser-CO2 (DEKA SmartXide2 c80-El.En, Florence Italy) CO2 laser: Single session of CO2 laser debridement
Traditional Surgery
n=10 Participants
Ulcer debridement with traditional surgery traditional surgery: Single session of traditional debridement
Total
n=20 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
67.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1 • n=93 Participants
76.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6 • n=4 Participants
71.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9 • n=27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants
n=93 Participants
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
5 Participants
n=27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants
n=93 Participants
7 Participants
n=4 Participants
15 Participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
10 participants
n=93 Participants
10 participants
n=4 Participants
20 participants
n=27 Participants
Body Mass Index
25.6 Kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.0 • n=93 Participants
30.8 Kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2 • n=4 Participants
28.2 Kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5 • n=27 Participants
Diabetes duration
13.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1 • n=93 Participants
20.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5 • n=4 Participants
17.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2 • n=27 Participants
HbA1c
6.6 percentage of total hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=93 Participants
7.4 percentage of total hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4 • n=4 Participants
7.0 percentage of total hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3 • n=27 Participants
Duration of ulcer
5.6 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3 • n=93 Participants
3.3 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4 • n=4 Participants
4.6 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3 • n=27 Participants
Ulcer area
2.0 cm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7 • n=93 Participants
2.7 cm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8 • n=4 Participants
2.3 cm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2 • n=27 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Percent change in bacterial colonies from baseline. Variation from baseline and immediately after the end of procedure.

Population: Per-protocol analysis: patients with no detectable bacterial load at baseline were excluded.

Percent change in bacterial colonies from baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CO2 Laser
n=8 Participants
Ulcer debridement with laser-CO2 (DEKA SmartXide2 c80-El.En, Florence Italy) CO2 laser: Single session of CO2 laser debridement
Traditional Surgery
n=8 Participants
Ulcer debridement with traditional surgery traditional surgery: Single session of traditional debridement
Bacterial Load
-99.9 Percent change from baseline
Interval -100.0 to -90.0
-50.0 Percent change from baseline
Interval -96.0 to 0.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: During procedure.

Population: ITT analysis: patients with no detectable bacterial load at baseline were included.

Scores of Brief Pain Inventory. Scale ranges: from 0 to 10. 0 = No pain; 10= Pain as bad as you can imagine.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CO2 Laser
n=10 Participants
Ulcer debridement with laser-CO2 (DEKA SmartXide2 c80-El.En, Florence Italy) CO2 laser: Single session of CO2 laser debridement
Traditional Surgery
n=10 Participants
Ulcer debridement with traditional surgery traditional surgery: Single session of traditional debridement
Pain: Scores of Brief Pain Inventory
0 cm for a VAS scale.
Interval 0.0 to 1.5
1.0 cm for a VAS scale.
Interval 0.0 to 3.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and immediately after the end of procedure

Percent change of ulcer area covered by fibrin from baseline to immediately after the end of procedure

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CO2 Laser
n=10 Participants
Ulcer debridement with laser-CO2 (DEKA SmartXide2 c80-El.En, Florence Italy) CO2 laser: Single session of CO2 laser debridement
Traditional Surgery
n=10 Participants
Ulcer debridement with traditional surgery traditional surgery: Single session of traditional debridement
Fibrin: Percent of Ulcer Area Covered by Fibrin
-83.1 Percent change from baseline
Interval -91.9 to -75.9
-42.9 Percent change from baseline
Interval -61.7 to -30.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and immediately after procedure

Population: ITT analysis: patients with no detectable bacterial load at baseline were included.

Percent change of ulcer area covered by granulation from baseline to immediately after the end of procedure.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CO2 Laser
n=10 Participants
Ulcer debridement with laser-CO2 (DEKA SmartXide2 c80-El.En, Florence Italy) CO2 laser: Single session of CO2 laser debridement
Traditional Surgery
n=10 Participants
Ulcer debridement with traditional surgery traditional surgery: Single session of traditional debridement
Granulation: Percent of Ulcer Area Covered by Granulation.
307.7 Percent change from baseline
Interval 164.8 to 932.8
230.4 Percent change from baseline
Interval 125.4 to 855.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: during procedure

Population: ITT analysis: patients with no detectable bacterial load at baseline were included.

proportion of patients with bleeding necessitating haemostasis

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CO2 Laser
n=10 Participants
Ulcer debridement with laser-CO2 (DEKA SmartXide2 c80-El.En, Florence Italy) CO2 laser: Single session of CO2 laser debridement
Traditional Surgery
n=10 Participants
Ulcer debridement with traditional surgery traditional surgery: Single session of traditional debridement
Bleeding: Proportion of Patients With Bleeding Necessitating Haemostasis
2 participants
8 participants

Adverse Events

CO2 Laser

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 3 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Traditional Surgery

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 8 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
CO2 Laser
n=10 participants at risk
Ulcer debridement with laser-CO2 (DEKA SmartXide2 c80-El.En, Florence Italy) CO2 laser: Single session of CO2 laser debridement
Traditional Surgery
n=10 participants at risk
Ulcer debridement with traditional surgery traditional surgery: Single session of traditional debridement
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Bleeding
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 2 • During procedure and after 1h.
80.0%
8/10 • Number of events 8 • During procedure and after 1h.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Pain needing anesthesia
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 2 • During procedure and after 1h.
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • During procedure and after 1h.
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • During procedure and after 1h.
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 2 • During procedure and after 1h.

Additional Information

Dr. Matteo Monami, Director Diabetic Foot Unit

AOU Careggi

Phone: 00390557946563

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place